A transvaginal ultrasound-based diagnostic calculator for uterus post-cesarean scar defect

BMC Women's Health

Table 1 Demographic Data

demographic	CSD in Hysteroscopy
demographic	no N = 26 [26.0%]	yes N = 74 [74.0%]	P value
Participants’ Age—year	31.5 (27.0–38.0)	35.0 (29.0–37.0)	0.584
Defect Length—mm	1.5 (1.0–2.0)	7.0 (4.0–9.0)	< 0.001^a
Defect Width—mm	2.0 (2.0–3.0)	7.0 (4.0–11.0)	< 0.001^a
Defect Depth—mm	0.3 (0.2–0.4)	4.0 (2.1–10.0)	< 0.001^a
Patients with one previous CS	15 (57.7%)	20 (27%)	0.007^a
Patients with two previous CSs	8 (30.8%)	25 (33.8%)
Patients with three previous CSs	3 (11.5%)	29 (39.2%)

^asignificant P value (< 0.05)
Quantitative variables are reported as median (interquartile range); Categorical variables are reported as count (%)
CS: cesarean section, CSD: cesarean scar defect, TVU: transvaginal ultrasonography

ISSN: 1472-6874