Table 2 Intraoperative characteristics of patients with mini-laparotomy vs. laparoscopic/robotic approach
|  | Laparoscopic/robotic (N = 90) | Mini-laparotomy (N = 26) | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | n | % | n | % | |
ASA grade | |||||
1 | 17 | 19.3 | 4 | 15.4 | 0.408 |
2 | 61 | 69.3 | 16 | 61.5 | |
3 | 9 | 10.2 | 6 | 23.1 | |
4 | 1 | 1.1 | 0 | 0.0 | |
Concomitant procedure* | |||||
RMUS | 41 | 45.6 | 11 | 42.3 | 0.700 |
Anterior repair | 3 | 3.3 | 10 | 38.5 | < 0.001 |
Posterior repair | 8 | 8.9 | 11 | 42.3 | < 0.001 |
Revision of prior MUS | 6 | 2.9 | 3 | 4.3 | 0.696 |
Rectopexy | 3 | 3.3 | 1 | 3.8 | 1.000 |
Perineorrhaphy | 5 | 5.6 | 4 | 15.4 | 0.112 |
Intraoperative complications* | |||||
None | 88 | 98.9 | 26 | 100.0 | 1.000 |
Cystostomy | 1 | 1.1 | 0 | 0.00 | |
Procedure length (minutes) | 89 | 242.0 ± 52.6 | 25 | 97.3 ± 35.0 | < 0.001 |
EBL (mL) | 85 | 84.5 ± 68.4 | 26 | 63.6 ± 58.9 | 0.163 |