From: Agency and role models: do they matter for adolescent girls’ sexual and reproductive health?
Ideal age at childbirth (β) | Attitude towards gender-differentiated parental control (OR) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 1 | Model 2 | |
Panel 1: Role model presence | ||||
Has a role model | 1.18*** | 0.77** | 1.03 | 1.00 |
Older and Urban (ref) Younger and rural Younger and urban | -2.14*** -1.73** | 0.12*** 0.06*** | ||
Household asset score | 0.21*** | 1.01 | ||
Female-headed household No (ref) Yes | 0.37** | 1.28** | ||
Literacy status of household head Not literate (ref) Literate | 0.48* | 1.02 | ||
Caregiver’s social norm | 0.09** | 1.12*** | ||
Sample size | 2,655 | 2,638 | 3,024 | 3,006 |
Adjusted/Pseudo R2 | 0.0159 | 0.0441 | 0.0000 | 0.0382 |
Panel 2: Role model characteristics | ||||
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 1 | Model 2 | |
Role model characteristics None (ref) Family Friends Teachers/other community members Someone famous | 1.94*** 1.72** 0.09 1.88*** | 1.45** 1.32* 0.13 1.01** | 0.96 1.31 0.89 1.30* | 0.98 1.11 0.88 1.57** |
Older and urban (ref) Younger and rural Younger and urban | -2.15*** -1.88*** | 0.11*** 0.06*** | ||
Household asset score | 0.19*** | 1.00 | ||
Female-headed household No (ref) Yes | 0.42** | 1.24** | ||
Literacy status of household head Not literate (ref) Literate | 0.48* | 1.01** | ||
Caregiver’s social norm | 0.10*** | 1.12*** | ||
Sample size | 2,482 | 2,465 | 2,830 | 2,812 |
Adjusted/Pseudo R2 | 0.0297 | 0.0511 | 0.0020 | 0.0418 |