Skip to main content

Table 4 The adjusted odds ratios of the assessed factors for lipid profile and their 95% confidence interval using the multiple logistic regression model

From: Association between oral contraceptives with lipid profile: results from Hoveyzeh cohort study (HCS)

Variables

 

HDL

TC

LDL

Adjusted OR(95% CI)

Adjusted OR(95% CI)

Adjusted OR(95% CI)

Age(year)

35–39

Ref

Ref

Ref

40–44

1.19 (0.95–1.49)

0.73 (0.58–0.93) *

0.57 (0.32–0.99) *

45–49

1.21 (0.97–1.52)

0.74 (0.58–0.94) *

0.65 (0.38–1.13)

Education levels

Illiterate

Ref

Ref

 

Primary school

1.07 (0.70–1.64)

1.21 (0.76–1.92)

 

Secondary school

1.28 (0.82–1.98)

0.92 (0.56–1.51)

 

High school and Diploma

1.29 (0.76–2.17)

0.86 (0.47–1.58)

 

University

2.35 (1.36–4.07) *

0.70 (0.36–1.34)

 

Residence type

Urban

Ref

  

Rural

0.83 (0.68–1.01)

  

Wealth index

Poorest

Ref

  

Poor

1.02 (0.76–1.38)

  

Moderate

1.06 (0.80–1.41)

  

Rich

1.07 (0.81–1.41)

  

Richest

1.23 (0.93–1.63)

  

BMI

Underweight

Ref

Ref

Ref

Normal

0.25 (0.08–0.75) *

0.24 (0.06–1.04)

 

Overweight

0.46 (0.36–0.59) *

0.63 (0.48–0.83) *

0.84 (0.43–1.64)

Obese

0.73 (0.60–0.89) *

0.99 (0.81–1.22)

1.28 (0.78–2.09)

Physical activity (MET)

Q1

Ref

 

Ref

Q2

1.40 (1.01–1.95) *

 

0.91 (0.32–2.56)

Q3

1.14 (0.90–1.44)

 

1.66 (0.87–3.18)

Q4

1.07 (0.86–1.34)

 

1.47(0.77–2.80)

Use contraceptive

Yes

0.83 (0. 69-1.01)

1.29 (1.05–1.58) *

1.12 (0.68–1.84)

No

Ref

Ref

Ref

  1. *P < 0.05 was considered as a statistically significant level in logistic regression
  2. OR: Odds Ratio; CI: Confidence Interval; BMI: Body Mass Index; MET: Metabolic Equivalent of Task; TC: Total cholesterol; HDL: High-Density Lipoproteins