Skip to main content
Download PDF

The role of daughters in relation to their mother’s cervical cancer diagnosis and treatment in Guatemala: a descriptive study

BMC Women's Health volume 23, Article number: 142 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

There is currently no information on how caregivers for women diagnosed with cervical cancer in Guatemala, particularly daughters, are affected by their supportive role. This study’s objective was to describe the support role of caregivers in the country, with a focus on daughters with a mother diagnosed with cervical cancer.

Methods

This analysis utilizes data from a cross-sectional study which aimed to understand pathways to cervical cancer care. Women seeking cervical cancer treatment at the Instituto de Cancerologia (INCAN) in Guatemala City, Guatemala and their companions were surveyed. Descriptive statistics were calculated.

Results

One hundred forty-five women seeking treatment and 71 companions participated in the study. Patient's daughters were most frequently reported as the person who provided the most support (51%) and as the most reported to have encouraged the patient to seek care. Furthermore, daughters were noted as the person most reported to fulfill the major household and livelihood roles of the patient while they were seeking or receiving treatment (38.0%). Most daughters reported that they were missing housework (77%), childcare (63%), and income-earning activities (60%) to attend the appointment with their mothers.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that in Guatemala cervical cancer patient's daughters have a significant support role in their mother’s cancer diagnosis. Furthermore, we found that while caring for their mothers, daughters in Guatemala are often unable to participate in their primary labor activities. This highlights the additional burden that cervical cancer has on women in Latin America.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Cervical cancer is largely preventable through screening and Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination [1]. However, due to a lack of widespread comprehensive screening programs as well as historically underfunded healthcare systems, [2, 3] it remains the second most common cancer for women living in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) [4]. Among women in LMICs who do seek care, many face a limited number of publicly available centers that provide effective screening and cancer care, as well as lacking availability of trained medical staff, leaving many women unscreened or unable to complete treatment for premalignant lesions or cancers [5,6,7]. As a result, women in LMICs are more likely to be diagnosed with late stages of the disease [8] and 88% of global cervical cancer deaths occur in these settings [4].

As in other LMIC settings, the burden of cervical cancer in Guatemala is high. The adjusted standard mortality rate of cervical cancer in Guatemala is 11.9 deaths per 100,000 person-years, which is six times higher than the United States (2.1 deaths per 1000,000 person years) [9]. At the country level there are only a handful of specialized public hospitals providing services to cancer patients. Thus, most patients are treated at tertiary care hospitals located in Guatemala City, requiring many women to travel from across the country to seek cervical cancer treatment. Given that the capacity and resources of these public hospitals are limited, patients are often referred to the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCAN), the only non-profit hospital in Guatemala specializing in cancer treatment for adults, usually at no cost. However, women can attend INCAN directly and pay small fees to get attention if they wish so. Women at INCAN have access to chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery. The type of treatment and its length depends on the stage at diagnosis and treatment availability at that time. As a result, the lack of widespread services has led to unsurprisingly inconsistent care and treatment. A 2019 study by Zamorano et al. reviewed the charts of women seeking care at INCAN from 2005–2007 and found that approximately 25% of women diagnosed did not initiate care after their diagnosis and a further 20% were lost to follow up after six months [10].

Existent research has focused on the role of spouses [11,12,13] and children in general [14, 15] with regards to a woman’s cervical cancer diagnosis in LMICs. However, there is limited knowledge on the support role of other caregivers, and more specifically on the role of patient’s daughters in relation to their mother’s cervical cancer diagnosis. To our knowledge this is the first study to focus on the support role of daughters with mothers diagnosed with cervical cancer in Guatemala. The gendered nature of caregiving necessitates an improved understanding of the support provided by daughters, as women in these countries typically bear the burden of the majority of paid and unpaid caring work [16,17,18]. This in turn limits their ability to access educational and employment opportunities. The present study aims to describe which individuals provide the most support to women seeking cervical cancer care in Guatemala and assess the burden of care for the daughters of women seeking cervical cancer care.

Methods

Study population

This study utilizes data from a cross-sectional study conducted at INCAN that aimed to understand the pathways to care for cervical cancer. The study recruited women seeking cervical cancer care and their companions. Women were eligible for the study if they were (i) currently seeking cervical cancer treatment at INCAN; (ii) over the age of 18; and (iii) spoke Spanish or were accompanied by someone who could act as a translator. Companions were eligible for the study if they (i) were accompanying an individual with cervical cancer seeking treatment at INCAN who had consented to participate in the study; (ii) over the age of 18; and (iii) spoke Spanish.

Data collection

Women were recruited using convenience sampling from July 24th to September 1st, 2017. Participants were recruited from the outpatient clinic for gynecologic and breast cancers, the inpatient and outpatient radiotherapy departments, and the outpatient chemotherapy department. Participants received 40 Quetzales (approximately 5.20 USD) as compensation for their time participating in the study.

Two trained interviewers fluent in Spanish administered surveys on tablets using the Qualtrics offline application. Patients and their companions were administered surveys separately and surveys were tailored to the participant (i.e., patient or companion-specific survey). Questions were read aloud to participants and entered into Qualtrics by study personnel. All answers were self-reported.

Measures and analysis

Patient survey

The patient survey consisted of 113 questions that took approximately 30 to 60 min to complete. The survey included questions on the participant’s demographics, access to healthcare, cervical cancer screening and treatment history, knowledge of cervical cancer and HPV, barriers to seeking treatment, and the patient’s social support network. The survey utilized validated questions from a 2017 survey in Guatemala developed Gottschlich et al. [19] as well as the breast module of the Cancer Awareness Measure, adapted to the Guatemalan cervical cancer population [20]. The tool was piloted with a group of volunteers.

Primary outcomes for the patient survey included relationship with main source of support, with whom patient first disclosed diagnosis, and relationship with individual who encouraged patient to see a doctor were assessed. These questions had the response options daughter, spouse/partner, son, mother, father, sister, brother, aunt, uncle, male friend, female friend, a member of their religious community, and other. Due to small cell sizes, all responses except for spouse/partner, mother, son, and daughter were recategorized as “other”. Daughter-in-laws were categorized as daughter in both the patient and companion survey data.

Data related to questions regarding to the demographics and cancer characteristics of women seeking cervical cancer care such as age, ethnicity, native language, education, literacy, income, marital status, number of children, travel time to appointment, cancer stage, time since diagnosis, time between symptoms and seeking care, and sought out screening because felt sick were also summarized. To confirm cancer stage, we extracted all available medical charts for participants.

Companion survey

The companion survey consisted of 52 questions and took approximately 15 min to complete. The survey included questions on the companion’s demographics, relationship to the patient, and the impact of cervical cancer treatment on the patient and family, including the companion.

Primary outcomes were what activities the companion missed to attend the appointment (income earning activities, caring for an elderly relative, caring for children, housework, social activities, religious activities, school), number of previous visits by companion to INCAN, and amount of time typically spent at INCAN by companion. Companions also reported who fulfils the major roles of the patients when she is seeking treatment, and which individuals were most impacted by the woman’s cervical cancer diagnosis (daughter, spouse/partner, son, mother, father, sister, brother, aunt, uncle, male friend, female friend, and other).

Data related to questions from the companion’s survey including language, relationship, distance travelled from outside Guatemala City, anticipated number of days attending treatment appointments with your companion, accommodation, and transportation were also summarized.

Analysis

All data was analyzed using R 4.0.5 [21]. Descriptive statistics were calculated using counts and frequencies. After investigating the primary outcomes from the companion survey, the dataset was subset to only include daughters and the analyses were rerun.

Ethics

Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics committee of University of Michigan (IRB# HUM00127150, INCAN, and the Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama (CIE-REV 069/2017). All study participants provided written informed consent.

Results

Cervical cancer patients

Of the 145 women diagnosed with cervical cancer who completed the survey, most identified as Ladina (non-indigenous) (77.9%), had less than a primary school education (89.0%), were married (58.9%), and had more than five children (42.7%) (Table 1). Additionally, the majority of the women self-reported that they were diagnosed with Stage II or III cervical cancer and over 85% of women sought out treatment because they were experiencing symptoms. Of the 145 participants, 112 had medical records available for abstraction. From these records, we saw that nearly 90% of the women with available medical records were actually diagnosed at later stages (IIB-IV).

Table 1 Demographic and cancer characteristics of women seeking cervical cancer care
Full size table

Women seeking treatment for cervical cancer identified daughters as the person who provides the most overall social support (Fig. 1). Furthermore, daughters were reported as the person most reported to encourage them to seek care (40.0%). When asked about the first person to whom the participants disclosed their diagnosis, the spouse was the most common response (32.4%) followed closely by daughters (31.7%).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Type of support provided to women being treated for cervical cancer stratified by individual classification

Full size image

Companions

In all, 71 companions completed the survey (Table 2). The majority of companions were under the age of 45 (64.8%). The majority were daughters of the women being treated for cervical cancer (49.3%), followed by their spouses (21.1%). About 75% of the companions reported traveling from outside Guatemala City and about 76% reported using the public bus to travel to INCAN.

Table 2 Characteristics of companions
Full size table

When asked what person was most impacted by the woman’s cervical cancer diagnosis, most companions reported that daughters were the most impacted (59.2%). This was followed by sons (53.5%) and sisters (45.1%). Fathers were identified as one of the least impacted according to the patient’s companions (7.0%).

Daughter companions

The companions reported that daughters were most reported to fulfill the major roles of the patient when they are seeking treatment (38.0%). Major roles included incoming earning, caring for children and elderly family members, and caring for home. Moreover, 37.1% of daughters who served as companions reported that they anticipated that they would be away from home for more than eight hours. Additionally, 80% of daughters reported that they have accompanied their mother for treatment three or more times and approximately 63% believed that they would need to accompany their mother for treatment at least three more times. The majority of companion daughters (77%) reported that they were missing housework/childcare (63%), and income earning activities (60%) (Fig. 2). Additionally, 5.7% of the daughter companions reported having to miss school to accompany their mother to treatment.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Reported activities missed by daughters serving as companions to their mother’s cervical cancer appointments

Full size image

Discussion

This study included 145 women attending cervical cancer treatment and 71 companions at INCAN in Guatemala City. Findings showed that daughters have a large role in the support of cervical cancer patients undergoing treatment at INCAN, as reported by both the patients and their companions.

The large support role of daughters in their mother’s cervical cancer diagnosis in Guatemala is unique because spouses have largely been reported to provide the most support for individuals diagnosed with cancer in other settings [22, 23]. Within current literature there is a limited understanding of the support role of daughters in relation to their mother’s cervical cancer diagnosis. Most of the current relevant research focuses on the relationship between women diagnosed with breast cancer and their daughters [24, 25]. There is a clear research gap in understanding the relationship among women diagnosed with cervical cancer and their daughters, particularly in LMICs. It is important to understand the daughter-caregiver relationship, not only to allow for the provision of additional support for women diagnosed with cervical cancer, but also for their caregiving daughters. A 1998 study by Raveis et al. of 164 cancer outpatients and their adult caregiving daughters found that caregiver burden was significantly correlated with depression [26]. As such, a reliance on daughters can have a negative psychological burden for those providing support, highlighting a double burden of cervical cancer in women in which in not only impacts women diagnosed, but their caregiver as well.

Cervical cancer can be a stigmatizing disease. Many women report embarrassment and shame due to the location of the cancer as well as the connection of the disease to HPV, a sexually transmitted infection [27,28,29]. As a result, many women report feelings of isolation [28], being a burden to others [29], and verbal abuse [27] after their diagnosis. Prior research has shown that a cervical cancer diagnosis can have a negative impact on the relationship a woman has with her partner and the support she receives, particularly in LMICs [11,12,13]. For example, Rosser et al. conducted a qualitative study among 110 men in Western Kenya about their knowledge and attitudes about cervical cancer. Only 21.8% of men reported that they would try and assist their partners if they were diagnosed with cervical cancer [30]. In fact, many women report spousal desertion after their cervical cancer diagnosis [31, 32]. Women in Guatemala may feel shame and fear in speaking about their diagnosis with their partners. Futheremore, there is also the issue of the “machista” culture, women are seen as inferior, and with a disease that affects their “womanness “ they are viewed as even less worth. Many male family members do not believe that it is their role to look after sick female members of their family. Rather boys are pulled out of school to work to meet household financial needs while girls are asked to care for the sick [33, 34]. With this, it is unsurprising that daughters play an important role in the support of their mother’s cervical cancer diagnosis. In addition to expanding screening programs, one way to ease the burden of support from daughters would be to provide additional education about cervical cancer to male caregivers and other uninformed relatives and friends to help reduce the stigmatization of the disease. Increased knowledge about HPV and education has been shown to reduce overall stigma of the disease [30, 35].

Prior research has shown that daughters are often expected to fulfill caregiver roles for ailing parents [36,37,38,39]. Our findings support this as daughters were shown to be the primary support for their mothers diagnosed with cervical cancer in this Guatemalan patient’s sample. In addition to attending multiple day long trips to the cancer clinic, daughters also noted that they missed labor-related tasks such as childcare and income earning activities. By placing the caregiving role of a woman’s cervical cancer diagnosis primarily on daughters, it prevents the caregiving daughters from consistently providing care to their own children, continuing their education or performing paid or unpaid labor. The latter is important because most of the unpaid labor is provided by women [40]. Similarly, previous research has demonstrated that a women’s cervical cancer diagnosis impacts her ability to maintain employment [28, 41, 42] and ability to care for her children [43]. As such, a cervical cancer diagnosis economically hinders both the women diagnosed as well as their daughters. This is important because women in Guatemala are already disadvantaged in terms of education, labor force participation, financial independence, and political representation [44].

This study has several strengths and limitations. First, this study is strengthened by its novelty, as to our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the relationship between cervical cancer patients and their daughters in Guatemala. Additionally, this study was conducted in the only specialized center providing public cancer care in Guatemala, which sees patients from all over the country. With regards to limitations, this study was limited to self-reported measures. Women were asked to self-report measures such as time since diagnosis and types of available health centers in their community, which could lead to recall bias. We were also limited in our understanding of the number of women who had daughters and daughter in laws as this information was not collected. Rather, we were only able to report on the number of women who brought their daughter or daughter-in-law to the clinic that day. Furthermore, non-probabilistic sampling methods were used to recruit women which could lead to selection bias in the study results. Similarly, as this study was conducted at one treatment center, it is likely not a representative sample of all women diagnosed with cervical cancer in Guatemala.

Our study indicates that women diagnosed with cervical cancer in Guatemala rely predominately on their daughters for support. There is a need to further explore the reliance on daughters for support from women diagnosed with cervical cancer not only in Guatemala but in other LMICs. Both quantitative and qualitative methods could provide a greater understanding of the role daughters have in providing support. Additionally, more research is needed on how to best support daughters while caring for their mothers and ensure that they are being screened for cervical cancer. Furthering this research will inform policymakers and stakeholders in Guatemala and Central America with information on how to support both women diagnosed with cervical cancer and their daughters, in order to promote gender equity—goal five of the sustainable development goals [45]. Furthermore, this evidence on the burden of cervical cancer on daughters in Guatemala provides global policymakers with additional evidence for expanding cervical cancer screening programs, which will help lead to the eventual elimination of cervical cancer worldwide.

In conclusion, our study suggests that in Guatemala cervical cancer patient's daughters have a significant support role in their mother’s cancer diagnosis. Furthermore, we found that while caring for their mothers, daughters in Guatemala are often unable to participate in their primary labor activities. This highlights the additional burden that cervical cancer has on women in Latin America.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. The Lancet. Eliminating cervical cancer. Lancet. 2020;395(10221):312.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Anyangwe SC, Mtonga C. Inequities in the global health workforce: the greatest impediment to health in sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2007;4(2):93–100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Louie KS, De Sanjose S, Mayaud P. Epidemiology and prevention of human papillomavirus and cervical cancer in sub-Saharan Africa: a comprehensive review. Tropical Med Int Health. 2009;14(10):1287–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arbyn M, Weiderpass E, Bruni L, de Sanjosé S, Saraiya M, Ferlay J, Bray F. Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(2):e191–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnston C, Ng JS, Manchanda R, Tsunoda AT, Chuang L. Variations in gynecologic oncology training in low (LIC) and middle income (MIC) countries (LMICs): Common efforts and challenges. Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2017;20:9–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Nakaganda A, Solt K, Kwagonza L, Driscoll D, Kampi R, Orem J. Challenges faced by cancer patients in Uganda: Implications for health systems strengthening in resource limited settings. J Cancer Policy. 2021;27: 100263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rakhshanda S, Dalal K, Chowdhury HA, Mayaboti CA, Paromita P, Rahman AKMF, Hussain AHME, Mashreky SR. Assessing service availability and readiness to manage cervical cancer in Bangladesh. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):670.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Vu M, Yu J, Awolude OA, Chuang L. Cervical cancer worldwide. Curr Probl Cancer. 2018;42(5):457–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zamorano AS, Barnoya J, Gharzouzi E, Chrisman Robbins C, Orozco E, Polo Guerra S, Mutch DG. Treatment compliance as a major barrier to optimal cervical cancer treatment in Guatemala. J Glob Oncol. 2019;5:1–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Amoo EO, Olawole-Isaac A, Okorie N, Ajayi MP, Adekola PO, Amana TR, Olu-Owolabi F. Spousal desertion and coping strategies among women with cervical cancer in Nigeria: a schematic framework for wellbeing. Afr Popul Stud. 2018;32(1 Suppl.):4012–21.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Afiyanti Y, Milanti A. Physical sexual and intimate relationship concerns among Indonesian cervical cancer survivors: A phenomenological study. Nurs Health Sci. 2013;15(2):151–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kebede W, Kebede K. Psychosocial experiences and needs of women diagnosed with cervical cancer in Ethiopia. Int Soc Work. 2017;60(6):1632–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kamau RK, Osoti AO, Njuguna EM. Effect of diagnosis and treatment of inoperable cervical cancer on quality of life among women receiving radiotherapy at Kenyatta National Hospital. East Afr Med J. 2007;84(1):24–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Binka C, Nyarko SH, Awusabo-Asare K, Doku DT. “I always tried to forget about the condition and pretend I was healed”: coping with cervical cancer in rural Ghana. BMC Palliat Care. 2018;17(1):24–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Wuest J. Repatterning care: women’s proactive management of family caregiving demands. Health Care Women Int. 2000;21(5):393–411.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Meleis AI, Lindgren TG. Man works from sun to sun, but woman’s work is never done: insights on research and policy. Health Care Women Int. 2002;23(6–7):742–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Glazer NY. THE HOME AS WORKSHOP: Women as Amateur Nurses and Medical Care Providers. Gend Soc. 1990;4(4):479–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gottschlich A, Rivera-Andrade A, Grajeda E, Alvarez C, Mendoza Montano C, Meza R. Acceptability of human papillomavirus self-sampling for cervical cancer screening in an indigenous community in Guatemala. J Glob Oncol. 2017;3(5):444–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Cancer Research UK KsCLaUCL: Breast module of the Cancer Awareness Measure (Breast-CAM): Toolkit. 2011.

  21. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lund L, Ross L, Petersen MA, Groenvold M. Cancer caregiving tasks and consequences and their associations with caregiver status and the caregiver’s relationship to the patient: a survey. BMC Cancer. 2014;14(1):541.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kurtz ME, Kurtz JC, Given CW, Given B. Relationship of caregiver reactions and depression to cancer patients’ symptoms, functional states and depression—A longitudinal view. Soc Sci Med. 1995;40(6):837–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hamid W, Khan TA. Experiences of social support among Kashmiri women with breast cancer. Health Risk Soc. 2021;23(1–2):52–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fisher CL. Coping with breast cancer across adulthood: emotional support communication in the mother-daughter bond. J Appl Commun Res. 2010;38(4):386–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Raveis VH, Karus DG, Siegel K. Correlates of depressive symptomatology among adult daughter caregivers of a parent with cancer. Cancer Interdiscip Int J Am Cancer Soc. 1998;83(8):1652–63.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Shrestha G, Mulmi R, Phuyal P, Thakur RK, Siwakoti B. Experiences of cervical cancer survivors in Chitwan, Nepal: A qualitative study. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(11):e0234834–e0234834.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Obi SN, Ozumba BC. Cervical cancer: socioeconomic implications of management in a developing nation. J Obstetr Gynaecol. 2008;28(5):526–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Noor-Mahomed SB, Schlebusch L, Bosch BA. Suicidal behavior in patients diagnosed with cancer of the cervix. Crisis J Crisis Intervent Suicide Prev. 2003;24(4):168–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rosser JI, Zakaras JM, Hamisi S, Huchko MJ. Men’s knowledge and attitudes about cervical cancer screening in Kenya. BMC Womens Health. 2014;14(1):138.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Binka C, Doku DT, Awusabo-Asare K. Experiences of cervical cancer patients in rural Ghana: An exploratory study. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(10):e0185829–e0185829.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Maree JE, Mosalo A, Wright SCD. “It depends on how the relationship was before you became ill”: black South African women’s experiences of life partner support through the trajectory of cervical cancer. Eur J Cancer Care. 2013;22(4):459–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wilson TD. Violence against Women in Latin America. Lat Am Perspect. 2014;41(1):3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Driscoll SD, Goodman R. Emancipatory Praxis for Cervical Cancer Health Equity in Guatemala. Int J Human Caring. 2019;23(1):71–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Waller J, Marlow LAV, Wardle J. The association between knowledge of HPV and feelings of stigma, shame and anxiety. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 2007;83(2):155.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Mendez-Luck CA, Kennedy DP, Wallace SP. Guardians of health: The dimensions of elder caregiving among women in a Mexico City neighborhood. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68(2):228–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Spitze G, Logan J. Sons, daughters, and intergenerational social support. J Marriage Fam 1990;52(2):420–30.

  38. Nguyen H, Nguyen T, Tran D, Hinton L. “It’s extremely hard but it’s not a burden”: A qualitative study of family caregiving for people living with dementia in Vietnam. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(11):e0259788.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Perrin PB, Panyavin I, MorlettParedes A, Aguayo A, Macias MA, Rabago B, Picot SJF, Arango-Lasprilla JC. A Disproportionate Burden of Care: Gender Differences in Mental Health, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Social Support in Mexican Multiple Sclerosis Caregivers. Behav Neurol. 2015;2015:283958.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Ferrant G, Pesando LM, Nowacka K. Unpaid Care Work: The missing link in the analysis of gender gaps in labour outcomes. Boulogne Billancourt: OECD Development Center; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Arrossi S, Matos E, Zengarini N, Roth B, Sankaranayananan R, Parkin M. The socio-economic impact of cervical cancer on patients and their families in Argentina, and its influence on radiotherapy compliance. Results from a cross-sectional study. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;105(2):335–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hailu A, Mariam DH. Patient side cost and its predictors for cervical cancer in Ethiopia: a cross sectional hospital based study. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:69–69.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Tadesse SK. Socio-economic and cultural vulnerabilities to cervical cancer and challenges faced by patients attending care at Tikur Anbessa Hospital: a cross sectional and qualitative study. BMC Womens Health. 2015;15:75–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Gender Data Portal: Guatemala [https://genderdata.worldbank.org/countries/guatemala]. Accessed 28 Mar 2023.

  45. Sachs J, Kroll C, Lafortune G, Fuller G, Woelm F: Sustainable development report 2022. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2022.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge our surveyors as well as INCAN, and INCAP for their support.

Funding

Ms. Hallie Dau received Canada Graduate Doctoral Award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Dr. Rafael Meza is supported by the Rogel Scholar Award and the University of Michigan School of Public Health’s Office of Global Public Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Population and Public Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

    Hallie Dau, Anna Gottschlich & Gina Ogilvie

  2. Women’s Health Research Institute, BC Women’s Hospital and Health Centre, Room H203J - 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3N1, Canada

    Hallie Dau, Anna Gottschlich & Gina Ogilvie

  3. School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Lynn Metz, Christian S. Alvarez & Rafael Meza

  4. Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama, Research Center for the Prevention of Chronic Diseases, Guatemala City, Guatemala

    Natalia Pineda, Andres Pineda, Carlos Mendoza-Montano & Alvaro Rivera-Andrade

  5. Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Kristin Bevliacqua

  6. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Guatemala City, Guatemala

    Eduardo Gharzouzi

Authors
  1. Hallie Dau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anna Gottschlich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lynn Metz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Natalia Pineda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Andres Pineda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Christian S. Alvarez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kristin Bevliacqua
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Carlos Mendoza-Montano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Gina Ogilvie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Alvaro Rivera-Andrade
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Eduardo Gharzouzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Rafael Meza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HD (formal analysis, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing), AG (conceptualization, funding acquisition, writing – review and editing), LM (investigation, writing – review and editing), NP (project administration, writing – review and editing), AP (project administration, writing – review and editing), CSA (conceptualization, writing – review and editing), KB (conceptualization, methodology, writing – review and editing), CM (conceptualization, methodology, writing – review and editing), GO (conceptualization, funding acquisition, writing – review and editing), AR (conceptualization, project administration, writing – review and editing), EG (conceptualization, writing – review and editing), RM (conceptualization, funding acquisition, writing – review and editing). The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Gottschlich.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics committee of University of Michigan (IRB# HUM00127150, INCAN, and the Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama (CIE-REV 069/2017). All study participants provided written informed consent. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

All study participants provided written informed consent. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dau, H., Gottschlich, A., Metz, L. et al. The role of daughters in relation to their mother’s cervical cancer diagnosis and treatment in Guatemala: a descriptive study. BMC Women's Health 23, 142 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02305-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02305-3

Keywords

BMC Women's Health

ISSN: 1472-6874

Contact us