Table 3 Women’s report on the coordination and quality of cervical cancer care (n = 80)
Variables | Count | Percent |
|---|---|---|
Frequency of screening for cervical cancer | Â | Â |
Once | 55 | 68.8 |
Twice | 19 | 23.8 |
More than twice | 6 | 7.5 |
Waiting time for the screening service in the facility | Â | Â |
< 1 h | 64 | 80.0 |
1–2 h | 11 | 13.8 |
> 2 h | 5 | 6.3 |
Had a preference for a provider | Â | Â |
Yes | 36 | 45.0 |
No | 44 | 55.0 |
The most preferred provider | Â | Â |
Doctor | 33 | 41.3 |
Midwife | 31 | 38.8 |
Nurse | 15 | 18.8 |
Health officer | 1 | 1.3 |
Rating of the capacity of a health professional | Â | Â |
Poor | 0 | 0.0 |
Below expectation | 4 | 5.0 |
Meets expectation | 20 | 25.0 |
Above expectation | 19 | 23.8 |
Excellent | 37 | 46.3 |
Rating of the overall coordination and quality of care | Â | Â |
Poor | 4 | 5.0 |
Below expectation | 6 | 7.5 |
Meets expectation | 28 | 35.0 |
Above expectation | 13 | 16.3 |
Excellent | 29 | 36.3 |