Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Effects of gestational age and the mode of surgical abortion on postabortion hemorrhage and fever: evidence from population-based reproductive health survey in Georgia

BMC Women's HealthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:136

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-017-0495-7

  • Received: 29 December 2015
  • Accepted: 15 December 2017
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Every year around 50 million unintended pregnancies worldwide are terminated by induced abortion. Even in countries, where it is legalized and performed in a safe environment, abortion carries some risk of complications for women. Findings of researchers on the factors that influence the sequelae of abortion are controversial and inconsistent. This study evaluates the effects of gestational age and the method of surgical abortion (i.e., dilatation and curettage and vacuum aspiration) on the most common abortion complications: postabortion hemorrhage and fever.

Methods

We performed a secondary analysis of the data from the population-based Georgian Reproductive Health Survey 2010. Information on 1974 surgical abortions performed >30 days prior to the survey interview were analyzed during the study. Logistic regression statistical analysis was applied to compare the abortion sequelae that followed vacuum aspiration and dilatation and curettage at different gestational ages (<10 weeks and ≥10 weeks). We examined two major early abortion-related complications: postabortion hemorrhage and febrile morbidity (fever ≥38 °C).

Results

Postabortion hemorrhage was reported in 43 cases (1.9%), and febrile morbidity occurred in 44 cases (2%) among all of the surgical abortions. The abortions performed by dilatation and curettage were associated with an estimated fourfold increased risk of developing hemorrhage (OR 4.4, 95% CI 2.2–8.6) and a twofold increased risk of developing fever (OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.17–4.79) compared with the abortions that were performed via vacuum aspiration. The risk of postabortion hemorrhage (OR 1.9, 95% CI 0.8–4.4) or fever (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.4–2.1) did not significantly differ at gestational age < 10 weeks and ≥10 weeks.

Conclusion

Vacuum aspiration was associated with reduced risks of postabortion hemorrhage and fever compared to dilatation and curettage. Gestational age ≥ 10 weeks was not found to be a predictive factor of immediate postabortion complications: hemorrhage and fever.

Keywords

  • Postabortion hemorrhage
  • Fever
  • Gestational age
  • Dilatation and curettage
  • Vacuum aspiration

Background

Eighty million women worldwide have an unintended pregnancy annually [1] and around 50 million of them are terminated by induced abortion [2]. Alarmingly high rates (~11 million abortions annually) were documented in the Soviet Union [3]. Georgia as a former soviet republic showed highest abortion estimates reported for any country according to the first population-based Reproductive Health Survey (RHS) in 1999 [4] - 3.7 abortions per woman, which declined to 3.1 in 2005 [5], and to 1.6 in 2010 [6]. Despite tangible progress, abortion in Georgia still plays a leading role in fertility control, which explains generated interest toward abortion-related morbidity and the factors that affect it.

An abortion complication in countries in which the procedure is legalized is primarily associated with infection, hemorrhage, and uterine injury [7]. Although the rate of abortion-related morbidity has been reported to be on average 9–10% [8, 9], the range varies markedly across the world from <1% to 15% as does the severity of complications [1012].

Many researchers have studied the factors that influence the sequelae of abortion, including gestational age [13, 14], method of abortion [13], patient age [13, 15], and use of prophylactic antibiotics [16]. Gestational age and the method of surgical abortion have been reported to be the most significant and interrelated factors that cumulatively affect abortion-related morbidity [13]. However, the findings of the studies available are controversial and inconsistent.

In the United States, where abortion is safe, the risk of complications has been documented to increase exponentially with increasing gestational age [17]. Similarly, in a worldwide review, second trimester abortions were associated with significantly greater complication rates compared with first-trimester abortions (0.5–3% vs. 1–8%) [3]. Contradictory were findings of Jacot and associates in a comparative study of the complication rates of first and second trimester abortions, which documented no difference in the morbidity rates according to gestational age [18].

Method of abortion is another important factor that may affect abortion-related complications. The choice of the method to use (medical abortion, vacuum aspiration or dilatation and curettage (D&C)) depends on the setting, where abortion is performed, availability of the equipment, skills of the service providers, gestation at which a woman presents for abortion.

Aspiration of uterus is a recommended standard method for first-trimester surgical termination of pregnancy [19, 20]. However, some Georgian health care providers still prioritize D&C as a preferred technique for surgical abortion [7].

Few studies are available which directly compare D&C and vacuum aspiration as methods for surgical abortion and their findings are controversial. Some investigators have demonstrated that lower complication rates are associated with vacuum aspiration compared with D&C [21]. However, these results have been disputed by other researchers [22] who failed to find the described pattern.

The controversy and inconsistency regarding the findings of abortion-related morbidity studies may be explained by the variability in the complication tracking processes and the definitions of sequelae across the studies. The studies that have been conducted to date are limited by short-term findings. Most of them relied on hospital data to trace the medical sequelae of abortion and therefore only examined the immediate post-operative period, typically the first 24 h. Because the patients were not followed up for longer period, complications that may have emerged later often have been omitted [23].

The results of the largest population-based reproductive health survey in Georgia were studied with the aim of evaluating the effects of gestational age and the method of surgical abortion (D&C and vacuum aspiration) on the most common abortion complications. The study analyzed information on postabortion fever and hemorrhage collected from women minimum 30 days after the abortion. By allowing enough time for development of postabortion complications, the study addressed the limitation of previous researches related to the short-term follow-up of abortion-related complications.

Methods

The study performed secondary analysis of the data from the population-based Georgian RHS 2010 that was conducted by the National Center for Disease Control and Public Health (NCDC&PH) in collaboration with the Georgian Ministry of Labor, Health, and Social Affairs (MoLHSA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, USA (6).

The original survey employed large, nationally representative, probability sample (13,363 households). Information was collected through face-to-face interviews with women of reproductive age (15–44 years old) who were living in Georgia at the time of the survey.

Study participants

The study targets were derived from the surveyed women who underwent surgical abortions. For the purpose of the study, surgical abortion was defined as a procedure that was performed with the intent of terminating a pregnancy using D&C or vacuum aspiration. The study included all reported cases of surgical abortion and excluded medical abortion, miscarriages and ectopic pregnancies.

To minimize recall bias regarding abortion-related complications, only abortions performed within the five years (2005–2010) prior to the interview were analyzed. To allow enough time for developing postabortion hemorrhage and fever, surgical abortions performed more than 30 days before the interview were included in data analysis. Thus, the final sample used for the study yielded a total of 1974 surgical abortions.

Types of interventions

The two types of surgical abortion methods, that is, vacuum aspiration and D&C, were compared. The abortion sequelae that occurred at different gestational ages, that is, <10 weeks and ≥10 weeks, were also compared with each other.

Outcome measures

Two major early abortion-related complications were traced during this study:
  • Hemorrhage (defined as severe blood loss requiring blood transfusion)

  • Febrile morbidity (defined as fever ≥38 °C).

Data analysis

The collected data were analyzed using SPSS version 21.0 (IBM, Amonk, NY, USA).

We applied logistic regression analysis to examine the associations of the mode of abortion and gestational age with abortion-related complications: postabortion hemorrhage and fever.

In the initial stage, a number of potential predisposing social and medical factors/confounders derived from previous studies were considered for inclusion in the model. These factors were the following: age, ethnicity, educational status, employment, residence, wealth, parity, and the number of previous induced abortions.

Univariate regression analyses were performed, and crude odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for each of these variables. Subsequently, binary logistic regression was applied using the backward selection technique. All variables that were considered to be potential affecting factors were entered into the model, and those with the smallest contributions were removed sequentially until all the remaining variables contributed to the model. Ultimately, only the variables that were significant at a P-value <0.05 were retained in the final model.

Results

Of 1974 surgical abortions analyzed, 652 (33%) were performed by D&C and 1322 (67%) by vacuum aspiration, 1687 (85%) at <10 weeks of gestation and 287 (15%) at ≥10 weeks of gestation.

Table 1 illustrates the socio-demographic factors and reproductive history of women performing surgical abortions according to method of abortion and gestational age.
Table 1

Selected characteristics of women with surgical abortions by method of abortion and gestational age

Characteristics

Method of abortion

Gestational age

D&C

(N = 652)

n (%)

Vacuum aspiration

(N = 1322)

n (%)

P

<10 weeks

(N = 1687)

n (%)

≥10 weeks

(N = 287)

n (%)

P

Age (years)

 15–24

73 (11.2)

137 (10.4)

0.173

174 (10.3)

36 (12.5)

0.237

 25–34

359 (55.1)

786 (59.5)

 

991 (58.7)

154 (53.7)

 

 35–44

220 (33.7)

399 (30.2)

 

522 (30.9)

97 (33.8)

 

Residence

 Urban

166 (25.5)

585 (44.3)

<0.001

681 (40.4)

70 (24.4)

<0.001

 Rural

486 (74.5)

737 (55.7)

 

1006 (59.6)

217 (75.6)

 

Education level

 Secondary incomplete

174 (26.7)

255 (19.3)

<0.001

341 (20.2)

88 (30.7)

<0.001

 Secondary complete

225 (34.5)

408 (30.9)

 

544 (32.2)

89 (31.0)

 

 Professional college

111 (17.0)

170 (12.9)

 

235 (13.9)

46 (16.0)

 

 University

142 (21.8)

489 (37.0)

 

567 (33.6)

64 (22.3)

 

Wealth quintile

 Lowest

200 (30.7)

211 (16.0)

<0.001

316 (18.7)

95 (33.1)

<0.001

 Second

171 (26.2)

301 (22.8)

 

403 (23.9)

69 (24.0)

 

 Middle

159 (24.4)

325 (24.6)

 

417 (24.7)

67 (23.3)

 

 Fourth

41 (6.3)

229 (17.3)

 

249 (14.8)

21 (7.3)

 

 Highest

81 (12.4)

256 (19.4)

 

302 (17.9)

35 (12.2)

 

Ethnicity

 Georgian

506 (77.6)

1105 (83.6)

<0.001

1398 (82.9)

213 (74.2)

<0.001

 Azeri

71 (10.9)

89 (6.7)

 

131 (7.8)

29 (10.1)

 

 Armenian

56 (8.6)

77 (5.8)

 

102 (6.0)

31 (10.8)

 

 Other

19 (2.9)

51 (3.9)

 

56 (3.3)

14 (4.9)

 

Employment

 Employed

98 (15.0)

252 (19.1)

0.027

298 (17.7)

52 (18.1)

0.852

 Unemployed

554 (85.0)

1070 (80.9)

 

1389 (82.3)

235 (81.9)

 

 Other

0

0

 

0

0

 

Parity

 0

3 (0.5)

4 (0.3)

<0.001

5 (0.3)

2 (0.7)

<0.001

 1

89 (13.7)

226 (17.1)

 

261 (15.5)

54 (18.8)

 

 2

347 (53.2)

825 (62.4)

 

1032 (61.2)

140 (48.8)

 

3

151 (23.2)

207 (15.7)

 

298 (17.7)

60 (20.9)

 

 4+

62 (9.5)

59 (4.5)

 

91 (5.4)

31 (10.8)

 

Number of previous induced abortions

 1

206 (31.6)

384 (29.0)

<0.001

499 (29.6)

91 (31.7)

0.196

 2

172 (26.4)

366 (27.7)

 

456 (27.0)

82 (28.6)

 

 3

119 (18.3)

221 (16.7)

 

285 (16.9)

55 (19.2)

 

4+

155 (23.8)

351 (26.6)

 

447 (26.5)

59 (20.6)

 

Highly educated women with higher incomes who were from urban areas tended to have abortions at a lower gestation age (<10 weeks) and through vacuum aspiration (P < 0.05). The differences were more marked in women with four or more complete pregnancies. These women were nearly twice as likely to undergo an abortion by D&C and at a gestational age ≥ 10 weeks than by vacuum aspiration and at a gestational age of <10 weeks (P < 0.05).

The total complication rate (from hemorrhage or fever) among surgical abortions by D&C or vacuum aspiration was 3.9% (77 cases).

The number of uterus perforations was too small (2 cases in total) to allow analysis of this complication according to method of abortion or gestational age.

Hemorrhage

Postabortion hemorrhage was reported in 43 cases (1.9%). The rate was significantly higher after D&C (4.1%) than after vacuum aspiration (1.2%, P < 0.05). Abortions at gestational ages ≥10 weeks were not associated with an increased rate of hemorrhage compared with the abortions at <10 weeks of gestation (2.8% vs. 2.1%, respectively, P = 0.44, Table 2).
Table 2

Incidence of postabortion complications according to method of abortion and gestational age (N = 1974)

Postabortion complications

Method of abortion

Gestational age

D&C

n = 652

Vacuum extract.

n = 1322

P

<10 weeks

n = 1687

≥10 weeks

n = 287

P

Hemorrhage

n (%)

27(4.1%)

16(1.2%)

<0.001

35(2.1%)

8(2.8%)

0.444

Fever

n (%)

24(3.7%)

20(1.5%)

0.002

33(1.9%)

11(3.8%)

0.046

Table 3 illustrates the results of the regression analysis. The univariate analyses showed that the risk of postabortion hemorrhage was highest for the D&C procedure and for women with history of more than four abortions. Age, residence, education, wealth, ethnicity, employment and parity had no significant effect on postabortion hemorrhage (P > 0.05). Gestational age was also found to be a non-significant factor regarding hemorrhage after an abortion.
Table 3

Univariate and multivariate analyses of the potential risk factors for a postabortion hemorrhage

Risk factors

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

Crude OR

CI 95%

P

Adjusted OR

CI 95%

P

Lower

Upper

Lower

Upper

Age

1.277

0.783

2.081

0.327

    

Residence

0.964

0.516

1.802

0.909

    

Education

0.988

0.863

1.131

0.861

    

Wealth

0.931

0.747

1.160

0.525

    

Ethnicity

1.024

0.814

1.289

0.838

    

Employment

1.062

0.488

2.310

0.879

    

Parity

0.972

0.651

1.450

0.888

    

# of induced abortions

1.338

1.012

1.769

0.041

1.330

1.006

1.759

0.046

Method of abortion

3.526

1.886

6.592

<0.001

4.397

2.239

8.638

<0.001

Gestational age

0.739

0.339

1.609

0.446

1.909

0.823

4.428

0.132

After adjustments for the number of induced abortions, the binary logistic regression model revealed that the abortions performed by D&C were associated with an estimated fourfold increase in the risk of developing a hemorrhage (OR 4.4, 95% CI 2.2–8.6) compared with abortions that were performed via vacuum aspiration.

Even after the adjustment, gestational age did not significantly influence postabortion hemorrhage.

Fever

Febrile morbidity (fever ≥38 °C) occurred in 44 cases (2%) among all of the surgical abortions performed via D&C and vacuum aspiration. The fever rate was found to be twice as high following D&C (3.7%) than following vacuum aspiration (1.5%, P < 0.05). A twofold increase in fever incidence was also observed following the abortions performed at or after the gestational age of 10 weeks compared with those performed before 10 weeks (3.8% vs. 1.9%, respectively, P = 0.046, Table 2).

The results of univariate regression analysis regarding the effects of various factors on postabortion fever are demonstrated in Table 4. The women with higher number of births, history of induced abortion, and D&C procedure were at the greatest risk of developing postabortion fever (P < 0.05). Age, residence, education, wealth, ethnicity and employment did not significantly affect the rate of fever (P > 0.05). The difference in fever between the abortions performed at <10 and ≥10 weeks of gestation was not significant (P > 0.05).
Table 4

Univariate and multivariate analyses of the potential risk factors for a postabortion fever

Risk factors

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

Crude OR

CI 95%

P

Adjusted OR

CI 95%

P

Lower

Upper

Lower

Upper

Age

1.139

0.702

1.848

0.599

    

Residence

1.026

0.555

1.895

0.935

    

Education

0.917

0.797

1.055

0.225

    

Wealth

0.844

0.679

1.048

0.125

    

Ethnicity

1.079

0.841

1.384

0.550

    

Employment

0.728

0.305

1.736

0.474

    

Parity

1.596

1.037

2.458

0.034

    

# of ind. Abortions

1.453

1.093

1.932

0.010

1.439

1.082

1.915

0.012

Method of abortion

2.488

1.364

4.538

0.003

2.370

1.171

4.795

0.016

Gestational age

0.501

0.250

1.002

0.051

0.934

0.414

2.112

0.871

Table 4 also presents the results of the final binary logistic regression analysis with the outcome variable of fever. After applying backward stepwise regression, the final model contained only two significantly contributing variables: the method of abortion and the number of previous induced abortions. Gestational age was included in the model, but had no significant influence. After adjusting for the number of induced abortions, the abortions performed by D&C were associated with a 2.37-fold increased risk (OR 2.37, 95% CI: 1.17–4.79) of developing fever compared with the abortions performed via vacuum aspiration.

Gestational age was not significantly associated with either postabortion hemorrhage or with postabortion fever.

Discussion

The early sequelae of abortion, including uterine perforation, hemorrhage, and infection, and the factors affecting these sequelae have been studied by many researchers; however, the conclusions drawn from these studies are diverse and frequently controversial. The disparities in the findings might be explained by variability in the postabortion follow-up periods across the studies and ill-defined or disparate definitions of abortion-related complications.

The present study does not suffer from the limitation of a short follow-up period. The data regarding abortion complications were collected through direct interviews with the women who received the service minimum 30 days prior to the interview, which allowed sufficient time for the development of postabortion hemorrhage and fever.

The study compared the occurrence of hemorrhage and fever after abortions performed through vacuum aspiration versus D&C and before versus after the gestational age of 10 weeks.

Method of abortion: Vacuum aspiration vs. D&C

In our study, D&C abortions were associated with increased risks of both postpartum hemorrhage and fever compared with vacuum aspiration, which contradicts with the results of meta-analysis of the trials conducted by Lean et al. [22] with 420 women and by Schweppe et al. [7] with 47 women. These studies found no significant differences in excessive blood loss or febrile morbidity following abortions performed with either vacuum aspiration or D&C. However, the interpretations of these studies should be approached with caution due to the small sample sizes and rarity of the outcomes, which likely hindered the detection of meaningful differences.

In a study of 4463 women, Edelman and associates found variability in the complication rates according to method of abortion at different gestational ages: prior to 12 weeks of pregnancy, vacuum aspiration was associated with reduced risks of excessive blood loss, prolonged bleeding and pelvic infection. After 12 weeks of gestation, the groups did not differ significantly in terms of complication rates [21].

Gestational age: <10 weeks vs. ≥10 weeks

In the present study, gestational age was not found to strongly influence the development of postabortion complications. The risks of hemorrhage and fever did not significantly differ before and after 10 weeks of gestation.

These findings do not agree with previous data, indicating that complication rates invariably increase with increased gestation duration. The results of a study from Tietze et al. documented a dramatic growth of complication rates with higher gestation [24]. Moberg and associates also reported a notable rise in postabortion hemorrhage with increased gestational age among 1123 women who had undergone vacuum aspiration abortions. This increase was particularly pronounced after 11 weeks of gestation [25].

In a study by Ferris and colleagues [23] that examined post-abortion complications in Canadian (Ontario) abortion clinics via retrospective analyses of a provincial database of 83,469 abortions, the odds ratio for abortion complications was 1.3 (95% CI 1.02–1.63) between 9 and 12 weeks of gestation compared to the complications that occurred at <9 weeks and increased dramatically with further increase in gestational age. However, the findings of this study were based on a very short-term follow-up period (a few hours after the procedure), while even short-term postabortion complications may appear for up to several days after the procedure, and such complications were likely not represented in this study.

Our study results are supported by those of Jacot et al. (18), which did not find an increase in the risk of complications with increased gestational age. However, the research was limited to only a single clinic and to abortions that were performed under local anesthesia, which makes the findings not generalizable.

Study limitations

The present study has several limitations. First, our findings relied solely on the responses of the women and were not verified through medical records. Hence, we do not know whether all of the respondents coded their complications similarly, although standard explanation of the complications was provided to each respondent by the interviewers. Second, because the information about abortion complication was collected from women who were interviewed months or even years after the abortions, the possibility of recall bias is present. To minimize the risk of recall bias, we only analyzed information about postabortion complications that occurred within five years prior to the interview.

Conclusion

The absolute risk of complications after abortion is generally low when the termination of pregnancy is performed and managed by a skilled provider. The D&C procedure was found to be associated with increased risks of developing postabortion hemorrhage and fever compared with the vacuum aspiration procedure. Unlike the results of previous studies, increased gestational age (≥ 10 weeks) was not found to be a predictive factor of immediate postabortion complications: hemorrhage and fever.

There is a distinct need to define postabortion complications in a uniform manner and to establish uniform criteria for abortion follow-up period to make the study findings comparable and consistent.

Abbreviations

CDC: 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

D&C: 

Dilatation and curettage

IRB: 

Institutional Review Board

MoLHSA: 

Ministry of Labor, Health, and Social Affairs

NCDC&PH: 

National Center for Disease Control and Public Health

RHS: 

Reproductive Health Survey

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors express their appreciation to the National Center for Disease Control and Public Health and the Unites States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for conducting the Reproductive Health Survey 2010 and for providing the survey data to the authors of the study for secondary analysis.

The views expressed in the publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the National Center for Disease Control and Public Health or Unites States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Funding

The study was supported by Letten Foundation. The funding body has no role in the design of the study, analysis and interpretation of data and in writing of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The primary dataset used in the study is not publicly available. The permission to use the dataset was granted to the principal investigator by the dataset owner - National Center for Disease Control and Public Health of Georgia. In case of need the data can be obtained from the corresponding author via a written request at the following email address: ekapestvenidze@gmail.com.

Authors’ contributions

EP conceived, conducted the study, managed the data, performed statistical analysis and wrote the early draft of the manuscript. NL and NB participated in statistical analysis and data interpretation. LU and TA were involved in the critical revision of manuscript. BSP was involved in and provided overall supervision for the entire process of study planning, implementing, manuscript writing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval for secondary analysis of the survey data was granted by a National Center for Disease Control and Public Health Institutional Review Board of Georgia (IRB # 2015–0119) and the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics of Norway (2015/1351/REK).

The survey was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all the surveyed women prior to the interview.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Clinical Medicine, Rikshospitalet, Division of Women and Children, University of Oslo, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372 Oslo, Norway
(2)
Michener Institute of Health Sciences Ultrasound post-degree Diploma Program, 220 St Patric str, Toronto, ON, M5A 3A1, Canada
(3)
Tbilisi State Medical University, 33 Vazha-Pshavela Avenue, 0186 Tbilisi, Georgia
(4)
Division of Women and Children, Rikshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372 Oslo, Norway
(5)
Present address: 10 Jvania str. Apt 34, 0179, Tbilisi, Georgia

References

  1. Grimes DA, Benson J, Singh S, Romero M, Ganatra B, Okonofua FE, et al. Unsafe abortion: the preventable pandemic. Lancet. 2006;368(9550):1908–19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Sedgh G, Bearak J, Singh S, Bankole A, Popinchalk A, Ganatra B, et al. Abortion incidence between 1990 and 2014: global, regional, and subregional levels and trends. Lancet. 2016;388(10041):258–67.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Henshaw SK, Singh S, Haas T. The incidence of abortion worldwide. Int Fam Plann Persp. 1999;25(Suppl):S30–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Serbanescu F, Morris L, Nutsubidze N, Imnadze P, Shakh-Nazarova M. Reproductive Health Survey Georgia, 1999-2000. Final Report. 2001; http://ghdx.healthdata.org/record/georgia-reproductive-health-survey-1999-2000. Accessed 27 August 2015
  5. Serbanescu F, Imnadze P, Bokhua Z, Nutsubidze N, Jackson DB, Morris L. Reproductive health survey: Georgia 2005. Final report. National Center for disease control and medical. Statistics. 2007; http://ghdx.healthdata.org/record/georgia-reproductive-health-survey-2005. Accessed 1 September 2015
  6. Butsashvili M, Kandelaki G, Sturua L, Shakh-Nazarova M, Mebonia N, Avaliani N. Reproductive Health Survey Georgia, 2010. Final Report. 2012; http://hivhealthclearinghouse.unesco.org/sites/default/files/resources/reproductive_health_survey_georgia_2010.pdf. Accessed 27 August 2015
  7. Kulier R, Fekih A, Hofmeyr GJ, Campana A. Surgical methods for first trimester termination of pregnancy. Reviews Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;4:CD002900.Google Scholar
  8. Hakim-Elahi E, Tovell HM, Burnhill MS. Complications of first-trimester abortion: a report of 170,000 cases. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;76(1):129–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Joint study of the Royal College of General Practitioners and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Induced abortion operations and their early sequelae. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1985;35(273):175–80.PubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Edström KGB. Early complications and late sequelae of induced abortion: a review of the literature. Bull World Health Organ. 1975;52(2):123–39.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Niinimäki M, Pouta A, Bloigu A, Gissler M, Hemminki E, Suhonen S, et al. Immediate complications after medical compared with surgical termination of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(4):795–804.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Soulat C, Gelly M. Immediate complications of surgical abortion. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 2006;35(2):157–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Cates W Jr, Schulz KF, Grimes DA, Tyler CW Jr. The effect of delay and method choice on the risk of abortion morbidity. Fam Plan Perspect. 1977;9(6):266–8. 273View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Grossman D, Blanchard K, Blumenthal P. Complications after second trimester surgical and medical abortion. Reprod Health Matters. 2008;16(31 Suppl):173–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Buehler JW, Schulz KF, Grimes DA, Hogue CJ. The risk of serious complications from induced abortion: do personal characteristics make a difference. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;153(1):14–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hodgson JE, Major B, Portmann K, Quattlebaum FW. Prophylactic use of tetracycline for first trimester abortions. Obstet Gynecol. 1975;45(5):574–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Reardon DC. Risk factors for legal induced abortion-related mortality in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(3):635.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Jacot FR, Poulin C, Bilodeau AP, Morin M, Moreau S, Gendron F, Mercier DA. Five-year experience with second-trimester induced abortions: no increase in complication rate as compared to the first trimester. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;168(2):633–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. The Care of Women Requesting Induced Abortion. Evidence-based Clinical Guideline Number 7. Second edition. 2011. https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/abortion-guideline_web_1.pdf. Accessed 18 September 2015.
  20. Clinical Policy Guidelines. In: National Abortion Federation. 2015. http://5aa1b2xfmfh2e2mk03kk8rsx.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015_NAF_CPGs.pdf Accessed 23 September 2015.
  21. Edelman DA, Brenner WE, Berger GS. The effectiveness and complications of abortion by dilatation and vacuum aspiration versus dilatation and rigid metal curettage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1974;119(4):473–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lean TH, Vengadasalam D, Pachauri S, Miller ER. A comparison of D & C and vacuum aspiration for performing first trimester abortion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1976;14(6):481–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ferris LE, McMain-Klein M, Colodny N, Fellows GF, Lamont J. Factors associated with immediate abortion complications. CMAJ. 1996;154(11):1677–85.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Tietze C, Levit S. Legal abortions: early medical complications. An interim report of the Joint Program for the Study of Abortion. Fam Plan Perspect. 1971;3(4):6–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Moberg P, Sjöberg B, Wiqvist N. The hazards of vacuum aspiration in late first trimester abortions. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1975;54(2):113–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement