Skip to main content
Download PDF

The role of men’s forgiveness in marital satisfaction and coping strategies of infertile iranian women

BMC Women's Health volume 23, Article number: 227 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Infertility and its related problems create tensions in infertile women, which may lead to reduced marital satisfaction and the use of ineffective coping strategies. Considering the important role of forgiveness, marital satisfaction and effective coping strategies in the quality of life of infertile couples, and taking into account the growing number of Iranian infertile couples, this study was conducted to determine the relationship between men’s forgiveness, marital satisfaction, and coping strategies of infertile Iranian women.

Methods

This cross-sectional study included 200 Iranian infertile couples. The research environment was the most equipped infertility center in the west of Iran. Sampling was continuous. Data collection tools used included a self-generated demographic and fertility questionnaire, the Family Forgiveness Scale (FFS), the Index of Marital Satisfaction (IMS), and the Ways of Coping Questionnaire-revised (WOCQ-R).

Results

Husbands’ forgiveness had a significant direct relationship with the marital satisfaction of infertile women (r = -0.27, p < 0.001). However, there was no significant correlation between Husbands’ forgiveness, emotion-focused, and problem-focused coping of infertile women. Among the subscales of forgiveness, only the subscale of recognition had inversely correlated with the emotional coping of infertile women.

Conclusion

The results showed that the higher the forgiveness of husbands, the higher the marital satisfaction of infertile women. Also, with the increase of husbands’ forgiveness in the recognition subscale, the use of emotion-focused coping decreased in infertile women. Based on the results with empowering the husbands of infertile women with forgiveness skills, it is possible to take a step towards marital satisfaction and thus improve the quality of life of infertile women.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

One of the expectations of everyone from marriage is the birth of a child and reproduction [1]. This expectation is more pronounced in traditional societies [2]. Therefore, having a child is one of the most fundamental issues for most couples [3]. According to the results of a national plan, the infertility rate in Iran is 20.2% (19.9% ​​in cities and 22% in rural areas). This amount is far from the global average of 12–15% [4].

Infertility and its treatment, as a crisis in life, affects understanding couples of each other needs and desires. Therefore, it affects their satisfaction with marital life [5,6,7]. Infertility has a stressful nature. It can decrease psychological well-being by creating tension and stress. The pressure resulting from infertility affects positive personal, social and marital relationships, one of the dimensions of psychological well-being and causes a psychological imbalance in couples and marital incompatibility [8, 9]. However, some studies have reported that infertility does not affect marital satisfaction [6, 10, 11]. Some other studies have even reported a positive effect of infertility on marital satisfaction and increased couple intimacy [12, 13]. Most studies have shown the adverse effects of infertility on marital satisfaction [5, 14,15,16,17]. These studies show that infertility leads to boredom [14], decreased intimacy, fear of ending the relationship and helplessness in couples [17]. On the other hand, the husbands of infertile women face a series of arduous therapeutic and psychological activities [18, 19]. They are problems with sexual desire and marital relationships, feelings of guilt, hopelessness, depression, decreased self-esteem and feelings of emptiness in life [5, 20].

Two significant aspects of mental health include positive emotions and life satisfaction related to forgiveness [21]. Forgiveness is a powerful tool that ends a broken or painful relationship and provides the conditions for reconciliation with the partner. Therefore, removing one of the partners from the circle of negative interaction increases marital satisfaction and reduces conflict. [22]. Couples sometimes hurt each other in life. If they do not forgive the mistakes of their spouses, fall into the circle of negative interactions, their aggression towards each other will increase, their positive interactions will decrease, and they will experience less marital satisfaction [23]. The findings of a study showed a significant negative relationship between forgiveness and marital conflict [24]. Another study also showed that forgiveness is a predictor of marital satisfaction [25].

Forgiveness in couples is associated with emotion-focused coping, which is higher in women than men [26]. Coping responses are conscious efforts to control or reduce stress and acquisition to tolerate the threat that leads to stress [27]. Therefore, learning the necessary skills to use appropriate strategies is essential to reducing the problems caused by infertility [28]. Infertility problems cause negative thoughts in infertile people. The emotion-focused coping engages the person more with these negative thoughts. Negative thoughts constantly occupy a person’s mind and prepare him/her for depression. Meanwhile, in non-critical situations where the person does not necessarily experience negative emotions; emotion-focused coping may the positive function [13]. A quantitative study on infertile Iranian couples showed that couples use few effective coping methods like focusing on emotion and expressing it, negative thinking and wishful thinking, and methods such as denial and distancing. But, infertile couples, who are more determined in performing religious duties, use religious coping such as prayer, trust, and Patience [29].

Forgiveness is related to with adaptive coping strategies, focus on planning, positive reappraisal, perspective review and acceptance [30, 31]. Couples react to certain behaviors during marital conflicts and dissatisfaction with the situations that arise in conjugal relationships. Usually, these behaviors become a dominant behavioral pattern throughout their life. From this perspective, the frequency of behavioral patterns depends on the severity of the problem and conflict. In other words, the more intense and essential the issue for couples, the more tangible and recognizable behavioral patterns and coping strategies become [32]. Scientific evidence showed that strategies are the most important predictors of marital satisfaction. Strategies, especially coping strategies that control stress, can help increase the marital satisfaction of infertile women. [33]. For couples experiencing infertility, applying appropriate coping strategies has a positive effect on mitigating the stress caused by infertility and its treatment process [34, 35]. One study showed that, in women, forgiveness has positively correlated with emotions and acceptance coping strategies and is negatively related to negative evaluation and avoidance [26]. Infertility with psychosocial consequences in various forms requires strategies to reduce stress. These strategies can improve the quality of life of infertile people [36]. According to the evidence, most of the studies that examined the relationships between the variables of forgiveness, marital satisfaction and coping strategies, their research community consists of fertile individuals or couples. For this reason, this study was conducted with the aim of determining the relationship between men’s forgiveness, marital satisfaction, and coping strategies of infertile Iranian women.

Methods

The present cross-sectional study included 200 infertile couples referring to the Infertility Treatment and Research Center of Omid Royan in the Central Province of Iran. Central Province has 32 cities and 66 villages. Center of Omid Royan is the most equipped infertility center in western Iran. The average number of visitors to this center is about 12,000 per year. About 80% of the clients are from Central Province and 20% from neighboring provinces. We selected eligible samples by continuous method.

To determine the sample size, we could not use studies that examined the relationship between forgiveness and marital satisfaction; because they had a high Pearson correlation coefficient and a small sample size was obtained. On the other hand, we did not find any study that examined the relationship between forgiveness and coping strategies. Therefore, r = 0.2 was used to determine the sample size, which means that two variables are correlated when they have at least 4% common variance [37]. We obtained a sample size of 200 couples with a confidence interval of 95%, test power of 80% and Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.2 between forgiveness, marital satisfaction and coping strategies.

The inclusion criteria were; having at least literacy to complete the questionnaires, having primary or secondary infertility with only female factor approved by the obstetrician, having no living child from secondary infertility, having a minimum of 1-year infertility treatment, having no adopted children, lack of other medical illnesses unrelated to infertility, absence of any mental illnesses requiring treatment based on self-report, not using any drugs, being in the first marriage in each couple, and lack of any tension-generating in the last six months such as loss of loved one, etc.

The data collection tools included a self-generated demographic and fertility questionnaire, Family Forgiveness Scale (FFS), Index of Marital Satisfaction (IMS), and Ways of Coping Questionnaire-revised (WOCQ-R).

Family forgiveness scale (FFS)

FFS was designed and developed by Pollard et al. to measure forgiveness in families and couples, as well as the subscales of forgiveness. It has two sections. Each section has 20 items. The first section focuses on the family origin and the second section focuses on the primal relationship (nuclear family). Since the infertile couples in our study were childless, we used only the second section of the questionnaire (primal relationship). It has five subscales of realization, recognition, reparation, restitution, and resolution. Each subscale has four items, which are scored based on a four-point Likert scale, ranging from “never true (score = 1) to always true (score = 4)”. The score range of each subscale is between 4 and 16 and the score range of the entire scale is between 20 and 80, with the higher scores indicating more forgiveness. Pollard et al. obtained Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.55–0.86 for the subscales of the FFS [38]. FFS has been psychometrically measured for the Iranian population by Seyf et al. in a study conducted on a sample of 766 married couples in Tehran (Iran). They reported the reliability of the second section of the scale at 85% based on Cronbach’s alpha [39].

Index of marital satisfaction (IMS)

Hudson designed IMS to measure the degree, severity, or magnitude of the problem a spouse or partner has in a partner relationship. This scale consists of 25 items, of which 13 items are positively worded and 12 negatively worded. The positively worded items include 1, 3, 5, 8, 9, 11, 13, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, and 23. The items IMS rate on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (None of the time) to 7 (All of the time). The overall score is obtained by summing up the 13 reverse-scoring items and adding them to the remaining scores. Then, the total number of completed responses given by the participant is subtracted, then the obtained figure is multiplied by 100. The score range of this scale is between 0 and 100. This scale has two clinical cutoff scores, the first of which is 30. Clients, who obtain a score of below 30, can be presumed not to have a clinically significant problem in this area. Clients, who obtain a score of above 30, can be presumed to have a clinically significant problem in this area. The second cutoff score is 70. Clients who obtain a score of 70 or higher are almost always experiencing severe distress. When distress reaches this level, there is a clear possibility that some form of violence will occur. This scale does not contain items about children that are suitable for our study in this regard. In the Hudson study, the IMS had test-retest reliability of 0.96 [40]. In Iran, Pouurakbar calculated the reliability of the IMS by test-retest at a distance of 15 days at 0.96. Also, for a more accurate evaluation, the reliability of the IMS was calculated at 0.88 using the split-half method [41].

Ways of coping questionnaire-revised (WOCQ-R)

WOCQ-R was designed and revised by Lazarus and Folkman. It contains a wide range of coping and behavioral strategies people use to manage internal and external demands in stressful situations. The WOCQ-R consists of 66 items and eight subscales. The 16 items of this questionnaire are deviant phrases. This questionnaire measures two problem-focused and emotion-focused coping strategies. The problem-focused coping strategy of this questionnaire consists of four subscales, including accepting responsibility, seeking social support, Planful problem solving and positive reappraisal. The emotion-focused coping strategy of this questionnaire includes four subscales of confrontative coping, escape/avoidance, self-controlling and distancing. The items in this questionnaire rate on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from “does not apply and/or not used (score 0), used somewhat (score 1), used quite a bit (score 2), and used a great deal (score 3)”. WOCQ-R has two ways of scoring, raw and relative. The choice of scoring method depends on the information we are looking for it. Raw scores describe the coping effort for each of the eight types of coping. Relative scores describe the proportion of effort represented for each coping. It expresses as a percentage that ranges from 0 to 100. We used raw scoring in this study. In this way, the total score of each subscale is divided by the number of items in that subscale. Thus, the range of scores in each subscale is between 0 and 3. A high score indicates that the person has often used the behaviors described by that scale in coping with stressful events. Folkman et al. obtained Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.61–0.79 for the subscales of this questionnaire [42]. In Iran, Nazarpour and Khazai reported a Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.59–0.79 for the subscales of this questionnaire [43].

Sampling began after approval of the project by the ethics committee of the Iran University of Medical Sciences with the code (IR.IUMS.REC.1397.544). After explaining the objectives of the study and the principle of confidentiality, the researcher obtained informed written consent from the eligible subjects. The study population of the present study were infertile couples due to female infertility. Husbands only completed the FFS, and infertile women completed the demographic and fertility questionnaire, IMS, and WOCQ-R. They completed the questionnaire by self-administered. Data were analyzed by SPSS software version 22 using independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, and Pearson correlation tests. The significance level for all tests was p < 0.05.

Results

Infertile women had a mean [± SD] age of 28.38 [± 4.63] years. The mean [± SD] age of the infertile women’s husbands was 33.08 [± 4.56] years. Couples had a mean [± SD] marriage duration of 6.9 [± 3.44] years. The mean [± SD] infertility duration of infertile women was 4.04 [± 2.40] years with a range of 1–13 years, and the mean [± SD] duration of infertility treatment was 2.73 [± 2.01] years with a range of 1–11 years. We presented more information about the demographic and fertility characteristics of the subjects in Table 1.

Table 1 Demographic and fertility characteristics in couples (n = 200)
Full size table

Table 2 shows that the mean score of marital satisfaction was higher than 30. In other words, the infertile women had significant clinical problems. According to the cutoff points of the IMS, 110 (55%) of infertile women in the present study did not have a clinically significant problem, 78 (39%) of them had a clinically significant problem, and only 12 (6%) of them had severe stress and the possibility of domestic violence.

Table 2 Means and standard deviations of marital satisfaction and ways of coping of infertile women (n = 200)
Full size table

Table 3 showed that the fertility characteristics of couples had no statistically significant relationship with the forgiveness of husbands.

Table 4 shows the relationship between the forgiveness of husbands, marital satisfaction and coping strategies of infertile women.

Table 3 The relationship between forgiveness of husbands and fertility characteristics in couples (n = 200)
Full size table
Table 4 The Correlation between forgiveness, marital satisfaction, and ways of coping (n = 200)
Full size table

Discussion

The results of this study, which aimed at determining the relationship between men’s forgiveness, marital satisfaction and coping strategies of infertile Iranian women, showed that with the increasing forgiveness of husbands, marital satisfaction of infertile women increases. However, the forgiveness of husbands did not have a significant relationship with the coping strategies of infertile women. According to the searches conducted by the researchers, no study was found that examines the relationship between forgiveness and marital satisfaction in the society of infertile women. Therefore, the researchers used studies with the research community of fertile people to compare the results.

The results of a study aimed at investigating attachment with marital satisfaction mediated by forgiveness and empathy in Iranian student couples showed that forgiveness and empathy, directly and indirectly, increase marital satisfaction [44], which was in line with the results of the present study. Findings of another study conducted on 1,513 married people in the United States showed a significant relationship between well-being, forgiveness and marital satisfaction [45]. Afkhami et al. reported that marital conflict significantly inversely correlated with the subscales of forgiveness including reparation, restitution recognition and realization [24]. This finding is in line with the results of the present study. Findings a study in Iran showed a significant relationship between the four subscales of forgiveness including realization, reparation, restitution, and recognition, and marital satisfaction of couples, but there was no significant relationship between the subscale of recognition and marital satisfaction [46].

Fahimdanesh et al. investigated the relationship between forgiveness and marital satisfaction in 200 Iranian couples with a marriage duration of one to ten years. The results showed that forgiveness predicts marital satisfaction in all samples of men and women. They suggested that family counselors should encourage couples to learn the skill of forgiveness and thereby improve their marital relationships [47]. Among other studies that had similar results to our findings, we can point to the study of Gaur and Bhardwaj aimed at examining relationship between empathy, forgiveness and marital adjustment in couples. The results of this study showed that marital compatibility had a direct relationship with high levels of forgiveness. The ability to forgive a life partner and willingness to forgive is one of the most important factors of marital compatibility [48]. Fincham et al. showed that forgiveness in couples predicts quality of care for each other, quality of communication, aggression and marital satisfaction [23]. A review article that examined the factors related to marital satisfaction showed that forgiveness is one of the factors affecting marital satisfaction [49].

The interpretations that scientific evidence provides for the relationship between forgiveness and marital satisfaction are as follows: Forgiveness is one’s moral response to another’s injustice [50], it is a powerful way to end a broken or painful relationship and provides reconciliation for the wrongdoers, and also marital forgiveness eliminates couples’ negative interactions and brings them back together. Such cohesion increases marital satisfaction and facilitates logical efforts to resolve inevitable marital conflicts. As a result, couples can find their healthy functioning. This model also ensures their mental health [23].

In the present study, there was no significant relationship between the forgiveness of husbands and emotion-focused coping and problem-focused coping of infertile women. However, there was a weak and inverse relationship between the subscale of recognition and emotion-focused coping in infertile women, in other words, the greater the forgiveness of husbands in terms of recognition, the lower the emotion-focused coping of infertile women. Regarding the relationship between forgiveness and coping strategies, by conducting extensive research, we obtained a few studies to compare the results of the present study.

Gabe and Monaghan showed that forgiveness has a significant positive relationship with problem-focused coping [30], which is contrary to the findings of the present study, but in line with our results, a study reported that forgiveness in women has a positive relationship with emotion-focused coping [26].

Emotion-focused coping includes distancing, escape/avoidance, confrontive coping, and self-controlling. Maltby et al. conducted a study to examine the cognitive nature of forgiveness. They evaluated the use of coping strategies in the forgiveness process. This study showed an inverse correlation between forgiveness and avoidance and a direct relationship between acceptance and forgiveness [26]. Similar to the results of our study, Zargar et al. stated in their study when a person accepts something, or in other words, recognizes it, his or her emotional behaviors will decrease [51]. Perhaps this explains the inverse effect of husbands’ recognition on the emotion-focused coping of their infertile wives in the present study. This reason can also be attributed to the relationship between the subscale of restitution and coping strategies because women gain more peace after appeasement [52]. It may be the reason why emotion-focused coping is reduced. It finds similar to the findings of the present study. In confirmation of this, Toussaint and Webb, which sought to determine the effect of gender differences on appeasement and forgiveness in Norwegian men and women, found that women had more appeasement than men, but restitution was associated more with forgiveness in men than in women [53].

Study limitation

- Since the participants completed the questionnaires by self-reporting method, the response to some items might have been influenced by cultural factors and values ​​of the society in which the study samples live.

Conclusion

The results showed that the higher the forgiveness of husbands, the higher the marital satisfaction of infertile women. Also, with the increase of husbands’ forgiveness in the recognition subscale, the use of emotion-focused coping decreased in infertile women. Based on the results, empowering the spouses of infertile women with forgiveness skills may lead to marital satisfaction and, as a result, the betterment of their quality of life.

Data Availability

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

FFS:

Family Forgiveness Scale

IMS:

Index of Marital Satisfaction

WOCQ-R:

Ways of Coping Questionnaire-revised.

References

  1. Darakchi S. Muslim marriages: intergenerational differences in the notions of marriage among the bulgarian pomaks. Marriage Fam Rev. 2019;55(8):778–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2019.1610137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ciritel AA, De Rose A, Arezzo MF. Childbearing intentions in a low fertility context: the case of Romania. Genus. 2019; 75(1):1–25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-018-0046-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hasanpoor-Azghdy SB, Simbar M, Vedadhir A. The social consequences of infertility among iranian women: a qualitative study. Int J Fertil Steril. 2015;8(4):409. https://doi.org/10.22074/ijfs.2015.4181.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Akhondi MM, Ranjbar F, Shirzad M, Ardakani ZB, Kamali K, Mohammad K. Practical difficulties in estimating the prevalence of primary infertility in Iran. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2019;13(2):113. https://dx.doi.org/10.22074%2Fijfs.2019.5583.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Amanelahifard A, Nikbakht R, Hoseini MA, Ahmadi Fakhr S, Hoseini Z. The comparison of marital satisfaction and quality of life between fertile and infertile women. Biannual J Appl Couns. 2012;2(1):75–88.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Amirian M, Mazloum SR, Laal Ahangar M. Comparison of marital satisfaction in fertile and infertile couples and its relationship with sexual problems. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil. 2015;18(143):1–0. https://doi.org/10.22038/ijogi.2015.4334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nayebi Nia AS, Dolatian M, Hasan Pour Azghadi B, Ebadi A, Akbarzadeh Baghban A. Domestic violence and its association with domains of reproductive health in women: a systematic review. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2018;27(158):205–17.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mousavi SS, Hasanpoor Azghady SB. Psychological wellbeing in iranian infertile women: a review of the studies in Iran. Iran J Nurs. 2019;32(117):45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vitale SG, La Rosa VL, Rapisarda AM, Lagana AS. Psychology of infertility and assisted reproductive treatment: the italian situation. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;38(1):1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2016.1244184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Amiri M, Sadeqi Z, Hoseinpoor MH, Khosravi A. Marital satisfaction and its influencing factors in fertile and infertile women. J fam reprod health. 2016;10(3):139.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mohammadpour A. Effect of Auriculotherapy on depression in infertile women: a Randomized Clinical Trial. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil. 2019;22(9):36–44. https://doi.org/10.22038/ijogi.2019.14000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Molgora S, Fenaroli V, Acquati C, De Donno A, Baldini MP, Saita E. Examining the role of dyadic coping on the marital adjustment of couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART). Front Psychol. 2019;10:415.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hasanpoor-Azghady SB, Simbar M, Vedadhir AA, Azin SA, Amiri-Farahani L. The social construction of infertility among iranian infertile women: a qualitative study. J Reprod Infertil. 2019;20(3):178.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Abhar-Zanjani F, Khjehmerza V, Sayedi M, Shahabi Zadeh F, Dastjerdi R, Bahryneian A. Study beliefs, communication and marital dissatisfaction in fertile and infertile couples. Fundam Ment Health. 2015;17, 81–86.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Arbabi Moghaddam R, Hasanpoor–Azghady SB, Amiri Farahani L. Study of Perceived Social Support and its predictors in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Iran J Endocrinol Metab. 2020;22(1):62–71.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Maroufizadeh S, Hosseini M, Foroushani AR, Omani-Samani R, Amini P. The relationship between perceived stress and marital satisfaction in couples with infertility: actor-partner interdependence model. Int J Fertil Steril. 2019;13(1):66.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Sahraian K, Jafarzadeh F, Poursamar SL. The relationship between social support and marital satisfaction in infertile women based on infertility factor. Nurs Midwifery J. 2015;12(12):1104–9.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hadizadeh-Talasaz F, Simbar M, Roudsari RL. Exploring infertile couples’ decisions to disclose donor conception to the future child. Int J Fertil Steril. 2020;14(3):240. https://doi.org/10.22074/ijfs.2020.44408.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Ardakani ZB, Navabakhsh M, Tremayne S, Akhondi MM, Ranjbar F, Tabrizi AM. The impact of third party reproduction on family and kinship. J Reprod Infertil. 2021 Jan;22(1):3. https://dx.doi.org/10.18502%2Fjri.v22i1.4990.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Laganà AS, La Rosa VL, Rapisarda AM, Vitale SG. Reflections about the impact of infertility on female sexual function. Kathmandu Univ Med J. 2016;14(56):299–300.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Głaz S. The relationship of forgiveness and values with meaning in life of polish students. J relig health. 2019;58(5):1886–907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-019-00860-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Chi P, Tang Y, Worthington EL, Chan CL, Lam DO, Lin X. Intrapersonal and interpersonal facilitators of forgiveness following spousal infidelity: a stress and coping perspective. J clin psychol. 2019;75(10):1896–915. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22825.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fincham FD, Beach SR. Forgiveness in marriage: implications for psychological aggression and constructive communication. Pers Relatsh. 2002;9(3):239–51. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6811.00016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Afkhami I, Bahrami F, Fatehizadeh M. A correlational study on couples’forgiveness and marital conflicts in yazd province. J Fam Res. 2007; 3, 431–442.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Naderi L, Nory A. The prediction of marital satisfaction of couples in isfahan based on empathy and forgiveness. Knowl Res Appl Psychol. 2017;16(4):69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Maltby J, Macaskill A, Gillett R. The cognitive nature of forgiveness: using cognitive strategies of primary appraisal and coping to describe the process of forgiving. J Clin Psychol. 2007;63(6):555–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chernoff A, Balsom AA, Gordon JL. Psychological coping strategies associated with improved mental health in the context of infertility. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2021;24:73–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-020-01029-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Moura-Ramos M, Gameiro S, Canavarro MC, Soares I, Almeida‐Santos T. Does infertility history affect the emotional adjustment of couples undergoing assisted reproduction? The mediating role of the importance of parenthood. Br J Health Psychol. 2016;21(2):302–17. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fbjhp.12169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Taghipour A, Karimi FZ, Latifnejad Roudsari R, Mazlom SR. Coping strategies of women following the diagnosis of infertility in their spouses: a qualitative study. Evidence Based Care. 2020;10(1):15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rey L, Extremera N. Forgiveness and health-related quality of life in older people: adaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies as mediators. J health psychol. 2016;21(12):2944–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105315589393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Akhtar S, Dolan A, Barlow J. Understanding the relationship between state forgiveness and psychological wellbeing: a qualitative study. J relig health. 2017;56(2):450–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-016-0188-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dewees C H. An investigation of bereaved parents: coping strategies and effects on the marital relationship, San Antonio, St. Mary’s University (Texas). 2005.

  33. Solati K, Hasanpour-Dehkordi A. The effect of stress management based on group cognitive-behavioural therapy on marital satisfaction in infertile women. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(7):VC01.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Yazdani F, Kazemi A, Ureizi-Samani HR. Studying the relationship between the attitude to infertility and coping strategies in couples undergoing assisted reproductive treatments. J Reprod Infertil. 2016;17(1):56.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Sohbati F, Hasanpoor-Azghady SB, Jafarabadi M, Amiri-Farahani L, Mohebbi M. Psychological well-being of infertile women and its relationship with demographic factors and fertility history: a cross-sectional study. BMC Womens Health. 2021;21(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-020-01167-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Koraei A, Dasht Bozorgi Z, Zahery Abdh Vand S. The Effect of coping strategies on coping with infertility in women: Mediator Role of Marital Quality. Avicenna J Nurs Midwifery Care 2018; 26 (3):191–202.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Plichta Kellar S, Kelvin E. Munro’s statistical methods for Health Care Research. Kindle Edition. Publisher: Stacey Plichta Kellar ScD CPH. 2023.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Pollard MW, Anderson RA, Anderson WT, Jennings G. The development of a family forgiveness scale. J Fam Ther. 1998;20(1):95–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.00070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Seyf S, Bahari F, Khosravi Z. Forgiveness scale extended to the iranian families. Womens Stud.2006; 3, 97–112.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hudson WW. Index of marital satisfaction. 1992 [Online]. Available: www.Therapyinla.Com/Psych/Psych0101.Html.

  41. Pouurakbar S. Surveying The Role Of Personality Traits In Exhalation Of The Relationship Between Sexual Satisfaction With Marital Satisfaction. PhD. Dissertation. Tehran: University Of Tarbiat Moddares. 2011.

  42. Folkman S, Lazarus RS, Gruen RJ, DeLongis A. Appraisal, coping, health status, and psychological symptoms. J pers soc psychol. 1986;50(3):571. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.50.3.571.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Khazai K. Correlation between body image and coping styles with severity of primary dysmenorrhea. J Fundam Ment Health. 2012;14(56):55–344. https://doi.org/10.22038/jfmh.2013.893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ahmadi Ardakani Z, Fatemi Oghada N. Examining the model of relationship between attachment styles and marital satisfaction: the mediating roles of forgiveness and empathy. Med J Mashhad Univ Med Sci. 2019;62:15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Olson JR, Marshall JP, Goddard HW, Schramm DG. Shared religious beliefs, prayer, and forgiveness as predictors of marital satisfaction. Fam Relat. 2015;64(4):519–33. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Zehtab Najafi A, Darvizeh Z, Piyvastegar M. The relationship between forgiveness and marital satisfaction of Kermanshahi couples. Woman Cult. 2011; 3, 23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Fahimdanesh F, Noferesti A, Tavakol K. Self-compassion and forgiveness: major predictors of marital satisfaction in young couples. Ame J Fam Ther. 2020;48(3):221–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2019.1708832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Gaur P, Bhardwaj AB. Relationship between empathy, forgiveness and marital adjustment in couple. Int J Indian Psychol. 2015;3(1):145–51.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Tavakol Z, Nasrabadi AN, Moghadam ZB, Salehiniya H, Rezaei E. A review of the factors associated with marital satisfaction. Galen Med J. 2017;6(3):197–207. https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.v6i3.641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Cornish MA, Wade NG. A therapeutic model of self-forgiveness with intervention strategies for counselors. J Couns Devel. 2015;93(1):96–104. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2015.00185.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Zargar F, Bagheri N, Tarrahi MJ, Salehi M. Effectiveness of emotion regulation group therapy on craving, emotion problems, and marital satisfaction in patients with substance use disorders: a randomized clinical trial. Iran J Psychiatry. 2019;14(4):283.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Black A. Women’s everyday resistance to intimate partner violence: a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for a Master of Science in Health Psychology at Massey University, Aotearoa. Master of science degree, Massey University. 2018.

  53. Toussaint L, Webb JR. Gender differences in the relationship between empathy and forgiveness. J Soc Psychol. 2005;145(6):673–85. https://doi.org/10.3200/socp.145.6.673-686.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The present study is the result of a master’s thesis at the Iran University of Medical Sciences. The university has provided financial support for the project. We would like to express our sincere gratitude and appreciation to the honorable authorities of the Iran University of Medical Sciences and the subjects who participated in this study.

Funding

The present research is the result of a part of the master’s thesis funded by the Research Deputy of Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Midwifery and Reproductive, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Rashid Yasemi st., Valiasr St, Tehran, 1996713883, Iran

    Samaneh Safari

  2. Department of Midwifery and Reproductive, Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Seyedeh Batool Hasanpoor-Azghady & Leila Amiri-Farahani

Authors
  1. Samaneh Safari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Seyedeh Batool Hasanpoor-Azghady
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Leila Amiri-Farahani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.S and SB.HA designed the study. S.S collected data. S.S, SB.HA, and L.A.F analyzed and interpreted the data. Moreover, SB.HA and L.A.F wrote and revised the paper. All of the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seyedeh Batool Hasanpoor-Azghady.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The research project was confirmed by the Ethics Committee of Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, with the ethics code of (IR.IUMS.REC.1397.544). After obtaining a sampling license from Iran University of Medical Sciences. The participants were asked to sign a written informed consent. Respondents were completely informed of the study purpose and procedures. Besides, they were assured of the confidentiality of information. All methods present study were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Safari, S., Hasanpoor-Azghady, S.B. & Amiri-Farahani, L. The role of men’s forgiveness in marital satisfaction and coping strategies of infertile iranian women. BMC Women's Health 23, 227 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02389-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02389-x

Keywords

BMC Women's Health

ISSN: 1472-6874

Contact us