Table 3 Predictive Function of Each Defect Dimension to Predict a Hysteroscopy-Endorsed Cesarean Scar Defect
From: A transvaginal ultrasound-based diagnostic calculator for uterus post-cesarean scar defect
Predicting variable | AUROCC (95%CI) | Optimal Cutoff | Sensitivity (95%CI) | Specificity (95%CI) | PPV (95%CI) | NPV (95%CI) | PLR | NLR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Defect Width—mm | 0.910 (0.835–0.958) | 2 mm | 87.84 (78.2–94.3) | 88.46 (69.8–97.6) | 95.6 (88.2–98.4) | 71.9 (57.7–82.7) | 7.61 | 0.14 |
Defect Length—mm | 0.907 (0.833–0.956) | 3 mm | 82.43 (71.8–90.3) | 92.31 (74.9–99.1) | 96.8 (88.9–99.1) | 64.9 (52.7–75.4) | 10.72 | 0.19 |
Defect Depth—mm | 0.923 (0.852–0.967) | 2 mm | 77.03 (65.8–86.0) | 100.00 (86.8–100.0) | 100.0 | 60.5 (50.2–69.9) | N/Ca | 0.23 |