Skip to main content

Table 4 Effect of 12 weeks DNS training on FMS in middle-aged women

From: Effect of dynamic neuromuscular stabilization training using the inertial load of water on functional movement and postural sway in middle-aged women: a randomized controlled trial

Variables

Group

pre

post

F-value

p

Deep Squat

(point)

EXG

1.92 ± 0.67

2.75 ± 0.45$$$

time

12.922

0.002**

group

5.863

0.024*

CON

1.83 ± 0.58

1.92 ± 0.51

time*group

8.650

0.008**

Hurdle Step

(point)

EXG

1.82 ± 0.60

2.27 ± 0.47

time

2.995

0.098

group

3.968

0.060

CON

1.75 ± 0.45

1.83 ± 0.39

time*group

1.426

0.246

Inline Lunge

(point)

EXG

1.67 ± 0.65

2.58 ± 0.51$$$

time

16.851

0.000***

group

0.693

0.414

CON

1.92 ± 0.51

2.00 ± 0.60

time*group

11.702

0.002**

Shoulder Mobility

(point)

EXG

1.75 ± 0.87

2.00 ± 0.60

time

0.191

0.666

group

7.755

0.011*

CON

1.33 ± 0.65

1.25 ± 0.62

time*group

0.765

0.391

Leg Raise

(point)

EXG

2.58 ± 0.51

3.00 ± 0.00

time

2.514

0.127

group

4.783

0.040*

CON

2.42 ± 0.67

2.33 ± 0.65

time*group

5.657

0.026*

Push Up

(point)

EXG

2.08 ± 0.67

2.58 ± 0.67

time

4.000

0.058

group

4.508

0.045*

CON

1.83 ± 0.58

2.00 ± 0.60

time*group

1.000

0.328

Rotary Stability

(point)

EXG

2.00 ± 0.00

2.25 ± 0.62

time

0.512

0.482

group

3.143

0.090

CON

1.92 ± 0.51

1.83 ± 0.39

time*group

2.047

0.167

Total score

(point)

EXG

13.83 ± 1.53

17.25 ± 1.76$$$

time

16.206

0.001***

group

26.031

0.000***

CON

13.00 ± 1.48

13.17 ± 1.64

time*group

13.331

0.001***

  1. Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, $$$p < 0.001, $$p < 0.01 vs pre. EX Experimental Group, CON Control Group, ML Medial–Lateral, AP Anterior–Posterior