Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Women's Health

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Reasons for delay in decision making and reaching health facility among obstetric fistula and pelvic organ prolapse patients in Gondar University hospital, Northwest Ethiopia

  • Mulat Adefris1Email author,
  • Solomon Mekonnen Abebe2,
  • Kiros Terefe1,
  • Abebaw Addis Gelagay2,
  • Azmeraw Adigo1,
  • Selamawit Amare1,
  • Dorothy Lazaro3,
  • Aster Berhe3 and
  • Chernet Baye1
BMC Women's HealthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:64

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-017-0416-9

Received: 8 February 2017

Accepted: 10 August 2017

Published: 22 August 2017

Abstract

Background

Obstetric fistula and pelvic organ prolapse remain highly prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa, where women have poor access to modern health care. Women having these problems tend to stay at home for years before getting treatment. However, information regarding the reasons contributing to late presentation to treatment is scarce, especially at the study area.

The objective of this study was to assess the reasons whywomen with obstetric fistula and pelvic organ prolapse at Gondar University Hospital delay treatment.

Method

A hospital based cross-sectional study was conducted among 384 women. Delay was evaluated by calculating symptom onset and time of arrival to get treatment at Gondar University Hospital. Regression analysis was conducted to elicit predictors of delay for treatment.

Result

Of the total 384 participants, 311 (80.9%) had pelvic organ prolapse and 73(19.1%) obstetric fistula. The proportion of women who delayed treatment of pelvic organ prolapse was 82.9% and that of obstetric fistula 60.9%. Fear of disclosing illness due to social stigma (AOR = 2; 1.03, 3.9) and lack of money (AOR = 1.97; 1.01, 3.86) were associated with the delay of treatment for pelvic organ prolapse,while increasing age (AOR =1.12; 1.01, 1.24) and divorce (AOR = 16.9; 1.75, 165.5) were were responsible for delaying treatment forobstetric fistula.

Conclusion

A large numberof women with pelvic organ prolapse and obstetric fistula delayed treatment. Fear of disclosure due to social stigma and lack of moneywere the major factors that contributed to thedelay to seek treatment for pelvic organ prolapse,while increasing age and divorce were the predictors for delaying treatment for obstetric fistula.

Background

About 20–30 women develop serious morbidities for every maternal death [1, 2]. These morbidities include pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and obstetric fistula (OF). POP is defined as a down ward descent of pelvic structures and parity as well as advanced age were reported to be the most important risk factors [3, 4].

OF, the most devastating morbidity [2, 5] caused by prolonged and obstructed labor, is defined as an abnormal hole between a woman’s vagina and bladder or rectum through which urine or stool continually leak [1]. POP and OF are major public health problems in developing countries [6]. Worldwide POP occurs in about 316 million women (9.3% of all females) [7] .However, the prevalence of POP in low and middle-income countries is reported to be 19.7% (range 3.4%–56.4%) [8]. Apilot study conducted at Dabat district, Ethiopia, revealed the prevalence of symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse as 6.3%, whereas anatomic prolapse stage (II-IV) was 162(55.1%) [9].

Similarly,each year, between 50,000 to 100, 000 women worldwide develop OF, and an estimated 2–3 million have OF globally [10, 11]. A meta-analysis in 19 sub-Saharan African countries noted that Ethiopia and Uganda have the largest number of women withsymptoms of OF. In Ethiopia,about 110,000 women in have OF. The Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey data noted a life time prevalence rate of10.6 per 1000 OF cases among women who had ever given birth [12, 13].

POP and OF greatly affect women’s quality of life and result in physical, social, psychological, sexual and economic problems [14] Understanding the effects of POP and OF in women’s experiences or quality of life is important to increase understanding of the condition and encourage early treatment seeking behavior A qualitative study done among POP cases in Sweden showed that delay in seeking health care was influenced by absence of information, blaming oneself, feeling ignored by the doctor and adapting to successive impairment [15].

Most women in Ethiopia do not seektreatment for POP and OF despite the availability of treatment facilities for both conditionsin the country [2]. Studies identified that women with POP and OF tend to stay at home for years before getting treatment [16, 17]. However, barriers toearly presentation to treatment and the reasons for the delay in seeking treatment is not well known. Hence, this study aimed to identify factors contributing to thedelay in decision making to seek treatment among POP and OF patients at Gondar University Hospital, northwest Ethiopia.

Methods

Study setting

Gondar is a densely populated historical city of the Amhara Region (capital of Ethiopia in seventeenth century) with an estimated urban population of 254,420,(120,569 male and 133,851 female). The study was conducted at Gondar University Hospital which is located in Gondar city, the northwestern part of the country. The hospital was established in 1956 and currently has more than 500 beds; of these, 70 beds and two major operation theatre are dedicated toOF and POP patients; since 2011 the treatment cost is covered by the hospital and the United Nation Population Fund (UNFPA).

Study design and population

A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted to assess delays in seeking treatment. The participants population were all women admitted for POP and OFto the Fistula Center of the hospital from Jan 2015 to Jan 2016

Study variables

  • Dependent variable: Delay in deciding to seek treatment for POP and OF. Socio-demographic characteristics of women (age, religion, ethnicity, marital status, educational status), household income, number of children, failure to recognize signs of complication, failure to perceive severity of illness, decision making power, distance from health facility, health care cost, and means of transportation were collected as independent variables. In addition, the questionnaire included, duration of POP and OF, lifestyle (blaming oneself, feeling ignored by the community, living with family, ureteral reconstruction, distance from health facility, fleeing bad smell, early marriage, experience about health system, health care cost), clinic attendance, cultural factor (Value of women health, decision making power, awareness about the problem). Fistula cases who sought health care within 3 months were classified as “good”, while above 3 months were considered as “poor” or delayed. POP caseswho stayed until12 months and above to get treatment wereconsidered as “delayed”.

Data collection

Data were collected by interviewing all eligible participants, using a pretested structured questionnaire. We assessed using the two delay model approach which recognizes the different factors women face in achieving timely and effective medical care needed for OF and POP [18]. Data was collected for one year by four trained Bachler of science nurses.

Quality control methods

The study tools were initially developed in English and then translated into Amharic and back into English to ensure consistency and accuracy in the phrasing of questions. The interview was conducted in Amharic after questioner was pretested on ten women at different hospital located in community culturally closely affiliated to Gondar. Training was given to data collectors and a strict supervision was made by the research team, and 5% of the collected data was checked daily for completeness and consistency.

Data processing and analysis

The data was coded, double entered, and cleaned using Epi-info version 7and exported to STATA version 12 for analysis. Delay in decision to seek treatment was evaluated by calculating symptom onset and time of decision to seek treatment. Both univariate and bivariate analysis were done to describe frequency, percentage and themean; multivariable regression was carried out e to see the presence and strengths of association.

Independent variables were selected based on the literature, and a cut of point at p-value ≤0.20 in the bivariate test was included in the multivariable logistic regression model. Multi-collinearity effect was also checked for the full model. Informed consent was obtained from the study participants, and the study was approved by the IRB of the University of Gondar.

Result

Socio-demographic and economic characteristics

A total of 384 eligible women took part in the study. Of these, 311 (80.9%) were POP and 73 (19.01%) OF cases.. The mean age of the participants was 42.57 years (SD ± 13.1 years) with a range of 12 to 85 years old. The mean age of POP cases was 45.27 (SD ± 12) years and that of OF 31.1 (SD ± 10.3) years (Table 1). Most (78%) of the participants had given birth at home. The proportion of still births among OF cases was high 54 (73.97%). The socio-demographic and lifestyle characteristics of the participants were stratified by POP and OF (Table 1).
Table 1

The socio-demographic and life style characteristics of the study participants stratified by POP and Fistula case at the Hospital of Gondar University

Variable

Total n(%)

POP n(%)

Fistula n(%)

Age in Years

 12–24

28 (7.3)

9 (2.9)

19 (26)

 25–34

65 (16.9)

35 (11.3)

30 (41.1)

 35–44

126 (32.8)

113 (36.3)

13 (17.8)

 45 and above

165 (42.9)

154 (49.5)

11 (15.1)

Resident

 Urban

63 (16.5)

45 (14.5)

19 (26.1)

 Rural

320 (83.5

266 (85.5)

54 73.9)

Age at 1st Delivery

 Less than 18 years old

238 (61.9)

204 (65.6)

34 (46.6)

 18 years and older

146 (38.02)

107 (34.4)

39 (53.4)

Marital Status

 Single

40 (10.4)

29 (9.32)

11 (15.1)

 Married

200 (52.1)

165 (53.1)

35 (47.9)

 Divorced

86 (22.4)

63 (20.3)

23 (31.5)

 Widowed

53 (13.8)

51 (16.4)

2 (2.74)

 Separated

5 (1.30)

3 (0.96)

2 (2.74)

Education Status

 Unable to read and write

333 (86.7)

283 (91)

50 (68.5)

 Grade 1 to 7

37 (9.6)

23 (7.4)

14 (19.2)

 Grade 8 to 12

12 (3.13)

5 (1.61)

7 (9.59

 Deploma and above

2 (0.52)

0 (0.00)

2 (2.74)

Parity

 No child

7 (1.8)

4 (1.3)

3 (4.1)

 1 to 2

71 (18.5)

35 (11.2)

36 (49.3)

 3 to 6

163 (42.4)

137 (44.1)

26 (35.6)

 7 to 10

128 (33.3)

121 (38 9)

7 (9.6)

 11 to 15

15 (3.9)

14 (4.5)

1 (1.4)

Still birth

 Yes

116 (30.2)

62 (19.9)

54 (73.9)

 No

268 (69.8)

249 (80.1)

19 (26.1)

The mean ages at first marriage among OF and POP cases were 14.42 (±SD 2.9) years and 13.3 (±3.4 SD) years,respectively. About 89.6% of the OF and 97.6% of the POP cases were married before celebrating their 18th birth days. The proportion of women who gave the first birth before the age of 18 years were 46.6%. Of these, 27.4% OF patients gave birth before the age of 15,while 65.6% POP cases gave the first births before the age of 18. The mean number of parity of POP was 6 (SD ± 2.7) and 3.2(SD ± 2.7) for OF. Overall, 70.4% of POP and 26% of OF cases were grandmultipara (had 5 or more births). About 44.9% OF and 16.1% POP reported that they were isolating themselves (Fig. 1).

About 88.7% of the POP patients had stage 3 pelvic organ prolapse (Fig. 2). More than 95% of OF and POP cases were economically dependent. About half (49%) of OF disclosed their problem to their family, and 99.7% of OF cases mentioned the smell of urine and faeces as the reasons of the community for not willing to live with them.

Proportion of delay in seeking treatment

The proportion of women who delayed for POP was 82.6% [95% CI: 78.4%, 86.8%], and that of OF was 63% [95% CI: 51.7%, 74.3%]. The mean length of delay for POP and OF were 85.8 and 48.3 months with a range of 1–348 months, respectively.

Descriptively, the participants said that unavailability of roads (91.6%), lack of transportation (87.7%), distance from health facility (requiring 2 days or more to reach health facility) (35.5%), and walking (82.2%) were the main barriers to seeking early treatment for POP and OF cases.

Determinants of delays in seeking treatment for pelvic organ prolapse and obstetric fistula

In the multivariate analysis, factors that were significantly associated with delays of seeking treatment among POP were fear of disclosure and lack of money. Women who had fear of disclosure were two times (AOR = 2; 1.03,3.9) more likely to delay treatment for POP as compared to those who had no such fear. Women who mentioned lack of money as the reason for delay were two times (AOR = 1.97; 1.01,3.86) more likely to delay seeking treatment for POP as compared to those who didn’t mention lack of moneyas the reason for the delay (Table 2).
Table 2

Multivariable logistic regression analysis showing the relationship between decision delay to seek professional health care and factors associated among pelvic organ prolapse patients in Gondar referral Hospital of Gondar, Northwest Ethiopia

Variable

Yes n(%)

Crud Odds Ratio [95% CI:]

Adjusted Odds Ratio [95% CI:]

Age in Years

 12–24

5 (55.6)

1.00

1.00

 25 to 34

31 (88.6)

6.2 [1.16–33.17]

0.33 [0.07–1.62]

 35 to 44

95 (84.1)

4.2 [1.03–17.26]

1.48 [0.39–5.71]

 45 to 54

68 (81.9)

3.6 [0.87–15.13]

1.14 [0.47–2.75]

 55 and above

58 (81.7)

3.6 [0.84–15.15]

1.16 [0.47–2.83]

Education status

 Unable to read and write

236 (83.4)

1.00

1.00

 Grade 1 to 7

17 (73.9)

0.57 [0.21–1.50]

1.71 [0.16–17.68]

 Grade 8 to 12

4 (80.0)

0.79 [0.087–7.28]

1.12 [0.0913.75]

Marital Status

 Single

22 (75.9)

1.00

1

 Married

139 (84.2)

1.70 [0.66–4.39]

1.66 [0.59–4.64]

 Divorced

53 (84.1)

1.68 [0.57–4.99]

1.56 [0.48–5.12]

 Widowed

41 (80.4)

1.30 [0.43–3.90]

1.07 [0.30–3.79]

 Separated

2 (66.7)

0.63 [0.05–8.12]

0.51 [0.03–8.07]

Lack of support

 No

202 (81.4)

1.00

1.00

 Yes

55 (87.3)

1.56 [0.69–3.51]

1.41 [0.60–3.33]

Fear of disclosure

 No

167 (80.7)

1.00

 

 Yes

90 (86.5)

1.55 [0.85–2.83]

2.00 [1.03–3.90]*

Use modern Medicine

 Yes

121 (79.1)

1.00

 

 No

136 (86.1)

1.64 [0.90–2.96]

1.91 [0.99–3.67]

Do you isolate your self

 No

212 (81.5)

  

 Yes

45 (88.2)

0.59 [0.24–1.46]

0.71 [0.27–1.86]

Low Income

 No

119 (77.8)

1.00

 

 Yes

138 (87.3)

1.97 [1.08–3.61]

1.97 [1.01–3.86]*

*= p-value ≤0.05

After adjusting for a number of important covariates, the multivariable logistic regression analysis showedthat OF patients who were divorced had a significant association with delay in seeking treatment compared to singles. The odds of delay in seeking treatment were 16 times higher among divorced than never married women (AOR = 16.9; 1.75,165.5). The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that when a person got older by one year, the odds of delay in seeking treatment for OF increased by 12% (AOR =1.12; 1.01, 1.24) (Table 3).
Table 3

Multivariable logistic regression analysis showing the relationship between decision delay to seek professional health care and factors associated among obstetrics fistula patients in Gondar referral Hospital of Gondar, Northwest Ethiopia

Variable

Delayed n(%)

Crude OR [95% Conf. Interval

Adjusted OR [95% Conf. Interval

Age

 

1.09 [1.02–1.16]

1.12 [1.01–1.24]*

Marital Status

 Single

4 (36.4)

1.00

1.00

 Married

17 (48.6)

1.65 [0.41–6.67]

1.28[0.24–6.72]

 Divorced

25 (92.6)

21 [3.29–145.2]

16.9 [1.75–165.5]*

Distance was reason for delayed

 No

31 (60.8)

1.00

1.00

 Yes

15 (68.1)

1.38 [0.47–3.98]

0.26 [0.05–1.41]

Economic status

 Good

23 (50)

1.00

1.00

 Poor

23 (85.2)

5.75 [1.71–19.3]

3.49 [0.56–21.7]

Parents alive

 Yes

31 (56.4)

1.00

1.00

 No

15 (83.3)

3.87 [1.01–14.9]

0.33 [0.03–3.44]

Availability of treatment center

 No

39 (60.9)

1.00

1.00

 Yes

7 (77.8)

2.24 [0.43–11.7]

3.68 [0.31–44.4]

Fear of small

 No

36 (58.1)

1.00

1.00

 Yes

10 (90.9)

7.22 [0.89–59.9]

5.59 [0.41–76.1]

Disclosure of the problem

 No

19 (61.3)

1.00

1.00

 Yes

27 (64.3)

0.89 [0.34–2.29]

0.26 [0.05–1.40]

Afraid of losing social value

 No

38 (59.4)

1.00

1.00

 Yes

8 (88.9)

5.47 [0.65–46.4]

14.91 [0.98–225.7]

*= p-value ≤0.05

Discussion

The aim of this study was to assess the proportion of women with POP or OF who delayed seeking treatment and to identify factors associated with the delays (delay to decide to seek care and treatment (first delay) and delay to reach treatment center (second delay). In this institution- based study, we found a high proportionof delay in seeking treatment for both POP and OF participants. Factors associated with the in seeking treatment for POP were fear of disclosure and lack of money, and for OF marital status and age.

In this study, it was noted that the proportion of women who delayed seeking treatment for POP (82.6%), and OF (63%) was high. Similarly, the mean length of delay for POP was 85.8 months (SD± 80.2), which is higher than the report from Israel (41.2 months with SD ± 39.5) [19]. However, the mean length of delay for OF (48.3 months) was in line with a similar study done in Israel (47.6 months) [19]. Due to social stigma attached to these problems, women with POP and OF usually feel embarrassed, isolate themselves,and this in turn results in different social and psychological consequences. These also make women not to disclose their problems to their relatives and keep them secret and thereby delay seeking treatment [20, 21]. In this study, it was noted that women who had fear of disclosure were two times more likely to delay seeking treatment for POP compared to those who had no fear of disclosure.

Financial constraint was one of the reasons for delaying seeking treatment for POP. In this finding, women who mentioned lack of money as a reason for the delay were nearly two times more likely to delay seeking treatment for POP as compared to those who didn’t mentionlack of money as the reason for the delay. Women with low or no income were not able to cover the health service expenses (medical and surgical), transport, foodand other indirect costs. Most women, especially rural women in Ethiopia are not economically empowered [22]A systematic review also indicated that financial problem was the most frequently mentioned reason for delaying to seeking treatment [23]. As POP is not a lifethreatening condition, many patients don’t want to seek treatment even if they are symptomatic. However, early treatment improves patient quality of life by improving the social, psychological, physical and sexual life of the women.

In this study, it is identified that fistula patients who were divorced were more likely to delay seeking treatment for OF than unmarried ones. Most fistula patients experienced stigma from their husbands, families and the community. A systematic review identified that socio- cultural factors were the second most frequent barriers to early treatment seeking. Different studies noted that more than 50% of women with OF were divorced [16, 23]. This implies that social problems, including social stigma and divorce can prevent women from getting early treatment [24].

In our work, age was found to have a significant association with delays to seek treatment for OF. The older the women the longer the delay to seek treatment for OF. Older women may believe that the symptom or the problem is a part of aging and tend to become reluctant to seek medical help.

The limitation of our study is that, some of the information was based on self-report which make it subject to recall bias. Hence, a longitudinal research is needed to assess the relationship amongvariables over time. Even though all patients were getting treatment during data collection, the sample size, especially the number of fistula cases was too small for us to do a rigorous and detailed analysis on the various risk factors.This study can be regarded as an eye opener for studies on POP and OF in Ethiopia and has clearly indicated the need for further detailed research with sufficiently large sample size. Another limitation of this study is its across-sectional design which might not show temporal relationships and thus making the observed associations not necessarily causal.

Conclusion

A large number of women with POP and OF delayed seeking treatment. Fear of disclosure due to social stigma and financial constraints were the major factors that contributed to the delays of seeking treatment for POP,while old age and divorced marital status were the major predictors of delays in seeking treatment for OF.These social problems contribute todelays in seeking treatment in two ways; one is their negative impact on women’s economic status, and the other is that is due to the problem no one offers to continually support and encourage the woman to seek treatment.

Recommendations

The authors recommended that the government, health professionals, communities, families, and husbands should play a role in reducing delays in seeking treatment for POP and OF. The government needs to increase the geographic and economic accessibility of the services. Health professionals, more importantly community health extension workers, should address cognitive accessibility to the community and families about the problems, and to identify cases and facilitate referral to nearby treatment centers. Creating awareness in the community and families about the real nature of the problem will help POP and OFpatients to get the necessary support from the community and their families, and this will in turn reduce delay in treatment and social stigma.

Abbreviations

OF: 

Obstetric Fistula

POP: 

Pelvic organ prolapse

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their deepest and heartfelt thanks to all study subjects.

Availability of data and materials

The authors declare that except the data that was shared in the main paper, the data will not be shared in either SPSS or spread sheet or any other format as we didn’t request ethical clearance and we didn’t obtain any statement from our university institutional review board.

Authors’ contributions

MA, SMA, KT, involved in protocol development, data management, manuscript writing/editing, AA, DL, AB, AZA, CB involved in protocol development, data management, manuscript writing/editing and SA involved in data management, manuscript editing. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

After obtaining ethical clearance from the Institutional Review Board of the University of Gondar and permission to conduct the study from the hospital administration, aconvenient times, were arranged for the interview. The aim and anticipated benefit of the study were clearly disclosed; written consent was obtained, and confidentiality was maintained. Participants were recruited voluntarily after obtaining full information about the research. They were informed of their rights to withdraw from the study at any stage. For the sake of privacy and confidentiality no personal identifiers,such as names were collected.

Consent for publication

This manuscript doesn’t contain any individual persons data, image, and video, so; consent for publication is not applicable.

Competing interests

The funders had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or in the preparation of the manuscript. The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Gondar
(2)
Institute of Public Health, University of Gondar
(3)
UNFPA Country office

References

  1. Wall LL. Obstetric vesicovaginal fistula as an international public-health problem. Lancet. 2006;368(9542):1201–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed S, Tuncalp O. Burden of obstetric fistula: from measurement to action. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3(5):e243–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Cosson M, Davila GW, Deprest J, Dwyer PL, Fatton B, Kocjancic E, Lee J, et al. An international Urogynecological association (IUGA) / international continence society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) & grafts in female pelvic floor surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(1):3–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A. Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women's Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(6):1160–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. In: Obstetric Fistula: Guiding principles for clinical management and programme development. edn. Geneva World Health Organization: WHO; 2006.Google Scholar
  6. Wall LL. Preventing obstetric fistulas in low-resource countries: insights from a Haddon matrix. Obstetrical & gynecological survey. 2012;67(2):111–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Nygaard I, Bradley C, Brandt D, Women's Health I. Pelvic organ prolapse in older women: prevalence and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(3):489–97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Zipporah Muthoni Kimani OO, Anthony Kibe: The prevalence and impact of obstetric fistula on women of Kaptembwa –Nakuru, Kenya. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology May 2014, 4.Google Scholar
  9. Walker GJ, Gunasekera P. Pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence in developing countries: review of prevalence and risk factors. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(2):127–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Tuncalp O, Tripathi V, Landry E, Stanton CK, Ahmed S. Measuring the incidence and prevalence of obstetric fistula: approaches, needs and recommendations. Bull World Health Organ. 2015;93(1):60–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. WHO: 10 facts on obstetric fistula. In.; 2014.Google Scholar
  12. Maheu-Giroux M, Filippi V, Samadoulougou S, Castro MC, Maulet N, Meda N, Kirakoya-Samadoulougou F. Prevalence of symptoms of vaginal fistula in 19 sub-Saharan Africa countries: a meta-analysis of national household survey data. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3(5):e271–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Biadgilign SLY, Reda AA, Deribe K. A population based survey in Ethiopia using questionnaire as proxy to estimate obstetric fistula prevalence: results from demographic and health survey. Reprod health. 2013;10:14. doi:10.1186/1742-4755-10-14.
  14. Fritel X, Varnoux N, Zins M, Breart G, Ringa V. Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse at midlife, quality of life, and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(3):609–16.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Mojgan Pakbaz MP, Mats Löfgren and Ingrid Mogren: A hidden disorder until the pieces fall into place' - a qualitative study of vaginal prolapse. BMC Women's Health http://wwwbiomedcentralcom/1472–6874/10/18 2010, 10(18).Google Scholar
  16. Williams G. The Addis Ababa fistula hospital: an holistic approach to the management of patients with vesicovaginal fistulae. The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland. 2007;5(1):54–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Muleta M, Rasmussen S, Kiserud T. Obstetric fistula in 14,928 Ethiopian women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(7):945–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Debora Barnes-Josiaha CM, Antoine Augustinc: The “three delays” as a framework for examining maternal mortality in Haiti Social sciences and Medicine 15 April 1998,, 46 (8):981–993.Google Scholar
  19. Krissi H, Eitan R, Edward R, Peled Y. Diagnostic delay in secondary care for lower urinary tract and pelvic organ prolapse symptoms in women. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;286(1):115–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Huang AJ, Brown JS, Kanaya AM, Creasman JM, Ragins AI, Van Den Eeden SK, Thom DH: Quality-of-life impact and treatment of urinary incontinence in ethnically diverse older women. Arch Intern Med 2006, 166(18):2000–2006.Google Scholar
  21. Nygaard IBC, Brandt D. Women’s Health Initiative Pelvic organ prolapse in older women: prevalence and risk factors. Obstetrical & gynecological survey. 2004;104:489–97.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Demographic E, Survey H. In. Edited by central statistical agency AAE. In ICF international, Calverton, Maryland. USA; March. 2011;2012Google Scholar
  23. Ben Bellows RB, Zoe Baker, Charlotte Warren: Barriers to obstetric fistula treatment in low-income countries: a systematic review. In. Edited by Council P. Nairobi; December 2014.Google Scholar
  24. The Prevention and treatment of obstetric fistula.. In: Report on Technical working group,. In. Geneva World Health Organization; Apr 1989: (WHO/FHE/89–85).Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement