Skip to main content

Table 3 Bivariate associations between participant characteristics and preferred abortion term among people accessing abortion (n = 681)

From: Abortion terminology preferences: a cross-sectional survey of people accessing abortion care

 

Expressed no preference for a single term (reference)

n (%)

Preferred "abortion" as only term

n (%)

Preferred "ending a pregnancy" as only term

n (%)

Preferred "pregnancy termination" as only term

n (%)

13+ weeks gestation

93 (47.2)

42 (21.3)

38 (19.3)

24 (12.2)

Reason for seeking care is fetus has medical condition

8 (33.3)

1 (4.2)

8 (33.3)

7 (29.2)

Pregnancy intention (feelings about becoming pregnant before pregnant)

    

 Mistimed, wanted to be pregnant later or sooner

108 (46.6)

52 (22.4)

37 (16.0)

35 (15.1)

 Wanted to be pregnant then

7 (26.9)

7 (26.9)

7 (26.9)

5 (19.2)

 Did not want to be pregnant then or at any time in the future (reference)

132 (44.9)

68 (23.1)

53 (18.0)

41 (14.0)

 Not sure what wanted

50 (39.7)

43 (34.1)*

20 (15.9)

13 (10.3)

Felt worried other people might find out they ended the pregnancy

    

 Not at all (reference)

142 (42.3)

105 (31.3)

43 (12.8)

46 (13.7)

 A little bit

55 (42.3)

29 (22.3)

26 (20.0)

20 (15.4)

 Somewhat

48 (51.6)

19 (20.4)

15 (16.1)

11 (11.8)

 Very much

48 (41.4)

19 (16.4)

33 (28.5)**

16 (13.8)

Age (years)

    

 15–19 (reference)

37 (45.7)

25 (30.9)

12 (14.8)

7 (8.6)

 20–24

81 (46.6)

36 (20.7)

29 (16.7)

28 (16.1)

 25–29

85 (42.9)

56 (28.3)

33 (16.7)

24 (12.1)

 30–34

54 (43.6)

33 (26.6)

21 (16.9)

16 (12.9)

 35–45

39 (37.9)

22 (21.4)

22 (21.4)

20 (19.4)*

Race/ethnicity

    

 Non-Hispanic white (reference)

94 (48.0)

32 (16.3)

41 (20.9)

29 (14.8)

 Hispanic, any race

79 (47.3)

30 (18.0)

27 (16.2)

31 (18.6)

 Black, non-Hispanic

72 (37.3)

74 (38.3)***

24 (12.4)

23 (11.9)

 Asian/Pacific Islander, non-Hispanic

19 (42.2)

9 (21.4)

9 (21.4)

5 (11.9)

 Mixed race or other race/ethnicity

29 (36.7)

27 (34.2)**

16 (20.3)

7 (8.9)

Belongs to a church or religious community

77 (44.3)

49 (28.2)

27 (15.5)

21 (12.1)

Received any government assistance in past year

129 (42.0)

86 (28.0)

51 (16.6)

41 (13.4)

Could come up with $2,000 in a month if needed

83 (44.6)

42 (22.6)

33 (17.7)

28 (15.1)

U.S. born

262 (42.7)

161 (26.2)

105 (17.1)

86 (14.0)

Site

    

 A

78 (40.4)

57 (29.5)

35 (18.1)***

23 (11.9)***

 B

88 (45.1)

60 (30.8)

28 (14.4)

19 (9.7)

 C

92 (45.8)

32 (15.9)**

33 (16.4)

44 (21.9)

 D

39 (42.4)

23 (25.0)

21 (22.8)

9 (9.8)

  1. Table presents row percents, calculated from bivariate crosstabs, excluding n = 16 who only chose “D&C”, D&E” or an “other” term. Missing values imputed using multiple imputation with chained equations
  2. P values were derived from simple multinomial regression models estimating Relative Risk Ratio, with reference outcome category as “no preference”, adjusted for “site”
  3. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001