Skip to main content
Download PDF

The prevalence and phenotypic manifestations of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) among infertile Sudanese women: a cross-sectional study

BMC Women's Health volume 22, Article number: 165 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a global health problem associated with significant morbidity during reproductive age. Only a few published studies that address the clinical manifestations and phenotypic presentation of the disease have been conducted in Africa, including Sudan. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the clinical and biochemical presentation of the different PCOS phenotypes among infertile Sudanese women.

Methods

A cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted from January to December 2019. A total of 368 infertile women with PCOS (based on the Rotterdam criteria) were recruited from a fertility center in Khartoum, Sudan. Clinical, hormonal, and ultrasonographic characteristics were described and compared between the four phenotypes of PCOS.

Results

Majority (321 [87.2%]) of the women had oligo/anovulation (OA). Polycystic ovary morphology on ultrasound appeared in 236 (64.1%) women, acne in 171 (46.5%) women, acanthosis nigricans in 81 (22.0%) women, and hirsutism in 101 (27.4%) women. Phenotype D was the most prevalent among infertile Sudanese women (51.6%), followed by phenotype B (22.6%), phenotype C (18.2%), and phenotype A (7.6%). No statistical differences in the body mass index and hormonal profile between the four phenotypes were noted. Women with phenotype A were older and had high mean blood pressure, and a higher waist/hip ratio was observed among women with phenotype D.

Conclusion

Unlike the global distribution of PCOS phenotypes, Sudanese women uniquely expressed phenotype D as the most prevalent. More epidemiological studies are needed in the region due to geographical, ethnic, and genetic variations.

Plain English summary

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a global health problem associated with significant drawbacks during reproductive life. Few published studies have been conducted in Africa (including Sudan) addressing the clinical manifestations and phenotypic presentation of the disease. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the clinical and biochemical presentation of the different PCOS phenotypes among infertile Sudanese women. A total of 368 infertile women with PCOS from a fertility center in Khartoum, Sudan, participated in the study. Clinical, hormonal, and ultrasonographic characteristics were described and compared between the four phenotype groups of PCOS. In this regard, Sudanese women uniquely expressed phenotype D as the most prevalent, and this does not match with the global distribution of PCOS phenotypes. Moreover, women with phenotype A were older and had high mean blood pressure, and a higher waist/hip ratio was observed among women with phenotype D. More epidemiological studies on this subject are needed in the region due to geographical, ethnic, and genetic variations.

Peer Review reports

Background

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a combination of metabolic, endocrinological, and genetic disorders. This syndrome is common during the reproductive age, with a global prevalence of 5–20% [1, 2]. PCOS can lead to poor obstetric outcomes such as infertility, pregnancy loss, gestational diabetes, and macrosomia [1]. Furthermore, metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and increased cardiovascular disease risk are recognized complications of this condition [3, 4]. Accumulating evidence suggests that one of the most important mechanisms of PCOS pathogenesis is insulin resistance [3, 4]. For this reason, the use of insulin sensitizers, such as inositol isoforms, has gained increasing attention due to their safety profile and effectiveness [5, 6].

The European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) and the American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) have set criteria for the diagnosis of PCOS (Rotterdam 2003) [7]. The Rotterdam criteria include oligo-anovulation (OA) (cycles greater than 35-day intervals or 8 cycles or less per year), hyperandrogenism (HA), and polycystic ovary morphology (PCOM) (ovarian volume of 10 ml and/or an antral follicle count [AFC] of more than 12 cysts of 2–9 mm in diameter, any two being enough for the diagnosis of PCOS) [7]. Based on Rotterdam criteria, four main phenotypes were described: phenotype A, composed of OA, HA, and PCOM; phenotype B (OA and HA); phenotype C (HA and PCO); and phenotype D (OA and PCO) [8]. ESHRE 2018 guidelines recommend the assessment of clinical HA (hirsutism, acne, and alopecia). In this regard, hirsutism was assessed through a modified Ferriman-Gallwey score (mFG) with a diagnostic level of ≥ 4–6 [9]. It is noteworthy that the expression of PCOS has varied depending on geographical and ethnic differences even in the same country [10]. Furthermore, phenotype A has been reported as dominant in more than half of published clinical data [11, 12]. Even though data on PCOS in different settings have been published, no data on the epidemiology of PCOS in Africa exist [1]. Thus, we aimed to assess the clinical manifestations of PCOS phenotypes among infertile Sudanese women.

Methods

Study design and settings

A cross-sectional study was conducted at Saad Abualila Infertility Center (Khartoum, Sudan) from the first of January to the end of December 2019. During the study, the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies were strictly followed [13].

The outcome measures

The main outcome measures were prevalence and clinical, hormonal, and ultrasonographic features of PCOS phenotypes.

Study population and sampling techniques

All confirmed PCOS cases (according to Rotterdam criteria) of reproductive age (18–45 years) who attended the infertility center of the Saad Abualila Hospital at the time of the study were included. Exclusion criteria included the following: women with diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, pregnancy, and endocrine diseases and women who received hormonal treatments in the last six months before the study.

The sample size was determined using the formula of calculating the sample size of frequency in a population. We hypothesized that phenotype D would be prevalent in 50% of the women with PCOS, as there was no available data among the population in the region. However, previous reports have demonstrated that 51.6% of women expressed phenotype D of PCOS [14]. The resulting sample size was 384 with a 95% level of confidence and a 5% margin of error.

Data collection

After signing informed consent, all participants passed through three stages: questionnaire, physical examination, and ultrasonography. The questionnaire includes dermatological complaints (acanthosis nigricans), sociodemographic data, and medical, obstetric, menstrual, and gynecological history. Physical examination was conducted by the gynecologist who ran the clinics. Weight in kilograms, height in centimeters, and blood pressure were measured. Waist/hip ratio (WHR) was measured according to World Health Organization (WHO) protocol using a stretch-resistant tape [15]. Hirsutism was assessed through the modified Ferriman-Gallwey (mFG) score. The presence of acne, acanthosis nigricans, and alopecia was detected through visual assessment as well. Ultrasonographic examinations were performed by for all participants; the number of follicles in each ovary and the ovarian volume were determined. A total of 5 ml of blood was drawn from each respondent to test follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and total testosterone (TT). All serum hormone analyses were conducted using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Stat Fax 2600 ELISA System, USA). Afterward, PCOS cases were identified and classified into the four phenotypes: A, B, C, and D.

Definitions and measurements

PCOS diagnosis was made in the presence of at least two criteria: OA defined as cycles (vaginal bleeding episodes) greater than 35–day intervals or 8 cycles or less per year and biochemical and/or clinical HA. The hirsutism is defined at the cut-off of ⩾ 4–6 mFG score as per ESHRE PCOS guideline 2018 [9]. PCO was detected under the guide of the Rotterdam criterion (ovarian volume of 10 ml and/or an AFC of 12 cysts or more, measuring 2–9 mm in diameter) [7]. The ultrasonography was operated by a gynecologist who ran the clinics and diagnosed PCOS cases. A transducer of a 6.5 MHz frequency was used for this purpose. To measure biochemical HA, TT was measured using an immunoassay analyzer (AIA 360, Tosoh, Japan), and levels > 0.88 ng/mL were considered diagnostic for HA [16]. BMI was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the squared height in meters. WHO classification was used to classify the women according to their BMIs as follows: normal weight (18.5–24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25.0–29.9 kg/m2), or obese (30.0–34.9 kg/m2) [17]. Blood pressures > 140 systolic and > 90 diastolic were considered abnormal. Hypertension defined as blood pressure > 140/90 mmHg was noted on two or more occasions using the same calibrated mercury manometer.

Furthermore, according to WHO protocol, the waist circumference was measured at the midpoint between the lower margin of the last palpable ribs and the top of the iliac crest using stretch‐resistant tape. Hip circumference was measured around the widest portion of the buttocks, with the tape parallel to the floor. PCOS cases were divided into four phenotypes: A (OA, HA, and PCO), B (HA and OA), C (HA and PCO), and D (OA and PCO).

Statistical analysis

Data were entered into a computer using SPSS for analysis. Continuous data were assessed for normal distribution using the Shapiro–Wilk test. All continuous data were not found to be normally distributed and were compared between the four phenotype groups of PCOS using Kruskal–Wallis. Dichotomous variables were compared with a two-tailed Chi-square or Fischer exact test where appropriate. P-value > 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Out of 384 PCOS women who were targeted as our sample size, 368 were enrolled in the study after the exclusion of 16 subjects who did not fulfill the inclusion criteria.

The median (interquartile range) age of the sample was 26.0 (7.9) years; moreover, 274 (71.7%) women have higher than a secondary level of education, and 156 (42.4%) were employees (Table 1). Physical examination revealed that 156 (42.4%) women were obese and 10 (2.7%) had hypertension (Table 1).

Table 1 Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of infertile women in Khartoum, Sudan
Full size table

The clinical presentation of infertile Sudanese women is shown in Table 1. The median (interquartile range) of the WHR was 0.97 (0.05) cm. The majority of the women (321 [87.2%]) presented OA. PCO appeared in 236 (64.1%), acne in 171 (46.5%), acanthosis nigricans in 81 (22.0%), and hirsutism in 101 (27.4%) (Table 1). Phenotype D was the most prevalent among infertile Sudanese women (51.6%), followed by phenotype B (22.6%), phenotype C (18.2%), and phenotype A (7.6%) (Table 2, Fig. 1).

Table 2 Clinical manifestations and frequency of polycystic ovary syndrome phenotypes in Khartoum, Sudan
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Frequency of PCOS phenotypes in Khartoum, Sudan

Full size image

Furthermore, no statistical differences in BMI, hormonal profile (TT, LH, FSH), and LH/FSH ratio were detected between the four phenotypes (Table 3). Significantly higher median age and mean blood pressure were reported in women with phenotype A when compared with other phenotypes: (P = 0.046) and (P = 0.001), respectively. WHR was significantly higher among women with phenotype D (P = 0.043) compared to phenotype groups A, B, and C (Table 3).

Table 3 Clinical, hormonal and participant’s characteristics among the four polycystic ovary syndrome phenotypes in Khartoum, Sudan
Full size table

Discussion

In the present study, 42.4% of the women were obese. Another published study demonstrated that BMI was significantly higher among infertile PCOS cases in Khartoum, Sudan [18]. A higher frequency (63.7%) of obesity was also noted in PCOS women in California, USA [19]. However, a lower prevalence of obesity (31.4%) was reported among infertile Jordanian women with PCOS [20]. In the current study, 87.2% of the women with PCOS had OA, and this aligns with the previous finding that OA accounts for 70% of the cases [21]. However, Azziz et al. observed that approximately 80% of the women with PCOS had OD [22].

Approximately two-thirds of the women in this study presented diagnostic ultrasonographic features of PCO. Likewise, it has been documented that PCOM on ultrasound is the most common feature of PCOS [12]. This finding was comparable to a previous study from Denmark [23], lower than findings from China (94.2%) [24], and higher than the prevalence reported among Tanzanian women (78.1%) [25]. Perhaps the low predictive value of PCOM could be explained by whether 5 MHz or 7.9 MHz ultrasound probes were used [12, 23]. Clinical HA is widely manifested among PCOS patients. In this regard, Jamil et al. have reported that most of the investigated women with PCOS had HA [26]. In our study, we observed that 27.4% of participants had hirsutism. Similar results of hirsutism (30.6%) were demonstrated in an infertile cohort of Nigerian women with PCOS [27]. The prevalence of hirsutism was nearly double (60.4%) among infertile women with PCOS in Egypt [28]. Ultimately, the expression of hirsutism varies depending on the geographical regions, ethnicity, and genetics, and it is important to develop a population-specific cut-off level. Approximately 70% of women with hirsutism have PCOS [29].

In the current study, approximately half (46.5%) of the women had acne. A much lower incidence (15.6%) of acne was reported in China [24]. These wide variations could be attributed to the ethnic differences between Asian and African populations. Around a fifth (22.0%) of the women in our study showed acanthosis nigricans at the time of examination. This cutaneous manifestation was similarly documented in Erbil, Iraq (28.5%) [26]. Another study among Vietnamese women with PCOS indicates that only 1.5% exhibited acanthosis nigricans [16]. These differences could be explained by the nature of the study’s population. Contrary to the Vietnamese study, our study and the Iraqi study were conducted on infertile cohorts.

On another note, in the current study, phenotype D was the most prevalent among infertile Sudanese women (51.6%), followed by phenotype B (22.6%), phenotype C (18.2%), and phenotype A (7.6%). These findings align with a study from China and Iran [14] that reported phenotype D as the most prevalent. Furthermore, we observed unique distribution among infertile Sudanese women indicating phenotype A as the least prevalent (7.6%). Globally published data indicate that more than half of PCOS patients identified within the clinical settings demonstrate phenotype [11, 12]. Overall, it seems that the classic form of PCOS (i.e., phenotypes A and B) constitutes approximately two-thirds of the total of PCOS patients identified within the clinical settings [30]. Unfortunately, insufficient data exist regarding the distribution of phenotypes in women with PCOS identified in medically unbiased (i.e., unselected) populations, which would more accurately reflect the distribution of phenotypes in PCOS in the “natural” state. A meta-analysis of studies on PCOS has provided further evidence of referral bias for the PCOS phenotype [11].

Few published studies recently documented the distribution of PCOS phenotypes using Rotterdam criteria [31, 32]. In these studies, around two-thirds of PCOS women expressed phenotypes B and C; however, phenotype A and phenotype D had equal rates of prevalence. It is noteworthy that the differences in the rates of expression of PCOS phenotypes even in the same settings could be explained by whether the assessment of the women occurred either while they were seeking medical care or while they were attending a routine health assessment [19, 33].

In this study, no statistical differences in BMI, hormonal profile (TT, LH, FSH), and LH/FSH ratio were observed between the four phenotypes. However, Jamil et al. observed higher BMI among women with phenotypes A and B, but they agreed on the absence of significant differences in the hormonal profile (LH and FSH) [26]. In line with our findings, Sahmay et al. did not report significant differences in TT among the four phenotypes [34].

In this study, phenotype A women were significantly older and had higher blood pressure than women with other phenotypes. The association between advanced age and increased blood pressure among PCOS women was confirmed in a recent Brazilian study [35]. Furthermore, it has been reported that the classic PCOS (phenotypes A and B) can be referred to as the complete phenotype [36].

Additionally, the results of the current study revealed that WHR was significantly higher among women with phenotype D compared to women with phenotypes A, B, and C. In contrast to our findings, other studies reported that WHR was higher in the classic phenotypes A and B [16, 37]. WHR reflects truncal obesity, insulin resistance, and metabolic syndrome. However, various previous studies did not report a significant difference in insulin resistance and dyslipidemia between different PCOS phenotypes [38]. An assessment of studies in Africa highlights the lack of research among Black women in Sub-Saharan Africa, where no large-scale epidemiologic studies of PCOS have been conducted and only very few studies on the PCOS phenotype exist [25, 27, 39]. Furthermore, PCOS among Black women may be associated with additional or more severe morbidities, such as uterine leiomyomata, compared to White women [40]. Furthermore, future research must address several points such as current challenges for ovarian stimulation in patients affected by PCOS [41, 42].

Conclusion

Infertile Sudanese women uniquely expressed phenotype D as the most prevalent PCOS phenotype. The majority of the study population presented OA, followed by PCOS and clinical HA. No published data on PCOS phenotypes in Sudan have been published, and only a few studies have been conducted in Africa. Therefore, this highlights a need for epidemiological studies in Africa concerning PCOS phenotypes, particularly due to genetic, racial, and geographical variations.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

PCOS:

Polycystic ovary syndrome

ESHRE:

The European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology

ASRM:

The American Society of Reproductive Medicine

AFC:

Antral follicle count

OA:

Oligo-anovulation

HA:

Hyperandrogenism

PCOM:

Polycystic ovary morphology

mFG:

Modified Ferriman-Gallwey score

WHR:

Waist/hip ratio

WHO:

World Health Organization

FSH:

Follicular stimulating hormone

LH:

Luteinizing hormone

TT:

Total testosterone

BMI:

Body mass index

References

  1. Ntumy M, Maya E, Lizneva D, Adanu R, Azziz R. The pressing need for standardization in epidemiologic studies of PCOS across the globe. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019;35:1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bozdag G, Mumusoglu S, Zengin D, Karabulut E, Yildiz BO. The prevalence and phenotypic features of polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:2841–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hallajzadeh J, Khoramdad M, Karamzad N, Almasi-Hashiani A, Janati A, Ayubi E, et al. Metabolic syndrome and its components among women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2018;10:56–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tay CT, Hart RJ, Hickey M, Moran LJ, Earnest A, Doherty DA, et al. Updated adolescent diagnostic criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome: impact on prevalence and longitudinal body mass index trajectories from birth to adulthood. BMC Med. 2020;18:389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Laganà AS, Rossetti P, Buscema M, La Vignera S, Condorelli RA, Gullo G, et al. Metabolism and ovarian function in PCOS women: a therapeutic approach with inositols. Int J Endocrinol. 2016;2016:6306410. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6306410.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Paul C, Laganà AS, Maniglio P, Triolo O, Brady DM. Inositol’s and other nutraceuticals’ synergistic actions counteract insulin resistance in polycystic ovarian syndrome and metabolic syndrome: state-of-the-art and future perspectives. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016;32:431–8. https://doi.org/10.3109/09513590.2016.1144741.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fauser BCJM, Tarlatzis F, Chang A, Legro R, et al. Consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2003;2004(19):41–7.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Evidence-based Methodology Workshop on Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) | NIH Office of Disease Prevention Website https://prevention.nih.gov/research-priorities/research-needs-and-gaps/pathways-prevention/evidence-based-methodology-workshop-polycystic-ovary-syndrome-pcos. Accessed 28 Apr 2022.

  9. Teede HJ, Misso ML, Costello MF, Dokras A, Laven J, Moran L, et al. Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:1602–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao H, Song X, Zhang L, Xu Y, Wang X. Comparison of androgen levels, endocrine and metabolic indices, and clinical findings in women with polycystic ovary syndrome in uygur and han ethnic groups from Xinjiang province in China. Med Sci Monit. 2018;24:6774–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lizneva D, Kirubakaran R, Mykhalchenko K, Suturina L, Chernukha G, Diamond MP, et al. Phenotypes and body mass in women with polycystic ovary syndrome identified in referral versus unselected populations: systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:1510-1520.e2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mumusoglu S, Yildiz BO. Polycystic ovary syndrome phenotypes and prevalence: differential impact of diagnostic criteria and clinical versus unselected population. Curr Opin Endocrine Metab Res. 2020;12:66–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Prev Med (Baltim). 2007;45:247–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mehrabian F, Khani B, Kelishadi R, Kermani N. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance according to the phenotypic subgroups of polycystic ovary syndrome in a representative sample of Iranian females. J Res Med Sci. 2011;16:763–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. NCDs | STEPwise approach to surveillance (STEPS). WHO. 2020. https://www.who.int/teams/noncommunicable-diseases/surveillance/systems-tools/steps. Accessed 28 Apr 2022.

  16. Cao NT, Le MT, Nguyen VQH, Pilgrim J, Le VNS, Le DD, et al. Defining polycystic ovary syndrome phenotype in Vietnamese women. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019;45:2209–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Erika O, Megumi H, Motoi S, Dang DA, Le HT, Nguyen TTT, et al. Maternal body mass index and gestational weight gain and their association with perinatal outcomes in Viet Nam. Bull World Heal Organ. 2011;89:127–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mohammed S, Awooda HA, Rayis DA, Hamdan HZ, Adam I, Lutfi MF. Thyroid function/antibodies in sudanese women with polycystic ovarian disease. Obs Gynecol Sci. 2017;60:187–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ezeh U, Yildiz BO, Azziz R. Referral bias in defining the phenotype and prevalence of obesity in polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(6):E1088–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Al-Jefout M, Alnawaiseh N, Al-Qtaitat A. Insulin resistance and obesity among infertile women with different polycystic ovary syndrome phenotypes. Sci Rep. 2017;7:5339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fairley DH, Taylor A. Anovulation. BMJ. 2003;327:546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Azziz R, Carmina E, Dewailly D, Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Escobar-Morreale HF, Futterweit W, et al. The androgen excess and PCOS society criteria for the polycystic ovary syndrome: the complete task force report. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:456–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lauritsen MP, Bentzen JG, Pinborg A, Loft A, Forman JL, Thuesen LL, et al. The prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in a normal population according to the Rotterdam criteria versus revised criteria including anti-Müllerian hormone. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:791–801.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang HY, Guo CX, Zhu FF, Qu PP, Lin WJ, Xiong J. Clinical characteristics, metabolic features, and phenotype of Chinese women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a large-scale case-control study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;287:525–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pembe AB, Abeid MS. Polycystic ovaries and associated clinical and biochemical features among women with infertility in a tertiary hospital in Tanzania. Tanzan J Health Res. 2009;11:175–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jamil AS, Alalaf SK, Al-Tawil NG, Al-Shawaf T. Comparison of clinical and hormonal characteristics among four phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome based on the Rotterdam criteria. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;293:447–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ugwu GO, Iyoke CA, Onah HE, Mba SG. Prevalence, presentation and management of polycystic ovary syndrome in Enugu, south east Nigeria. Niger J Med. 2013;22:313–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sanad AS. Prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome among fertile and infertile women in Minia Governorate. Egypt Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2014;125:81–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fauser BCJM, Tarlatzis BC, Rebar RW, Legro RS, Balen AH, Lobo R, et al. Consensus on women’s health aspects of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): The Amsterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored 3rd PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. In: Fertility and Sterility. Elsevier Inc.; 2012. p. 28–38.e25.

  30. Wild RA, Carmina E, Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Dokras A, Escobar-Morreale HF, Futterweit W, et al. Assessment of cardiovascular risk and prevention of cardiovascular disease in women with the polycystic ovary syndrome: a consensus statement by the androgen excess and polycystic ovary syndrome (AE-PCOS) society. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010; 2038–49.

  31. Li R, Zhang Q, Yang D, Li S, Lu S, Wu X, et al. Prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in women in China: a large community-based study. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2562–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Moran C, Tena G, Moran S, Ruiz P, Reyna R, Duque X. Prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome and related disorders in mexican women. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2010;69:274–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Luque-Ramírez M, Escobar-Morreale HF. Polycystic ovary syndrome as a paradigm for prehypertension, prediabetes, and preobesity. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2014;16:500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sahmay S, Atakul N, Oncul M, Tuten A, Aydogan B, Seyisoglu H. Serum anti-mullerian hormone levels in the main phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;170:157–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. de Medeiros SF, Yamamoto MMW, de Medeiros MAS, Barbosa BB, Soares JM, Baracat EC. Changes in clinical and biochemical characteristics of polycystic ovary syndrome with advancing age. Endocr Connect. 2020;9:74–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Azziz R. Polycystic ovary syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132:321–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang HY, Zhu FF, Xiong J, Shi XB, Fu SX. Characteristics of different phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome based on the Rotterdam criteria in a large-scale Chinese population. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;116:1633–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Cupisti S, Haeberle L, Schell C, Richter H, Schulze C, Hildebrandt T, et al. The different phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome: no advantages for identifying women with aggravated insulin resistance or impaired lipids. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2011;119:502–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Ogueh O, Zini M, Williams S, Ighere J. The prevalence of polycystic ovary morphology among women attending a new teaching hospital in southern Nigeria. Afr J Reprod Health. 2014;18:160–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wise LA, Palmer JR, Stewart EA, Rosenberg L. Polycystic ovary syndrome and risk of uterine leiomyomata. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:1108–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Facchinetti F, Espinola MSB, Dewailly D, Ozay AC, Prapas N, Vazquez-Levin M, et al. Breakthroughs in the use of inositols for assisted reproductive treatment (ART). Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2020;31:570–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TEM.2020.04.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Laganà AS, Vitagliano A, Noventa M, Ambrosini G, D’Anna R. Myo-inositol supplementation reduces the amount of gonadotropins and length of ovarian stimulation in women undergoing IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018;298:675–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00404-018-4861-Y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan

    Alawia N. Elasam & Mohamed A. Ahmed

  2. College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia

    Abdel B. A. Ahmed, Manal E. Sharif, Abdalla Abusham & Bahaeldin Hassan

  3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Unaizah College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Unaizah, 56219, Saudi Arabia

    Ishag Adam

Authors
  1. Alawia N. Elasam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohamed A. Ahmed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abdel B. A. Ahmed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Manal E. Sharif
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Abdalla Abusham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Bahaeldin Hassan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ishag Adam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AN, idea generation and data collection, MA, data collection, AA, manuscript writing, ME, idea generation, AB, data interpretation, BH, manuscript writing, IA, data analysis. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed A. Ahmed.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Research and Ethical Committee of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Sudan (#2018, 11). Informed consents were signed by the participant.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elasam, A.N., Ahmed, M.A., Ahmed, A.B.A. et al. The prevalence and phenotypic manifestations of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) among infertile Sudanese women: a cross-sectional study. BMC Women's Health 22, 165 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-01762-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-01762-6

Keywords

BMC Women's Health

ISSN: 1472-6874

Contact us