Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Gender and thrombolysis therapy in stroke patients with incidence of dyslipidemia

BMC Women's Health volume 19, Article number: 11 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

When untreated, dyslipidemia is a higher risk factor for stroke and stroke-related mortality in men than in women. However, when dyslipidemia is treated the risk reduction is the same, but men benefited from mortality reduction more than women. Whether there is a gender difference in exclusion criteria for the use of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) or thrombolysis therapy in an acute ischemic stroke subpopulation with dyslipidemia is yet to be investigated.

Method

In a dyslipidemic stroke population obtained from a stroke registry, gender differences in exclusion risk factors were determined using clinical and demographic variables. Univariate analysis compared the recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) group and the no rtPA group. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine demographic and clinical factors associated with inclusion and exclusion for rtPA in the total dyslipidemic stroke population and the subsets of the male and female population. The regression model was tested using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, for the overall correct classification percentage. Significant interactions and multicollinearity between independent variables were examined using variance inflation factors.

Results

A total of 769 patients presented with acute ischemic stroke with incidence dyslipidemia; 325 received rtPA while 444 were excluded from rtPA. Of those excluded from rtPA, 54.30% were female and 45.72% were male. In an adjusted analysis, female patients with increased age (OR = 1.024, 95% CI, 1.001–1.047, P < 0.05), with a history of carotid artery stenosis (OR = 7.063, 95% CI, 1.506–33.134, P < 0.05), and previous stroke (OR = 1.978, 95% CI, 1.136–3.442, P < 0.05) were more likely to be excluded from rtPA. Male patients with atrial fibrillation (OR = 2.053, 95% CI, 1.059–3.978, P = 0.033), carotid artery stenosis (OR = 2.400, 95% CI, 1.062–5.424, P = 0.035), and previous stroke (OR = 1.785, 95% CI, 1.063–2.998, P = 0.028) were more likely to be excluded from rtPA.

Conclusion

Although there are some similarities in the clinical risk factors for exclusion in both male and female stroke patients with incidence of dyslipidemia, there are differences as well. Elderly female stroke patients with incidence of dyslipidemia are more likely to be excluded from rtPA, even after adjustment for the effect of confounding variables. Further research should focus on how identified clinical risk factors can be targeted and managed to improve the use of rtPA in elderly female acute ischemic stroke population with incidence of dyslipidemia.

Peer Review reports

Background

Gender differences in clinical risk factors of acute ischemic stroke patients have been studied [1,2,3,4,5]. Findings indicate that women tend to develop acute ischemic strokes at an older age and have a worse prognosis when compared with men [6]. Women that develop ischemic stroke tend to have higher rates of hypertension and atrial fibrillation [7,8,9], while men have higher rates of smoking, dyslipidemia, coronary artery disease, and carotid artery stenosis [5, 10, 11]. The risk factors tend to increase in prevalence as the stroke population ages, resulting in a relative increase in risk for elderly female or elderly male stroke patients [12,13,14]. Female stroke patients are known to present with more severe symptoms, less likely to recover all functions, poor outcomes, and a general reduction in quality of life when compared to men stroke patients [15,16,17,18]. Moreover, women are more likely to present with atrial fibrillation [19], and hypertension [20], whereas men are more likely to present congestive heart disease and diabetes [21]. These studies reveal evidence of a gender difference in stroke symptoms and past clinical history.

Dyslipidemia is a major risk factor for acute ischemic stroke [22,23,24,25]. Uncontrolled levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C), and total cholesterol (TC) are involved in acute ischemic stroke [26]. Dyslipidemia is known to increase the risk of stroke in males due to the expression of estrogens [27, 28]. The neuroprotective function of estrogen is seen in the younger female population; no difference was found in the risk of stroke between males and females in older populations with dyslipidemia as a risk factor [29, 30]. It is possible that age-related comorbidities often associated with elderly stroke patients [31] may complicate treatment outcomes in elderly male or female stroke patients with dyslipidemia. When untreated, dyslipidemia has a higher risk of stroke and stroke-related mortality in men compared to women [32]. When treated with statin the risk reduction is approximately equal between the genders, but men benefited more from mortality reduction than women [33, 34]. However, it is not clear whether the existing gender difference is shown in the exclusion or inclusion criteria for rtPA in a dyslipidemic stroke population.

In the general population, acute ischemic stroke has a more severe effect in women than in men when untreated [5, 8, 35]. However, treatment of acute ischemic stroke with rtPA eliminates outcome differences between genders, suggesting that women have a more robust response to thrombolytic therapy than men [36,37,38]. However, gender differences in a dyslipidemic subpopulation of acute ischemic stroke patients with and without rtPA is not fully understood. If a greater benefit of thrombolytic therapy continues to persist in women within the stroke population with dyslipidemia, one possibility is that there is a disproportionate distribution of clinical risk factors between male and female acute ischemic stroke with incidence dyslipidemia, such that more male or female or vice versa maybe excluded from rtPA. We tested this hypothesis in a population of female dyslipidemic acute ischemic stroke patients and compared our results with male dyslipidemic acute ischemic stroke patients. First, we characterized clinical risk factors in acute ischemic stroke patients with incident dyslipidemia that received or were excluded from rtPA. Secondly, we determined the effect of demographic and clinical risk factors that influence the exclusion or inclusion of ischemic stroke patients with incidence of dyslipidemia from rtPA. Our findings will help to identify clinical risk factors that can be targeted to eliminate gender differences and improve the use of rtPA in the management of an acute ischemic stroke population with incidence of dyslipidemia.

Methods

Data collection

Retrospective data was obtained from a stroke registry of patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke between January 1, 2010 and June 30, 2016 at the Greenville Health Care System (GHS). The GHS stroke registry contributes to Get with The Guidelines (GWTG)–Stroke, a national registry of the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association. The GHS registry has been described in previous studies [13, 18, 39,40,41,42,43]. All data including neuroimaging data were reviewed by a clinician, who determined whether the patient met the clinical case description of acute stroke. The events were categorized as ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, intracerebral hemorrhage, or subarachnoid hemorrhage according to descriptions of stroke from the Classification of Cerebrovascular Diseases III [44]. A stroke nurse identified and abstracted data for the patient’s demographics, clinical variables that were used for the study. Stroke risk factors were determined through evaluation of the documented patient medical history retrieved during admission to the GHS stroke unit. The data collected included demographics (age and gender), admission date, medications, clinical diagnosis, prehospital care, pre-stroke and post-stroke ambulatory status, in-hospital procedures, past medical history, and the clinical decision whether to treat the patient with rtPA or not. Documentation also included potential contraindications, patient history, characteristics of stroke presentation, physiologic status, and patient refusal of rtPA treatment. Data collection was scrutinized under quality control checks using established protocol to ascertain the quality of the data and to insure against several types of errors, including: errors in interpretation or coding, errors in data entry. This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Greenville Health system in 2017. This study is a retrospective data analysis and all data were de-identified. The study did not involve patients and no consent was required.

Data analysis

Demographic and clinical characteristics of male and female stroke patients with incidence of dyslipidemia who were included or excluded for rtPA were analyzed using univariate analysis. Comparisons between the male and female patients were determined using a two-tailed, independent samples student t-test for the discrete numerical variables. Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-squared test. Following the analysis of gender differences between the rtPA group and the no rtPA group, further analysis was determined using a multivariate analysis. In this analysis, a binary logistic regression was used to identify clinical factors that were associated with exclusion from the rtPA group. In the regression model, rtPA treatment was used as the dependent variable. In addition, gender was included as the primary independent variable in the regression model for the whole dyslipidemic stroke population, while the male and female sub-cohort were analyzed separately in the regression model. Although dyslipidemia was an inclusion criterion in the model, it may not appear in the final stepwise regression model if it was not significantly associated with the dependent variable in order to meet the criteria for stepwise consideration. In our analysis, the predictor variables for each logistic regression model were selected by stepwise regression and variables with P < 0.01 remained in the model. The binary logistic regression model was further tested by using a Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Multicollinearity and significant interactions between independent variables were examined using variance inflation factors. All statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics Software Version 24.0, and a p-value of less than 0.05 was used to determine significance.

Results

A total of 769 stroke patients presented with incidence of dyslipidemia (Table 1). As shown in Table 1, more females (P = 0.006) were excluded from rtPA when compared with male stroke patients with incidence of dyslipidemia. The characterization of stroke patients with incidence of dyslipidemia by rtPA status and gender is presented in Table 2. More females were excluded from rtPA (P = 0.002) when compared with male patients. Females excluded from rtPA were older (73.6 ± 12.7 vs 69.9 ± 12.7), had a higher NIH Stroke Scale rating (P = 0.002), greater mean GWTG risk of mortality (P = 0.046), and lower coronary artery disease (0.017) when compared with male stroke patients with incidence of dyslipidemia.

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of acute ischemic stroke patients with incidence of dyslipidemia.
Full size table
Table 2 Demographic and clinical characteristics of acute ischemic stroke patients with incidence of dyslipidemia stratified by rtPA and gender status.
Full size table

Following multivariable regression analysis of the entire population of both male and female dyslipidemic stroke patients (Table 3), six variables were associated with rtPA: history of atrial fibrillation (OR = 1.807, 95% CI, 1.140–2.862,P = 0.012), gender (OR = 1.675, 95% CI, 1.192–2.354,P = 0.003), history of previous stroke (OR = 1.847, 95% CI, 1.276–2.673,P = 0.001), and carotid artery stenosis (OR = 3.030, 95% CI, 1.540–5.960, P = 0.001) were significantly associated with exclusion from rtPA, while antiplatelet medication (OR = 0.539, 95% CI, 0.310–0.938,P = 0.029) and NIH Stroke Scale scores (OR = 0.882, 95% CI, 0.832–0.936, P = 0.001) were significantly associated with inclusion for rtPA in stroke patients with incidence of dyslipidemia.

Table 3 Factors associated with rtPA in the whole dyslipidemic stroke population.
Full size table

A further adjusted analysis was performed with a more specific focus on the male dyslipidemic stroke population (Table 4) revealed that a history of atrial fibrillation (OR = 2.053, 95% CI,1.059–3.978, P = 0.033), history of carotid artery stenosis (OR = 2.400, 95% CI, 1.062–5.424, P = 0.035), and history of previous stroke (OR = 1.785, 95% CI, 1.063–2.998, P = 0.028) were significantly associated with exclusion from rtPA. Even after adjusting for confounding variables, the significant effect of NIHSS (OR = 0.879, 95% CI, 0.805–0.959, P = < 0.004) and anti-hypertensive medication (OR = 0.534, 95% CI, 0.301–0.948, P = 0.032) for inclusion in rtPA was still present in the male stroke patients with incidence of dyslipidemia. In the adjusted analysis for the female dyslipidemic stroke population (Table 5), NIHSS (OR = 0.887, 95% CI, 0.815–0.965, P = 0.005) and use of antihypertensive medication (OR = 0.347, 95% CI, 0.144–0.836, P = 0.018) were associated with inclusion for rtPA. Female dyslipidemic stroke patients with increased age (OR = 1.024, 95% CI, 1.001–1.047, P = 0.043), carotid artery stenosis (OR = 7.063, 95% CI, 1.506–33.134, P = 0.013), or previous stroke (OR = 1.978, 95% CI, 1.136–3.442, P = 0.016) were more likely to be excluded from rtPA.

Table 4 Factors associated with rtPA in the male dyslipidemic stroke population.
Full size table
Table 5 Factors associated with rtPA in the female dyslipidemic stroke population.
Full size table

Discussion

Gender differences seen within the stroke population are multifactorial with genetics, demographics, and clinical factors all playing a role. For example, stroke is greater in women than in men [9, 34], and among those with a maternal history of stroke, the risk is greater in women than men [34]. Several studies have reported evidence of a gender difference in the onset, treatment, and care of stroke [9, 34, 35]. For example, women are known to have a greater incidence of stroke than men (3% vs. 1.6%) and more severe outcomes complicated by comorbidities [36, 37]. Therefore, understanding pre-treatment demographic and clinical variables that contribute to a gender difference could help eliminate any gender treatment disparities and improve treatment outcome in stroke populations irrespective of gender.

In the univariate analysis, we found that a number of patients’ pre-treatment variables did not significantly differentiate males and females in the exclusion from rtPA. These variables include hypertension, atrial fibrillation previous stroke, dyslipidemia, previous TIA, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, carotid artery stenosis, history of smoking, diabetes, cholesterol antihypertension, antiplatelet, reduction medication, diabetes medication and body mass index. However, more females were excluded because of higher NIHSS and GWTG risk of mortality, while fewer females were excluded because of coronary artery disease compared with higher dyslipidemic male stroke patients. Moreover, male and female dyslipidemic stroke patients were significantly different in terms of age, suggesting that unadjusted gender differences in rtPA may have been masked by age.

Following adjustment for the effects of age and clinical risk factors in the whole dyslipidemic stroke population, more female dyslipidemic stroke patients did not receive rtPA. In addition, patients with carotid artery stenosis, previous stroke and atrial fibrillation were excluded rtPA. Even after the adjustment, the exclusion from rtPA was strongly associated with the female gender in the whole population. The effect of age disappeared after adjustment while the female gender was significant as an exclusion criterion for rtPA. This finding suggests that the female gender reflects differences in clinical risk factors in rtPA decision making, such that severe comorbidities play a major role in the exclusion of female dyslipidemic stroke patients from rtPA.

The effect of age and gender disappeared after the adjusted analysis in male dyslipidemic stroke patients. Men with atrial fibrillation, carotid artery stenosis, and previous stroke have the tendency of being excluded from rtPA. In the adjusted model for the female population, female patients with increased age, carotid artery stenosis, and a pre-treatment of prior stroke were more likely to be excluded from rtPA treatment. The adjusted analysis did not eliminate the effect of age in the female dyslipidemic stroke population; this suggests a pattern towards a higher exclusion of older women than men. Most of the pre-treatment variables identified in this study have been observed in other studies [1,2,3,4, 38, 39]. In our study, women were older than men that received rtPA (70.4 years vs 66.5 years), and this is similar to other studies [40, 41]. Moreover, our results indicated that women were older than men in the exclusion group (73.6 years vs 69.9 years). In our study, both male and female stroke patients with incidence of dyslipidemia were likely to be excluded because of carotid artery stenosis and prior stroke while other studies found that women were more likely to have carotid artery stenosis [42,43,44]. Moreover, other studies found that men tend to face the likelihood of being excluded because of previous history of stroke [45, 46]. We found that there is a tendency that both men and women may not receive rtPA because of atrial fibrillation while other studies found that women were more likely to have atrial fibrillation [42,43,44].

In our study, the adjusted analysis did not eliminate the effect of age or gender in the largely older female dyslipidemic stroke patients that dominated our sample population. This finding suggests that female gender in dyslipidemic stroke population maybe be directly linked to older age (70 yrs), carotid artery stenosis and previous history of stroke. It is possible that the female gender may not have the sufficient sample size power to trigger exclusion from rtPA in our younger age (70 yrs) female dyslipidemic stroke population. Many factors have been attributed to the observed effect of gender in elderly stroke. This includes the effect of cardiomyopathy in women, especially at older age [47]. The genes that control the reaction to rtPA are different in men and women [48].

In addition, the hormonal activities that promote hypercoagulability are different in men and women [45], and may affect predisposition to stroke in women. The current study took the existing observations of gender, stroke and thrombolysis therapy to a different level by assessing the effect of gender in exclusion from rtPA in a dyslipidemic stroke population. Our findings indicate that gender difference is not only related to genetic factors, but clinical risk factors and age are also markedly involved. A better management of elderly stroke patients with incidence of dyslipidemia could improve the use of rtPA and stroke treatment outcomes. Investigating therapies targeting dyslipidemia may thus be useful to improve rtPA outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Limitations of this study included the following: how dyslipidemia was managed after the onset of stroke is not clear, this is a retrospective and single institution study making it difficult to extrapolate our findings to other centers. Moreover, this is a retrospective study and there is tendency for a selection bias because our data was not randomized. An important contribution of this study to existing literature in stroke neurology is our finding that gender as a risk factor for stroke with incidence of dyslipidemia is closely linked to age and clinical risk factors including carotid artery stenosis and previous stroke.

Conclusion

The current study provides a significant addition to understanding the gender-related exclusion from rtPA associated with acute ischemic stroke with incidence of dyslipidemia. The importance of gender and age as risk factors in dyslipidemic stroke cannot be underestimated.

Abbreviations

GWTG:

Get with The Guidelines

HDL-C:

High-density lipoprotein

LDL-C:

low-density lipoprotein

NIHSS:

National Institute of Health stroke scale

OD:

Odd ratio

rtPA:

Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator

TC:

Total cholesterol

TIA:

Trans ischemic attack

References

  1. Melnikov S, Itzhaki M, Koton S. Age-group and gender differences in stroke knowledge in an Israeli Jewish adult population. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2018;33(1):55–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shantha GPS, Mentias A, Bhise V, Kumar A, Rasmussen T, Adams C, Chaikriangkrai K, Mohsen A, Alqasrawi M, Sigurdsson G, et al. Gender differences in the trends of hospitalizations for acute stroke among patients with atrial fibrillation in the United States: 2005 to 2014. Am J Cardiol. 2017;120(9):1541–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tolibova N, Vakhabova N. Gender differences in stroke subtypes, severity, risk factors, and outcomes among elderly patients with acute ischemic stroke in Uzbekistan. J Neurol Sci. 2017;381:377.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zrelak PA. Gender differences in symptom perception and care-seeking behavior in acute stroke. Stroke. 2018;49:18–42.

  5. Giralt D, Domingues-Montanari S, Mendioroz M, Ortega L, Maisterra O, Perea-Gainza M, Delgado P, Rosell A, Montaner J. The gender gap in stroke: a meta-analysis. Acta Neurol Scand. 2012;125(2):83–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gibson CL. Cerebral ischemic stroke: is gender important? J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2013;33(9):1355–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Tsadok MA, Jackevicius CA, Rahme E, Humphries KH, Behlouli H, Pilote L. Sex differences in stroke risk among older patients with recently diagnosed atrial fibrillation. JAMA. 2012;307(18):1952–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hsieh FI, Chiou HY. Stroke: morbidity, risk factors, and Care in Taiwan. J Stroke. 2014;16(2):59–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Yu CS, An ZP, Zhao WJ, Wang WJ, Gao CL, Liu SF, Wang JH, Wu JL. Sex differences in stroke subtypes, severity, risk factors, and outcomes among elderly patients with acute ischemic stroke. Front Aging Neurosci. 2015;7:174.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Hart CL, Hole DJ, Smith GD. Comparison of risk factors for stroke incidence and stroke mortality in 20 years of follow-up in men and women in the Renfrew/Paisley study in Scotland. Stroke. 2000;31(8):1893–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Li B, Wang T, Lou YZ, Guo XF, Gu HF, Zhu YX, Ning XJ, Wang JH, Tu J. Sex differences in outcomes and associated risk factors after acute ischemic stroke in elderly patients: a prospective follow-up study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24(10):2277–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Foerch C, Ghandehari K, Xu GL, Kaul S. Exploring gender distribution in patients with acute stroke: a multi-national approach. J Res Med Sci. 2013;18(1):10–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Fredwall M, Sternberg S, Blackhurst D, Lee A, Leacock R, Nathaniel TI. Gender differences in exclusion criteria for recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;25(11):2569–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Park TH, Ko Y, Lee SJ, Lee KB, Lee J, Han MK, Park JM, Kim DE, Cho YJ, Hong KS, et al. Gender differences in the age-stratified prevalence of risk factors in Korean ischemic stroke patients: a nationwide stroke registry-based cross-sectional study. Int J Stroke. 2014;9(6):759–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang DR, Liu JF, Liu M, Lu CZ, Brainin M, Zhang JY. Patterns of stroke Between University hospitals and nonuniversity hospitals in mainland China: prospective multicenter hospital-based registry study. World Neurosurg. 2017;98:258–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Andrew NE, Srikanth V. Sex differences in stroke outcomes a case for better health care for older women. Neurology. 2018;90(22):995–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Li OL, Silver FL, Lichtman J, Fang JM, Stamplecoski M, Wengle RS, Kapral MK. Sex differences in the presentation, care, and outcomes of transient ischemic attack results from the Ontario stroke registry. Stroke. 2016;47(1):255–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gainey J, Brechtel L, Konklin S, Madeline E, Lowther E, Blum B, Nathaniel IT. In a stroke cohort with incident hypertension; are more women than men likely to be excluded from recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rtPA)? J Neurol Sci. 2018;387(15):139–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Karp DN, Wolff CS, Wiebe DJ, Branas CC, Carr BG, Mullen MT. Reassessing the Stroke Belt using small area spatial statistics to identify clusters of high stroke mortality in the United States. Stroke. 2016;47(7):1939–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Di Carlo A, Lamassa M, Baldereschi M, Pracucci G, Basile AM, Wolfe CDA, Giroud M, Rudd A, Ghetti A, Inzitari D, et al. Sex differences in the clinical presentation, resource use, and 3-month outcome of acute stroke in Europe - data from a multicenter multinational hospital-based registry. Stroke. 2003;34(5):1114–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kapral MK, Fang JM, Hill MD, Silver F, Richards J, Jaigobin C, Cheung AM. Rcsn Sex differences in stroke care and outcomes - results from the registry of the Canadian stroke network. Stroke. 2005;36(4):809–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee DH, Choi YJ, Han IB, Hong JB, Do Han K, Choi JM, Sohn S. Association of ischemic stroke with ankylosing spondylitis: a nationwide longitudinal cohort study. Acta Neurochir. 2018;160(5):949–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu D, Zhao ZY, Wang AX, Ge SQ, Wang H, Zhang XY, Sun Q, Cao WJ, Sun M, Wu LJ, et al. Ischemic stroke is associated with the pro-inflammatory potential of N-glycosylated immunoglobulin G. J Neuroinflammation. 2018;15:123.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Tziomalos K, Athyros VG, Karagiannis A, Mikhailidis DP. Dyslipidemia as a risk factor for ischemic stroke. Curr Top Med Chem. 2009;9(14):1291–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Xu T, Zhang JT, Yang M, Zhang H, Liu WQ, Kong Y, Xu T, Zhang YH. Dyslipidemia and outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Biomed Environ Sci. 2014;27(2):106–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gofman JW, Lindgren F, Elliott H, Mantz W, Hewitt J, Strisower B, Herring V. The role of lipids and lipoproteins in atherosclerosis. Science. 1950;111(2877):166.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jover-Mengual T, Castello-Ruiz M, Torregrosa G, Burguete MC, Lopez-Morales MA, Jurado-Rodriguez A, Aliena A, Jorques M, Alborch E, Salom JB. Mechanisms involved in the neuroprotective effects of the selective estrogen receptor modulator, BAZEDOXIFENE IN ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2015;117:21.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Koellhoffer EC, McCullough LD. The effects of estrogen in ischemic stroke. Transl Stroke Res. 2013;4(4):390–401.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sheikh HU, Pavlovic J, Loder E, Burch R. Risk of stroke associated with use of estrogen containing contraceptives in women with migraine: a systematic review. Headache. 2018;58(1):5–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hurn PD, Macrae IM. Estrogen as a neuroprotectant in stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2000;20(4):631–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Senoo K, An Y, Ogawa H, Lane DA, Wolff A, Shantsila E, Akao M, Lip GYH. Stroke and death in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation in Japan compared with the United Kingdom. Heart. 2016;102(23):1878–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Deb P, Sharma S, Hassan KM. Pathophysiologic mechanisms of acute ischemic stroke: An overview with emphasis on therapeutic significance beyond thrombolysis. Pathophysiology. 2010;17:197–218.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Amarenco P, Labreuche J, Lavallee P, Touboul PJ. Statins in stroke prevention and carotid atherosclerosis - systematic review and up-to-date meta-analysis. Stroke. 2004;35(12):2902–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dale KM, Coleman CI, Shah SA, Patel AA, Kluger J, White CM. Impact of gender on statin efficacy. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007;23(3):565–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Smith DB, Murphy P, Santos P, Phillips M, Wilde M. Gender differences in the Colorado stroke registry. Stroke. 2009;40(4):1078–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Madsen TE, Choo EK, Seigel TA, Palms D, Silver B. Lack of gender disparities in emergency department triage of acute stroke patients. West J Emerg Med. 2015;16(1):203–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Vaartjes I, Reitsma JB, Berger-van Sijl M, Bots ML. Gender differences in mortality after hospital admission for stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;28(6):564–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Buijs JE, Uyttenboogaart M, Brouns R, de Keyser J, Kamphuisen PW, Luijckx GJ. The effect of age and sex on clinical outcome after intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;25(2):312–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Nathaniel TI, Cochran T, Chaves J, Fulmer E, Sosa C, Yi S, Fredwall M, Sternberg S, Blackhurst D, Nelson A, et al. Co-morbid conditions in use of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke. Brain Inj. 2016;30(10):1261–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Nathaniel IT, Gainey J, Blum B, Montgomery C. Clinical risk factors in thrombolysis therapy: Telestroke versus Nontelestroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;27(9):2524–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Nathaniel TI, Gainey J, Blum B, Montgomery C, Ervin L, Madeline L. Clinical risk factors in thrombolysis therapy: Telestroke versus Nontelestroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;27(9):2524–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Fazzone B, Morris G, Black LA, Williams JA, Leacock R, Sternberg S, Blackhurst D, Nelson A, Nathaniel IT. Exclusion and Inclusion Criteria for Thrombolytic Therapy in an Ischemic Stroke Population.e 4(2): 1112. J Neurol Disord Strok. 2016;4(2):1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Gainey J, Brecthtel J, Blum B, Keels A, Madeline L, Lowther E, Nathaniel IT. Functional outcome measures of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator–treated stroke patients in the Telestroke technology. J Exp Neurosci. 2018;12:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Whisnant JP, Basford JR, Bernstein EF. Special report from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. Classification of cerebrovascular diseases III. Stroke. 1990;21(4):637–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Roy-O'Reilly M, McCullough LD. Sex differences in stroke: the contribution of coagulation. Exp Neurol. 2014;259:16–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the stroke unit of Greenville Health system for helping in data collection.

Funding

This research was funded by the Fullerton Foundation Grant. The Fullerton foundation played no role in the study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of the results. The Fullerton foundation had no influence in writing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

Materials are available on request to the corresponding author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of South Carolina, School of Medicine-Greenville, Greenville, SC, 29605, USA

    Brice Blum, Leah Wormack, Mason Holtel, Alexandria Penwell, Shyyon Lari, Brittany Walker & Thomas I. Nathaniel

Authors
  1. Brice Blum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Leah Wormack
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mason Holtel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alexandria Penwell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shyyon Lari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Brittany Walker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Thomas I. Nathaniel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

LW, BB and TIN, designed the concept, experimental design and data analysis. MH, AP, BW, and SL participated in writing the manuscript, data collection and editing the manuscript. All co-authors provided critical review on different drafts of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. TN is currently the module director for Neuroscience at the University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville. His research interests focus on Stroke Neurology. BB is a Year 3 medical student at the University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville. LW is a year 3 medical student at the University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville. AP is a year 2 medical student at the University of South Carolina School of Medicine. BW is a year 2 medical student at the University of South Carolina School of Medicine. Shyyon Lari is a year 2 medical student at the University of South Carolina School of Medicine.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas I. Nathaniel.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from Data collection was scrutinized under quality control checks. All protocols were approved by the ethics committee of the Greenville Health system. This study is a retrospective data analysis and all data were de-identified. The study did not involve patients and no consent was required.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

both the Ben Gurion University of the Negev, the Physicians for Human Rights Israel, and the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health Institutional Review Boards. No interviews were conducted until informed written consent.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Blum, B., Wormack, L., Holtel, M. et al. Gender and thrombolysis therapy in stroke patients with incidence of dyslipidemia. BMC Women's Health 19, 11 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0698-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0698-6

Keywords

BMC Women's Health

ISSN: 1472-6874

Contact us