Skip to main content
Download PDF

Self-efficacy and positive thinking as predictors of health-related quality of life in women with stress urinary incontinence

BMC Women's Health volume 22, Article number: 444 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI), which causes involuntarily leakage of urine, has an impact on many women and may affect self-efficacy, which, in turn, can lead to poor health-related quality of life (QOL). This study aimed to explore the effects of sociodemographic and health information, symptom distress, self-efficacy, and positive thinking on the health-related QOL (general QOL and urinary incontinence-specific QOL) of women with SUI.

Methods

A cross-sectional study design was used. Women with SUI were recruited from the obstetrics and gynecology outpatient department and urodynamics examination room of a hospital by convenience sampling from August 2021 to March 2022. Participants were surveyed on the following questionnaires: Urogenital Distress Inventory, Geriatric Self-efficacy Index for Urinary Incontinence, Positive Thinking Scale, 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12), and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire Short Form.

Results

Participants (N = 135) had a mean age of 53.76 years old. The mean SF-12 physical component summary score was 48.48 (physical QOL), and the mental component summary score was 46.56 (mental QOL). The urinary incontinence-specific QOL score was 16.01. Women with greater positive thinking and higher self-efficacy for urinary incontinence had better physical and mental QOL. Women with less symptom distress of urinary incontinence and higher self-efficacy for urinary incontinence had better urinary incontinence-specific QOL.

Conclusion

The health-related QOL of women with SUI is affected by many factors, including positive thinking, self-efficacy, and symptom distress. Healthcare professionals can provide multifaceted programs to improve the health-related QOL of women with SUI.

Highlights

• General quality of life was influenced by positive thinking in women with SUI.

• Health-related QOL was influenced by self-efficacy in women with SUI.

• Symptom distress was a predictor of urinary incontinence-specific QOL.

• Multi-element programs are needed to improve the health-related QOL of women with SUI.

Peer Review reports

Background

Urinary incontinence refers to the involuntary outflow of urine from the body of an individual. Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) occurs when the detrusor muscles do not contract during instances of increased abdominal pressure, caused by activities such as coughing, laughing, lifting weights, and sneezing [1]. A survey showed that 45.9% of women have experienced SUI [2]. SUI can be alleviated through weight loss, pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), extracorporeal electromagnetic stimulation, medications, and surgery [1, 3, 4]. Some women consider urinary incontinence to be a normal phenomenon caused by aging or other reasons, and, thus, they are not properly evaluated and treated [5]. In more conservative eastern countries, in particular, many women seek medical attention only when the distress caused by SUI becomes severe, and many women with mild SUI do not receive any treatment [5, 6].

Symptoms of urinary incontinence and the distress generated can leave women feeling alone [7]. Many women with urinary incontinence are self-deprecating, shy, remorseful, and embarrassed and feel hopeless [8]; they withdraw socially or avoid certain activities [8, 9], thereby worsening their health-related quality of life (QOL) [6, 10]. Evidence has shown that the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has had a negative impact on individuals’ mental health, which may have resulted in the deterioration of health-related QOL in women with SUI [11].

QOL is a subjective, multifaceted, and complex concept and is one of the vital indicators used when evaluating the benefits of care [12, 13]. Scholars argue that an individual’s health-related QOL consists of different levels, including physiological, psychological, social, and spiritual and involves disease- and treatment-related symptoms [13]. Health-related QOL can be assessed through disease-specific and general approaches [12, 13].

Urinary incontinence increases the incidence of social dysfunction in women [9]. Women with more symptom distress of urinary incontinence experience a greater impact of SUI on their travel, social and physical activities, and emotional well-being [6]. A study in Australia found that, when patients with urinary incontinence had mixed symptoms of depression, all aspects of their health-related QOL were worse than those of other patients without symptoms of depression [10].

Self-efficacy is a manifestation of an individual’s confidence in achieving a certain goal [14, 15]. Self-efficacy for urinary incontinence refers to an individual’s confidence or self-efficacy in preventing involuntary urinary leakage [16]. Self-efficacy determines whether an individual can adopt or modify self-care behavior after obtaining relevant care information and knowledge [14, 15]. Women who have a higher self-efficacy for urinary incontinence are expected to be more able to adopt or modify self-care behaviors to prevent involuntary urinary leakage [14, 16], thereby maintaining their health-related QOL [16, 17]. If the self-efficacy for urinary incontinence in women with SUI can be improved, then their health-related QOL can be enhanced [4, 16].

Positive thinking is both a positive cognition and a coping behavior [18]. Previous studies have shown that individuals with greater positive thinking have higher life satisfaction [19] and are happier [20]. According to the author’s best knowledge, no studies have explored the correlation between positive thinking and health-related QOL (general QOL and urinary incontinence-specific QOL) in women with SUI. Therefore, this study aimed to explore health-related QOL and its predictors in women with SUI. The factors associated with health-related QOL explored in this study include sociodemographic and health characteristics, symptom distress, self-efficacy for urinary incontinence, and positive thinking.

Methods

Design and study sample

A cross-sectional study design was used. Women with SUI were recruited from the obstetrics and gynecology outpatient department and urodynamics examination room of a hospital through convenience sampling from August 2021 to March 2022. During the study period, potential participants were referred by an obstetrician. In addition, flyers used to advertise the study were placed in the outpatient department to recruit participants from the hospital. Women who were willing to participate in the study could contact the investigator. The investigator ensured that women met the inclusion criteria by interviewing them and checking their medical records. The research methodology, content, and study purpose were explained to eligible women. After obtaining verbal and written consent, a structured questionnaire was given to participants. The inclusion criteria were as follows: women with SUI confirmed by a physician; over 20 years old; and agreed to participate in the study and sign a consent form. Exclusion criteria were as follows: women with a Barthel Index score below 90; those who had urinary catheters; those who were unable to communicate; those with urinary incontinence due to cancer or severe illness; and those with psychiatric disorders, such as major depression and dementia.

Estimated sample size

A correlation coefficient (r) of 0.70 between the score on the Geriatric Self-efficacy Index for Urinary Incontinence (GSE-UI) and the score on the Incontinence QOL questionnaire previously reported in patients in an incontinence study was used as the basis for sample size estimation [16]. The sample size was estimated using G*Power Version 3.1.9.2 [21] with the following parameters: for linear regression statistical analysis, α = 0.05, power = 80%, and independent variables = 14. This resulted in a required sample size of at least 33 participants. Of 174 potential participants, 32 did not meet the inclusion criteria, and seven declined to participate due to the time commitment required. A total of 135 participants completed the questionnaire.

Measurements

Sociodemographic and health information list

The data collected on this scale consisted of basic demographic properties and disease treatment characteristics. The items included age, education level, religious beliefs, marital status, occupation, self-reported financial status, chronic disease, self-reported health status, menopausal status (e.g., perimenopausal, post-menopausal), and SUI treatment. In addition, we recorded the numbers of newly diagnosed COVID-19 cases reported by the Central Epidemic Command Center in Taiwan [22] on the dates when participants completed the questionnaire.

Distress caused by symptoms of urinary incontinence

A short version of the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI) included a total of six questions, which were part of the three subscales of obstruction, stress, and irritation. A 4-point scoring method was adopted, with a score range of 0–3, and the score was linearly scaled to 0–100. A higher score indicates greater distress [23, 24]. The scale has acceptable reliability and validity [23]. A UDI-6 score of 33.33 has a specificity of 83.3% and a sensitivity of 97.0% for detecting greater distress caused by urinary incontinence [25]. The Chinese version scale has acceptable criterion, convergent, and discriminant validity [6, 26] as well as acceptable reliability, with a Cronbach’s α of 0.80 [26]. The Cronbach’s α in this study was 0.75.

Self-efficacy index for urinary incontinence

A total of 12 questions in the GSE-UI were administered, using a 10-point scoring method. The total score ranged from 0 to 120. A higher score indicates better self-efficacy for urinary incontinence [16, 27]. This original English scale has a specificity of 78.2% and a sensitivity of 75.1% for detecting clinically significant changes in patients with urinary incontinence. The Cronbach’s α of the internal consistency of the scale was 0.90 [27]. With the consent of the original scale developers, this study used the forward-backward method to translate the English version scale into a traditional Chinese version scale [28]. Then, expert validity and face validity were verified, and the contents of the scale were adjusted according to expert opinion to construct a scale that could be used with women with SUI in Taiwan. The content validity index was 1.0 [29], and the Cronbach’s α was 0.92.

Positive thinking

The Positive Thinking Scale comprises personal satisfaction and goal pursuit. The scale includes a total of 18 questions and uses a 5-point scoring method. The total score ranges from 18 to 90. A higher score indicates a greater perception of positive thinking [18, 30, 31]. The Korean version of the original scale has acceptable discriminant and convergence validity. The Cronbach’s α of the total scale internal consistency was 0.88 [18, 19]. The Chinese version scale has acceptable concurrent, predictive, and construct validity, and the Cronbach’s α of the internal consistency ranged from 0.88 to 0.98 [30, 31]. In this study, the Cronbach’s α was 0.93.

General quality of life

The Chinese version of the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) was used to assess general QOL in the study participants. The SF-12 is a short version of the SF-36, easy to complete, and less burdensome [32]. The SF-12 consists of eight domains, namely, general health, physical functioning, bodily pain, vitality, role physical, role emotional, social functioning, and mental health. The scores are converted into a physical component summary (PCS) score and mental component summary (MCS) score by using PRO CoRE software. A higher score reflects better physical and mental QOL. The SF-12 can explain more than 90% of the score variation of the SF-36 with acceptable reliability [33, 34]. The Chinese version of the SF-12 has acceptable reliability and validity [32].

Urinary incontinence-specific quality of life

The Chinese version of the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire short form (IIQ-7) has been used widely to assess urinary incontinence-specific QOL [26]. This study used the IIQ-7 to assess urinary incontinence-specific QOL in women with SUI. The scale contains seven questions that cover four subscales, namely, travel, physical activity, emotional health, and social/relationships. Using a 4-point scoring method, the score was linearly scaled to 0–100. A higher score indicates a greater impact caused by urinary incontinence and worse urinary incontinence-specific QOL [24, 26]. The Chinese version of IIQ-7 has criterion, convergent, and discriminant validity. The Cronbach’s α of the total scale reliability was 0.93 [26]. The Cronbach’s α in this study was 0.89.

Ethical considerations

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the hospital (No. 20210107R) and was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The researchers explained the content and purpose of the study to women who met the inclusion criteria and gave them time to reflect on their willingness to participate in the study. Questionnaires were completed only after women had agreed and signed the research consent form. Participants were allowed to discontinue or withdraw from this study at any time without prejudice to their therapeutic rights. The questionnaire information was coded in lieu of participant names and was locked in a steel cabinet in the investigator’s office to protect the data and ensure subject privacy.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 20.0. Descriptive statistical methods included mean, standard deviation (SD), frequency, percentage, percentile, and range. Inferential statistics consisted of independent sample t-tests, one-way analysis of variance, Pearson product-difference correlations, and multiple linear regressions. When using stepwise regression for multivariate analysis, the variants were included in the analysis along with the statistically significant variables of univariate analysis, which included urinary incontinence symptom distress, urinary incontinence self-efficacy, and positive thinking. A two-tailed test was used, and a p-value of less than 0.05 indicated statistical significance.

Results

A total of 135 women were enrolled in this study. The mean age was 53.76 (SD = 12.37) years. Of the participants, 80.0% had a high school education or above, 90.4% were married, 73.3% had religious beliefs, 52.6% were unemployed or retired, and 51.9% perceived their financial status as sufficient. Further, 60.7% had chronic diseases, 46.7% were post-menopausal, 24.4% were in perimenopause, 24.4% of women with urinary incontinence performed PFMT, and 29.6% received extracorporeal magnetic innervation (ExMI) (Table 1).

Table 1 Sociodemographic and health characteristics of participants (N = 135)
Full size table

Predictors of general quality of life

The mean PCS score was 48.48 (SD = 7.54). In the univariate analysis, for women with SUI, there were significant correlations between age, education level, occupation, chronic disease, menopausal status (perimenopausal and post-menopausal), perceived physical health, symptom distress, self-efficacy, and positive thinking with PCS scores. Further stepwise regression analysis found that the most important factors that predicted PCS scores in women with SUI were as follows: perceived physical health (B = 1.35, p < .001), chronic diseases (B = − 3.19, p = .006), self-efficacy (B = 0.04, p = .034), perimenopause (B = − 3.11, p = .016), positive thinking (B = 0.13, p = .016), and post-menopause (B = − 2.43, p = .035; No > Yes). These factors explain 38% of the variance in PCS scores. That is, women with better perceived physical health and higher self-efficacy for urinary incontinence and women with a greater perception of positive thinking experienced better physical QOL. Patients without a chronic disease had better physical QOL than did those with chronic diseases. Compared with women who were perimenopausal or post-menopausal, those who were not in perimenopause or post-menopause had better physical QOL (Tables 2, 3 and 4).

Table 2 Correlations between sociodemographic and health characteristics and health-related quality of life (N = 135)
Full size table
Table 3 Pearson correlation coefficients (N = 135)
Full size table
Table 4 Predictors of health-related quality of life (N = 135)
Full size table

The mean MCS score was 46.56 (SD = 9.85). Univariate analysis revealed significant correlations between perceived physical health, self-efficacy, and positive thinking with MCS scores in women with SUI. Further stepwise regression analysis found that positive thinking (B = 0.54, p < .001) and self-efficacy (B = 0.06, p = 0.027) were the most important factors that predict MCS scores in women with SUI and explained 39% of the variance in MCS scores. That is, women with more positive thinking and higher self-efficacy for urinary incontinence experienced better mental QOL (Tables 2, 3 and 4).

Predictors of urinary incontinence-specific quality of life

The mean score of the urinary incontinence-specific QOL was 16.01 (SD = 15.80). Univariate analysis found significant correlations between age, education, religious beliefs, marital status, occupation, post-menopausal status, perceived physical health, symptom distress, and self-efficacy with urinary incontinence-specific QOL scores in women with SUI. Further stepwise regression analysis found that symptom distress (B = 0.65, p < .001) and self-efficacy (B = − 0.11, p = .004) were the most important factors for predicting the scores of urinary incontinence-specific QOL of women with SUI and explained 57% of the variance in urinary incontinence-specific QOL scores. That is, women with less symptom distress of urinary incontinence and higher self-efficacy for urinary incontinence had a better urinary incontinence-specific QOL (Tables 2, 3 and 4).

Discussion

This study is the first to explore the effect of positive thinking on health-related QOL among women with SUI. The results showed that the physical health information of women with SUI included essential factors that significantly affected their physical QOL, namely, chronic disease, menopausal status, and self-reported health status. Moreover, women with greater positive thinking experienced better physical and mental QOL. Women with higher self-efficacy for urinary incontinence had better health-related QOL. Women with less symptom distress of urinary incontinence had better urinary incontinence-specific QOL.

In the current study, the results indicated that women with SUI had mean PCS and MCS scores of 48.48 and 46.56, respectively, during the COVID-19 pandemic. These scores are significantly better than those obtained in a study conducted in Bangladesh [35]. In that study, the data of 126 women with different types of urinary incontinence showed that these women had PCS and MCS scores of 33.9 and 42.0, respectively. One potential reason for the difference in scores between the two studies was that the current study focused on women with SUI and excluded women diagnosed with major depression. In addition, the PCS score of women with SUI in the current study was similar to or better than that of the Taiwanese female spouses of patients with prostate cancer (between 45.48 and 48.03), but their MCS score was worse (between 52.28 and 53.37) [36]. This difference could be attributed to the effect of SUI on women at the psychosocial level. In traditional Chinese culture, women with SUI perceive social rejection, social isolation, and internalized shame; these factors prompt them to seek medical treatment [37] and may contribute to worse mental QOL. Hence, psychosocial care is an important issue among this group of women. Healthcare professionals should evaluate and understand the symptoms, relevant experiences, perceptions, and demands of women with SUI. They must provide individualized information and healthcare content to maintain or improve the physical and mental QOL of women with SUI.

Similar to what was proposed, the results of the current study showed that women’s physical state exhibits an important correlation with their physical QOL. For example, women with chronic diseases and poor physical health and those in perimenopause or post-menopause have poor physical QOL. Previous studies have shown that women who are entering menopause [38] or in post-menopause [39] have a higher incidence of urinary incontinence. Moreover, women with urinary incontinence and chronic disease [40] have poorer physical QOL than do women without these health problems. A study on women with urinary incontinence showed that those women with comorbidity and pelvic organ prolapse had worse physical QOL than did those without these health issues [35]. The physical state of women with SUI is closely related to their physical QOL. Therefore, healthcare professionals must conduct more evaluations and focus more attention on women with chronic diseases who are in perimenopause or post-menopause and in a poor health state. These women should be provided with appropriate treatment and care to maintain or improve their physical QOL.

The overall mean positive thinking score of women in the current study was 68.69, which is slightly better than that of patients who are receiving hormone treatment for advanced prostate cancer (66.1) [41] or middle-aged women in the community (66.8) [20]. The reason for such a difference in positive thinking scores among the population remains unknown, and additional research is necessary to clarify this issue. Although women with greater positive thinking experience better physical and mental QOL, positive thinking does not significantly predict urinary incontinence-specific QOL among women in areas such as physical activities, traveling, social/family relationships, and emotional health. No previous studies have explored the correlation between positive thinking and health-related QOL among women with SUI. Research on the general population has shown that people with greater positive thinking have higher life satisfaction [19]. In addition, studies of patients with prostate cancer have found that patients with greater positive thinking experience better prostate cancer-specific QOL, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, and functional well-being [30]. An individual’s positive thinking is correlated with perceived social support, general self-efficacy, and satisfaction with treatment [41]. Additional research is needed to confirm the effect of positive thinking on the health-related QOL of individuals. In future research, women with SUI can be encouraged to maintain adequate positive thinking to improve their physical and mental QOL, including setting and pursuing reasonable life goals and receiving social support from others.

In the current study, women with SUI who experienced less symptom distress of urinary incontinence had better urinary incontinence-specific QOL. In addition, the women with SUI in the current study who had higher self-efficacy for urinary incontinence experienced better health-related QOL, including physical, mental, and urinary incontinence-specific QOL. Such a finding is congruent with the results of previous studies on elderly patients with symptom distress of urinary incontinence. In Başer Seçer et al.’s study, elderly patients were divided into the low group (0–40), the medium group (41–80), and the high group (81–120) in accordance with their GSE-UI scores [17]. Among the three groups, the low group had the worst symptoms of urinary incontinence and the worst urinary incontinence-specific QOL. Healthcare professionals could enhance self-efficacy for urinary incontinence among women with SUI by providing them with relevant information, such as management strategies for SUI, to improve urinary incontinence and health-related QOL.

Limitations

This study was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Accordingly, patients who visited the hospital during this period might have been caring more about their urinary incontinence symptoms. Hence, the findings of this study cannot be generalized to women with SUI who chose not to seek treatment in a hospital due to various reasons. Further, previous studies have noted that a correlation exists among urinary incontinence symptoms, distress, depression, and health-related QOL [10, 42]. Major depression cases were excluded in the current study to avoid interference to the relationship among research variables. Such an exclusion, however, may cause the overestimation of the health-related QOL of women with SUI. In our future research, women with SUI who suffer from major depression will be included to compare the difference in health-related QOL between women with and without depressive symptoms. A cross-sectional study showed that the correlation among variables was preliminarily elucidated; however, insights into the relevant experiences of women with SUI that change over time could not be obtained. In future research, a combination of longitudinal and qualitative study designs can be used to gain an in-depth and comprehensive understanding of the experiences of women with SUI.

Recommendations

This study found that a variety of physical and psychosocial factors affect the health-related QOL of women with SUI. Numerous interventions are currently used to improve urinary incontinence symptoms, including PFMT [43, 44] and hybrid telerehabilitation [44]. One study [45] explored the effectiveness of self-management programs for urinary incontinence among elderly women. Self-management programs were determined to be acceptable to women with urinary incontinence, and they could help to improve anxiety, symptom severity, and urinary incontinence symptoms. Although the aforementioned study did not report a statistically significant improvement in the effectiveness of the self-management program in improving QOL and self-efficacy, participants claimed that the intervention made them more confident and motivated to manage their condition. Therefore, to improve health-related QOL among women with SUI, intervention programs should evaluate, manage, and concurrently monitor physical symptoms, symptoms of distress caused by urinary incontinence, and the psychosocial status of patients.

Conclusions

The results of this study show that women with SUI who have a chronic disease and are in perimenopause or post-menopause and a poor health state have poor physical QOL. Women with SUI who have greater perception of positive thinking experience better general QOL. Women with higher self-efficacy for urinary incontinence have better general QOL and urinary incontinence-specific QOL. Women with fewer symptoms of urinary incontinence experience better urinary incontinence-specific QOL. Healthcare professionals can improve these factors to maintain or improve the health-related QOL of women with SUI.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request from the first author. The data are not publicly available due to the consideration of ethics, and research data should be used only for academic purposes.

Abbreviations

COVID-19:

Coronavirus Disease 2019

ExMI:

Exceptional magnetic innervation

GSE-UI:

Geriatric Self-efficacy Index for Urinary Incontinence

IIQ-7:

Incontinence Impact Questionnaire Short Form

MCS:

Mental component summary

PCS:

Physical component summary

PFMT:

Pelvic floor muscle training

QOL:

Quality of life

SD:

Standard deviation

SF-12:

12-Item Short-Form Health Survey

SUI:

Stress urinary incontinence

UDI:

Urogenital distress inventory

References

  1. Wu JM. Stress incontinence in women. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:2428–36. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp1914037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Abufaraj M, Xu T, Cao C, Siyam A, Isleem U, Massad A, et al. Prevalence and trends in urinary incontinence among women in the United States, 2005-2018. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;225:166.e161–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2021.03.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lukacz ES, Santiago-Lastra Y, Albo ME, Brubaker L. Urinary incontinence in women: a review. JAMA. 2017;318:1592–604. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.12137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Weber-Rajek M, Strączyńska A, Strojek K, Piekorz Z, Pilarska B, Podhorecka M, et al. Assessment of the effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) and extracorporeal magnetic innervation (EXMI) in treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: a randomized controlled trial. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:1019872. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1019872.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu C, Wang K, Sun T, Xu D, Palmer MH. Predicting help-seeking intention of women with urinary incontinence in Jinan, China: a theory of planned behaviour model. J Clin Nurs. 2015;24:457–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12623.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lin SY, Dougherty MC. Incontinence impact, symptom distress and treatment-seeking behavior in women with involuntary urine loss in southern Taiwan. Int J Nurs Stud. 2003;40:227–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7489(02)00081-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ramage-Morin PL, Gilmour H. Urinary incontinence and loneliness in Canadian seniors. Health Rep. 2013;24:3–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Southall K, Tuazon JR, Djokhdem AH, van den Heuvel EA, Wittich W, Jutai JW. Assessing the stigma content of urinary incontinence intervention outcome measures. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2017;4:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055668317738943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vo K, Forder PM, Byles JE. Urinary incontinence and social function in older Australian women. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64:1646–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.14250.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Avery JC, Stocks NP, Duggan P, Braunack-Mayer AJ, Taylor AW, Goldney RD, et al. Identifying the quality of life effects of urinary incontinence with depression in an Australian population. BMC Urol. 2013;13:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-13-11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Xiong J, Lipsitz O, Nasri F, Lui LMW, Gill H, Phan L, et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2020;277:55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Cella DF. Quality of life: concepts and definition. J Pain Symptom Manag. 1994;9:186–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-3924(94)90129-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. King CR, Hinds PS. Quality of life from nursing and patient perspectives: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84:191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. Health behavior: theory, research, and practice. 5th ed. Principal Place, LON: Jossey-Bass; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tannenbaum C, Brouillette J, Korner-Bitensky N, Dumoulin C, Corcos J, Tu le M, et al. Creation and testing of the geriatric self-efficacy index for urinary incontinence. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56:542–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01572.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Başer Seçer M, Çeliker Tosun Ö, Tosun G. Do levels of self-efficacy affect urinary incontinence, falls, quality of life, sleep, and physical activity in elderly people with urinary incontinence? Ir J Med Sci. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-022-03053-3.

  18. Kim HJ, Oh YH, Oh GS, Suh DW, Shin YC, Jung JY. Development and validation study of the positive thinking scale. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology. 2006;11:767–84.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jung JY, Oh YH, Oh KS, Suh DW, Shin YC, Kim HJ. Positive-thinking and life satisfaction amongst Koreans. Yonsei Med J. 2007;48:371–8. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2007.48.3.371.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim SJ, Hur MH. Understanding of factors influencing happiness of middle-aged women in Korea based on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Psychiatry Investig. 2019;16:539–46. https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2019.04.25.2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Faul FEE, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39:175–91. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Taiwan Centers for Disease Control. Attention COVID-19. http://www.cdc.gov.tw/En. Accessed 10 Oct 2022.

  23. Shumaker SA, Wyman JF, Uebersax JS, McClish D, Fantl JA. Health-related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence: the incontinence impact questionnaire and the urogenital distress inventory. Continence program in women (CPW) research group. Qual Life Res. 1994;3:291–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00451721.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Uebersax JS, Wyman JF, Shumaker SA, McClish DK, Fantl JA. Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the incontinence impact questionnaire and the urogenital distress inventory. Continence program for women research group. Neurourol Urodyn. 1995;14(2):131–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.1930140206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Skorupska K, Grzybowska ME, Kubik-Komar A, Rechberger T, Miotla P. Identification of the urogenital distress Inventory-6 and the incontinence impact Questionnaire-7 cutoff scores in urinary incontinent women. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021;19(1):87. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01721-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Chan SS, Choy KW, Lee BP, Pang SM, Yip SK, Lee LL, et al. Chinese validation of urogenital distress inventory and incontinence impact questionnaire short form. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:807–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1102-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tannenbaum C, Brouillette J, Michaud J, Korner-Bitensky N, Dumoulin C, Corcos J, et al. Responsiveness and clinical utility of the geriatric self-efficacy index for urinary incontinence. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57:470–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02146.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17:268–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations Res Nurs Health. 2006;29:489–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.2014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chien CH, Chuang CK, Liu KL, Wu CT, Pang ST, Chang YH. Health-related quality of life and its associated factors in prostate cancer patients who receive androgen deprivation therapy. Cancer Nurs. 2021;44:E34–42. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000000752.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Chien CH, Huang YW. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the positive thinking scale in individuals after hip fracture surgery. Psicol Reflex Crit. 2022;35(1):31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-022-00235-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Shou J, Ren L, Wang H, Yan F, Cao X, Wang H, et al. Reliability and validity of 12-item short-form health survey (SF-12) for the health status of Chinese community elderly population in Xujiahui district of Shanghai. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2016;28(2):339–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-015-0401-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220–33. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Maruish ME. User’s manual for the SF-12v2 health survey. 3rd ed. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Imoto A, Sarker M, Akter R, Matsuyama A, Honda S. Health-related quality of life in parous women with pelvic organ prolapse and/or urinary incontinence in Bangladesh. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(4):887–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04410-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Chien CH, Chuang CK, Liu KL, Pang ST, Wu CT, Chang YH. Prostate cancer-specific anxiety and the resulting health-related quality of life in couples. J Adv Nurs. 2019;75:63–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13828.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang C, Li J, Wan X, Wang X, Kane RL, Wang K. Effects of stigma on Chinese women's attitudes towards seeking treatment for urinary incontinence. J Clin Nurs. 2015;24:1112–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12729.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Nygaard CC, Schreiner L, Morsch TP, Saadi RP, Figueiredo MF, Padoin AV. Urinary incontinence and quality of life in female patients with obesity. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2018;40(9):534–9. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1670626.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Akkus Y, Pinar G. Evaluation of the prevalence, type, severity, and risk factors of urinary incontinence and its impact on quality of life among women in Turkey. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(6):887–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2904-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Avis NE, Colvin A, Bromberger JT, Hess R. Midlife predictors of health-related quality of life in older women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2018;73(11):1574–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/gly062.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Chien CH, Chuang CK, Liu KL, Pang ST, Wu CT, Chang YH. Exploring the positive thinking of patients with prostate cancer: self-efficacy as a mediator. Cancer Nurs. 2022;45:E329–e337. https://doi.org/10.1097/ncc.0000000000000868.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kaur T, Kumari R, Sharma JB, Pandey K, Uppal B, Deb KS. A cross-sectional case-control study of depression in incontinent women. J Midlife Health. 2021;12(2):132–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/jmh.JMH_98_20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Hagen S, Elders A, Stratton S, Sergenson N, Bugge C, Dean S, et al. Effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training with and without electromyographic biofeedback for urinary incontinence in women: multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2020;371:m3719. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3719.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Santiago M, Cardoso-Teixeira P, Pereira S, Firmino-Machado J, Moreira S. A hybrid-telerehabilitation versus a conventional program for urinary incontinence: a randomized trial during COVID-19 pandemic. Int Urogynecol J. 2022:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05108-6.

  45. Fu Y, Nelson EA, McGowan L. An evidence-based self-management package for urinary incontinence in older women: a mixed methods feasibility study. BMC Urol. 2020;20:43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-020-00603-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We appreciate that Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan, R.O.C., provided support for this study.

Funding

This project is funded by the Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan [grant number 110D005–3].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Nursing, National Taipei University of Nursing and Healh Sciences, No.365, Ming-te Road, Peitou District, Taipei City, 112, Taiwan

    Ching Hui Chien & Xuan Yi Huang

  2. Department of Nursing, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan

    Shu Pen Hsu

  3. Physiology Examination Room, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan

    Yi Hua Yen

  4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan

    Hun Shan Pan

  5. College of Medicine, Fu Zen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan

    Hun Shan Pan

  6. Department of Nursing, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan

    Feng Chu Yen

Authors
  1. Ching Hui Chien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xuan Yi Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shu Pen Hsu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yi Hua Yen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hun Shan Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Feng Chu Yen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CHC designed the study and performed data curation; CHC and HXY participated in conceptualization and project administration; CHC, PHS, HSP, and YYH performed the data collection; CHC and YFC performed data analyses and visualization; CHC wrote the first draft; and PHS participated in review and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hun Shan Pan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This research has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital (IRB No.: 20210107R).

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

All authors agreed to publish this article.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chien, C.H., Huang, X.Y., Hsu, S.P. et al. Self-efficacy and positive thinking as predictors of health-related quality of life in women with stress urinary incontinence. BMC Women's Health 22, 444 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-02025-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-02025-0

Keywords

BMC Women's Health

ISSN: 1472-6874

Contact us