Variables | Number | Percent (%) |
---|---|---|
Surgical management option performed by ObGyn for Apical prolapse(central defect) (multiple responses) | ||
Vaginal hysterectomy + McCall Culdoplasty | 145 | 51.8 |
Vaginal hysterectomy with Uterosacral ligament suspension | 139 | 49.6 |
Iliococcygeus suspension | 3 | 1.1 |
Sacrospinous ligament fixation(SSLF) | 92 | 32.9 |
Sacral colpopexy | 26 | 9.3 |
Other(Colpocliesis) | 25 | 8.9 |
Reason for not performing McCall Culdoplasty (n = 135) | ||
I didn’t know how to do it | 71 | 52.6 |
Lack of the appropriate material | 15 | 11.11 |
I feel complication rate is high | 2 | 1.48 |
I feel it is le effective than other alternatives | 22 | 16.3 |
Reason for not performing Sacrospinous ligament fixation (n = 188) | ||
I didn’t know how to do it | 100 | 53.2 |
Lack of the appropriate material | 69 | 36.7 |
I feel complication rate is high | 14 | 7.4 |
I feel it is le effective than other alternatives | 4 | 2.13 |
Other –limited cases | 1 | 0.53 |
Reason for not performing Sacral colpopexy (n = 254) | ||
I didn’t know how to do it | 169 | 66.5 |
Lack of the appropriate material | 73 | 28.7 |
I feel complication rate is high | 35 | 13.78 |
I feel it is le effective than other alternatives | 9 | 3.54 |
Other – high complication | 4 | 1.57 |