Skip to main content
Download PDF

Oral health and emotional well-being in premenopausal and postmenopausal women: a cross-sectional cohort study

BMC Women's Health volume 21, Article number: 338 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Menopause, the absence of ovarian sex steroids, is frequently accompanied by emotional and physiological changes in a woman´s body, as well as oral health changes. The present study aimed to evaluate the association between the periodontal health status and emotional and physical well-being among postmenopausal women (PMW) in comparison with regularly menstruating premenopausal women (RMPW).

Methods

A total of 115 women (PMW, n = 56, mean age ± SD: 54 ± 5; RMPW, n = 59, mean age ± SD: 41 ± 4) received a comprehensive medical assessment and a full-mouth oral examination. All completed the Women’s Health Questionnaire (WHQ) to measure emotional and physical well-being. The corresponding bone mineral density (BMD) scores were obtained from participants´ medical records.

Results

Tooth loss was significantly higher in PMW than RMPW after adjusting for age (3.88 ± 2.41 vs 2.14 ± 2.43, p < 0.05). No significant difference was found in the prevalence of periodontitis between the two groups (PMW: 39.2%, RMPW: 32.2%, p > 0.05). The prevalence of periodontitis was associated with fewer daily brushing sessions in PMW (p = 0.021). Based on the WHQ, both PMW and RMPW with periodontitis had higher ‘’depressed mood’’ scores compared to periodontally healthy women (p = 0.06 and p = 0.038, respectively). The women who reported fewer daily toothbrushing sessions found to have higher depressive mood scores (p = 0.043).

Conclusions

Presence of periodontitis is associated with the emotional and physical well-being of women and reinforcement of oral healtcare is recommended at different stages of a woman’s life including menopause to reduce the risk for early tooth loss in women.

Peer Review reports

Background

There are several stages in a woman’s life where changes in hormone levels make them more susceptible to oral diseases, including during menstruation, pregnancy, and menopause [1,2,3]. Menopause is a period in a woman’s lifetime, characterized by permanent cessation of menses, accompanied by major changes in sex hormone levels. The menopausal transition is frequently associated with concomitant physiological and psychological changes including vasomotor symptoms, sleep and mood disturbances [4]. Postmenopausal changes also affect intraoral tissues, as thinning of the oral mucosa, alterations of the oral flora, and decrease of alveolar bone mineral density [5,6,7].

Periodontitis is a chronic inflammatory disease of supporting tissues around teeth that may lead to tooth loss due to alveolar bone resorption. It occurs as a result of a dysbiotic subgingival flora in susceptible individuals [8, 9]. Although increased levels of ovarian hormones, as seen in puberty, pregnancy and menstruation, can result in an increase in gingival inflammation and microbial changes in dental plaque [1,2,3, 10], contrariwise, during menopause, a lack of hormones can also lead to poor periodontal health. Hormonal changes and decreased bone mineral density are proposed to increase predisposition towards alveolar bone loss in postmenopausal women [11]. Previous studies estimated menopause as a risk factor for periodontitis. However, controversial results were reported. So far, there is no consensus for an increased risk of periodontitis after menopause [12,13,14].

Individuals under emotional stress are more likely to develop periodontitis [15, 16]. Women are shown to be more prone to mental illnesses compared to men, representing a two-fold greater incidence [17]. Furthermore, the menopausal transition puts women at greater risk for depression [18]. Quality of life and psychological stress factors need to be investigated as confounders in oral health evaluations of postmenopausal women.

We hypothesized that certain psychosomatic characteristics could characterize women at greater risk of poor oral health before or during menopause. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between clinical periodontal health and physical and emotional symptoms extracted by Women’s Health Questionnaire (WHQ) scores, in postmenopausal women (PMW), in comparison with regularly menstruating premenopausal women (RMPW). We also evaluated systemic bone mineral density as a modifying factor of periodontitis in PMW.

Methods

Participants

This cross-sectional cohort study included 115 women with an age range of 35–65 years. The study was conducted between March and October 2019 at the Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey in collaboration with the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University. The protocol was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ege University Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee for Clinical Research (18-10/61). All participants signed an informed consent and the study conforms to the STROBE guidelines for human observational studies.

The study population comprised of two main groups, postmenopausal women (PMW) and regularly menstruating premenopausal women (RMPW). The women in the PMW group were included if they were under 65 years of age and had a history of spontaneous amenorrhea within the last 12 months. The women in the RMPW group were included as participants if they were above the age of 35 years and without any irregularity in their menstrual cycles within the past 12 months. All women had at least 10 natural teeth without any prosthetic restoration. Women were excluded if they used antibiotics within the last 3 months, if they went through menopause after a medical attempt, or if they had ongoing cancer therapy or another acute disease or diabetes.

Periodontal examinations

A total of 115 women (PMW: N = 56, RMPW: N = 59) who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were asked to complete standardized questionnaires to acquire demographic data, self-reported systemic health history, age (years) at the visit and at menopause, weight and height, lifestyle/oral care habits, frequency of dental visits, education, and marital status prior to periodontal examinations. The full-mouth periodontal examination was conducted by the trained and calibrated examiners (AT, GE, weighted kappa = 0.887 for probing depth (PD)). The following periodontal parameters were recorded from six surfaces per tooth: PD, gingival recession (GR), bleeding on probing (BOP), and plaque index (PI) [19]. PD was defined as the distance in millimeters from the gingival margin to the base of the gingival sulcus measured using a manual probe (Michigan 0 probe with Williams markings) in all the teeth present except for third molars. Similarly, clinical attachment level (CAL) was measured as the distance from the cementoenamel junction to the base of the pocket and recorded manually to the nearest millimeter marking on the probe.

Periodontal diagnosis was made according to the 2017 classification for periodontal and gingival diseases [20] under consideration of clinical presentation and patients’ medical history. Participants were categorized based on their periodontal status into periodontitis (Stage I/II-Moderate and Stage III/IV-Severe) or non-periodontitis (gingivitis and healthy). Individuals were diagnosed with periodontitis if interdental CAL was detectable at ≥ 2 non-adjacent teeth, or if buccal/oral CAL ≥ 3 mm with pocketing > 3 mm at ≥ 2 adjacent teeth was present. Periodontitis patients were grouped as ‘’severe periodontitis’’ (Stage III and IV), if they had a history of tooth loss due to periodontitis, CAL ≥ 5 mm and/or PD ≥ 6 mm and/or vertical bone loss ≥ 3 mm and/or furcation involvement grade 2 or 3 was present. Milder cases were recorded as ‘’moderate periodontitis’’ (Stage I and II). PD ≤ 3 mm and BOP ≥ 10% was recorded as ‘’gingivitis’’. Individuals with PD ≤ 3 mm and full mouth BOP < 10% were recorded as ‘’healthy’’. Figure 1 shows clinical and radiographic images from one representative within the postmenopausal group with clinically diagnosed periodontitis.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Clinical and radiographic images of a representative patient from the postmenopausal group with periodontitis diagnosis

Full size image

The women’s health questionnaire

The Turkish version of the Women’s Health Questionnaire (WHQ) [21], attained from https://eprovide.mapi-trust.org and previously validated [22, 23], was directed to all participants. WHQ is a questionnaire which has been developed to assess a mid-aged woman’s short-term well-being in nine sections; depressed mood, somatic symptoms, vasomotor symptoms, anxiety/fears, sexual behavior, sleep problems, menstrual symptoms, memory/concentration, and attractiveness with a total of 37 questions. The sections ‘’menstrual symptoms’’ and ‘’sexual behavior’’ were excluded during evaluation due to unanswered questions [24]. The answers to the questionnaire were defined as ‘’Yes, definitely’’, ‘’Yes, sometimes’’, ‘’No, not much’’ and No, not at all’’. However, the calculation is based on binary scoring as 0 or 1, instead of a 4-point score. Every question took a score of 0 or 1. The sum of the scores in the related section was divided by the number of questions and each section was scored between 0–1. Scores approaching 1 indicated that the individual experienced symptoms related to a particular domain more prominently.

Bone mineral density scores

As the PMW group consisted of participants who were referred to the Gynecology Clinics, the bone densitometry measurement results (femur and lumbar spine, recorded as either normal, osteopenic, or osteoporotic) for 39 of the women were available in the hospital’s electronic records and included in the assessment.

Statistical analysis

Power analysis was performed using G*Power 3.1.9.2 version [25]. Fifty-three volunteers for each group were sufficient to demonstrate statistical significance between the two groups for 0.05 Type-I error and 80% power with a medium effect significant (d = 0.05). An extra 10% participants were included to overcome the potential information loss due to incomplete questionnaire data (59 participants in each group). Three participants from the PMW group were excluded due to incomplete questionnaires. Statistical analyses were conducted with the statistical software SPSS v. 19.0 (IBM, Somers, NY, USA). The Chi-Square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to investigate the association between categorized variables. After the Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test, multiple group comparisons were performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test, if the data was not normally distributed. In cases of a significant result with the Kruskal–Wallis test, two-group comparisons were performed with Dunn Test with Bonferroni correction. For normally distributed numerical parameters, one-way ANOVA was performed for multiple group analysis. Two-group comparisons were performed with a t-test or Mann-Whitney-U test. The linear relationship between ordinal and numeric variables was analyzed with Spearman’s correlation analysis. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was applied for the assessment of tooth loss difference between the two groups after adjusting for age.

Results

Demographics

The questionnaires collected self-reported information on demographics, overall health status, oral hygiene habits, and smoking. The participants’ age ranged from 35 to 65 years, the mean age was 54 ± 5 years in the PMW group and 41 ± 4 years in the RMPW group. The mean age of menopausal transition was 46 ± 4 years (Table 1).

Table 1 Characteristics of participants (N = 115)
Full size table

Educational status and smoking

The education level was higher in the RMPW group (p = 0.019). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding smoking status (p = 0.95) (Table 1).

Systemic health and body mass index

Thirty-three patients in the PMW group (58.9%) and 23 patients in the RMPW group (38.9%) reported the presence of at least one systemic disease. The difference between the groups was significant (p = 0.032). In addition, BMI was significantly higher in PMW than RMPW (p = 0.036, mean ± SD 27.55 ± 5.41, 25.61 ± 4, respectively).

Oral findings

Tooth number

The mean number of missing teeth was significantly higher in the PMW group (p < 0.0001). After co-variance analysis based on age, the difference remained significant (p = 0.048) (Table 2). Presence of periodontitis did not significantly affect the number of missing teeth (p = 0.88 for PMW, p = 0.16 for RMPW).

Table 2 Oral findings and oral care habits of participants
Full size table

Periodontal measures

After full-mouth clinical examinations, 22 patients in the PMW group (39.3%) and 19 patients in the RMPW group (32.2%) were diagnosed with periodontitis (Table 2). There was no significant difference between PMW and RMPW regarding the prevelance of periodontitis (p = 0.42). Periodontitis patients compared to non-periodontitis patients displayed higher mean value for the duration after menopause (9.19 ± 6.05 years and 7.37 ± 8.69 years, respectively), and a younger menopause age (45.76 ± 4.17 years and 47.68 ± 3.96 years, respectively). However, differences were not significant (p = 0.88 and p = 0.091, respectively). Smoking prevelances (PMW periodontitis: 38,1% non-periodontitis: 32.4%; RMPW, periodontitis: 42.7%, non-periodontitis: 25%) and BMI were similar between periodontitis and non-periodontitis groups. (Smoking; PMW: p = 0.172, RMPW: p = 0.674) (BMI; PMW: p = 0.971, RMPW: p = 0.181). In the PMW group, the prevelaence of periodontitis was associated with significantly fewer daily brushing sessions (p = 0.021).

Oral care habits

The majority of women (58% of PMW and 52% of RMPW) were reportedly brushing their teeth ≥ 2 times/day and 70.94% of women were visiting a dentist upon a complaint. The intergroup comparisons differed statistically for neither frequency of dentist visits nor daily toothbrushing (p = 0.52 and p = 0.62, respectively) (Table 2).

The women’s health questionnaire outcomes

Mean scores of seven domains in the WHQ are summarized in Table 3. Scores of somatic symptoms, vasomotor symptoms, sleep problems and attractiveness were significantly higher in PMW compared to RMPW (p = 0.002, p < 0.0001, p = 0.005, and p = 0.001, respectively). However, scores for ‘’depressed mood’’, “memory/concentration” and “anxiety/fears” did not differ significantly between the two groups (p > 0.05).

Table 3 Questionnaire scores among study groups
Full size table

Relationship of periodontal diagnoses with depressive mood and sleep problems domains

In the RMPW group, periodontitis patients had significantly higher ‘’sleep problems’’ (p = 0.043) and ‘’depressive mood’’ (p = 0.038) scores compared to patients without periodontitis. In PMW, participants with periodontitis had higher mean ‘’depressive mood’’ score compared to participants without periodontitis (0.29 ± 0.15 and 0.24 ± 0.25, respectively) (p = 0.06) (Fig. 2A). The women (PMW and RMPW) who reported fewer daily toothbrushing sessions found to have higher depressive mood scores (p = 0.043) (Fig. 2B).

Fig. 2
figure 2

 A Comparison of depressed mood scores (Mean ± SD) in regularly menstruating premenopausal women (RMPW) and post-menopausal women (PMW) with or without periodontitis. P values are given for Mann Whitney-U Test. B Daily toothbrush frequencies concerning depressed mood scores (Mean ± SD) in the entire cohort (RMPW and PMW together). P-value is given for Kruskal–Wallis Test

Full size image

Bone mineral density diagnoses

In PMW, 39 patients’ electronic reports for osteoporosis were available categorized as ‘’normal’’, ‘’osteopenic’’ or ‘’osteoporotic’’. The diagnoses were based on the lumbar spine (L1-L4) and femur neck T score measurements, according to WHO criteria [26]. There was no significant difference for osteoporosis diagnoses between periodontitis and non-periodontitis groups (Lomber area, p = 0.454, femoral area, p = 0.328) (Table 4).

Table 4 Bone diagnoses and periodontitis in PMW
Full size table

Discussion

There are several stages in a woman’s life during which changes in hormone levels make them more susceptible to oral diseases, including menopause [1,2,3]. The present findings indicate that women after menopause experience more tooth loss, higher BMI and concomitant systemic diseases. Moreover, the presence of periodontitis is associated with higher depressive mood scores in women but not with osteoporotic changes.

An association between postmenopause and higher numbers of missing teeth has been supported by Alves et al. [13]. Yet, they described that there is a tendency for a more extensive tooth loss among postmenopausal women compared to the premenopausal controls. Nevertheless, this association did not remain significant after adjusting for the confounding factors. Reportedly, low bone mineral density [27, 28], the number of pregnancies [29] or hypertension [30] are among the risk factors related to tooth loss in women. Pan et al. suggested poor oral hygiene as a major contributing factor for tooth loss during menapose, rather than bone mineral density [31]. Hormone replacement therapy was reported to be associated with longer tooth retention [30, 32].

Although alterations in sex hormone levels affect periodontal tissues and lead to poorer periodontal health [1, 5, 33, 34], the present study did not identify significant differences regarding periodontal parameters between the two studied groups. There was also no association between osteoporosis scores and increased risk of periodontitis in postmenopausal women [35, 36]. While the majority of the studies reported a positive association between systemic bone mineral density and radiographic alveolar bone crest height [7, 12, 37,38,39], the association between osteoporosis and clinical parameters of periodontitis are inconclusive [37, 40, 41]. Supportively, LaMonte et al. found no positive correlation between menopause age or duration of postmenopausal life with periodontitis in more than a thousand postmenopausal women who had been followed up for 5 years [12]. This is further supported by earlier studies demonstrating that menopause may not pose a risk to the periodontium in postmenopausal women with good oral health [42].

The present findings may not be suprising, as the relationship between menopause and periodontitis is complex due to the number of factors involved. In the present study, in particular, mean age differences between the two groups were approximately 13 years. Nevertheless, the group of postmenopausal women had higher number of missing teeth after age adjustment. However, it is arguable that age, smoking, socio-economic factors as well as systemic conditions may play a role as confounders on the relationship between menopause and missing teeth [12]. Furthermore, tooth loss is of complex aetiology, reflecting cumulative conditions of oral health over time [43].

We also found significantly higher ‘’depressive mood’’ scores in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women who had periodontitis. In line with the present findings, an earlier study in Japanese females between 40 and 59 years of age showed that depressive tendencies during menopause are more common among women with oral health problems [44]. The WHQ has been widely used to evaluate the efficacy of medical interventions such as hormone replacement therapies or non-medical interventions (i.e. exercise) upon the quality of life scores [45]. Although oral health-related quality of life is a widely studied subject in the general population [46, 47] and also in postmenopausal women [48, 49], to the best of our knowledge no previous study used the WHQ to assess the link between the quality of life scores and periodontal health. Premenopausal women may also be susceptible to depressive mood at times of hormonal transitions [50]. There are several hypothesis to explain the association between depression and periodontal diseases and they share common risk factors such as poor oral hygiene, smoking and low socioeconomic status [15, 51]. The present findings indicated that the association between depressive mood and periodontitis might be mediated by oral hygiene habits as both pre/postmenopausal women reported less frequent tooth brushing. Earlier reports indicated that depressive mood is related to the negligence of oral health care [52]. Additionally, increased dental plaque levels may lead to an inflammatory breakdown of the periodontal tissues, and vice-versa, systemic inflammation induced by the presence of periodontitis may lead to depression [53]. Since both depression and periodontits are of chronic nature, further follow-up studies would be required in order to evaluate their progression patterns during menapouse.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that there is an association between the number of missing teeth, poor emotional well-being, and menopause. Women with a history of periodontitis may experience concomitant emotional problems or women with depressive mood may be more susceptible to periodontitis. The WHQ is of great value for assessment of psychosocial effects of menopause in women with poor oral health. Nevertheless, the presented data due to its cross-sectional design may not be sufficient to understand the oral health trends during pre- and postmenopause. Additional multi-centered, larger follow-up studies are needed in order to confirm or exclude the role of menopause on poor oral health.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

PMW:

Postmenopausal women

RMPW:

Regularly menstruating premenopausal women

WHQ:

Women’s health questionnaire

BMD:

Bone mineral density

BMI:

Body mass index

PD:

Probing depth

GR:

Gingival recession

BOP:

Bleeding on probing

PI:

Plaque index

CAL:

Clinical attachment level

SD:

Standard deviation

HRT:

Hormone replacement therapy

References

  1. Akcalı A, Bostanci N, Özçaka Ö, Öztürk-Ceyhan B, Gümüş P, Tervahartiala T, et al. Elevated matrix metalloproteinase-8 in saliva and serum in polycystic ovary syndrome and association with gingival inflammation. Innate Immun. 2015;21(6):619–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gümüş P, Emingil G, Öztürk V-Ö, Belibasakis GN, Bostanci N. Oxidative stress markers in saliva and periodontal disease status: modulation during pregnancy and postpartum. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15(1):261.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bostanci N, Krog MC, Hugerth LW, Bashir Z, Fransson E, Boulund F, et al. Dysbiosis of the human oral microbiome during the menstrual cycle and vulnerability to the external exposures of smoking and dietary sugar. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:625229.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Monteleone P, Mascagni G, Giannini A, Genazzani AR, Simoncini T. Symptoms of menopause—global prevalence, physiology and implications. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;14(4):199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mariotti A, Mawhinney M. Endocrinology of sex steroid hormones and cell dynamics in the periodontium. Periodontology 2000. 2013;61(1):69–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar PS. Sex and the subgingival microbiome: do female sex steroids affect periodontal bacteria? Periodontology 2000. 2013;61(1):103–24.

  7. Geurs NC, Lewis CE, Jeffcoat MK. Osteoporosis and periodontal disease progression. Periodontology 2000. 2003;32(1):105–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bostanci N, Bao K, Greenwood D, Silbereisen A, Belibasakis GN. Periodontal disease: from the lenses of light microscopy to the specs of proteomics and next-generation sequencing. Adv Clin Chem. 2019;93:263–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hajishengallis G, Lamont RJ. Polymicrobial communities in periodontal disease: Their quasi-organismal nature and dialogue with the host. Periodontology 2000. 2021;86(1):210–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gürsoy M, Pajukanta R, Sorsa T, Könönen E. Clinical changes in periodontium during pregnancy and post-partum. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35(7):576–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mascarenhas P, Gapski R, Al-Shammari K, Wang HL. Influence of sex hormones on the periodontium. J Clin Periodontol. 2003;30(8):671–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. LaMonte MJ, Hovey KM, Genco RJ, Millen AE, Trevisan M, Wactawski-Wende J. Five-year changes in periodontal disease measures among postmenopausal females: the Buffalo OsteoPerio study. J Periodontol. 2013;84(5):572–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Alves RC, Félix SA, Rodriguez-Archilla A, Oliveira P, Brito J, dos Santos JM. Relationship between menopause and periodontal disease: a cross-sectional study in a Portuguese population. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(7):11412.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Haas AN, Rösing CK, Oppermann RV, Albandar JM, Susin C. Association among menopause, hormone replacement therapy, and periodontal attachment loss in southern Brazilian women. J Periodontol. 2009;80(9):1380–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Genco R, Ho A, Grossi S, Dunford R, Tedesco L. Relationship of stress, distress, and inadequate coping behaviors to periodontal disease. J Periodontol. 1999;70(7):711–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hugoson A, Ljungquist B, Breivik T. The relationship of some negative events and psychological factors to periodontal disease in an adult Swedish population 50 to 80 years of age. J Clin Periodontol. 2002;29(3):247–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Weissman MM, Bland RC, Canino GJ, Faravelli C, Greenwald S, Hwu H-G, et al. Cross-national epidemiology of major depression and bipolar disorder. Jama. 1996;276(4):293–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bromberger JT, Matthews KA, Schott LL, Brockwell S, Avis NE, Kravitz HM, et al. Depressive symptoms during the menopausal transition: the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN). J Affect Disord. 2007;103(1–3):267–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Loe H. The gingival index, the plaque index and the retention index systems. J Periodontol. 1967;38(6):Suppl:610-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Caton JG, Armitage G, Berglundh T, Chapple IL, Jepsen S, Kornman KS, et al. A new classification scheme for periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions–Introduction and key changes from the 1999 classification. J Periodontol. 2018;89:S1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hunter M. The Women’s Health Questionnaire: a measure of mid-aged women’s perceptions of their emotional and physical health. Psychol Health. 1992;7(1):45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Çetinay P, Gülseren Ş. Kadın Sağlığı Anketi Türkçe Formu’nun Geçerlik ve Güvenirliği. Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi. 2005;42:1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Erci B, Güngörmüş Z, Oztürk S. Psychometric validation of the Women’s Health Questionnaire in menopausal women. Health Care Women Int. 2014;35(5):566–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Girod I, de la Loge C, Keininger D, Hunter M. Development of a revised version of the Women’s Health Questionnaire. Climacteric. 2006;9(1):4–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A-G. Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41(4):1149–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lewiecki EM. Osteoporosis: clinical evaluation. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000.

  27. Kim CS, Kim EK, Lee KS, Lee HK, Choi YH, Hwang TY, et al. Relationship between bone mineral density, its associated physiological factors, and tooth loss in postmenopausal Korean women. BMC Women’s Health. 2015;15:65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Darcey J, Horner K, Walsh T, Southern H, Marjanovic EJ, Devlin H. Tooth loss and osteoporosis: to assess the association between osteoporosis status and tooth number. Br Dent J. 2013;214(4):E10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ueno M, Ohara S, Inoue M, Tsugane S, Kawaguchi Y. Association between parity and dentition status among Japanese women: Japan public health center-based oral health study. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):993.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Taguchi A, Sanada M, Suei Y, Ohtsuka M, Lee K, Tanimoto K, et al. Tooth loss is associated with an increased risk of hypertension in postmenopausal women. Hypertension. 2004;43(6):1297–300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pan M-Y, Hsieh T-C, Chen P-H, Chen M-Y. Factors associated with tooth loss in postmenopausal women: a community-based cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(20):3945.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Han K, Ko Y, Park YG, Park JB. Associations between the number of natural teeth in postmenopausal women and hormone replacement therapy. Maturitas. 2016;94:125–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hassan MN, Belibasakis GN, Gumus P, Öztürk V, Emingil G, Bostanci N. Annexin-1 as a salivary biomarker for gingivitis during pregnancy. J Periodontol. 2018;89(7):875–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Raivisto T, Heikkinen AM, Silbereisen A, Kovanen L, Ruokonen H, Tervahartiala T, et al. Regulation of salivary peptidoglycan recognition protein 1 in adolescents. JDR Clin Transl Res. 2020;5(4):332–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Brennan RM, Genco RJ, Hovey KM, Trevisan M, Wactawski-Wende J. Clinical attachment loss, systemic bone density, and subgingival calculus in postmenopausal women. J Periodontol. 2007;78(11):2104–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Yalcin F, Gurgan S, Gul G. Oral health in postmenopausal Turkish women. Oral Health Prev Dentist. 2006;4(4).

  37. Tezal M, Wactawski-Wende J, Grossi SG, Ho AW, Dunford R, Genco RJ. The relationship between bone mineral density and periodontitis in postmenopausal women. J Periodontol. 2000;71(9):1492–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Martinez-Maestre MA, Gonzalez-Cejudo C, Machuca G, Torrejon R, Castelo-Branco C. Periodontitis and osteoporosis: a systematic review. Climacteric. 2010;13(6):523–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Payne JB, Reinhardt RA, Nummikoski P, Patil K. Longitudinal alveolar bone loss in postmenopausal osteoporotic/osteopenic women. Osteoporos Int. 1999;10(1):34–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ronderos M, Jacobs DR, Himes JH, Pihlstrom BL. Associations of periodontal disease with femoral bone mineral density and estrogen replacement therapy: cross-sectional evaluation of US adults from NHANES III. J Clin Periodontol. 2000;27(10):778–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Weyant RJ, Pearlstein ME, Churak AP, Forrest K, Famili P, Cauley JA. The association between osteopenia and periodontal attachment loss in older women. J Periodontol. 1999;70(9):982–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Amar S, Chung KM. Influence of hormonal variation on the periodontium in women. Periodontology 2000. 1994;6(1):79–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Helal O, Göstemeyer G, Krois J, Fawzy El Sayed K, Graetz C, Schwendicke F. Predictors for tooth loss in periodontitis patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2019;46(7):699–712.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Yoshida N, Sugimoto K, Suzuki S, Kudo H. Change in oral health status associated with menopause in Japanese dental hygienists. Int J Dent Hygiene. 2018;16(1):157–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Hunter MS. The Women’s Health Questionnaire (WHQ): frequently asked questions (FAQ). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1(1):41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Durham J, Fraser HM, McCracken GI, Stone KM, John MT, Preshaw PM. Impact of periodontitis on oral health-related quality of life. J Dent. 2013;41(4):370–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Wong RM, Ng SK, Corbet EF, Keung Leung W. Non-surgical periodontal therapy improves oral health‐related quality of life. J Clin Periodontol. 2012;39(1):53–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Williams KA, Shamia H, DeBaz C, Palomo L. Quality of life and poor oral health: a comparison of postmenopausal women. Dent J. 2016;4(4):44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. DeBaz C, Shamia H, Hahn J, Mithani S, Sadeghi G, Palomo L. Periodontitis impacts quality of life in postmenopausal women. Climacteric. 2015;18(4):637–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Bromberger JT, Schott LL, Kravitz HM, Sowers M, Avis NE, Gold EB, et al. Longitudinal change in reproductive hormones and depressive symptoms across the menopausal transition: results from the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010;67(6):598–607.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Dolic M, Bailer J, Staehle HJ, Eickholz P. Psychosocial factors as risk indicators of periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32(11):1134–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Heitz-Mayfield L. Disease progression: identification of high‐risk groups and individuals for periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32:196–209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Nascimento GG, Gastal MT, Leite FRM, Quevedo LA, Peres KG, Peres MA, et al. Is there an association between depression and periodontitis? A birth cohort study. J Clin Periodontol. 2019;46(1):31–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Authors declare that the study has no funding source.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section of Oral Health and Periodontology, Division of Oral Diseases, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels Allé 8, 14152, Huddinge, Sweden

    Nil Yakar, Angelika Silbereisen & Nagihan Bostanci

  2. Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey

    Nil Yakar, Asena Türedi & Gülnur Emingil

  3. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey

    Çağdaş Şahin

  4. Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey

    Timur Köse

Authors
  1. Nil Yakar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Asena Türedi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gülnur Emingil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Çağdaş Şahin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Timur Köse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Angelika Silbereisen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Nagihan Bostanci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

NY contributed to study design, data acquisition, drafted and revised the manuscript. AT did the chairside examinations. GE contributed to conception, design, and contributed to the chairside examination of the participants and revised the manuscript. ÇŞ evaluated the volunteers for inclusion criteria, informed them about the protocol, and took their consent for participation. TK did the statistical analysis and revised the manuscript. AS critically revised the manuscript. NB contributed to the study conception and design, data interpretation and revised the manuscript. All authors gave their final approval and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Gülnur Emingil or Nagihan Bostanci.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ege University Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee for Clinical Research (18 − 10/61). All participants gave their written informed consent.

Consent for publication

The individual presented as a case in ‘Fig. 1’ has signed consent for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yakar, N., Türedi, A., Emingil, G. et al. Oral health and emotional well-being in premenopausal and postmenopausal women: a cross-sectional cohort study. BMC Women's Health 21, 338 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01480-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01480-5

Keywords

BMC Women's Health

ISSN: 1472-6874

Contact us