Skip to main content
Download PDF

Relationship between bone mineral density and ovarian function and thyroid function in perimenopausal women with endometriosis: a prospective study

BMC Women's Health volume 22, Article number: 134 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

In women with endometriosis, the association between ovarian function, hormones, and bone mineral density (BMD) is unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to elucidate the association between changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and clinical data, such as ovarian reserves, in perimenopausal women with endometriosis.

Methods

In this prospective study, we evaluated 207 female patients who visited the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the University of Tokyo Hospital between December 2015 and December 2020. We included patients aged ≥ 40 years with a history of endometriosis or who presented with endometriosis lesions. Patients with a history of smoking, steroid administration, autoimmune diseases, dyslipidaemia, and heart disease were excluded. During the study period, patients who underwent two tests, an initial and a follow-up test (n = 142, average age: 45.02 years, average BMD: 1.16 g/cm2), were evaluated at regular intervals based on the annual rate of change in BMD.

Results

There was a weak negative correlation between the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and BMD and a weak positive correlation between the anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and BMD. The annual rate of change in BMD showed a very weak correlation with thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels. A large decline in BMD was associated with high TSH levels and higher average age at menopause. Patients with higher TSH exhibited a higher rate of decrease in BMD than those without.

Conclusions

High FSH or low AMH levels are associated with decreased BMD. Decreased ovarian reserve is associated with decreased BMD in perimenopausal women with endometriosis. High TSH levels increase the risk of BMD loss. This finding may suggest that women with endometriosis should undergo bone scanning to rule out the possibility of reduced bone mass and subsequent increased risk of fracture.

Peer Review reports

Background

One of the aetiologies of osteoporosis is a decrease in oestrogen levels due to a decrease in ovarian function [1,2,3]. In addition to suppressing bone resorption by acting directly on osteoclasts, oestrogen suppresses osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption by inhibiting the expression of osteoclast differentiation factors [4]. The decrease in bone strength and bone quality, defined by bone mineral density (BMD), progresses with age. After menopause, when patients enter a low oestrogen state, bone resorption increases, and BMD decreases, making women more prone to osteoporosis at this stage [1, 5, 6].

Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease characterised by the presence of endometrial-like tissue outside the uterus [7]. It is believed to affect 10% of women of reproductive age and form lesions in areas, such as the ovaries and peritoneum, causing dysmenorrhoea, chronic pelvic pain, dyspareunia, and infertility [7,8,9]. Endometriosis is an oestrogen-dependent disease because oestrogen plays an important role in its pathophysiology. Endometriosis enhances oestrogen receptor expression and progesterone resistance in endometrial tissues [10]. Oestrogen promotes the transplantation of endometrial tissue into the peritoneum, thereby affecting proliferation and immortalisation, and also causes local and systematic inflammation [8, 11]. Of the inflammatory factors, it has been reported that autoimmunity plays a major role in the development of endometriosis, and the relationship between thyroid autoimmunity and endometriosis has been highlighted [12, 13].

In addition to oestrogen, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinising hormone (LH), which are factors that depend on the menstrual cycle, and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) have been attracting considerable attention in recent years for assessing ovarian function. AMH is produced by the granulosa cells of follicles, can be measured in the serum, and is independent of the menstrual cycle. Ovarian reserve refers to ovarian function characterised by the quantity and quality of follicles; AMH has been shown to be an indicator of ovarian reserve, which is useful to optimise ovarian stimulation in fertility treatment, preserve fertility in young cancer patients, and predict the timing of menopause onset [14,15,16,17].

In addition to symptomatic treatment to suppress pain, pharmacotherapy for endometriosis includes hormone therapy to suppress oestrogen levels [9]. However, long-term hormone therapy can lead to a decrease in BMD. In addition, it has been demonstrated that surgical treatment may reduce ovarian function not only with radical oophorectomy but even when only the ovarian lesions are removed. Therefore, in patients with endometriosis, changes in ovarian function may affect bone metabolism and cause changes in BMD.

Previous studies have revealed that women with endometriosis did not exhibit a decrease in BMD compared with women of the same age without endometriosis [18, 19] and that long-term fracture risks did not increase in women with endometriosis [20]. Meanwhile, regarding the decrease in BMD as a side effect of hormone therapy, the impact of add-back therapy using gonadotropin-release hormone analogues and oestrogen preparations for bone protection [21], as well as the decrease in BMD due to long-term administration of Dienogest, a progestin preparation [22] have been investigated. Another report suggested that BMD was higher after ovariectomy for deep endometriosis than after ovariectomy for other indications [23]. However, almost no studies have investigated the relationship between ovarian function and BMD changes in women with endometriosis. Elucidating the association between BMD loss and ovarian function in women with endometriosis could be beneficial for preventing BMD loss and subsequent osteoporosis.

Therefore, the purpose of this study was to clarify the effects of ovarian function and endocrinological factors related to ovarian function on BMD reduction in perimenopausal patients with endometriosis. We investigated the association of BMD with the levels of FSH, AMH, and thyroid hormone in perimenopausal patients with endometriosis.

Methods

Study design and participants

This prospective cohort study included 207 patients who visited the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the University of Tokyo Hospital between December 2015 and December 2020. Following the approval of the study by the University of Tokyo Research Ethics Committee, we obtained written informed consent from all participants. To clarify the effects of ovarian function and endocrinological factors related to ovarian function on BMD reduction in perimenopausal patients with endometriosis, we included patients aged ≥ 40 years who had a history of endometriosis or presented with endometriosis lesions at the time of study participation. Patients with a history of endocrine disorders, such as diabetes, smoking, and steroid administration, factors which could affect bone metabolism, were excluded.

Physical assessment and laboratory analysis

Patient height and body weight were measured as physical measurements to calculate the body mass index (BMI). An ankle-brachial pressure index/pulse wave test was performed, and the upper arm’s systolic and diastolic blood pressures were measured. We analysed blood samples from participants using the chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay method to measure FSH and oestradiol. The electrochemiluminescence immunoassay method was used to measure free T4 (thyroxine), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), and AMH as ovarian function markers. The enzyme immunoassay method was used to measure tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b (TRACP-5b) as a marker of bone resorption. If the test result was below the measurement limit, the result was corrected to the lower limit before the analysis. BMD was measured at the lumbar spine (L2-L4) using the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) method (Discovery DXA System, Hologic, Inc., Marlborough, MA). Using the medical records, we collected information about patient age at testing, history of hormone therapy, surgical history, number of remaining ovaries, whether the patient had undergone menopause, and if so, the age at which menopause occurred.

During the study period, 142 patients (68.6%) who underwent two tests, an initial test and a follow-up test, were analysed at regular intervals based on the annual rate of BMD change. Of the 65 deviating patients, 19 patients ended their outpatient visits to our hospital because of relocation, and 46 patients refused follow-up testing. These patients were excluded from the analysis. We calculated the period between the initial and follow-up testing (years) and used the following formula from previous literature to determine the annual rate of BMD change [24].

$${\text{Annual Rate of BMD change}}\;{\text{(\% /year) = }}\frac{(BMD\;of\;second\;measurement) - (BMD\;of\;Initial\;measurement)}{{(BMD\;of\;Initial\;measurement) \times (year)}} \times 100$$

The patients were divided according to tertiles based on the annual rate of BMD change into severe bone loss, moderate bone loss, and mild bone loss groups. We compared the physical measurements at initial testing, haematological results, history of hormone therapy, surgical history, number of remaining ovaries, and age at menopause among the groups.

All statistical analyses were performed using the STATA statistical package (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX). Statistical comparisons between groups were performed using paired t-test and analysis of variance. A multiple comparison test was performed. Multinomial logistic analysis adjusted for age and body weight was conducted using the mild bone loss group as a reference. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Baseline characteristics

Table 1 shows the characteristics of the study participants. The average age was 45.02 years, and the average BMD was 1.16 g/cm2. The remaining ovaries were on both sides in 129 patients, one side in 73 patients, and none (both sides removed) in 5 patients. There were 70 (33.82%) postmenopausal patients, and the average age at menopause was 46.84 years. In addition, there were 106 patients with a history of hormone therapy within the previous year, and a total of 171 patients had a history of ovarian surgery.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of participants
Full size table

First, we studied factors affecting BMD. Table 2a shows the correlation between BMD and other factors at the initial testing. Pearson correlation analysis identified a significant correlation between BMD and the following factors: age exhibited a very weak negative correlation (r =  − 0.1523, p = 0.0285), body weight, and BMI showed a positive correlation (r = 0.4539; p < 0.0001 and r = 0.3996; p < 0.0001, respectively), whereas FSH showed a weak negative correlation (r =  − 0.3126, p < 0.0001) with BMD. Similarly, free T4 showed a very weak negative correlation (r =  − 0.1604, p = 0.0236) and AMH showed a weak positive correlation (r = 0.2183, p = 0.047) with BMD. FSH and AMH showed a significant association with BMD according to the multiple regression analysis adjusted for age and body weight (FSH: β =  − 0.00071, p = 0.0038; AMH: p = 0.018) (Table 2b).

Table 2 (a) Correlation between BMD and initial measurement. (b) Correlations between BMD, FSH, and AMH adjusted for age and weight: partial regression coefficients
Full size table

Analysis of the changes in BMD

Next, we analysed the rate of change in BMD. Table 3 summarises the data of 142 patients analysed to determine the annual rate of BMD change. The average BMD of initial and follow-up testing ware 1.15 ± 0.16 g/cm2 and 1.14 ± 0.15 g/cm2, respectively. The BMD between the initial and follow-up measurements BMD is significantly different (p = 0.023). The average period between the initial and follow-up testing was 1.41 ± 0.53 (range: 0.25–2.75) years. The changes in BMD and the annual rate of BMD change were 0.02 g/cm2 and − 0.53%/year, respectively.

Table 3 Physical and hormonal characteristics of initial and follow-up measurements for participants who underwent follow-up measurements
Full size table

We examined factors that affected the rate of BMD change. Table 4 shows the correlation between changes in BMD and physical/endocrinological factors measured at the initial test. TSH levels showed a very weak negative correlation (p = 0.0221) with BMD. Other factors were not significantly correlated with the rate of change in BMD.

Table 4 Correlation between change in annual rates of BMD (%/year) and initial measurement
Full size table

Multinomial logistic regression analysis: comparison of the rate of change in BMD by tertiles

We performed a multinomial logistic regression analysis to elucidate the risk factors for annual BMD decrease. The physical/endocrinological factors of each group of participants divided according to tertiles based on the rate of BMD change as per initial and follow-up testing are presented in Table 5. The average ages of the mild bone loss, moderate bone loss, and severe bone loss groups were 44.68 years, 45.09 years, and 45.34 years, respectively, with no significant difference between them. Similarly, the average body weights were 54.33 kg, 56.60 kg, and 55.75 kg, respectively, for the three groups, exhibiting no significant differences. The average BMD were 1.11 ± 0.19 g/cm2, 1.17 ± 0.14 g/cm2, and 1.15 ± 0.13 g/cm2, respectively, for the three groups, exhibiting no significant differences (in mild vs moderate bone loss group, p = 0.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] − 0.032 to 0.16, in moderate vs severe bone loss group, p = 0.86, 95% CI − 0.094 to 0.055, and in mild vs severe bone loss group, p = 0.50, 95% CI − 0.048 to 0.13). Figure 1a depicts the annual rate of BMD change in each group. The annual rates of BMD change in the mild, moderate, and severe bone loss groups were 2.07 ± 2.24%/year, 0.64 ± 0.50%/year, and 3.03 ± 1.12%/year, respectively. Figure 1b shows the TSH values for each group. The TSH values of the three groups were 1.42 ± 0.65 μIU/mL, 1.79 ± 1.28 μIU/mL, and 2.16 ± 1.34 μIU/mL, respectively. There were significant differences between the groups. A greater rate of decrease in BMD was associated with a higher TSH level. Similarly, Fig. 1c shows the average age at menopause in each group. The average age at menopause was 48.04 years, 46.80 years, and 45.13 years, respectively, and exhibited a significant difference. A greater rate of decrease in BMD was associated with a significantly higher average age at menopause. Figure 1d illustrates the results of the multinomial logistic regression analysis of TSH levels corrected for age and BMI. The relative risk of the two remaining groups in comparison with the mild bone loss group was 1.69 ± 0.45 (95% confidence CI 1.01–2.85) in the moderate bone loss group and 2.15 ± 0.57 (95% CI 1.28–3.61) in the severe bone loss group, indicating a significant difference. Multinomial logistic regression analysis with other factors, including FSH and AMH, did not identify a significant increase in the risk of bone loss.

Table 5 Physical and hormonal characteristics among women categorised based on the annual rates of change in BMD
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Comparison of the annual rates of change in the BMD, TSH and age at menopause. a BMD rates of change among the mild, moderate and severe groups. There were significant differences among the groups. b TSH levels in the three groups. There were significant differences among the groups. c Age at menopause in the three groups. There were significant differences among the groups. d Comparison of the relative risk ratios of TSH categorised by BMD rate of change. Values were adjusted for age and body weight. Error bars represent 95% confidence interval for the mean changes. Mild, mild bone density loss group; moderate, moderate bone density loss group; severe, severe bone density loss group; BMD, bone mineral density; TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone. *p < 0.05

Full size image

Discussion

The present study’s results indicated that high FSH and low AMH levels were associated with decreased BMD, suggesting that decreased ovarian function was associated with decreased BMD. Further, a greater rate of decrease in BMD was associated with a higher age at menopause. We showed that TSH was associated with the rate of decrease in BMD and that high TSH level constituted a risk factor for future BMD loss.

Ovarian function and bone mineral density in endometriosis patients

We found that high FSH and low AMH levels were associated with BMD loss in perimenopausal women with endometriosis and demonstrated that a decrease in ovarian function was related to a decrease in BMD. During menopause, FSH secretion from the pituitary gland increases with decreased oestrogen secretion, and high FSH levels persist after menopause [25, 26]. Previous reports have shown an association between elevated FSH levels and decreased BMD in premenopausal women rather than in perimenopausal women [27]. Meanwhile, an association between high FSH levels and decreased BMD was also observed in perimenopausal women [28]. It has also been reported that FSH is involved in the pathophysiology of postmenopausal osteoporosis [29]. The results of the present study supported the previously demonstrated association between elevated FSH levels and decreased BMD. In addition, several previous studies, including meta-analyses, have reported low AMH levels in patients with endometriosis [30,31,32]. Previous studies investigating the association between AMH and decreased BMD due to primary ovarian insufficiency in premenopausal women found a positive correlation between BMD and AMH, even after removing the influence of age [33]. The results of the present study showed that women with endometriosis had lower AMH levels than women without endometriosis, which is a new finding demonstrating the relationship between ovarian reserve and BMD.

Relationship between age at menopause and bone mineral density

In the present study, the age at menopause tended to be higher with a greater rate of decrease in BMD. In recent years, meta-analyses have shown that early-onset menopause increases the risk of fractures [34]. The duration of time after menopause and BMI are important factors determining the risk of osteoporosis [35]. Changes in BMD in perimenopausal women have been reported to include a period of rapid bone loss [36, 37]. The present study investigated the relationship between the rate of change in BMD and age at menopause; it is possible that we evaluated the difference between the rapid and slow periods of BMD change.

Relationship between TSH and bone mineral density

We demonstrated that high TSH levels increased the risk of subsequent BMD loss in perimenopausal patients with endometriosis. Regarding the association between thyroid hormone and BMD, high thyroid hormone levels and TSH suppression therapy have been suggested as risk factors for high turnover osteoporosis [38]. In addition, it is established that in overt hypothyroidism, bone turnover is reduced due to decreased bone resorption and osteoblast function. However, the relationship between hypothyroidism and BMD in adults remains unclear [39]. With regard to the relationship between endometriosis and thyroid diseases, a study in the United States that investigated whether patients with endometriosis experienced more autoimmune disorders and pain showed that hypothyroidism was significantly more common but there was no difference in hyperthyroidism [40]. A meta-analysis investigating the association between endometriosis and autoimmune diseases found no significant association with autoimmune thyroid diseases [41]. Meanwhile, in endometriosis, an association with thyroid autoimmunity has been reported in vitro, suggesting that thyroid hormone and TSH receptors may be involved in ovarian function regulation [42]. The present study demonstrated the relationship between TSH and changes in BMD in patients with endometriosis. This is considered meaningful as a new finding suggesting the involvement of TSH in the pathophysiology of endometriosis and bone metabolism.

Strengths and limitations

The strength of the present study is that it assessed changes in BMD over time, ovarian function, and thyroid hormone levels in perimenopausal patients with endometriosis in a prospective cohort study. A report on the accuracy of the bone densitometry instruments used in this study showed that the coefficient of variation was 1.36% in a population with a lumbar spine (L2-L4) BMD of 1.328 ± 0.175 g/cm2 (mean ± SD) [43]. Since this population had a BMI of 49.6 kg/m2 and a BMD higher than the mean of the subjects in the present study, the coefficient of variation of BMD in the present study was much smaller and is assumed to have little impact on the interpretation of the rate of BMD change.

However, we recognise that there are several limitations. First, we did not consider the effect of menstrual cycles on FSH levels. Although this is not an issue for participants undergoing hormone therapy or after menopause, measurements for other participants should have taken the menstrual cycle into consideration. The second limitation is related to AMH measurements. As the present study measured AMH using the conventional testing method, some cases were below the limit of measurement. These cases were regarded as being at the lower limit value, but this could have led to an overestimation of the ovarian function. In recent years, high-sensitivity AMH testing has been applied in clinical practice. Going forward, the use of high-sensitivity AMH testing is expected to enable more rigorous ovarian reserve assessment, and we would like to conduct research that incorporates such high-sensitivity AMH testing. Third, the study did not address the perimenopausal changes in BMD. As the present study involved a small number of cases and had many deviating cases, the changes over time could only be observed once. Therefore, it was not ascertained whether the change in BMD observed was during a period of rapid BMD decrease in each participant. We believe that further studies with larger cohorts, longer follow-up periods, and consideration of the BMD reduction phase of individuals are required.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated that high FSH or low AMH levels were associated with decreased BMD in perimenopausal patients with endometriosis. Because high TSH levels also increase the risk of subsequent BMD loss, measurements of ovarian reserve and TSH may be useful in estimating BMD loss in perimenopausal women with endometriosis. These findings could assist in disease management in women with endometriosis. It is necessary to conduct further studies on the relationship between ovarian reserve and BMD using high-sensitivity AMH testing.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

BMD:

Bone mineral density

FSH:

Follicle-stimulating hormone

LH:

Luteinising hormone

AMH:

Anti-Müllerian hormone

BMI:

Body mass index

T4 :

Thyroxine

TSH:

Thyroid-stimulating hormone

DXA:

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

CI:

Confidence interval

References

  1. Li L, Wang Z. Ovarian aging and osteoporosis. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1086:199–215.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gambacciani M, Levancini M. Hormone replacement therapy and the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Prz Menopauzalny. 2014;13:213–20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Riggs BL, Khosla S, Melton LJ 3rd. A unitary model for involutional osteoporosis: estrogen deficiency causes both type I and type II osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and contributes to bone loss in aging men. J Bone Miner Res. 1998;13:763–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zebaze RM, Ghasem-Zadeh A, Bohte A, Iuliano-Burns S, Mirams M, Price RI, et al. Intracortical remodelling and porosity in the distal radius and post-mortem femurs of women: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2010;375:1729–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zaidi M, Turner CH, Canalis E, Pacifici R, Sun L, Iqbal J, et al. Bone loss or lost bone: rationale and recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of early postmenopausal bone loss. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2009;7:118–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy. Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. JAMA. 2001;285:785–95.

  7. Zondervan KT, Becker CM, Missmer SA. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1244–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chapron C, Marcellin L, Borghese B, Santulli P. Rethinking mechanisms, diagnosis and management of endometriosis. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2019;15:666–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Falcone T, Flyckt R. Clinical management of endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131:557–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bulun SE, Yilmaz BD, Sison C, Miyazaki K, Bernardi L, Liu S, et al. Endometriosis. Endocr Rev. 2019;40:1048–79.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Grandi G, Mueller MD, Papadia A, Kocbek V, Bersinger NA, Petraglia F, et al. Inflammation influences steroid hormone receptors targeted by progestins in endometrial stromal cells from women with endometriosis. J Reprod Immunol. 2016;117:30–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Matarese G, De Placido G, Nikas Y, Alviggi C. Pathogenesis of endometriosis: natural immunity dysfunction or autoimmune disease? Trends Mol Med. 2003;9:223–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Poppe K, Velkeniers B, Glinoer D. The role of thyroid autoimmunity in fertility and pregnancy. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2008;4:394–405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Visser JA, de Jong FH, Laven JS, Themmen AP. Anti-Mullerian hormone: a new marker for ovarian function. Reproduction. 2006;131:1–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Broer SL, Broekmans FJ, Laven JS, Fauser BC. Anti-Mullerian hormone: ovarian reserve testing and its potential clinical implications. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20:688–701.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Freeman EW, Sammel MD, Lin H, Gracia CR. Anti-Mullerian hormone as a predictor of time to menopause in late reproductive age women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:1673–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Jamil Z, Fatima SS, Ahmed K, Malik R. Anti-Mullerian hormone: above and beyond conventional ovarian reserve markers. Dis Markers. 2016;2016:5246217.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lane N, Baptista J, Orwoll E. Bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in women with endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 1991;55:537–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dochi T, Lees B, Sidhu M, Stevenson JC. Bone density and endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 1994;61:175–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Melton LJ 3rd, Leibson CL, Good AE, Achenbach SJ, Oberg AL, Khosla S. Long-term fracture risk among women with proven endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:1576–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sauerbrun-Cutler MT, Alvero R. Short- and long-term impact of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue treatment on bone loss and fracture. Fertil Steril. 2019;112:799–803.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Seo JW, Lee DY, Yoon BK, Choi D. Effects of long-term postoperative dienogest use for treatment of endometriosis on bone mineral density. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;212:9–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gosset A, Escanes C, Pouilles JM, Vidal F, Tanguy Le Gac Y, Plu-Bureau G, et al. Bone mineral density in women with deep infiltrating endometriosis who have undergone early bilateral oophorectomy. Menopause. 2020;28:300–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yoshimura N, Kasamatsu T, Sakata K, Hashimoto T, Cooper C. The relationship between endogenous estrogen, sex hormone-binding globulin, and bone loss in female residents of a rural Japanese community: the Taiji Study. J Bone Miner Metab. 2002;20:303–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Burger HG, Hale GE, Robertson DM, Dennerstein L. A review of hormonal changes during the menopausal transition: focus on findings from the Melbourne Women’s Midlife Health Project. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13:559–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Randolph JF Jr, Zheng H, Sowers MR, Crandall C, Crawford S, Gold EB, et al. Change in follicle-stimulating hormone and estradiol across the menopausal transition: effect of age at the final menstrual period. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:746–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sowers MR, Finkelstein JS, Ettinger B, Bondarenko I, Neer RM, Cauley JA, et al. The association of endogenous hormone concentrations and bone mineral density measures in pre- and perimenopausal women of four ethnic groups: SWAN. Osteoporos Int. 2003;14:44–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sowers MR, Zheng H, Greendale GA, Neer RM, Cauley JA, Ellis J, et al. Changes in bone resorption across the menopause transition: effects of reproductive hormones, body size, and ethnicity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98:2854–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhu D, Li X, Macrae VE, Simoncini T, Fu X. Extragonadal effects of follicle-stimulating hormone on osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease in women during menopausal transition. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2018;29:571–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim YJ, Cha SW, Kim HO. Serum anti-Mullerian hormone levels decrease after endometriosis surgery. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;37:342–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Romanski PA, Brady PC, Farland LV, Thomas AM, Hornstein MD. The effect of endometriosis on the antiMullerian hormone level in the infertile population. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36:1179–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Muzii L, Di Tucci C, Di Feliciantonio M, Galati G, Di Donato V, Musella A, et al. AntiMullerian hormone is reduced in the presence of ovarian endometriomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(932):e931.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Yan Y, Chen W, Wang J, Huang J, Lv J, Zhao H, et al. Serum anti-Mullerian hormone levels are associated with low bone mineral density in premenopausal women. Biomarkers. 2020;25:693–700.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Anagnostis P, Siolos P, Gkekas NK, Kosmidou N, Artzouchaltzi AM, Christou K, et al. Association between age at menopause and fracture risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocrine. 2019;63:213–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Fistarol M, Rezende CR, Figueiredo Campos AL, Kakehasi AM, Geber S. Time since menopause, but not age, is associated with increased risk of osteoporosis. Climacteric. 2019;22:523–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Karlamangla AS, Burnett-Bowie SM, Crandall CJ. Bone health during the menopause transition and beyond. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 2018;45:695–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Finkelstein JS, Brockwell SE, Mehta V, Greendale GA, Sowers MR, Ettinger B, et al. Bone mineral density changes during the menopause transition in a multiethnic cohort of women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:861–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Brancatella A, Marcocci C. TSH suppressive therapy and bone. Endocr Connect. 2020;9:R158–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Delitala AP, Scuteri A, Doria C. Thyroid hormone diseases and osteoporosis. J Clin Med. 2020;9:1034.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Sinaii N, Cleary SD, Ballweg ML, Nieman LK, Stratton P. High rates of autoimmune and endocrine disorders, fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome and atopic diseases among women with endometriosis: a survey analysis. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:2715–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Shigesi N, Kvaskoff M, Kirtley S, Feng Q, Fang H, Knight JC, et al. The association between endometriosis and autoimmune diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25:486–503.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Aghajanova L, Lindeberg M, Carlsson IB, Stavreus-Evers A, Zhang P, Scott JE, et al. Receptors for thyroid-stimulating hormone and thyroid hormones in human ovarian tissue. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;18:337–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Carver TE, Christou N, Court O, Lemke H, Andersen RE. In vivo precision of the GE lunar iDXA for the assessment of lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck, and total body bone mineral density in severely obese patients. J Clin Densitom. 2014;17:109–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Kyoko Hattori for managing our work and Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

Funding

This study was supported by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (Grant Numbers 15gk0210007h0101 and 20gk0210018h0003) and the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (19FB0101and Large-scale demonstration project on prevention and health promotion).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan

    Mari Uehara, Osamu Wada-Hiraike, Mana Hirano, Kaori Koga & Yutaka Osuga

  2. Department of Preventive Medicine for Locomotive Organ Disorders, 22nd Century Medical and Research Center, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan

    Noriko Yoshimura

  3. Department of Sensory and Motor System Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan

    Sakae Tanaka

Authors
  1. Mari Uehara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Osamu Wada-Hiraike
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mana Hirano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kaori Koga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Noriko Yoshimura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sakae Tanaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yutaka Osuga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MU, OWH, KK, NY, ST, and YO made substantial contributions to the study conception and design. MU and MH contributed to the acquisition of data and analysis and interpretation of data. OWH was the principal investigator and played a significant role in the interpretation of data. MU and OWH have been involved in drafting the manuscript, and NY, ST, and YO revised it critically for important intellectual content. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript, and YO gave the approval to submit the latest version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Osamu Wada-Hiraike.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Ethical approval for this study was obtained from The University of Tokyo Hospital Institutional Review Board (approval number: 0324). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Uehara, M., Wada-Hiraike, O., Hirano, M. et al. Relationship between bone mineral density and ovarian function and thyroid function in perimenopausal women with endometriosis: a prospective study. BMC Women's Health 22, 134 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-01711-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-01711-3

Keywords

BMC Women's Health

ISSN: 1472-6874

Contact us