Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Investigation of the association between quality of life and depressive symptoms during postpartum period: a correlational study

BMC Women's HealthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:115

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-017-0473-0

Received: 1 April 2016

Accepted: 15 November 2017

Published: 21 November 2017

Abstract

Background

The onset of a major depressive episode is experienced by a large number of women in the weeks or months following delivery. Postpartum depression may deem those women experiencing it incapable of taking care for themselves, their family and their infants, while at the same time it could negatively affect their quality of life. The present study assessed the quality of life of a sample of mothers in Greece, in order to investigate the association between postpartum depression and quality of life (QoL).

Methods

145 women in a Private-General Obstetrics and Pediatric Clinic in Greece completed the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression scale (EPDS) and SF-36 questionnaire on the third and fourth day after delivery (caesarean or normal childbirth). The data were analyzed using SPSS version 17.0. Linear and logistic regression analysis was performed in order to find the independent factors related to the quality of life and postpartum depression symptoms.

Results

9.9% of the participants experienced postpartum depression symptoms. Significant associations were found between the place of residence and symptoms of postpartum depression, and more specifically, women outside of Attica indicated higher levels of postpartum depression symptoms (p = 0.008) than women living in Attica. The level of education was also found to be significantly associated with postpartum depression symptoms, since women with Primary and Secondary education experienced higher levels of postpartum depression symptoms (p = 0.005) than those with a tertiary education. Concerning quality of life, women with postpartum depression symptoms scored 24.27 lower in «Role-Physical», 15.60 lower in «Bodily pain», 11.45 lower in «General Health», 14.18 lower in dimension of «Vitality», 38.25 lower in Role – Emotional and 16.82 lower in dimension of mental health, compared to those without depression symptoms.

Conclusion

Postpartum depression symptoms are associated with the quality of life of women after pregnancy, and therefore constitute a powerful predictor of the quality of life. Health care professionals should provide individualized care for the prevention and treatment of Postpartum Depression symptoms in order to help women improve their quality of life.

Keywords

Post-partum depressionQuality of lifeWomenSf-36

Background

Postpartum depression (PPD) is considered to be a common psychiatric disorder after childbirth [1]. Potential risk factors include: a) a previous psychiatric history, b) depression during pregnancy, c) socio-economic insufficiency and d) existence of other medical conditions [24]. Postpartum depressive symptoms include amongst others: a) depressed mood, b) weakness, c) disappointment, d) agitation, e) psychological distress, f) sleep disorders [5]. PPD’s prevalence is considered to be high, although rates among different countries vary [6]. In a literature review concerning cross-cultural and social diversity of PPD’s prevalence, in which rates from 143 studies in 40 countries were reported, show that results from different studies raging from almost 0% to almost 60% [6]. In this context, the European Union Committee on Public Health has declared that women with PPD are one of the most important target groups for preventive interventions in the field of depression and promotion of resilience in general health policies [7]. PPD’s consequences are detrimental for both the baby and the mother. On the one hand it can cause delays in children physical, social and cognitive development [8], and on the other, aspects concerning maternity care, and mother’s health and quality of life may be strongly affected [9].

Quality of life (QoL), is according to the World Health Organization definition ([10], p.1570) “the individual’s perception of their life in the context of the culture and value systems in which they live and in relation to their goals, expectations, standards, and concerns”. Previous studies [11, 12], revealed significant correlations between postpartum depression and quality of life. In addition, in a study in Canada, Da costa et al. [13] showed that women with PPD scored significantly lower on all domains of SF-36 in comparison to women without PPD, although there was no association between the severities of depressed mood to worse physical health status. However, the influence of postpartum depression on quality of life or the health status of mothers after birth still remains vague [14]. Several other studies [15, 16], investigated the association of specific types of delivery and QoL.

However, QoL is a concept affected by culture and social systems [12, 17]. It is a term that is used in many studies, mainly in the health care field [18]. Thus it is important to assess the quality of life of a sample of mothers in Greece, in order to investigate the association between postpartum depression and quality of life (QoL) in the aforementioned context. There is a plethora of studies conducted in other cultures. Postpartum period is accompanied by many physical, emotional, and social changes in women’s health. Health professionals should pay close attention in order to avoid unnecessary medical expenses by increased length of stay in clinics. To the authors’ knowledge, no previous study in Greece has measured maternal quality of life during the postpartum period, although PPD’s prevalence and consequences is associated with the cultural differences found in many countries [19]. The present study assessed the quality of life of a sample of mothers in Greece, in order to investigate the association between postpartum depression and quality of life (QoL).

Methods

Sample recruitment

A cross-sectional descriptive study among women who gave birth at a private clinic in Athens was conducted. This clinic is a center of excellence in obstetrics and it was purposefully chosen as it was convenient and easily accessible. The data were collected at a period of three months in 2016. During this period, all women who had given birth at the clinic and met all the other inclusion criteria, were approached by members of the research team and were invited to participate in the study. The participants completed the questionnaire at the time of recruitment. Data were collected 3 or 4 days after giving birth because, women are discharged on the fourth day after their admission in the clinic. 205 mothers were invited to participate but only 145 agreed to take part in the study (RR: 70.73%). With the current sample size the study had >90% power to detect significant results through regression analysis. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (a) participants were to be interviewed in their third and fourth day after delivery (caesarean or normal childbirth); (b) participants had to demonstrate the cognitive ability to understand and complete the questionnaires; (c) the mother must have delivered a living, healthy baby and (d) participants had to give their informed consent.

Informed consent

Belmont Report [20] ethical principles were applied throughout the study. Prior to their participation, all participants signed an informed consent form after being provided with all the details and explanations, in simple language. The study was approved by the Scientific Council of the Private Clinic “Mitera A.E.” in Athens on November 2015 and questionnaires were distributed for a period of 3 months’ in 2016.

The participants were informed that they could voluntarily terminate their participation in the study at any time without any consequences to themselves or to the quality of their health care. All information obtained from research participants was kept confidential.

Instruments

An anonymous self-administered questionnaire was used. The first part contained questions recording socio-demographic, social and health-related characteristics of the sample including age, marital status, place of living, educational level, occupational status, one statement concerning their relationship with their husband and the existence or not of any chronic disease.

Participants completed the Greek version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) [21]. EPDS has been chosen as it has been developed in screening postpartum depression [22] and has been widely used for that purpose in numerous other studies [4, 12, 13, 23, 24]. EPDS consists of 10 points with a four-item scale, with maximum scores of 30. The Greek version of the EPDS was found to be a valid and reliable instrument with an internal consistency of a = 0.9. Statistical analysis suggested that a cut-off point of 11/12 with sensitivity 90% and specificity 97.2% [21]. Therefore, a total score of 12 or greater has been recommend as an indicator of possible depression [21].

On the other hand, in the current study, the Greek version of Medical outcomes study-short form (SF-36), was also used [25, 26]. SF-36 is considered to be a valid and reliable tool with high convergent and discriminatory validity that distinguishes between groups of respondents based on their age, gender and socioeconomic status [26]. It consists of 36 items with eight sub-scales: Physical Functioning (PF), role limitation due to physical problems or role-physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role limitation due to emotional problems or role-emotional (RE), and emotional wellbeing (EW). Each subscale ranges from zero to 100 with higher scores indicating a better condition. SF-36 is also divided into two components: Physical health (based on the PF, RP, BP and GH scales) and mental health (relating to VT, SF, RE and EW) [4]. The SF-36 was selected as a measure for our study since according to the literature [9] is the most frequently used tool in the relevant studies assessing the relationship between PPD and quality of life. In addition, SF-36 is a generic instrument, whose relationship with quality of life is more debatable, while there are few quality of life tools that has been specifically designed for the maternity care setting [9], from which, to our knowledge, none have been tested for their validity and reliability properties to the Greek population.

Analysis

Mean values and Standard Deviation were used for the description of the quantitative variables. Absolute (N) and the relative (%) frequencies were used for the description of quantitative variables. For comparison of proportions Pearson’s and Fisher’s exact tests were used. For comparison of quantitative variables between two groups Student’s t-test was used. Linear regression analysis with a stepwise method (p for entry 0.05, p for removal 0.10) was used in order to find independent factors associated with SF-36 dimensions. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to investigate if the normality assumption was satisfied. General health was log-transformed due to its skewed distribution. The significance levels are two-sided and statistical significance was set at 0.05. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 17.0.

Results

The mean age of the participants was 33.3 years (±4.2). Sample characteristics are presented in Table 1. The majority of them (84.5%), where living in Attica and were Greek (96.5%), 97.2% were married, most of them (47.9%) were employees working in the private sector and two women had a chronic disease. Additionally, 17% of the participants declared not having a very good relationship with their husband. (Table 1).
Table 1

Sociodemographics, Social and Health-related Characteristics of the Participants

  

Mean ± SD/Age range

Number

Percent

Age(years)

  

33.3 ± 4.2/23–45

  

Marital status

married

 

141

97.2

single

 

3

2.1

divorced

 

1

0.7

Place of living

Not in Attica

 

22

15.5

In Attica

 

120

84.5

Nationality

Greek

 

139

96.5

Other

 

5

3.5

Education

High school

 

33

22.8

Higher education (university)

 

91

62.8

Master’s

 

21

14.5

Occupation

Household

 

9

6.3

Unemployed

 

14

9.7

Public Servant

 

23

16.0

Private Employee

 

69

47.9

Merchants, tradesmen

 

16

11.1

other

 

13

9.0

Relationship with husband

Bad

 

5

3.5

Moderate

 

2

1.4

Good

 

17

12.1

Very good

 

117

83.0

Having a chronic disease

Yes

 

2

1.4

No

 

140

96.6

9.9% (N = 14) of the women were found to score high on EPDS (greater than cut-off 12). Association of postpartum depression with demographics and other characteristics is shown in Table 2. Significant correlations were found between the place of residence and symptoms of postpartum depression and more specific women outside of Attica indicated higher levels of postpartum depression symptoms (p = 0.008) than women living in Attica. The level of education was also found to be significantly correlated with postpartum depression symptoms, since women who did not undertake tertiary education experienced higher levels of postpartum depression symptoms (p = 0.005). (Table 2).
Table 2

Correlation of postpartum depression symptoms with demographics and other characteristics of the participants

  

postpartum depression symptoms

P

NO

YES

N

%

N

%

Age (years)

 

33.4 ± 4.2

 

32.32 ± 4.21

 

0.343b

Place of living

Not in Attica

15

71.4

6

28.6

0.008c

Attica

110

93.2

8

6.8

 

education

High school

23

74.2

8

25.8

0.005c

university

85

94.4

5

5.6

 

Master

20

95.2

1

4.8

 

occupation

Household- unemployed

20

90.9

2

9.1

1.000c

Public Servant

27

90.0

3

10.0

 

Private Employee

63

90.0

7

10.0

 

Merchants. tradesmen

16

88.9

2

11.1

 
 

1

76

92.7

6

7.3

0.351c

No of children

2

39

84.8

7

15.2

 

≥3

12

92.3

1

7.7

 

labour

caesarian

76

91.6

7

8.4

0.499a

normal

52

88.1

7

11.9

 

Family support

less

28

84.8

5

15.2

0.317c

Too much

99

91.7

9

8.3

 

aPearson’s χ2 test;bStudent’s t-test; cFisher’s exact test

Table 3 shows SF-36 mean scores. Mean value of Physical Component Summary was 36.1 (±9.2) and Mental Component Summary was 53.8 (±9.5).
Table 3

SF-36 mean scores

 

min

max

mean

SD

p for normality test

Physical Functioning

0.0

100.0

58.8

28.2

0.318

Role-Physical (RP)

0.0

100.0

33.3

38.3

0.001

Bodily Pain

0.0

100.0

44.9

25.7

0.092

General Health (GH)

40.0

100.0

81.5

12.7

0.079

Vitality

0.0

95.0

59.6

18.5

0.561

Social Functioning

0.0

100.0

65.7

26.1

0.101

Role-Emotional (RE)

0.0

100.0

73.3

37.5

0.088

Mental Health (MH)

28.0

100.0

79.4

13.8

0.411

Physical Component Summary

18.1

58.2

36.1

9.2

0.638

Mental Component Summary

26.4

70.4

53.8

9.5

0.520

p value for Kolmogorov-Smirnov test

Multivariate linear regression analysis with stepwise method was applied with dependent variable the scores of «Physical Functioning», «Role –physical», «Bodily pain» and «General health» (Table 4). Therefore, Relationship with their husband and type of labor were found to be independent variables that correlated significantly with the dimension «Physical Functioning». Participants with very good relationship with their husband had higher score in dimension «Physical Functioning» by 13.13 points compared with participants who had poor. Those who had normal birth had higher score in dimension «Physical Functioning» at 14.58 points, compared with participants who had a caesarean. Depression was found to be independently associated with the dimension «Role-Physical». Women with postpartum depression scored 24.27 lower in «Role-Physical». Depression was found to be independently associated with the dimension «Bodily pain». Women with postpartum depression scored 15.60 lower in «Bodily pain» dimension. Depression was found to be associated significantly with the dimension «General Health».
Table 4

Multivariate linear regression analysis results (stepwise method) for Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily pain and General Health

  

β

SE

P

Physical Functioning

 Relationship with their husband

poor

0.00a

  

Very good

13.13

6.48

0.045

 Labor

Caesarian

0.00

  

Normal

14.58

4.92

0.004

Role-Physical

 Depression symptoms

no

0.00

  

yes

−24.27

11.07

0.030

Bodily pain

 Depression symptoms

no

0.00

  

yes

−15.60

7.20

0.032

General Health

 Depression symptoms

no

0.00

  

yes

−0.12

0.03

0.002

aindicates reference category; analysis was based on log-transformed values

Multivariate linear regression analysis results with dependent variable the scores of Vitality, Social functioning, Role Emotional and Mental Health are shown in Table 5. Regression analysis revealed that Women with postpartum depression scored 14.18 lower in dimension of «Vitality». In addition, Place of living, education and depression correlate significantly with «social functioning. In particular, participants living in Attica scored 12.42 higher in «Social Functioning». Participants with university education scored 17.35 higher in «Social Functioning» compared to those with master education, whereas participants with higher school education scored 22.35 higher in «Social Functioning» compared to participants with master education. Also, participants with postpartum depression scored 25.68 lower in social functioning and 38.25 lower in Role Emotional. Furthermore, presence of depression and not very good relationships with their husband were independently associated with lower score on Emotional Wellbeing. (Table 5).
Table 5

Multivariate linear regression analysis results (stepwise method) for Vitality, Social functioning, Role Emotional and Mental Health

  

β

SE

P

Vitality

 Depression

no

0.00a

  

yes

−14.18

5.12

0.006

Social functioning

 Place of living

Outside Attica

0.00

  

Attica

12.42

5.95

0.039

 Educational level

master

0.00

  

Higher school

22.35

7.33

0.003

university

17.35

6.21

0.006

 Depression symptoms

no

0.00

  

yes

−25.68

7.21

0.001

Role – Emotional

 Depression symptoms

no

0.00

  

yes

−38.25

10.79

0.001

Emotional Wellbeing

 Depression symptoms

no

0.00

  

yes

−16.82

3.42

<0.001

 Relationship with their husband

poor

0.00

  

Very good

9.98

2.73

<0.001

aindicates reference category

Table 6 shows the linear regression analyses results for Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary. Those who had normal labor scored 4.51 higher in Physical Component Summary than those who had a caesarian. Furthermore, women with postpartum depression scored 12.58 lower in Mental Component Summary than those who hadn’t. (Table 6).
Table 6

Multivariate linear regression analysis results (stepwise method) for Physical and Mental Component Summary

  

β

SE

P

Physical Component Summary

 Labor

Caesarian

0.00a

  

Normal

4.51

1.76

0.012

Mental Component Summary

 Depression

no

0.00

  

yes

−12.58

2.63

<0.001

aindicates reference category

Discussion

The current study assessed the quality of life of a sample of mothers in Greece, in order to investigate the association between postpartum depression and quality of life (QoL). Quality of life is a concept affected by culture and social systems [12, 17], thus it was found important to assess it in the Greek context in order to explore any differences presented in that context.

Findings of the current study revealed that 9.9% of participants, experienced post-partum depression symptoms. The number of the studies that have been conducted in the specific field in Greece is limited. In the study of Gonidakis et al. [27] in a sample of 402 Greek women, 19.8% experienced PPD during the first 6 months after delivery. However, in the specific study the prevalence was different when women were approached after one week, one, three and six months [27]. When new mothers were approached one week after delivery, that as a time point in close to our study, only 6.8% were found to have PPD symptoms [27]. In another study among 205 Greek women, 14.5% reported PPD symptoms 2–3 days after delivery [28]. However, in the specific study a cut-off score of EPDS ≥14, which is consistent to the screening of major depression symptoms, was used [28]. In another study conducted among 1039 women in Greece, prevalence of PPD was 13.6% (EPDS ≥13) at 8 weeks postpartum [29]. By taking into account the above, we could say that our findings are not easily comparable with the results of other studies conducted in Greece, since a number of differences exist in the cut-off criteria of EPDS and assessment periods. Additionally, comparison with other countries’ rates is limited, since PPD prevalence is highly variable worldwide [6].

As far as the correlations found between postpartum depression and demographics of the participants, significant correlations were found between the place of residence and symptoms of postpartum depression, since women outside of Attica indicated higher levels of postpartum depression symptoms (p = 0.008) than women living in Attica. Previous studies have showed that place of residence may be related with postpartum depression [30]. According to the results of a study conducted among 29,405 women who lived in metropolitan Sydney in Australia, new mothers who were residents of the suburbs expressed higher postpartum depression symptoms, due to poor social-environmental conditions [30]. In our study, living outside Attica does not indicate poor living conditions such as poverty or criminality. However, since Attica is the metropolitan area of Athens, which is the capital of Greece, new mothers that took part in our study and were residents of Athens, have delivered in a place near their home, had better access to any service that they may require in the near future and a more expanded social network, including friends and relatives, that could provide them social support after childbirth.

In addition, in the current study, the level of education was found to be significantly correlated with postpartum depression symptoms, since women without tertiary education, experienced higher levels of postpartum depression symptoms (p = 0.005). However, our sample was not representative, since most of the participants had undertaken tertiary education which may affect the specific result.

As far as the quality of life assessment with the SF-36 scale, women who delivered naturally had worse subjective physical functioning, compared to those who had caesarean (P = 0.001) which is not in line with the findings of previous studies [31]. Also, women who had a very good relationship with their husband had better Physical Functioning compared to those who had poor (P = 0.017), which is in line with previous findings [27, 32]. Women who had symptoms of postpartum depression had significantly lower scores in the dimension “General Health” (P = 0.01), indicating worse physical role, compared to those who had no symptoms of postpartum depression.

Similar, but not the same, were the findings of a prospective study of Sadat et al. [4], in Iran, which showed that depression symptoms may affect most of quality of life fields among women, postpartum. More specifically, in our study depression symptoms were found to be associated significantly with five out of eight sub scales of SF-36 (General Health, Role-Physical, Bodily pain, Vitality and Emotional Wellbeing), while in Sadat et al. study [4] there were significant negative correlations between PPD scores and seven out of SF-36 subscales (except Role-Physical). However, in Sadat et al. study assessments of both PPD and quality of life were made prospectively in the second and fourth month postpartum, while in our study the assessment was made between third and fourth day after delivery.

Taking into consideration the aforementioned findings, there is a need for further longitudinal studies in order to explore the quality of life of those women on a long-term basis. Research data in the specific field may orient clinicians attention and provision of care to particular quality of life domains that seems to be more affected from PPD presence.

However, during the interpretation of the data, we must take into account the fact that during the past 7 years the financial recession and the political instabilities in Greece have created a difficult situation from which the majority of people have been affected. The county lost more than the 25% of its gross domestic product (GDP), [33], while a reduction in health spending of more than a third in real terms was made since the beginning of the crisis in 2009 [34]. Unemployment rates reached 26.15% in 2014 and remain high (compared to 7.8% in 2008) and proportion of population at risk of social exclusion because of poverty rose from 28.1% in 2008 to 36% in 2014 [35]. According to the findings of a systematic review concerning the impact of the financial crisis in Greek population, in which the results of 39 studies conducted in this period were included and considered for further analyses, crisis had a lot of consequences including increased rates in mental health problems, especially depression, and suicides, while a deterioration in of self-rated health was also reported [36].

As far as the strengths of the current research, those lie to the size of the study population and the uniformity of their ethnicity. Concerning the sample size, as we already mentioned in methods section, the research team approached all women who had given birth at the clinic and met the inclusion criteria during a period of three months, with a high response rate. Therefore, although we did not follow a random selection method, the fact that all women approached may be taken into account as a minimum probability sampling criterion. As far as the ethnicity, given that reports for PPD’s prevalence display a great variability due to cross-cultural variables [6], data from different countries and ethnicities may contribute to the better research and the comparison of the diversities of the prevalence. Undoubtedly, there were also some limitations. First and foremost is the design chosen, since correlational type of design, on the one hand provides the opportunity for correlations but correlations do not refer to individuals. Further, correlations do not identify causes. Finally, the sample was not representative of the broader population, since 77% of the participants had tertiary level qualification.

Conclusions

Postpartum depression symptoms are associated with quality of life of women after pregnancy and therefore constitutes a powerful predictor of quality of life. Holistic care models targeting the improvement of both physical and social functioning, that according to the findings are both affected from PPD symptoms and individualized care depended on the way of delivery (normal or caesarean) and the presence or absence of social recourses (e.g. presence of a good relationship with husband) may prove to be helpful for maintaining a good level of quality of life in women with PPD symptoms.

Abbreviations

ANOVA: 

Analysis of Variance

BP: 

bodily pain

EPDS: 

Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale

EW: 

emotional wellbeing

GH: 

general health

PF: 

Physical Functioning

PPD: 

Postpartum depression

QoL: 

Quality of Life

RE: 

role-emotional

RP: 

role-limitation due to physical problems or role physical

SF: 

Social Functioning

SF-36: 

Greek version of Medical Outcomes study-short form SF-36

SPSS: 

Statistical Package for the Social Sciences

VT: 

vitality

Declarations

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Belmont Report [22] ethical principles were applied throughout the study and all participants signed an informed consent form prior to their participation after being provided with all the details and explanations, in simple language, regarding their participation.

Availability of data and materials

The data will not be shared due to the fact that they were collected from a private hospital and there is a policy for not providing them to third parties.

Authors’ contributions

MP, CK, PS, MM, AT, and DN made substantial contribution to the conception and design of the study. MP and CK, performed the data collection statistical analysis. CK and AT performed statistical analysis. CK also prepared all the drafts of the manuscript. AT, CK, MP, PS, MM, AT, and DN provided intellectual input into the article. AT also revised the manuscript during review process. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Name of Ethics committee that approved the study: Scientific Council of the Private Clinic “Mitera A.E.” in Athens.

Reference Number: 28,112,015.

Consent for publication

This section is not applicable, since there are no data used within the manuscript that identify the participants and as authors stated before, participants had signed an informed consent for their participation in the study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Hellenic Open University, Patras, Greece
(2)
Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Limassol, Cyprus
(3)
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Psychology, Thessaloniki, Greece

References

  1. Horowitz JA, Murphy CA, Gregory KE, Wojcik JA. Community-based screening initiative to identify mothers at risk for postpartum depression. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2011;40:52–61.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. deCastro F, Hinojosa-Ayala N, Hernandez-Prado B. Risk and protective factors associated with postnatal depression in Mexican adolescents. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;32:210–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Dubey C, Gupta N, Bhasin S, Muthal RA, Arora R. Prevalence and associated risk factors for postpartum depression in women attending a tertiary hospital, Delhi, India. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2012;58:577–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Sadat Z, Abedzadeh-Kalahroudi M, Kafaei Atrian M, Karimian Z, Sooki Z. The impact of postpartum depression on quality of life in women after Child’s birth. Iran. Red crescent. Med J. 2014;16:e14995.Google Scholar
  5. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Association AP, editor. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.Google Scholar
  6. Halbreich U, Karkun S. Cross-cultural and social diversity of prevalence of postpartum depression and depressive symptoms. J Affect Disord. 2006;91:97–111.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cuijpers P, Shields-Zeeman L, Walters B, Petrea I. Prevention of depression and promotion of resilience. Scientific Paper. EU COMPASS FOR ACTION ON MENTAL HEALTH AND WELL-BEING. European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/mental…/ev_20161006_co03_en.pdf Accessed 22 May 2017.
  8. Wachs TD, Black MM, Engle PL. (2009). Maternal depression: a global threat to children’s health, development, and behavior and to human rights. Child Dev Perspect. 2009;3:51–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Symon AA. Review of mothers’ prenatal and postnatal quality of life. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:38.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med. 1998;46:1569–85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Dennis C-L. Can we identify mothers at risk for postpartum depression in the immediate postpartum period using the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale? J Affect Disord. 2004;78:163–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Zubaran C, Foresti K. Investigating quality of life and depressive symptoms in the postpartum period. Women and birth. Australian college of. Midwives. 2011;24:10–6.Google Scholar
  13. Da Costa D, Dritsa M, Rippen N, Lowensteyn I, Khalif S. Health-related quality of life in postpartum depressed women. Arch. Womens. Ment Health. 2006;9:95–102.Google Scholar
  14. Cheng C-Y, Li Q. Integrative review of research on general health status and prevalence of common physical health conditions of women after childbirth. Womens Health Issues. 2008;18:267–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ahmadi SE, Montazeri A, Mozafari R, Azari A, Nateghi MR, Ashrafi M. Health-related quality of life and Primi-gravid: a comparative study of natural conception and conception by assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs). Int. J. Fertil Steril. 2014;8:167–74.Google Scholar
  16. Torkan B, Parsay S, Lamyian M, Kazemnejad A, Montazeri A. Postnatal quality of life in women after normal vaginal delivery and caesarean section. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. BioMed Central; 2009;9:4.Google Scholar
  17. Steger MF, Frazier P, Oishi S, Kaler M. The meaning in life questionnaire: assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. J Couns Psychol. 2006;53:80–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. McKevitt C, Redfern J, La-Placa V, Wolfe CDA. Defining and using quality of life: a survey of health care professionals. Clin Rehabil. 2003;17(8):865–70. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215503cr690oa.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Moses-Kolko EL, Roth EK. Antepartum and postpartum depression: healthy mom, healthy baby. J Am Med Women's Assoc (1972). 2004; 59(3): 181–191.Google Scholar
  20. National Commission for the Proptection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Bethesda M. The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. ERIC Clearinghouse.; 1978.Google Scholar
  21. Leonardou AA, Zervas YM., Papageorgiou CC, Marks MN, Tsartsara EC, Antsaklis A, et al. Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and prevalence of postnatal depression at two months postpartum in a sample of Greek mothers. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2009; 27(1): 28–39. doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02646830802004909.
  22. Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh postnatal depression scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1987;150:782–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gibson J, McKenzie-Mcharg K, Shakespeare J, Price J, Gray RA. Systematic review of studies validating the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale in antepartum and postpartum women. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2009;119:350–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Eberhard-Gran M, Eskild A, Tambs K, Opjordsmoen S, Samuelsen SO. Review of validation studies of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2001;104:243–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Anagnostopoulos F, Niakas D, Pappa E. Construct validation of the Greek SF-36 health survey. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:1959–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Pappa E, Kontodimopoulos N, Niakas D. Validating and norming of the Greek SF-36 health survey. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:1433–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Gonidakis F, Rabavilas AD, Varsou E, Kreatsas G, Christodoulou GN. A 6-month study of postpartum depression and related factors in Athens Greece. Compr Psychiatry. 2008;49:275–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Giakoumaki O, Vasilaki K, Lili L, Skouroliakou M, Liosis G. The role of maternal anxiety in the early postpartum period: screening for anxiety and depressive symptomatology in Greece. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2009;30(1):21–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/01674820802604839.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Koutra K, Vassilaki M, Georgiou V, Koutis A, Bitsios P, Kogevinas M, et al. Pregnancy, perinatal and postpartum complications as determinants of postpartum depression: the Rhea mother–child cohort in Crete, Greece. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2016;22:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796016001062.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Eastwood JG, Phung H, Barnett B. Postnatal depression and socio-demographic risk: factors associated with Edinburgh depression scale scores in a metropolitan area of new South Wales, Australia. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2011;45(12):1040–6. https://doi.org/10.3109/00048674.2011.619160.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Torkan B, Parsay S, Lamyian M, Kazemnejad A, Montazeri A. (2009). Postnatal quality of life in women after normal vaginal delivery and caesarean section. BMC pregnancy childbirth. 2009; 9(1): 4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-9-4.
  32. Webster J, Nicholas C, Velacott C, Cridland N, Fawcett L. Quality of life and depression following childbirth: impact of social support. Midwifery. 2011;27(5):745–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2010.05.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kaitelidou D, Katharaki M, Kalogeropoulou M, Economou C, Siskou O, Souliotis K, et al. The impact of economic crisis to hospital sector and the efficiency of Greek public hospitals. EJBSS. 2016;4:111–25.Google Scholar
  34. OECD Health Policy in Greece. January 2016. http://www.oecd.org/greece/Health-Policy-in-Greece-January-2016.pdf Accessed 26 July 2017.
  35. Economou M, Angelopoulos E, Peppou LE, Souliotis K, Stefanis C. Suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in Greece during the economic crisis: an update. World Psychiatry. 2016;15:83–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Simou E, Koutsogeorgou E. Effects of the economic crisis on health and healthcare in Greece in the literature from 2009 to 2013: a systematic review. Health Policy. 2014;115:111–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement