Skip to main content
Download PDF

Cervical cancer screening utilization and associated factors among women attending antenatal care at Asella Referral and Teaching Hospital, Arsi zone, South Central Ethiopia

BMC Women's Health volume 23, Article number: 199 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Cervical cancer is a major public health problem affecting women worldwide. It is the second cause of mortality among women in Ethiopia. Early Cervical cancer screening has a tremendous impact on reducing morbidity and mortality related to cervical cancer infection. Therefore, this study aimed to assess cervical cancer screening utilization and associated factors among women attending Antenatal Care at Asella referral and teaching hospital, Arsi Zone, south-central Ethiopia.

Method

This study employed a facility-based cross-sectional study among 457 Antenatal Care mothers from December 2020 to February 2021. Data collection was performed using interviewer-administered structured questionnaires. Data were entered into EpiInfo Version 7 and transferred to SPSS V.21 for analysis. A logistic regression model was used to determine the factors associated with cervical cancer screening utilization and an adjusted odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval at p-value < 0.05 was computed to determine the level of statistical significance.

Result

The magnitude of cervical cancer screening utilization was found to be 7.2%(95% CI: 5.2, 10.6). Educational status of secondary and above (AOR = 2.92; 95%CI = 1.078–7.94), getting screened for any reproductive healthcare services(AOR = 4.95; 95%CI = 2.24–10.94), having multiple sexual partners(AOR = 4.55; 95%CI = 1.83–11.35), and satisfactory knowledge of cervical cancer screening(AOR = 3.89; 95%CI = 1.74–8.56) were significantly associated factors with cervical cancer screening utilization.

Conclusion

Utilization of cervical cancer screening was low among women attending Antenatal care at Asella Referral and Teaching hospital, Southcentral Ethiopia. Educational status, history of multiple sexual partners, getting screened for any reproductive healthcare services, and knowledge of cervical cancer screening were significant factors associated with the utilization of cervical cancer screening. Hence, to improve the utilization of Cervical cancer screening, there should be the implementation of programmed health education and awareness creation on the benefits of screening as well as the promotion of reproductive healthcare services at health facilities.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Cervical cancer is the growth of abnormal cells in the lining part of the cervix and is caused by various strains of the human papillomavirus (HPV), which is commonly a sexually transmitted infection. Among the two main known strains of HPV (HPV8 and HPV16), HPV16 has the most oncogenic potential to cause cervical cancer [1,2,3,4]. Cervical cancer has been an important public health problem [5]. Cervical cancer(CC) has also a great impact on women’s health and quality of life [6]. It is ranked as the fourth most common cancer among women worldwide. Globally, the incidence rate of CC was estimated to be more than half a million, and more than 311, 000 deaths were reported in 2018. Of this, around 90% of CC new cases and deaths occurred in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) including Africa [7, 8]. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimated nearly 119,284 cases and 81,687 deaths caused by CC in Africa, with Sub-Saharan African countries (SSA) bearing the highest global burden of disease. By the year 2018, there were 52,633 new cases and 37,017 death due to CC in Eastern Africa including Ethiopia [9, 10]. In Ethiopia, CC is the second most common cancer in women aged 15 to 44 years old with around 29.43 million women of reproductive age were at risk of developing cervical cancer. The incidence and mortality of CC in Ethiopia were 16.4 and 18.9 per 100,000 population respectively [11, 12]. Despite Ethiopia have developed strategic goal to reduce CC incidence and mortality by 2020, inaccessibility of information, early marriage, multi-sexuality, prolonged use of oral pills, multiparty, and early initiation of sexual contact contributed to the development of the disease [1, 13, 14]. However, the introduction of HPV vaccines for the eligible group has shown tremendous importance in terms of HPV reduction rates in countries where CC infection is high [15]. In addition, early screening, detection, and treatment of CC have also indispensable significance in tackling morbidity and mortality associated with advanced cervical cancer disease in Women [16, 17]. Despite the accessibility of effective screening strategies, there were wide disparities between countries regarding coverage of Cervical Cancer screening(CCS). For example, the magnitude of CCS was 80% in Austria [18], 29.55% in Bangladesh [19], 86.6% in South India [20], and 86.4% in Nepal [21]. Likewise, the magnitude of the CCS was 88.2% in Turkey [22], 94.1% in Kashmir [23], 28% in Uganda [16], and 36% in Kenya [24]. Despite the Federal Ministry of Health(FMOH) of Ethiopia has developed national cervical cancer prevention and control guidelines and targeted the screening of at least 80% of women, the utilization of CCS services among women is still, accounting 1.6% in urban and 0.4% in rural settings [11]. In addition, there is also variation in the level of uptake of CCS among eligible women in Ethiopia from place to place. For example, the uptake of CCS services among women was 2.2% in Adama [14], 19.9% in Mekele [25], 84.5% in Jimma [26], and 1% in the Arsi zone [27]. Previous studies found that different socio-economic factors(age, marital status, educational level, monthly income, and religion) [26, 28,29,30,31,32], behavioral(awareness and attitude toward CCS and multiple sexual partners) [28, 30, 33,34,35,36], reproductive(age of first sex, multiple previous pregnancies, and abortion) [27, 31, 37,38,39], and health system-related factors(shortage of CCS reagents, inaccessibility of service in nearby facilities, shortage of trained staff) [16, 36, 40,41,42,43,44] were among the factors affecting the utilization of CCS. In Ethiopia, the FMOH prepared and distributed national CC prevention and control guidelines along with the preparation of Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (VIA) and cryotherapy training manuals to health facilities to reduce the disease burden and defined eligible women for CCS across the country. A visual inspection with acetic acid screening combined with access to cryotherapy service was introduced as a single-visit approach for reproductive women between 30 and 49 years of age at least every 3 years [14, 45, 46]. Nowadays, the mass campaign and accessibility of CCS services at different hospitals have improved the number of women screened for CC infection [47, 48]. Though there is improvement in demand for CCS, little is known about the current status of the uptake of CCS at the study setting. This has a significant impact on health educators and healthcare providers in designing effective and efficient strategies to increase women’s adherence to CC screening. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the magnitude of CCS utilization and associated factors among women attended Antenatal Care (ANC)at Asella Referral and teaching hospital, South Central Ethiopia.

Methods and materials

Study setting, design, and period

A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted at Asella Referral and Teaching Hospital (ARTH) from December 2020 to February 2021. The hospital is located in Asella town, the main administrative town of Arsi Zone. Asella town is found in South Central Ethiopia and is located 175 km far from Addis Ababa, the capital of Ethiopia. The hospital serves the communities from 28 districts and 2 town administrations. The zone has a total population of around 3,563,474 of which 1,767,483 were females. Of the total number of women, approximately 44.8% were in the reproductive age group. A cervical cancer screening service was launched in 2016 at ARTH.

Study population and eligibility criteria

All reproductive-age women attending ANC at ARTH were the source population whereas all selected women aged 30 to 49 years who come for ANC service during the study time were the study population. In this study, reproductive-age women who were not aged 30–49 years old, with severe mental illness, and critically ill women were excluded.

Sample size and sampling procedures

The sample size was calculated using the formula for estimation of single population proportion (n = Z2 p (1 – p) / d2), considering the assumption of a 95% confidence level, a 4% margin of error, the proportion of women who utilized the cervical cancer screening from a previous study (p) of 22.9% [49] and 10% non-respondent rate. The final sample size for this study was 468 after including a 10% non-response rate. The ANC clinic was selected using a purposive sampling method and the trends of client flow in the last year were obtained from ANC registration for the equivalent period of our data collection. The sampling interval (K) was calculated by dividing the entire women aged 30–49 years by the total sample size, and it was approximately 3. The first woman was randomly chosen for the study by a lottery method, and then every three women were recruited for the study using a systematic sampling method.

Operational definitions

Cervical cancer screening utilization

participants who had screened at least once in their lifetime were considered to have utilized cervical cancer screening. The CCS utilization was determined by asking the question “Have you ever had cervical cancer screening in your lifetime?” Those study respondents who responded ‘Yes’ were coded as utilizing CCS service while the study participants who responded ‘No’ were coded as didn’t utilize CCS service [50].

Knowledge Assessment

Respondents’ knowledge about cervical cancer screening was assessed using 18 point scale. There were 14 knowledge-related multiple-choice questions with 18 correct answers. Each correct answer was given a point of 1 for a correct response and 0 for a wrong or I don’t know the response. The maximum score expected was 18 and the minimum was 0. A score of 80 − 100%(15–18) of correct answers was considered good knowledge, a point of 50 − 79%(9–14) will be considered satisfactory and a point of 0–50%(0–8) of the correct answers was poor knowledge [20].

Attitude assessment

The study participants’ attitude about cervical cancer screening was determined using 7 Likert Scale questions. These questions have either positive or negative responses that were listed as strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, and strongly disagree. The responses were sum-up and a total score was obtained for each respondent. The highest score was expected to be 35 and the lowest was 7. After calculating the mean score, those who scored the mean score and above had a positive attitude while respondents scoring below the mean were considered as having a negative attitude towards CCS services [49].

Data collection procedures (instruments, personnel, measurements)

Data collection was performed using an interviewer-administered structured questionnaire adapted from previous studies [51,52,53,54,55]. Data were collected by four trained BSc Midwifery professionals. The questionnaires comprised four parts. It was categorized into Sociodemographic characteristics, reproductive-related factors, knowledge and attitude about cervical cancer screening, and health facility-related factors.

Data quality management

Before the initiation of data collection, two days of training were provided to both supervisors and data collectors. The questionnaire was prepared in English and translated to the local language (Afan Oromo) and back to English by language experts. The pretest was performed on 5% of the sample size at Gobesa Primary Hospital before the actual data collection. Necessary amendments and modifications were done based on the results of the pretest data. Strict supervision was done by supervisors, and the overall quality of the collected data was monitored by the principal investigator. The collected data were also checked for completeness and consistency by the principal investigators and supervisors on daily basis.

Data processing and analysis

The data were coded, cleaned, and entered using Epi Info Version 7 and exported to SPSS V.25 for analysis. Frequencies and percentages were used to describe the characteristics of study participants. A bivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the association. All covariates with a p-value less than 0.25 during bivariate analysis were transferred to multivariate logistic regression analysis to control for all possible confounders. Then, variables with a p-value less than 0.05 and an Adjusted odds Ratio(AOR) with a 95% CI were used to declare the statistically significant level and to identify factors associated with CCS utilization. Model fitness was checked using Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit tests whereas normality of data and Multicollinearity was assessed using histogram and variance inflation factor respectively.

Result

Socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents

A total of 457 women aged 30–49 years old were interviewed making a response rate of 97.7% One hundred eighty-five (84.2%) of the study participants were aged between 30 and 39 years old, with a mean age of 36 (SD ± 4) years. More than three-fifths (66.3%) of the study participants were Oromo. Three hundred sixty-five (79.9%) respondents got married. Regarding educational status, more than two-fifth (46.6%) of respondents attained primary(1–8) education while 244 (53.4%) of them have secondary and above educational level. Moreover, one hundred ninety (41.6%) of the study participants were Muslims while 178(38.9%) were orthodox religious followers (Table 1).

Table 1 Socio-demographic characteristics of women who participated in the study, ARTH, Oromia, Ethiopia, 2020/2021
Full size table

Reproductive characteristics of study participants

Around two fifth (37.2%) of the study participants had their first sexual intercourse at age less than 18 years old. One hundred twenty-two (26.7%) women had a history of only one pregnancy while 249 (54.5%) of them had at least two up to three pregnancies. One hundred forty-two (31.1%) women had a history of abortion and 105(23%)of them had a history of abortion at least once in their lifetime(Table 2).

Table 2 Reproductive Characteristics of women at Asella Referral and Teaching Hospital, 2020/2021
Full size table

Knowledge of respondents towards cervical cancer screening

The majority (311, 68.1%) of the study participants heard about cervical cancer. About 42 (13.5%) of the participants described multi-sexuality as a risk factor for CC infection; the rest listed abortion(23, 7.4%), prolonged use of OCP(10, 3.2%), hereditary (7,2.2%), cigarette smoking(21,6.8%),6(1.6%)HPV infection or witchcraft as risk factors of CC infection. Regarding the knowledge about symptoms of CC, spotting between periods and foul-smelling vaginal discharge were symptoms correctly identified by 41(13.2%) and 52(16.7%) participants respectively. Seventy-two (23.2%) and fifty(16.1%) of the study participants responded that CC can be prevented through avoiding multi-sexuality and keeping genital hygiene respectively. More than three fourth (86.5%) and 232 (74.6%) of the respondents did not know the frequency of screening and whether CCS is provided without payment or not respectively. A majority (176, 56.6%) of the respondents know CC was a curable disease at its early stage. Around one-fifths (20.4%)of the respondents had satisfactory knowledge about cervical cancer screening (Table 3).

Table 3 Knowledge about risk factors and symptoms among women at Asella Referral and Teaching Hospital, South Central Ethiopia, 2020/2021
Full size table

Risk exposure among the study participants

The majority (151, 33%) of respondents had ever used Oral Contraceptive Pills (OCP), and of these around one-fifth (17.2%) were currently a user of OCP.  More than two-thirds (68.3%) and forty-seven (10.3%) of the respondents had a single partner and were diagnosed with sexually transmitted infections (STI) respectively. Four hundred fifty(98.2%) of the respondents were non-smokers at the time of the survey (Table 4).

Table 4 Risk exposure among women at Asella Referral and Teaching Hospital, South Central Ethiopia, 2020/2021
Full size table

Respondents’ attitude towards CC and its screening

One hundred sixty five (36.1%)of the study participants have a positive attitude toward cervical cancer and its screening. The majority of study participants, 197 (63.3%), showed agreement with an item describing that every woman is at risk of acquiring cervical cancer in her lifetime. Two hundred thirteen (68.5%) of the study participants disagreed with the statement that demonstrated CCS is not embarrassing. More than half(165, 53.1%) of the respondents, demonstrated an agreement with the item suggesting that a female healthcare provider is preferable to CCS. A majority (295, 94.9%) of the participants agreed that getting screened for cervical cancer prevents CC infections (Table 5).

Table 5 Attitude towards CC and its screening among women at Asella Referral and Teaching Hospital, South Central Ethiopia, 2020/2021
Full size table

Practice of cervical cancer screening among study participants

Among 457 study participants, thirty-three (7.2%, 95% CI: 5.2, 10.6) were screened for cervical cancer in their life at least once (Fig. 1). From those who didn’t screen, 322(75.9%) respondents mentioned a lack of information while 244(57.6%) participants stated as they feel healthy or had no symptoms (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Screening status of the respondents at Asella Referral and Teaching hospital, South Central Ethiopia, 2020/2021

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Reasons for not being screened among women attending ANC at Asella Referral and Teaching hospital, South Central Ethiopia, 2020/2021

Full size image

Factors associated with cervical cancer screening utilization

In bivariate logistic regression analysis age, marital status, educational level, gravidity, abortion episode, age of first sex, ever had STI, ever had screened for any reproductive health like STI, lifetime number of partners, knowledge, and attitude towards CC were candidate variables for multivariate logistic regression. However, during multivariate analysis educational status, ever screened for reproductive health, multi-sexuality, and knowledge about CCS were found to be statistically associated with CCS utilization. Women who attended secondary and above education were 2.93 times more likely to utilize CCS than women who attended up to primary level educational status (AOR = 2.93; 95%CI = 1.08–7.94). In addition, women who were screened for any reproductive health services were almost five times more likely to utilize CCS as compared to their counterparts (AOR = 4.95; 95%CI = 2.24–10.94). Moreover, women who had a history of multiple sexual partners were almost five times more likely to utilize CCS when compared to those who had a single partner(AOR = 4.55; 95%CI = 1.83–11.35). Furthermore, the odds of mothers with satisfactory knowledge about CC were almost four times higher than those who had poor knowledge of cervical cancer screening (AOR = 3.89; 95% CI = 1.74–8.56 (Table 6).

Table 6 Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis of factors associated with cervical cancer screening utilization among women attending ANC at ARTH, South Central Ethiopia, 2020/2021
Full size table

Discussion

Cervical cancer is a public health problem in Ethiopia. Thus, the reduction of morbidity and mortality due to CC infection requires the proper utilization of CCS [5]. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the magnitude of CCS utilization and associated factors among mothers attending ANC at ARTH. In this study, 7.2%(95% CI: 5.2, 10.6) of women had received CCS service at least once in their lifetime, which is consistent with a study done in Malaysia, 5.9%23,  Shabadino District, Ethiopia, 10.3% [56], Hossana town, Southern Ethiopia (9.9%) [57], and Ambo town, Ethiopia, 8.7% [58] . However, this finding was higher than the study done in Adama University (2.2%) [14], Dire Dawa, Ethiopia, 4% [54], and Addis Ababa (3.5%) [59] whereas this finding was lower than studies conducted in India, 11.62%40, Turkey, 11.8%22, Uganda,28% [16], Zimbabwe, 24% [35], Tanzania, 21% [60], Kenya, 46% [44], Embu County, Kenya, 36% [24], St. Paul’s Teaching and Referral Hospital, 12.2%32, and Southern Ethiopia 22.9% [49]. The possible explanation for the observed difference was variations in the level of awareness, limited access to screening services, level of knowledge and attitude of the participants, socio-cultural, socio-demographic, and study period.

In this study, the educational status of women was significantly associated with the utilization of cervical cancer screening. Women who attended secondary and above education were almost 3 times more likely to utilize CCS as compared to those who attended primary education(1–8) and below. This study finding was supported by the study done in Uganda [16], Tanzania [57], and the Amhara region, Ethiopia [39]. The possible explanations for this result could be, more educated women are more likely to use media and read magazines, and booklets and could have a better understanding of the benefit of cervical cancer screening service utilization In addition, women who had screened for any reproductive health services such as STI were almost five times more likely to utilize CCS compared to their counterparts. This finding is supported by the study conducted in Northwest Ethiopia [53], Southern Ethiopia [61], and Shabadino District, Ethiopia [56] and in Dire Dawa, Eastern Ethiopia [54]. This could be due to the fact that women who screened for reproductive health services might get advice from health providers about cervical cancer and the advantage of its screening as the service is provided in this department.

In this study, women who have a history of multiple sexual partners were almost five times more likely to utilize CCS compared to those who have a single partner. The result is supported by studies done in Malawi [51], and Ethiopia [52]. The possible explanation this could be due to women who had multiple sexual partners may have a high probability of contracting sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) including HPV which is a risk factor for CC infection and seeking medical care for STDs which might improve their chance of screening for Cervical Cancer. In addition, women’s awareness of CCS influences the uptake of CCS. Women who had satisfactory knowledge about CCS were almost four times more likely to utilize CCS as compared to those who had poor knowledge. This finding was supported by the study conducted in Pakistan [60], Malawi [62], Northern Ethiopia [25], and Eastern Ethiopia [59]. The possible explanation might be that women who had good knowledge of CC knows the benefits of screening which leads them to utilize the CCS service.

Limitations of the study

Even though the studies have a satisfactory response rate, it is not free from limitations. First, this study was affected by social desirability due to sensitive questions such as the report on the lifetime number of sexual partners, and age at first sex. Second, since the study is cross-sectional, it is impossible to establish a cause-and-effect relationship between outcome and predictor variables. Third, the study was potentially affected by recall bias to some extent and lacks generalizability as it is conducted on ANC mothers only.

Conclusion

This study showed that the magnitude of CCS utilization was low among mothers attending ANC at ARTH, South Central Ethiopia. Educational status, getting screened for any reproductive health care services, history of multiple sexual partners, and knowledge of CCS were statistically significant factors associated with CCS utilization. Hence, to improve the utilization of CCS services, there should be the implementation of programmed health education and awareness creation at health facilities specifically in primary health care. In addition, counseling services on the benefits of screening for CC should be delivered for all women attending healthcare services at health facilities, especially for those came with STIs.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AOR:

Adjusted odds Ration

ANC:

Antenatal Care

ARTH:

Asella Referral and Teaching Hospital

CC:

Cervical Cancer

CCS:

Cervical Cancer Screening

CI:

Confidence Interval

FMOH:

Federal Ministry of Health

HPV:

Human papillomavirus

COR:

Crude odds Ratio

LMIC:

Low and Medium-Income Countries

OCP:

Oral Contraceptive Pills

SD:

Standard Deviation

STD:

Sexually Transmitted Disease

STI:

Sexually Transmitted Infection

SSA:

Sub Saharan African

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. Australia CC. Understanding Cervical Cancer. Sheard R, editor. Sydney: The Generous Support of South Australians; 2019 December 2019. 72 p.

  2. WHO. Comprehensive cervical cancer prevention and control: a healthier future for girls and women Switzerland: World Health Organization 2013. p. 16.

  3. BURTON-JEANGROS C, Vanessa F. Women’s views on cervical cancer screening.A qualitative study of barriers to screening and HPV self‐sampling acceptability. Geneve: 2013.

  4. Cancer IAfRo. A review of human carcinogens. IARC Monogr. 2012;100B:475.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ethiopia FMoH. National Cancer Control Plan. In: Directorate DPaC, editor:Federal Ministry of Health Ethiopia;2016–2020.

  6. Bogani G, Lalli L, Sopracordevole F, Ciavattini A, Ghelardi A, Simoncini T, et al. Development of a nomogram predicting the risk of persistence/recurrence of cervical dysplasia. Vaccines. 2022;10(4):579.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. WHO. Cervical cancer. In: WHO, editor. 2020.

  8. Estimates of incidence. and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis [Internet]. 2020.

  9. Bruni L, Albero G, Serrano B, Mena M, Gómez D et al. J Muñoz,. Human Papillomavirus and Related Diseases Report. 2019.

  10. Gelibo T. Addis Ababa University (https://www.omicsonline.org/universities/Addis_Ababa_University/) AA, 16417. Results from a Population-Based WHO Steps Study in Ethiopia. 2017.

  11. FDRoEMo H. Guideline for Cervical Cancer Prevention and Control in Ethiopia. Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ministry of Health; 2015. p. 62.

  12. ICO/IARC. Human papillomavirus and related cancers, fact sheet 2018. HPV Information Center; 2019. p. 2.

  13. Elias M. Cervical cancer screening utilization and its associated factors among women aged 30 years and above in Woliso town, South West Showa Zone, Oromia region. Ethiopia Addis Ababa University; 2018.

  14. Tadesse A. Knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) towards screening for cervical cancer among Adama University female students, Adama, Ethiopia, 2014 Addis Ababa. Ethiopia: Addis Ababa University; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bogani G, Maggiore ULR, Signorelli M, Martinelli F, Ditto A, Sabatucci I, et al. The role of human papillomavirus vaccines in cervical cancer: Prevention and treatment. Crit Rev Oncol/Hematol. 2018;122:92–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Matildah K. Factors affecting uptake of cervical cancer screening services among women aged 25–49 attending antenatal clinic at Rukunyu Health Center iv, Kamwenge district 2018.

  17. Monti M, D’Aniello D, Scopelliti A, Tibaldi V, Santangelo G, Colagiovanni V, et al. Relationship between cervical excisional treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and obstetrical outcome. Minerva Obstet Gynecol. 2020;73(2):233–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rahman R, D Clark M, Collins Z, Traoree F, Dioukhane ME, Thiamg H, et al. Cervical cancer screening decentralized policy adaptation: an african rural-context-specific systematic literature review. Global Health Action. 2019;12(1):15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. RahmanFarzana AB. Awareness level of Cervical Cancer among Rural Women Attending Manikgonj 250-Bedded District Hospital. Manikgonj J Enam Med Coll. 2019;9(1):34–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Narayana G, Suchitra Jyothi M, Sunanda G, Dasaratha JR, Kumar Pradeep B. Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward cervical cancer among women attending obstetrics and Gynecology Department: a cross-sectional, hospital-based survey in South India. Indian J Cancer. 2018;54(2):391–487.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Thapa N, Mu M, Petrini A, Ma S, Na RSSwM et al. Knowledge, attitude, practice and barriers of cervical cancer screening among women living in mid-western rural,Nepal. JGO. 2018;29(4).

  22. Erbil N, Tezcan Y, Gür E, Nur, Yıldırım M, Alış N. Factors affecting cervical screening among turkish women asian. Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010;13:1463–70.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Javaeed A, Shoukat S, Hina S, Hameed Z, Ghauri K, Sanniya, Ahmed M. Malik Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices Related to Cervical Cancer Among Adult Women in Azad Kashmir: A Hospital-based Crosssectional Study. 2019; 11(3).

  24. Kibicho JW. Factors influencing utilization of cervical cancer screening services in Embu hospital. Embu County, Kenya: University of Nairobi; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bayu H, Berhe Y, Mulat A. A A. Cervical Cancer Screening Service Uptake and Associated Factors among Age Eligible Womenin Mekelle Zone,Northern Ethiopia, 2015: A Community Based Study Using Health Belief Model. PLoS ONE 11(3): e0149908. https://doi.org/10.1371/journalpone0149908.2016:13

  26. Nigussie T, Admassu B, Nigussie A. Cervical cancer screening service utilization and associated factors among age-eligible women in Jimma town using health belief model, South West Ethiopia. BMC Womens Health. 2019;19(127):10.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Feyisa Ch, Feyisa T. Perceived Threats towards Cervical Cancer among Women International. J Anesth Clin Med. 2019;7(1):20–6.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Roghieh B, Taghipour A. Personal and Socio-Cultural Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening in Iran, patient and provider perceptions: a qualitative study Asian Pac. J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(9):3729–34.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Morema E, Atieli H, Onyango R, Omondi J, Collins O. Determinants of cervical screening services uptake among 18–49 year old women seeking services at the Jaramogi Oginga Odinga Teaching and Referral Hospital, Kisumu, Kenya. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(335):7.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Getachew S, Getachew E, Gizaw M, Ayele W, Addissie A. J K. Cervical cancer screening knowledge and barriers among women in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. PLOS ONE; 2019.

  31. Fentie AM, Tadesse T, Beedemariam G. Factors affecting Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake, Visual Inspection with Acetic Acidpositivity and its predictors among women attending Cervical Cancer Screening Servicein Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Womens Health. 2020;20(147):10.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Woldetsadik AB, Amhare AF, Bitew ST, Pei, Leilei, Jing LJ. H. Socio-demographic characteristics and associated factors influencing cervical cancer screening among women attending in St. Paul’s Teaching and Referral Hospital, Ethiopia.BMC Women’s Health. 2020;20(70).

  33. Lim JNWP, Senior Lecturer AA, M, Mph. Locum Doctor, National Health Service, UK. Barriers to utilisation of cervical cancer screening in Sub Sahara Africa: a systematic review. European Journal of Cancer Care, 2017, 26, e12444 2017.

  34. Rimande-Joel, Golda EO, Knowledge. Belief and practice of Cervical Cancer Screening and Prevention among Women Asian Pacific. J Cancer Prev. 2019;20(11):3291–8.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tapera O, Dreyer G, Kadzatsa W, Nyakabau AM, Stray-Pedersen B. SJH H. Cervical cancer knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and practices of women aged at least 25years.BMC Women’s Health2019;19(91).

  36. Gebru Z, Gerbaba M, Dirar A. Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening in Arba Minch Town. J Community Med Health Educ. 2016;6(1):5.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Al-Meer FM, Aseel MT, Al-Khalaf J, Al-Kuwari MG. M.F.S I. Knowledge, attitude and practices regarding cervical cancer and screening among women EasternMediterranean Health Journal. 2011;17

  38. Kahesa C, Kjaer S, Mwaiselage J, Ngoma T, Tersbol B, Dartell M, et al. Determinants of acceptance of cervical cancer screening in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1093):8.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Aynalem YB, Anteneh KT, MM E. Utilization of Cervical Cancer Screening and Associated Factors Among Women in Debremarkos Town, Amhara Region, Northwest Ethiopia: Community Based Cross-Sectional Study., PLOSONE. 2020;15(4):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231307

  40. Singh S, Badaya S. Factors Influencing uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening among Women in India.Community Medicine & Health Education. 2012;2 (6).

  41. Tekle T, Wolka E, Nega B, Kumma W, Mengistu K. Knowledge, attitude and practice towards Cervical Cancer Screening among Women and Associated factors in hospitals of Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia. Cancer Manage Res. 2020;12:993–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Bira B. Acceptability of cervical cancer screening using see and treat (SAT) approachand determinant factors among women of reproductive age in health centers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Addis Ababa,Ethiopia: Addis Ababa University, College of Health Sciences; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Morris M, Rugendo. Factors Associated with the Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women of Reproductive Age in Homabay County, Kenya.Clinics Mother Child Health2016;13 (1).

  44. Njuguna E, Ilovi S, Muiruri P, Mutai K, Kinuthia J, Njoroge P. Factors influencing cervical cancer screening in a kenyan health facility: a mixed qualitative and quantitative study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(4):1180–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Shiferaw N, Salvador-Davila G, Kassahun K, Brooks MI, Weldegebreal T, Tilahun Y, et al. The single-visit approach as a cervical cancer prevention strategy among women with HIV in Ethiopia: successes and lessons learned. Global Health: Science and Practice. 2016;4(1):87–98.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Tadesse S. Preventive mechanisms and treatment of cervical cancer in Ethiopia. Gynecol Obstet (Sunnyvale). 2015;5(101):2161–0932.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Fang CY, Ma GX, Tan Y. Overcoming barriers to cervical cancer screening among asian american women. North Am J Med Sci. 2011;4(2):77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Boni SP, Gnahatin F, Comoé J-C, Tchounga B, Ekouevi D, Horo A, et al. Barriers and facilitators in cervical cancer screening uptake in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire in 2018: a cross-sectional study. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Tekle T, Wolka E, Nega B, Kumma W, KoyiraMengistu. Knowledge, attitude and practice towards Cervical Cancer Screening among Women and Associated factors in hospitals of Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia. Cancer Manage Res. 2020;12:993–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. WHO. Who Guidelines for Screening and Treatment of Precancerous Lesions for Cervical Cancer Prevention. WHO; 2013.

  51. Chosamata MS, Hong S, Tiraphat S. Determinants of cervical cancer screening utilization among women aged 30–45 years in Blantyre district. Malawi J public health Dev. 2015;13(3):19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Bayu H, Berhe Y, Mulat A, Alemu A. Cervical cancer screening service uptake and associated factors among age eligible women in Mekelle Zone, Northern Ethiopia, 2015: a community based study using health belief model. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(3):e0149908.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Muluneh BA, Atnafu DD, Wassie B. Predictors of cervical cancer screening service utilization among commercial sex workers in Northwest Ethiopia: a case-control study. BMC Womens Health. 2019;19(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Belay Y, Dheresa M, Sema A, Desalew A, Assefa N. Cervical cancer screening utilization and associated factors among women aged 30 to 49 years in dire Dawa, Eastern Ethiopia. Cancer Control. 2020;27(1):1073274820958701.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Feyisa GC, Temesgen H. Perceived benefits and barriers toward cervical cancer screening among women ≥ 15 years in Arsi Zone, Southeastern Ethiopia: application of the health belief model in a community-based cross-sectional study. J Cancer Res Pract. 2019;6(1):7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Kasim J, Kalu A, Kamara B, Alema HB. Cervical cancer screening service utilization and associated factors among women in the Shabadino District, Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Cancer Epidemiology. 2020;2020.

  57. Tryphone J, Njenga. Cervical Cancer screening: knowledge and perceptions among women of Reproductive Age attending Mnazi Mmoja Hospital, Ilala Municipal, Dar es Salaam. Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences; 2017.

  58. Natae SF, Nigatu DT, Negawo MK. WW M. Cervical cancer screening uptake and determinant factors among women in Ambo town, Western Oromia, Ethiopia: Community-based cross-sectional study.Cancer Medicine. 2021;10.

  59. Belay Y, Dheresa M, Sema A, Desalew A, Assefa N. Cervical Cancer screening utilization and Associated factors among women aged 30 to 49 years in dire Dawa, Eastern Ethiopia. Cancer Control. 2020;27:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Ali A, Suhai N, Rehman U, Feroz A, Hussain S, Abbasi et al. Factors Affecting the Utilization of Cervical Cancer Screening among Women: A Literature Review Using Ishikawa Diagram.EC GYNAECOLOGY Literature Review. 2019;8 (5).

  61. Ayanto SY, Belachew T, Wordofa MA. Determinants of cervical cancer screening utilization among women in Southern Ethiopia. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):14830.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Chosamata S, Hong Ah, Sariyamon T. Determinants of cervical cancer screening utilization among women aged 30–45 years in Blantyre district,Malawi Journal of Public Health and Development. 2015;13(3).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Asella Referral and Teaching hospital administration and ANC clinic staff for their support during data collection. Our appreciation also goes to data collectors and study participants for their cooperation and support during data collection.

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bokoji primary Hospital Clinical Governance and Quality Improvement Unit Coordinator, Oromia Health Bureau, Bokoji, Ethiopia

    Abdulmenan Ahmed Shero

  2. Department of Public Health, College of Health Science, Arsi University, Asella, Ethiopia

    Abdene Weya Kaso, Mesfin Tafa, Gebi Agero & Gizachew Abdeta

  3. Bergen Centre for Ethics and Priority Setting, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

    Alemayehu Hailu

Authors
  1. Abdulmenan Ahmed Shero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abdene Weya Kaso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mesfin Tafa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gebi Agero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gizachew Abdeta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Alemayehu Hailu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Abdulmenan Ahmed Shero, Abdene Weya Kaso and Mesfin Tafa designed and worked on the study protocols. Abdulmenan Ahmed Shero, Abdene Weya Kaso, Mesfin Tafa, Gebi Agero, and Gizachew Abdeta prepared a data collection tool and provided training to data collectors. Abdulmenan Ahmed Shero, and Abdene Weya Kaso conducted data entry to SPPS. Abdulmenan Ahmed Shero, Abdene Weya Kaso, Gizachew Abdeta, Alemayehu Hailu and Mesfin Tafa analyzed the data, interpreted the result, and wrote the manuscript’s draft and final version. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdene Weya Kaso.

Ethics declarations

Ethical consideration

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was received from the Research and Ethical Review Committee of Arsi University, College of Health Science (approval number: A/CHS/RC/ 61/2020). All participants provided a written informed consent to participate after the purpose of the study was described in their local language. The participants were also informed as they have full right to withdraw from the study participants and ask for anything unclear to them at any time. To assure the confidentiality of the participants, a unique code was written on the questionnaire.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shero, A.A., Kaso, A.W., Tafa, M. et al. Cervical cancer screening utilization and associated factors among women attending antenatal care at Asella Referral and Teaching Hospital, Arsi zone, South Central Ethiopia. BMC Women's Health 23, 199 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02326-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02326-y

Keywords

BMC Women's Health

ISSN: 1472-6874

Contact us