Skip to main content

Table 2 Prevalence of cervical cancer screening

From: Patterns in the prevalence and wealth-based inequality of cervical cancer screening in India

Characteristics

Weighted Prevalence in %

Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI)

P Value

Age Group (in 5 years)

 30–34

1.6 (1.4–1.7)

Ref

 

 35–39

1.9 (1.7–2.0)

1.21 (1.08–1.35)

0.001

 40–44

2.1 (2.0–2.4)

1.46 (1.30–1.65)

 < 0.001

 45–49

2.4 (2.2–2.5)

1.64 (1.46–1.83)

 < 0.001

Highest Education

 No Education

1.4 (1.3–1.5)

Ref

 

 Primary

2.1 (1.9–2.3)

1.43 (1.26–1.61)

 < 0.001

 Secondary

2.3 (2.1–2.5)

1.44 (1.29–1.62)

 < 0.001

 Higher

2.4 (2.1–2.8)

1.51 (1.27–1.79)

 < 0.001

Marital Status

 Never Married

0.9 (0.6–1.3)

Ref

 

 Formerly Married

2.1 (1.8–2.4)

0.98 (0.38–2.51)

0.962

 Currently Married

2.0 (1.9–2.1)

1.01 (0.40–2.55)

0.987

Religion

 Hindu

2.0 (1.9–2.1)

Ref

 

 Muslim

1.2 (1.0–1.3)

0.73 (0.62–0.86)

 < 0.001

 Christian

3.8 (3.1–4.5)

1.82 (1.48–2.24)

 < 0.001

 Sikh

2.5 (1.7–3.6)

1.13 (0.77–1.66)

0.545

 Buddhist/ Neo Buddhist

2.7 (1.7–4.2)

1.19 (0.73–1.95)

0.477

 Other

2.7 (0.9–7.4)

2.17 (0.74–6.30)

0.156

Caste

 Schedule Caste

2.3 (2.1–2.7)

Ref

 

 Schedule Tribe

0.9 (0.8–1.1)

0.45 (0.35–0.57)

 < 0.001

 OBC

2.3 (2.2–2.5)

0.92 (0.80–1.06)

0.260

 General

1.5 (1.4–1.7)

0.56 (0.47–0.66)

 < 0.001

 Don’t Know/ Not Recorded

0.9 (0.6–1.3)

0.42 (0.30–0.59)

 < 0.001

Place of Residence

 Urban

2.3 (2.1–2.6)

Ref

 

 Rural

1.8 (1.6–1.9)

0.91 (0.78–1.07)

0.254

Household Wealth Index

 Poorest

0.99 (0.88–1.1)

Ref

 

 Poorer

1.6 (1.5–1.8)

1.32 (1.13–1.54)

0.001

 Middle

2.2 (2.0–2.5)

1.59 (1.36–1.85)

 < 0.001

 Richer

2.4 (2.2–2.6)

1.54 (1.30–1.82)

 < 0.001

 Richest

2.4 (2.2–2.7)

1.55 (1.27–1.89)

 < 0.001

Health Insurance

 Not Covered

1.9 (1.7–2.0)

Ref

 

 Govt Schemes

2.5 (2.3–2.8)

1.22 (1.10–1.36)

 < 0.001

 Non-Govt Schemes

1.0 (0.8–1.1)

0.53 (0.44–0.64)

 < 0.001

 More than 1 Govt Scheme

4.4 (3.3–5.9)

2.08 (1.52–2.83)

 < 0.001

 More than 1 Non-Govt Scheme

1.7 (0.2–11.0)

0.87 (0.12–6.37)

0.892

 Both Govt & Non-Govt Schemes

3.2 (2.2–4.8)

1.49 (0.97–2.28)

0.067

Occupation

 Not working

1.7 (1.5–2.0)

Not included in the modela

 Working

2.4 (2.0–2.9)

 Don’t Know/Not Recorded

2.0 (1.8–2.1)

Partner’s Education

 No Education

1.9 (1.5–2.3)

Not included in the modela

 Primary

2.2 (1.7–2.8)

 Secondary

2.0 (1.7–2.3)

 Higher

2.4 (1.8–3.1)

 Don’t Know/ Not Recorded

2.0 (1.8–2.1)

Age at First Sex

 < 18 years

1.8 (1.7–1.9)

Ref

 

 >  = 18 years or Not had Sex

2.1 (2.0–2.3)

1.00 (0.91–1.09)

0.959

 Don’t Know

2.0 (1.7–2.4)

Not included in the modelb

Parity

 0–2 childbirth

2.3 (2.1–2.5)

Ref

 

 > 2 childbirth

1.6 (1.5–1.7)

0.78 (0.71–0.86)

 < 0.001

IUD

 No

1.9 (1.8–2.1)

Ref

 

 Yes

2.6 (2.2–3.1)

1.20 (0.99–1.45)

0.066

 Not Recorded

0.8 (0.5–1.2)

Not included in the modelb

Pill-OCP

 No

2.2 (2.0–2.3)

Ref

 

 Yes

0.8 (0.7–0.9)

0.42 (0.36–0.49)

 < 0.001

 Not Recorded

0.8 (0.5–1.2)

Not included in the modelb

Tobacco use

 No

2.0 (1.9–2.2)

Ref

 

 Yes

1.1 (0.9–1.3)

0.75 (0.62–0.90)

0.002

H/o STI

 No

2.1 (1.8–2.4)

Not included in the modela

 Yes

0.8 (0.4–1.4)

 Don’t Know/ Not Recorded

2.0 (1.8–2.1)

  1. a85% of responses are “Don’t know / Not recorded
  2. bExcluded due to collinearity