Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

The relationship between menopausal syndrome and gut microbes

BMC Women's Health volume 22, Article number: 437 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Gut microbes were closely related to women’s health. Previous studies reported that the gut microbes of premenopausal women were different from those of postmenopausal women. However, little was known about the relationship between gut microbiota dysbiosis and menopausal syndrome (MPS). The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between MPS and gut microbes.

Methods

Patients with MPS (P group, n = 77) and healthy women (H group, n = 24) at menopause were recruited in this study. The stool specimen and clinical parameters (demographic data, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), estradiol (E2), et al) of participants’ were collected. We evaluated the differences in gut microbes by 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. We used LEfSe to identify gut microbes with varying abundances in different groups. The Spearman correlation coefficients of clinical parameters and gut microbes were calculated. PICRUSt was used to predict the potential KEGG Ortholog functional profiles of microbial communities.

Results

The abundance of 14 species differed substantially between the MPS and menopausal healthy women (LDA significance threshold > 2.0) according to LEfSe analysis. Using Spearman’s correlation analysis, it was discovered that E2 had a positive correlation with Aggregatibacter segnis, Bifidobacterium animalis, Acinetobacter guillouiae (p < 0.05, these three species were enriched in menopausal healthy women), while FSH and LH had a negative correlation with them (p < 0.05). KEGG level3 metabolic pathways relevant to cardiovascular disease and carbohydrate metabolism were enriched in the MPS (p < 0.05), according to functional prediction by PICRUST and analyzed by Dunn test.

Conclusion

There was gut microbiota dysbiosis in MPS, which is reflected in the deficiency of the abundance of Aggregatibacter segnis, Bifidobacterium animalis and Acinetobacter guillouiae related to the level of sex hormones. In MPS individuals, species with altered abundances and unique functional pathways were found.

Peer Review reports

Background

During the menopause transition, women usually experience a progressive change in ovarian activity and a physiologic deterioration of hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis function associated with fluctuating hormone levels [1], which cause menopausal syndrome (MPS). Hot flashes, night sweats, sleep disturbances, sexual dysfunction, mood disorders, and other symptoms are problematic symptoms experienced by women with MPS [2]. Menopausal symptoms affect 69.5% to 80% of women at menopause [3, 4]. Menopausal symptoms not only have a detrimental impact on one’s quality of life, but may also link patients to cardiovascular disease, diabetes, osteoporosis, and breast cancer [5,6,7,8]. As a result, the prevention and treatment of MPS demand more attention.

More and more studies showed that the gut microbes are closely related to health and disease. Gut microbes are regarded as one of the organs of human body. The intestine is colonized with 1013–1014 bacteria mainly residing in the lumen and in the mucus [9]. Gut dysbiosis is involved in many female reproductive and endocrine diseases, such as endometriosis [10], polycystic ovary syndrome [11], obesity and sexual precocious puberty [12], et al. Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease, which is estrogen dependent. Gut microbes participate in the metabolism of estrogen in blood. The gut microbiota regulates estrogens through secretion of β-glucuronidase, an enzyme that deconjugates estrogens into their active forms [13]. The gut microbes in patients with endometriosis may have a large number of β- Glucuronidase producing bacteria, which may lead to increased levels of estrogen metabolites, leading to endometriosis [13]. Endometriosis is common in premenopausal women, and the disease may be mediated by high estrogen levels [14].

During menopause and postmenopause a variety of negative health outcomes may occur from the depletion of circulating estrogen. Premenopausal and postmenopausal women have different gut microbes [15]. A study showed that the gut microbiota community in menopausal women changed after isoflavones supplementation [16], which are plant-derived phytoestrogens. Another study showed that the level of estrogen metabolites in urine was positively correlated with the diversity of gut microbiota [17]. Osteoporosis develops as a result of continuous hypoestrogenemia. The gut microbiota has been found to interfere with hormone secretion, estrogen levels, metabolism and immune function, all of which influence bone metabolism [18, 19]. Numerous menopause-related symptoms and signs are derived as a result of lack of estrogen production. However, the link between gut microbiota and MPS was still poorly characterized. As a result, little was known regarding the link between gut dysbiosis and MPS. Furthermore, it remained unexplored how and which gut microbes may influence the key pathophysiological processes in MPS.

In order to study the taxonomic and functional features of the gut microbes in menopausal women, we conducted 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) gene sequencing and functional prediction analysis on the gut microbes of stool specimen taken from patients with MPS and healthy controls. Characterization of the compositional and functional features of the gut microbes in menopausal women helps us comprehend its involvement in women’s health, and hence the importance of gut microbes regulation in menopausal women’s health. We aim to provide potential techniques for the prevention and treatment of MPS.

Methods

Study participants

This study was a case-control study that included patients with menopausal syndrome (P group) and healthy women at menopause (H group). The Medical Ethics Committee of the Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine First Affiliated Hospital approved this study (NO.ZYYECK【2020】021). From June 2020 to October 2021, we recruited females aged 40–60 to perform the domestic modified Kupperman index (KI) score (Additional file 1) test at our hospital. All participants were informed about the study’s purpose and given written informed consent.

Participants in the P group must satisfy the following criteria: (1) female, 40–60 years old; (2) have at least one of these autonomic nerve changes (hot flashes, night sweats, insomnia, irritability, and other symptoms) and menstrual disorders (two consecutive cycle length changes > 7 days in 10 months); (3) have a domestic modified KI score > 15 points.

Participants in the H group must meet the following requirements: (1) female, 40–60 years old; (2) with a domestic modified KI score < 15 points and no hot flashes.

The following were the exclusion criteria: (1) have unexplained irregular vaginal bleeding; (2) have used sex hormones within 3 months; (3) have antibiotics within 2 weeks; (4) have a history of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled cardiac, hepatic, renal, mental, or hematological diseases.

A total of 101 out of 1253 women who participated in the survey from June 2020 to October 2021 were included in the analysis to investigate the gut microbes of two groups after the exclusion of women who were aged under 40 years and over 60 years (n = 806), meet the exclusion criteria and refused toparticipate (n = 366). Lastly, we included 77 patients with menopausal syndrome (P group) and 24 healthy women at menopause (H group).

Data collection

The Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine First Affiliated Hospital used a survey (Additional file 1) and a physical examination to collect data on demographic characteristics, medical history, menstrual history, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumstance (WC), hip, waist hip ratio (WHR), and blood pressure. Participants were given a fecal collection kit and instructed to collect their feces within 1 week after their visit. Within 4 h of collection, feces samples were collected and sent to the hospital for examination. The samples were kept at − 80 °C until they were processed. After 8 hours of fasting, the H group had their blood obtained to check for follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and estradiol (E2). After an 8-hour fast, the P group was required to have blood obtained and a bone mineral density (BMD) test. FSH, LH, E2, total cholesterol (CHOL), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), triglycerides (TG), fasting blood glucose (Glu), and fasting insulin (INS) are some of the blood test indications. The participants’ serum test results and BMD (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, DXA) testing room results were obtained from hospital laboratories and BMD (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, DXA) testing room, respectively.

Diagnostic criteria of menopausal syndrome

Clinical manifestations, followed by sex hormone levels, are used to diagnose MPS. Diagnostic criteria referred to the Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinical Guidelines [20]. The following are the diagnostic criteria: (1) menstrual disorders are the first clinical symptoms of perimenopause; (2) vasomotor symptoms are primarily hot flashes; (3) may have one or more additional symptoms such as mental disorder (anxiety, depression, or insomnia), urogenital atrophy, cardiovascular symptoms (chest tightness or palpitations), skin and body changes (itchy skin, obesity), and osteoporosis; (4) FSH>10 IU/L indicates decreased ovarian reserve; amenorrhea, FSH>40 IU/L and E2<10-20pg/mL indicates ovarian failure.

DNA extraction and PCR amplication

The HiPure Bacterial DNA Kit was used to extract bacterial genomic DNA (Megan, China). Using agarose gel electrophoresis and Qubit, the quality and quantity of the DNA was detected (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). After premixing using NEBnext-Ultra-II-Q5-Master-Mix, the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified (NEB, USA).

Illumina sequencing

Agilent 2200 Tape Station and Qubit® were used to assess the final library product (Life Technologies, USA). The first batch of samples was sequenced on the Miseq (Illumina, USA) platform at with pair-end 250 bp, whereas the second batch was sequenced on the NovaSeq (Illumina, USA) platform at with pair-end 250 bp.

Data analysis

The mean with SD was showed for normally distributed parameters, and p values were calculated using a student’s t-test; for not normally distributed parameters, the median with IQR (P25, P75) was showed, and p values were calculated using the Mann-Whitney U test. Counts were used to represent categorical variables, and the Chi-square test was used to obtain the p value. Statistical significance was defined as a value of p < 0.05.

Using the qiime tools import program, raw data FASTQ files were imported into a format that could be used by the QIIME2 system. To obtain the feature table of amplicon sequence variant (ASV), demultiplexed sequences from each sample were quality filtered and trimmed, de-noised, merged, and then the chimeric sequences were identified and removed using the QIIME2 dada2 plugin [21]. To generate the taxonomy table, the QIIME2 feature-classifier plugin was used to align ASV sequences to a pre-trained GREENGENES 13_8 99% database (trimmed to the V3-V4 region bound by the 338F/806R primer pair) [22]. The core-diversity plugin in QIIME2 was used to calculate diversity metrics. Wilcoxon calculated feature-level alpha diversity indices, such as Chao1 and Shannon diversity index, to estimate microbial diversity within a single sample. To study the structural variation of microbial communities among samples, researchers used beta diversity distance measurements and Bray Curtis, which were then visualized using principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) [23]. LEfSe was used to identify bacteria with varying abundances in different samples and groups [24] Clinical parameters and microbial species Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated and displayed as heat maps. The R program heatmap package is mostly used to generate the correlation heat map. PICRUSt was also used to predict the potential KEGG Ortholog functional profiles of microbial communities [25]. After getting the functional annotation, the Dunn test (R program dunn.test package) was performed to see if there were any significant differences between groups in the microbial community prediction function. A statistically significant value of p < 0.05 was used. The online sketching website was used to implement all visualizations (https://www.bioincloud.tech).

Results

Clinical characteristics of participants

In terms of age (p = 0.051), menopausal status (p = 0.798), BMI (p = 0.771), WHR (p = 0.243), SBP (p = 0.701), DBP (p = 0.127), hypertension, or diabetes (all p > 0.05), there was no significant difference between the P and H groups, indicating that the influence of gut microbiota caused by age, nutritional status, hypertension, or diabetes could be excluded (Table 1) However, the P groups had higher FSH and LH values, whereas the E2 levels were lower (all p < 0.05).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics
Full size table

Analysis of gut microbiota diversity

In an analysis of gut microbial diversity, no significant differences were found between P (n = 77) and H group (n = 24). The sequencing depths were examined by plotting the rarefaction curve of richness (ggplot2) (Additional file 2). Each group’s curve was found to be near saturation, indicating that the sequencing depth was adequate. The abundance and diversity of microbial communities, as measured by Chao1 and Shannon index, were reflected in Alpha diversity. Between the two groups, there was no significant difference in Chao1 (Wilcoxon, p = 0.167) or Shannon index (Wilcoxon, p = 0.432) (Fig. 1A-B). Bray curtis calculated beta diversity, which is an indicator of microbial community composition. P group had no significant difference from H group (PERMANOVA, p = 0.204) (Fig. 1C), according to principal coordinate analysis (PCoA).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Gut microbiota diversity of patients with MPS (P group) and menopausal healthy women (H group) at menopause. A Alpha diversity was measured by both Chao1 and Shannon index for comparisons between P (n = 77) and H groups (n = 24). B Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) with bray-curtis showed that P group (n = 77) had no significant difference from H group (n = 24)

Full size image

Gut microbiota composition and difference analysis

In the P (n = 77) and H (n = 24) groups, a total of 43 phyla, 281 genera, and 163 species were identified (Additional file 3). At the phylum and genus level, the top 20 average relative abundance of microbiota were showed (Fig. 2A-B). Using LEfSe analysis, we compared the gut microbiota compositions in two groups. LEfSe analysis detected 14 species with varying abundances: In the P group, Bifidobacterium adolescentis, Bifidobacterium longum, Bacteroides ovatus, Lactobacillus ruminis, Veillonella dispar, and Eubacterium biforme showed greater enrichment, whereas in H group, Corynebacterium stationis, Bifidobacterium animalis, Bacteroides coprophilus, Clostridium celatum, Ruminococcus albus, Helicobacter rodentium, Aggregatibacter segnis, Acinetobacter guillouiae were more abundant (LDA significance threshold > 2.0; Fig. 2C-D). In conclusion, we identified different species in two groups, indicating a significant different composition of the gut microbiota between the P and H group.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Composition and difference of the gut microbiota in P and H group. A Average relative abundance of microbiota at the phylum level and (B) at the genus level in P (n = 77) and H group (n = 24); sequences without annotations were classified as unclassified; those bacteria whose relative abundance was ranking > 20 were classified as others. C The taxonomic cladogram was generated based on the LEfSe and LDA scores. Bacterial taxa enriched in P group (red dots) and H group (green dots). D Taxa enriched in P group were indicated with a positive LDA score (red) and negative LDA score (green), respectively. Only taxa with an LDA significance threshold > 2.0 were showed in the figure; p, phylum; c, class; o, order; f, family; g, genus; s, species

Full size image

Associations between clinical parameters and gut microbiome

We explored the correlation between clinical parameters and species abundance using Spearman’s correlation analysis (Fig. 3). It was discovered that E2 had a positive correlation with Aggregatibacter segnis, Bifidobacterium animalis and Acinetobacter guillouiae, while FSH and LH had a negative correlation with these three species. E2 had the strongest positive correlation with Acinetobacter guillouiae (r = 0.253, p = 0.018), followed by Aggregatibacter segnis and Bifidobacterium animalis. FSH  (r = − 0.302, p = 0.004) and LH (r = − 0.276, p = 0.009) had the strongest negative correlations with Bifidobacterium animalis, followed by Aggregatibacter segnis and Acinetobacter guillouiae. Meanwhile, Aggregatibacter segnis, Bifidobacterium animalis, and Acinetobacter guillouiae were found enriching in the H group (LDA significance threshold > 2.0; Fig. 2C-D). The domestic modified KI scores was found to be positively correlated with Ruminococcus torques, Blautia obeum and Butyricicoccus pullicaecorum, while negatively correlated with Lactobacillus delbrueckii. The hot flash (HF) symptom scores was found to be positively related to Ruminococcus torques, while negatively related to Clostridium cocleatum. BMI, WHR, Glu, INS, CHOL, LDL, TG, and BMD were also correlated with species abundance. As a result, the clinical parameters were found to be correlated with the composition of the gut microbiome.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Correlation matrix for clinical parameters and species. Yellow and red signified a positive correlation, while blue signified a negative correlation. * 0.01 ≤ p<0.05，** 0.001 ≤ p<0.01. #Significantly different species between P and H groups, green signified genus enriching in H group. L1-L4, BMD of the 1st to 4th lumbar vertebrae; LNF, BMD of left neck of femur; LHip, BMD of the left hip; HF, Hot flash symptom score (a component of the domestic modified KI Score)

Full size image

Functional alternation of gut microbiota

Gut microbial functions were predicted by PICRUST in our study, of which the profiles revealed significant alterations in two groups. We constructed functional profiles for each sample using microbial KEGG Ortholog pathways. 8 KEGG level2 pathways (p < 0.05; Table 2) and 50 KEGG level3 pathways (p < 0.05; Additional file 4) enriched in the P group, were found to be significantly higher than in H group. Circulatory system, carbohydrate metabolism, digestive system, cell motility, signal transduction, folding, sorting and degradation, infectious disease, and biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites had more abundance in the P group than in the H group. Importantly, metabolic pathways related to cardiovascular disease and carbohydrate metabolism were enriched in the P group (p < 0.05; Table 3), indicating that the incidence of cardiovascular disease, obesity, diabetes and other related diseases may increase after women enter menopause.

Table 2 KEGG level2 differential pathways between P and H group
Full size table
Table 3 KEGG level3 differential pathways between P and H group
Full size table

Discussion

The findings showed that the gut microbiome composition was altered in MPS patients: the abundance of 14 species differed significantly between MPS patients and menopausal healthy women. We found underlying and intriguing relationships between gut microbe composition and function and MPS. It was discovered that E2 had a positive correlation with Aggregatibacter segnis, Bifidobacterium animalis, and Acinetobacter guillouiae (these three species were enriched in menopausal healthy women), while FSH and LH had a positive correlation with them. The domestic modified KI score, HF symptom score, BMI, WHR, Glu, INS, CHOL, LDL, TG and BMD were also correlated with species abundance. Functionally, the MPS was enriched in metabolic pathways related to cardiovascular disease and carbohydrate metabolism, implying that the incidence of cardiovascular disease, obesity, diabetes, and other related diseases may rise at menopause.

Ovarian function declines as women enter menopause, and the ovaries produce less estrogen, so the level of estradiol in the blood drops and the level of FSH rises. Estrogens and other female hormones play a key role in regulating the gut microbiome’s composition [26, 27]. Premenopausal women’s estrogen levels are usually higher than postmenopausal women’s. A previous study found that pre-menopausal and post-menopausal women had significantly different estrogen levels and hormone secretion, which could be linked to changes in the gut microbiome [28, 29]. Our study showed that patients with MPS had lower levels of estradiol, higher levels of FSH and LH, and a significantly different gut microbiota composition than menopausal healthy women. These changes suggested that estrogen levels, FSH, and LH may have an effect on gut microbiota composition.

Estrogen has been showed to influence the gut microbiome, and gut microbiome also had a significant impact on estrogen levels [30, 31]. We found that three bacteria species (Aggregatibacter segnis, Bifidobacterium animalis, and Acinetobacter guillouiae) were enriched in menopausal healthy women, and E2 had a positive correlation with them, while FSH and LH had a negative correlation with them. Bifidobacterium_animalis is considered a probiotic that can improve abdominal obesity [32], inflammation, oxidative stress, blood lipids, blood sugar and vascular endothelial function in patients with metabolic syndrome [33]. Aggregatibacter segnis and Acinetobacter guillouiae are primarily related with inflammation and infections [34, 35]. Changes in sex hormone levels may be caused by a decrease of Bifidobacterium animalis in MPS. Previous studies found that most gut microbiome showed an increase of β-glucuronidase enzyme activity [36]. β-glucuronidase could inactivate estrogen by blocking its binding to glucuronic acid, thus increasing the amount of estrogen in the body [37]. The gut microbiota with a positive correlation with the E2 may have an increase of β-glucuronidase enzyme activity to increase the amount of estrogen in the body.

The decline in estrogen result in MPS with vasomotor symptoms (hot flash), sleep disturbances and insomnia, adverse mood, vulvovaginal atrophy, sexual dysfunction, et al. [38]. This is in line with menopausal hormone therapy’s rapid resolution of MPS. A new vaginal cream containing visnadine (0.30%), prenylflavonoids (0.10%) and bovine colostrum (1%) was able to ameliorate both vaginal health and sexual quality [39]. Because prenylflavonoids exert similar effect as estrogen [40], visnadine ameliorate female sexual arousal disorder [41] and bovine colostrum relieve vaginal dryness [42]. Menopause symptoms not only have a detrimental impact on one’s quality of life, but may also link patients to cardiovascular disease, diabetes, osteoporosis, and breast cancer [5,6,7,8]. The decline in estrogen is also a serious threat to physiological activities and correlates with diseases such as type 2 diabetes [43], obesity [44], cardiovascular disease [45] and osteoporosis [46].

Changes in estrogen and gut microbiota in patients with MPS are consistent with functional predictions. Estrogen plays a leading role in the causes of female obesity [47]. Estrogen binding to its receptor can regulate glucose and lipid metabolism in a variety of ways. Disturbances in these metabolic pathways would contribute to the development of metabolic syndrome in post-menopausal women, as well as an increased risk of cardiovascular disease [48, 49]. In estrogen-deficient rats, MPS can be alleviated by maintaining gut microbial diversity [50]. Current studies have suggested the potentially strong association between gut microbiota, bone remodeling and bone metabolic diseases [51]. Gut microbiota disorders may cause increased gut permeability and trigger activation of key inflammatory pathways for inducing bone loss in sex steroid-deficient mice [52]. Probiotics have shown a positive effect on the management of healthy bone [53]. A previous study showed that a high-fat/carbohydrate diet programmed the gut microbiota to be predominated by Firmicutes (Clostridium), Prevotella and Methanobrevibacter but deficient in beneficial genera/species such as Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus and Akkermansia [54]. Bifidobacterium animalis abundance decreased in MPS, and metabolic pathways related to cardiovascular disease and carbohydrate metabolism were enriched in the MPS, according to our findings. Altering the gut microbiota in MPS patients may have therapeutic effects as well as reducing the risk of long-term chronic disease, according to our speculation.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we discovered taxonomic signatures associated with MPS in the gut microbes and predicted their function. We propose a hypothesis about how the gut microbiome affects menopausal women based on our findings. In MPS, our findings revealed a dysbiosis of the gut microbiome. In menopausal women, Bifidobacterium animalis is likely to be a beneficial gut microbiota. The gut microbiota may produce β-glucuronidase, which increases estrogen levels in the body. MPS was found to be particularly rich in metabolic pathways related to cardiovascular disease and carbohydrate metabolism, implying that the incidence of cardiovascular disease, obesity, diabetes, and other related diseases rises as women approach menopause. In patients with MPS, altering the gut microbiota could have therapeutic effects as well as reducing the risk of long-term chronic disease. Nevertheless, several limitations of the study should be taken into account: first of all, the sample size is limited; second, more research is needed to determine whether probiotics and fecal transplantation are preferentially used to prevent potential risks in postmenopausal women; third, future multiomic studies with a larger longitudinal cohort, as well as animal model experiments, will be required to verify our findings and gain a better understanding towards the underlying mechanisms of gut microbiota in MPS. The findings of the gut microbiome study provide not only new insights into disease mechanisms, but also novel therapies to help women feel better after menopause.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated for this study can be found in NCBI with accession code SRA: PRJNA858179 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=PRJNA858179).

Abbreviations

MPS:

Menopausal syndrome

16S rRNA:

16S ribosomal RNA

P group:

Patients with menopausal syndrome

H group:

Healthy women at menopause

BMI:

Body mass index

WC:

Waist circumstance

WHR:

Waist hip ratio

SBP:

Systolic blood pressure

DBP:

Diastolic blood pressure

FSH:

Follicle stimulating hormone

LH:

Luteinizing hormone

E2:

Estradiol

BMD:

Bone mineral density

CHOL:

Total cholesterol

HDL:

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol

LDL:

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

TG:

Triglycerides

Glu:

Fasting blood glucose

INS:

Fasting insulin

L1-L4:

BMD of the 1st to 4th lumbar vertebrae

LNF:

BMD of the left neck of femur

LH ip:

BMD of the left hip

KI:

Kupperman index

HF:

Hot flash symptom score (a component of the domestic modified KI Score)

References

  1. Gava G, Orsili I, Alvisi S, Mancini I, Seracchioli R, Meriggiola MC. Cognition, mood and sleep in menopausal transition: the role of menopause hormone therapy. Medicina-Lithuania. 2019;55(10):668.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sussman M, Trocio J, Best C, Mirkin S, Bushmakin AG, Yood R, et al. Prevalence of menopausal symptoms among mid-life women: findings from electronic medical records. BMC Womens Health. 2015;15:58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Yisma E, Eshetu N, Ly S, Dessalegn B. Prevalence and severity of menopause symptoms among perimenopausal and postmenopausal women aged 30-49 years in Gulele sub-city of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Womens Health. 2017;17:124.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Li RX, Ma M, Xiao XR, Xu Y, Chen XY, Li B. Perimenopausal syndrome and mood disorders in perimenopause: prevalence, severity, relationships, and risk factors. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95:e4466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Thurston RC. Vasomotor symptoms: natural history, physiology, and links with cardiovascular health. Climacteric. 2018;21:96–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Miller VM, JMK, Files JA, Joyner MJ, Kapoor E, Moyer AM, Rocca WA, Faubion SS. What’s in a name: are menopausal“hot flashes” a symptom of menopause or a manifestation of neurovascular dysregulation? Menopause. 2018;25:700–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Biglia N, AC, Gambacciani M, Lello S, Maffei S, Nappi RE. Vasomotor symptoms in menopause: a biomarker of cardiovascular disease risk and other chronic diseases? Climacteric. 2017;20:306–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Crandall CJ, Aragaki A, Cauley JA, Manson JE, LeBlanc E, Wallace R, et al. Associations of menopausal vasomotor symptoms with fracture incidence. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(2):524–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Johansson ME, Sjövall H, Hansson GC. The gastrointestinal mucus system in health and disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;10(6):352–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ata B, Yildiz S, Turkgeldi E, Brocal VP, Dinleyici EC, Moya A, Urman B. The Endobiota study: comparison of vaginal, cervical and gut microbiota between women with stage 3/4 endometriosis and healthy controls. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):2204.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Han Q, Wang J, Li W, Chen ZJ, Du Y. Androgen-induced gut dysbiosis disrupts glucolipid metabolism and endocrinal functions in polycystic ovary syndrome. Microbiome. 2021;9(1):101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Bo T, Liu M, Tang L, Lv J, Wen J, Wang D. Effects of high-fat diet during childhood on precocious puberty and gut microbiota in mice. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:930747.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Baker JM, Al-Nakkash L, Herbst-Kralovetz MM. Estrogen-gut microbiome axis: physiological and clinical implications. Maturitas. 2017;103:45–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Laschke MW, Menger MD. The gut microbiota: a puppet master in the pathogenesis of endometriosis? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(1):68.e1–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhao H, Chen J, Li X, Sun Q, Qin P, Wang Q. Compositional and functional features of the female premenopausal and postmenopausal gut microbiota. FEBS Lett. 2019;593(18):2655–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Guadamuro L, Azcarate-Peril MA, Tojo R, Mayo B, Delgado S. Use of high throughput amplicon sequencing and ethidium monoazide dye to track microbiota changes in an equol-producing menopausal woman receiving a long-term isoflavones treatment. AIMS Microbiol. 2019;5(1):102–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Fuhrman BJ, Feigelson HS, Flores R, Gail MH, Xu X, Ravel J, et al. Associations of the fecal microbiome with urinary estrogens and estrogen metabolites in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(12):4632–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Li L, Rao S, Cheng Y, Zhuo X, Deng C, Xu N, et al. Microbial osteoporosis: the interplay between the gut microbiota and bones via host metabolism and immunity. Microbiologyopen. 2019;8(8):e00810.

  19. Ma S, Qin J, Hao Y, Shi Y, Fu L. Structural and functional changes of gut microbiota in ovariectomized rats and their correlations with altered bone mass. Aging-Us. 2020;12(11):10736–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. M-J X. Obstetrics and gynecology clinical guidelines: Golden Shield Press; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJ, Holmes SP. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016;13:581–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Bokulich NA, Kaehler BD, Rideout JR, Dillon M, Bolyen E, Knight R, et al. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2's q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome. 2018;6:90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Vázquez-Baeza Y, Pirrung M, Gonzalez A, Knight R. EMPeror: a tool for visualizing high-throughput microbial community data. Gigascience. 2013;2:16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L, Gevers D, Miropolsky L, Garrett WS, et al. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 2011;12:R60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Langille MG, Zaneveld J, Caporaso JG, McDonald D, Knights D, Reyes JA, et al. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:814–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Koren O, Goodrich JK, Cullender TC, Spor A, Laitinen K, Backhed HK, et al. Host remodeling of the gut microbiome and metabolic changes during pregnancy. Cell. 2012;150(3):470–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Mueller S, Saunier K, Hanisch C, Norin E, Alm L, Midtvedt T, et al. Differences in fecal microbiota in different European study populations in relation to age, gender, and country: a cross-sectional study. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72(2):1027–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhu J, Liao M, Yao Z, Liang W, Li Q, Liu J, et al. Breast cancer in postmenopausal women is associated with an altered gut metagenome. Microbiome. 2018;6:136.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Brusselaers N, Maret-Ouda J, Konings P, El-Serag HB, Lagergren J. Menopausal hormone therapy and the risk of esophageal and gastric cancer. Int J Cancer. 2017;140(7):1693–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Huang G, Xu J, Lefever DE, Glenn TC, Nagy T, Guo TL. Genistein prevention of hyperglycemia and improvement of glucose tolerance in adult non-obese diabetic mice are associated with alterations of gut microbiome and immune homeostasis. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2017;332:138–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Flores R, Shi J, Fuhrman B, Xu X, Veenstra TD, Gail MH, et al. Fecal microbial determinants of fecal and systemic estrogens and estrogen metabolites: a cross-sectional study. J Transl Med. 2012;10:253.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Pedret A, Valls RM, Calderon-Perez L, Llaurado E, Companys J, Pla-Paga L, et al. Effects of daily consumption of the probiotic Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis CECT 8145 on anthropometric adiposity biomarkers in abdominally obese subjects: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Obes. 2019;43(9):1863–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Bernini LJ, Colado Simao AN, de Souza AHB, Alfieri DF, Segura LG, Costa GN, et al. Effect of Bifidobacterium lactis HN019 on inflammatory markers and oxidative stress in subjects with and without the metabolic syndrome. Br J Nutr. 2018;120(6):645–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nemec A, Musilek M, Sedo O, De Baere T, Maixnerova M, van der Reijden TJK, et al. Acinetobacter bereziniae sp nov and Acinetobacter guillouiae sp nov., to accommodate Acinetobacter genomic species 10 and 11, respectively. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010;60:896–903.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Revest M, Egmann G, Cattoir V, Tattevin P. HACEK endocarditis: state-of-the-art. Expert Rev Anti-Infect Ther. 2016;14(5):523–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Beaud D, Tailliez P, Anba-Mondoloni J. Genetic characterization of the beta-glucuronidase enzyme from a human intestinal bacterium, Ruminococcus gnavus. Microbiol Sgm. 2005;151:2323–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Shen R-L, Dang X-Y, Dong J-L, Hu X-Z. Effects of oat beta-Glucan and barley beta-Glucan on fecal characteristics, intestinal microflora, and intestinal bacterial metabolites in rats. J Agric Food Chem. 2012;60(45):11301–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Santoro N, Epperson CN, Mathews SB. Menopausal symptoms and their management. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am. 2015;44(3):497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Laganà AS, Vitale SG, Stojanovska L, Lambrinoudaki I, Apostolopoulos V, Chiofalo B, et al. Preliminary results of a single-arm pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of visnadine, prenylflavonoids and bovine colostrum in postmenopausal sexually active women affected by vulvovaginal atrophy. Maturitas. 2018;109:78–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Schaefer O, Hümpel M, Fritzemeier KH, Bohlmann R, Schleuning WD. 8-Prenyl naringenin is a potent ERalpha selective phytoestrogen present in hops and beer. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2003;84:359–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Caruso S, Mauro D, Cariola M, Fava V, Rapisarda AMC, Cianci A. Randomized crossover study investigating daily versus on-demand vulvar Visnadine spray in women affected by female sexual arousal disorder. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2018;34:110–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Nappi RE, Cagnacci A, Becorpi AM, Nappi C, Paoletti AM, Busacca M, et al. Monurelle biogel® vaginal gel in the treatment of vaginal dryness in postmenopausal women. Climacteric. 2017;20:467–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mauvais-Jarvis F, Manson JE, Stevenson JC, Fonseca VA. Menopausal hormone therapy and type 2 diabetes prevention: evidence, mechanisms, and clinical implications. Endocr Rev. 2017;38(3):173–88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Chao P-Y, Chiang T-I, Chang IC, Tsai F-L, Lee H-H, Hsieh K, et al. Amelioration of estrogen-deficiency-induced obesity by Ocimum gratissimum. Int J Med Sci. 2017;14(9):896–901.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Virani SS, Alonso A, Benjamin EJ, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, Carson AP, et al. Heart disease and stroke Statistics-2020 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;141(9):E139–596.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Li L, Wang Z. Ovarian Aging and Osteoporosis. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1086:199–215.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Leeners B, Geary N, Tobler PN, Asarian L. Ovarian hormones and obesity. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(3):300–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Lizcano F, Guzmán G. Estrogen deficiency and the origin of obesity during menopause. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:757461.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Nair AR, Pillai AJ, Nair N. Cardiovascular changes in menopause. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2021;17:e230421187681.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Park S, Kim DS, Kang ES, Kim DB, Kang S. Low-dose brain estrogen prevents menopausal syndrome while maintaining the diversity of the gut microbiomes in estrogen-deficient rats. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2018;315(1):E99–E109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Collins FL, Rios-Arce ND, Schepper JD, Parameswaran N, McCabe LR. The potential of probiotics as a therapy for osteoporosis. Microbiol Spectr. 2017;5(4):10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Li J-Y, Chassaing B, Tyagi AM, Vaccaro C, Luo T, Adams J, et al. Sex steroid deficiency-associated bone loss is microbiota dependent and prevented by probiotics. J Clin Investig. 2016;126(6):2049–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Takimoto T, Hatanaka M, Hoshino T, Takara T, Tanaka K, Shimizu A, et al. Effect of Bacillus subtilis C-3102 on bone mineral density in healthy postmenopausal Japanese women: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial. Biosci Microbiota Food Health. 2018;37(4):87–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Amabebe E, Robert FO, Agbalalah T, Orubu ESF. Microbial dysbiosis-induced obesity: role of gut microbiota in homoeostasis of energy metabolism. Br J Nutr. 2020;123(10):1127–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely thank the clinicians and the participants who were enrolled in this study.

Funding

This work was supported by the innovation and strengthening hospital project of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine First Affiliated Hospital (2019IIT17) and City school (hospital) joint funding project (202102010400). The funding bodies played no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Gynecology, Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, China

    Yaqian Liu & Ying Zhou

  2. The First Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China

    Ting Mao, Yanmei Huang, Jingtao Liang, Min Zhu, Peixun Yao & Yun Zong

  3. College of Basic Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China

    Jianying Lang

  4. Division of Laboratory Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University Guangzhou, Guangzhou, China

    Yingxuan Zhang

Authors
  1. Yaqian Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ying Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ting Mao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yanmei Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jingtao Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Min Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Peixun Yao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yun Zong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jianying Lang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Yingxuan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

This project was conceived and designed by Y.Q.L, Y.Z1 (Ying Zhou), and Y.X.Z. The project was managed by Y.Q.L, Y.X.Z, and Y.Z1. Clinical diagnosis was performed by Y.Z1. Y.Q.L, Y.M.H, and J.T.L were in charge of collecting the samples and administering the questionnaires to the participants. Y.Q.L, T.M and J.Y.L contributed to metagenomic data analysis. The manuscript was written by Y.Q.L. The manuscript was drafted with the help of Y.Z1, Y.M.H, Y.Z2 (Yun Zong), J.T.L, M.Z, and P.X.Y. The final version of the manuscript was approved by all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ying Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Medical Ethics Committee of the Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine First Affiliated Hospital approved this study (NO.ZYYECK【2020】021). All participants were informed about the study’s purpose and given written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Subject survey. Including general information of participants and the domestic modified Kupperman Index score.

Additional file 2.

The rarefaction curve of richness in different groups. (A-B) The curve in each group is nearly smooth with a sufficient amount of sequencing data and few new undetected genes.

Additional file 3.

Gut microbiota composition of phyla, genera, and species. There are 43 phyla, 281 genera, and 163 species were identified in the P (n = 77) and H (n = 24) groups.

Additional file 4.

KEGG level3 pathways of functional prediction. 50 KEGG level3 pathways enriched in the P group were found to be significantly higher than in H group.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Zhou, Y., Mao, T. et al. The relationship between menopausal syndrome and gut microbes. BMC Women's Health 22, 437 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-02029-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-02029-w

Keywords

BMC Women's Health

ISSN: 1472-6874

Contact us