Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of age of patients at breast cancer diagnosis, molecular subtype, expression of estrogen and progesterone receptor, and HER2 status among the five Brazilian geographic regions

From: Geographic differences in the distribution of molecular subtypes of breast cancer in Brazil

Variable

 

Brazilian geographic regions

p-value

  

SE

S

NE

CW

N

 

Age

(mean ± SD)

56.1 ± 13.5

55.8 ± 13.9

55.3 ± 13.7

54.3 ± 12.8

53.9 ± 13.1

<0.0001a

Molecular subtype

Luminal A

707 (28.8%)

324 (30.8%)

226 (24.1%)

143 (25.9%)

171 (25.3%)

<0.0001b

 

Luminal B

971 (39.5%)

388 (36.9%)

348 (37.1%)

190 (34.6%)

208 (30.8%)

 
 

Triple-positive

238 (9.7%)

114 (10.8%)

100 (10.7%)

71 (12.9%)

68 (10.1%)

 
 

HER2

195 (7.9%)

71 (6.7%)

99 (10.5%)

49 (8.9%)

91 (13.5%)

 
 

Triple-negative

345 (14.0%)

154 (14.6%)

163 (17.4%)

96 (17.4%)

137 (20.3%)

 
 

Non-availablec

4

5

3

2

3

 

ER/PR

Positive

2039 (82.8%)

871 (82.5%)

753 (80.0%)

418 (75.9%)

529 (78.0%)

0.0003b

 

Negative

422 (17.1%)

185 (17.5%)

188 (20.0%)

133 (24.1%)

149 (22.0%)

 

HER2

Positive

433 (17.6%)

188 (17.8%)

201 (21.3%)

119 (21.6%)

163 (24.0%)

0.017b

 

Negative

1972 (80.1%)

846 (80.1%)

725 (77.0%)

422 (76.6%)

506 (74.6%)

 
 

Score2+

56 (2.3%)

22 (2.1%)

15 (1.6%)

11 (2.0%)

9 (1.3%)

 

Total

 

2461

1056

941

551

678

 
  1. aKruskal-Wallis; bchi-square; cHER2 score 2+ and no FISH study to define the HER2 status.