Skip to main content

Disordered hypothalamus-pituitary-ovary axis in heterotopic extraovarian sex cord-stromal proliferation: a case report of fallopian tube serous adenofibroma



Fallopian tube serous adenofibromas are uncommon tumors of the female genital tract, only dozens of cases have ever been reported. Earlier study indicated that they might be derived from embryonic remnants of the Müllerian duct. Clinical presentation of these tumors is usually asymptomatic. Small cysts of 0.5–3 cm in diameter are mostly incidentally found at the fimbriae end, with coarse papillary excrescences lined by epithelial cells and connective tissue stroma without nuclear pleomorphism or mitosis.

Case presentation

A 23-year-old woman with normal secondary sexual characters and 46, XX karyotype, presented to the gynecology clinic complaining of irregular menstrual cycles. Laboratory studies reported unique discrepancy of hormone levels; anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH): 6.05 ng/mL (The normal range of AMH is 1.70–5.63 ng/mL in women aged under 35 years old), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH): 31.9 mIU/mL (reference range: 3.85–8.78, follicular phase; 4.54–22.51, ovulatory phase; 1.79–5.12, luteal phase; 16.74-113.59, menopause), and luteinizing hormone (LH): 52.0 mIU/mL (reference range: 2.12–10.89, follicular phase; 19.18-103.03, ovulatory phase; 1.20-12.86, luteal phase; 10.87–58.64, menopause), mimicking gonadotropin-resistant ovary syndrome. The ultrasound reported a right adnexal cyst of 10.4 × 7.87 × 6.7 cm. Laparoscopic evaluation was performed; pathology revealed serous adenofibroma of the fallopian tube with ovarian stroma contents. Heterotopic extraovarian sex cord-stromal proliferations was most probable. The patient’s hormone levels returned to the reproductive status two weeks after surgery; FSH: 7.9 mIU/mL, LH: 3.59 mIU/mL,and AMH: 4.32 ng/mL. The patient’s menstrual cycles have resumed to normal for over two years after removal of the fallopian tube cyst.


This case of fallopian tube serous adenofibromas presented a discrepancy of serum AMH and FSH mimicking gonadotropin-resistant ovary syndrome. The clinical picture derived from heterotopic extraovarian sex cord-stromal proliferation indicated a disordered hypothalamus-pituitary-ovary axis.

Peer Review reports


Fallopian tube tumors are relatively uncommon tumors of the female genital tract, among which serous adenofibromas are benign and very unusual [1,2,3]. Only dozens of cases have been reported since 1909 [4, 5]. Fallopian tube serous adenofibromas are mostly discovered incidentally during workup or surgery performed for other health issues [4, 5]. A review of literature of earlier cases with clinicopathological presentation of this tumor has recently been summarized [5, 6]. Clinical presentation of these tumors is usually asymptomatic, though a few cases present with symptoms of abdominal pain, palpable mass, vaginal bleeding and urinary or bowel symptoms [5, 6]. Small cysts of 0.5–3 cm in diameter are mostly found at the fimbriae end, with pathology presentation of coarse papillary excrescences lined by epithelial cells and connective tissue stroma without nuclear pleomorphism or mitosis [5, 6]. An earlier study indicated that they might be derived from embryonic remnants of the Müllerian duct [7]. Recent studies suggested that fallopian tube serous adenofibromas are heterotopic sex cord-stromal proliferations found in fimbriae, which arise from heterotopic ovarian tissue exposed during ovulation [8, 9].

Normal ovulatory cycle requires tightly integrated interactions between the hypothalamus, pituitary, and ovary. An elevation of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) in women indicates diminished ovarian function, as there is an absence of negative feedback on the hypothalamus-pituitary from the very low secretion of ovarian estradiol, leading to persistent secretion of FSH from pituitary gland [10]. The clinical picture of gonadotropin-resistant ovary syndrome (ROS) is characterized by hypergonadotropic amenorrhea, normal secondary sexual characteristics, normal 46, XX karyotype, and age-appropriate anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) values [11, 12]. ROS patients have morphologically normal ovaries with ordinary ovarian primordial follicles, which however are resistant to exogenous gonadotropin stimulation [13, 14]. Gonadotropin-resistant ovary syndrome is occasionally associated with autoimmune disease [15, 16], or antibodies against FSH receptor or mutations in FSH receptor gene [17,18,19].

We report the case of a woman of reproductive age with tubal serous adenofibroma who presented with irregular menstrual cycles and discrepant AMH and FSH levels that resembled characteristics of ROS. The patient resumed normal menstrual cycle and her serum hormone levels returned to reproductive status after removal of the fallopian tube cyst.

Case presentation

A 23-year-old woman, G0, reports irregular menstrual cycles for 6 months. Her body mass index (BMI) was 22.5 Kg/M2 and she presented with appropriate sex characteristics; Tanner stages 5 in both pubic hair and breast development. The patient‘smenarche occurred at the age of 12 years old and had relatively regular menstrual cycle intervals of 28–30 days and duration of 3–5 days. No heavy menstrual blood flow or blood clots were noted. No dysmenorrhea or symptoms of endometriosis were noted either. The acute onset of irregularity in the patient’s menstrual cycle occurred six months prior her first gynecologic visit. Her menstrual period was initially delayed for two weeks, then the entire menstrual cycle interval prolonged to two months. The patient then visited a gynecology clinic for further examination. No signs of androgen and/orcortisol excess, thyroid abnormalities, and galactorrhea, all of which might have resulted in the irregularity of menstrual periods, were noted. She denied of previous sexual exposure. The initial hormone profile blood test taken showed elevated FSH and luteinizing hormone (LH) of 31.1 mIU/mL and 52.0 mIU/mL (Table 1). An ultrasound scan was suggested, but the patient hesitated due to personal reasons. Blood test three months later showed FSH: 31.9 mIU/mL, LH: 17.22 mIU/mL, AMH: 6.05 ng/mL, and both estradiol and progesterone in ovulatory phase (Table 1), other hormone tests as listed in Table 1 were normal. The serum β-hCG level was not tested due to absence of sexual debut. Also, no intrauterine gestational sac or other symptoms and signs of ectopic pregnancy were noted. Tumor marker was within normal range; CA125: 9.51 U/ml. Karyotype analysis indicated normal 46, XX. No signs of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) such as hirsutism, acne, buffalo hump and obesity were noted. Ultrasound examination showed uterine size of 6.10 × 4.18 × 3.19 cm with endometrium thickness of 12 mm. Left ovary measured 2.81 × 1.81 cm. No multiple, small antral follicles distributed peripherally or throughout the dense stroma characteristics of PCOS was noted on bilateral ovaries. A 10.4 × 7.87 × 6.7 cm simple cyst at the right adnexal area was noted (Fig. 1). The cyst is anechoic and unilocular, with clear content and no internal blood flow. No septums,solid components, calcifications, papillary formations, and ascites were found under sonographic examination. A right ovarian cyst was highly suspected.

Table 1 Serum hormone profiles before and after surgical removal of fallopian serous adenofibroma
Fig. 1
figure 1

(A)(B) Abdominal sonographic scanning with size measurement of the mass

Laparoscopic evaluation was performed two weeks later. A right fallopian tube cyst was completely excised (Fig. 2A). During operation, the cyst occupied most of the right pelvic cavity. Though adjacent to the right ovary, there was no adhesion between the pelvic cyst and right ovary. Therefore, the removal of the pelvic cyst was performed smoothly and no ovarian tissue was resected during the operation. Bilateral ovaries were of normal size and were grossly normal under laparoscopic inspection. No characteristics of PCOS were noted, including thickened white capsule of the ovary. No other abnormal findings were noted over the pelvic region, including the uterus, left adnexa, cul-de-sac, and pelvic wall. The specimen removed consisted of one tissue fragment measuring 8.0 × 6.2 × 0.3 cm. Pathologic examination showed a cyst with smooth internal and external surface and eight polyps measuring up to 0.8 cm in maximal diameter connected to the inner wall (Fig. 2B). Microscopically, serous adenofibroma lined by simple flattened cuboidal epithelial cells with occasionally discernible apical cilia resting on fibrous wall was noted. Some areas showed broad and blunt papilla formation with attenuated epithelium and dense hypocellular fibrotic stroma (Fig. 3). No atypia or invasion was observed. Based on the histopathological findings, a pathologic diagnosis of serous adenofibroma of the fallopian tube was given. Focal area of ovarian stroma with corpora lutea was also noted.

Fig. 2
figure 2

(A) The picture of pelvic cavity taken during the operation. Ut: uterus; T: an amorphous mass extended from right adnexa and occupied the entire cul-de-sac; Lt O: left ovary; Lt F: left fallopian tube. (B) gross picture of the right adnexal mass fixed in formalin. Arrow: polyps in inner wall of the mass

Fig. 3
figure 3

(A) 100X and (B) 200X. Hematoxylin and Eosin stain of the cyst. Serous adenofibroma of tubal cyst lined by low cuboidal to ciliated columnar cells was identified, beneath which spindle cells were present. Multiple rough intracystic papillary projections supported by fibrous tissue were observed

The patient’s hormone levels returned to normal reproductive ranges two weeks after removal of the fallopian tube cyst, except for a slightly elevated FSH of 17.22 mIU/mL 10 months after the operation (Table 1). She has resumed normal menstrual cycles for over two years. Ultrasound scans were performed 10 and 18 months after the removal of the fallopian tube cyst: no ovarian or adnexal lesion was noted. The serum androgen levels were analyzed before and after the operation and no hyperandrogenism was noted (Table 1). The serum inhibin A and B concentrations were also in the range of reproductive status.

Discussion and conclusions

Tubal adenofibromatous lesions have recently been regarded as extraovarian sex cord-stromal proliferations [9]. In the present case, focal area of ovarian stroma with corpora lutea was noted in tubal adenofibroma lesion. Thus, heterotopic extraovarian sex cord-stromal proliferation was likely. Heterotopic extraovarian sex cord-stromal proliferations have mostly been incidentally detected and most of which were measured 1–7 mm in size and located at the fimbrial end of the fallopian tube [8, 9, 20, 21]. The present case was unusual for its large size and only another three case presentation reported tubal adenofibroma with the size up to 8 cm [5, 6, 22]. The application of immunohistochemical markers and molecular analysis on extensive sampling of the specimen is mandatory to provide an accurate diagnosis of sex cord-stromal tumors [23,24,25]. The incipient adenofibromas (< 3 mm in size) were noted in 23% of high-risk patients undergoing risk-reducing surgery [26]. Fimbrial adenofibromas were found in 9.9% of cases and were more common in women at high risk of extrauterine high-grade serous carcinoma [20]. Moreover, sex cord elements proliferation of ovarian serous cystadenofibromas have been shown to attain estrogen-secreting activities in cases associated with uterine abnormalities [27, 28]. Though fallopian tube adenofibromas are basically non-functional, recent report on cases of fallopian tube adenofibromas showed sex cord proliferation resembling microscopic adult granulosa cell tumors [8]. An adult granulosa cell tumor characterized by abnormally elevated (8–10 times normal range) AMH levels, and hyperandrogenism has been noted [29]. It is likely that microscopic sex cord or granulosa cell components, both undetected in our initial examination, did exist and alter the patient’s hypothalamus-pituitary-ovarian axis, resulting in characteristics that mimicked ROS.

The menopausal level FSH, age-appropriate AMH, normal secondary sexual characters, and normal karyotype of this case are characteristics that mimic ROS, except for irregular menstrual cycles other than amenorrhea [14, 30]. Similar to the successfully resumed ovarian function in ROS patients who received ovarian biopsy [31, 32], our patient resumed normal menstrual cycles after removal of the fallopian tube cyst. One diagnostic criterion of ROS is the presence of primordial follicles in ovarian biopsy [13, 14]. However, the presence of ovarian follicles in our patient cannot be determined because we did not perform biopsy of the ovaries during laparoscopic evaluation [33]. Though histologic proof could not be made, the ovulatory level of serum estradiol detected and the resumption of normal menstrual cycle after removal of the adnexal lesion suggested ovaries of reproductive state in our patient. Premature ovarian insufficiency and polycystic ovarian syndrome was possible but not likely. In our patient, resumed regular menstrual cycles and age appropriate AMH can be used to exclude the possibility of premature ovarian insufficiency, in whom very low to undetectable AMH presented [34]. The polycystic ovarian syndrome was also not possible by the gross picture of bilateral ovaries during operation and the plasma levels of androgens and inhibin detected.

During normal menstrual cycle, FSH concentrations rarely exceed 10 IU/L in the follicular phase, and do not exceed 20 IU/L during the mid-cycle peaks of FSH [35,36,37]. A recent study showed higher FSH levels of 22.44, 17.22, 15.9, 15.64 IU/L were detected at LH surge of the menstrual cycles of same individuals [38]. Thus, FSH level of 17.22 IU/L observed at 10 months after the surgery in our patient could be due to the sample taken during preovulatory surge. However, the repeated detection of FSH levels over 30 IU/L before surgery was still higher than most physiological investigations. Four months prior to surgery, the patient’s LH and estradiol levels were 52.0 mIU/mL and 133 pg/mL, respectively, implying the start of LH surge in the preovulatory phase. The ovulatory level of serum estradiol was presumed to down-regulate FSH secretion from the pituitary gland [10], but our patient’s serum FSH level was as high as 31.1 mIU/mL (Table 1). One week before surgery, the patient’s hormone profile was still atypical for her age with serum FSH and LH levels of 31.9 mIU/mL and 17.22 mIU/mL, respectively. Nevertheless, the hormone levels returned to normal reproductive status two weeks after surgery (Table 1), suggesting that the hypothalamus-pituitary-ovary axis resumed normal function.

The fallopian tube has been receiving increased attention in gynecological oncology since considerable evidence suggests that it represents the site-of-origin of many pelvic serous carcinomas [39,40,41,42,43,44,45]. In a recent study on ovarian tumors, 52.2% of the fallopian tubes were normal and 39.2% were affected by the tumors. Amongst grossly normal fallopian tubes, almost 70% were histologically normal, while transitional metaplasia was present in 17.4%, endometriosis in 8.1%, and adenofibroma in 2.2% [46]. Differential diagnosis of tumors of tubal origin includes tubal carcinoma, serous papillary tumor of low malignant potential (STLMP), and serous borderline tumor. STLMP and serous borderline tumors are characterized by cellular pleomorphism and nuclear atypia [47, 48], which were not observed in our case. Recent studies have demonstrated that most so-called ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas are likely to arise from the epithelium of the distal fimbrial portion of the fallopian tube from a precursor lesion known as serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) [49]. Fallopian tube epithelium that implants on the ovary, is suggested to be the origin of low-grade and high-grade serous carcinoma [50]. Besides, fallopian tube adenofibromas are seen in 10% of women with BRCA 1/2 mutations or a strong family history of breast/ovarian carcinomas, but in only 2.5% of non-high-risk women [51]. Thus, fallopian tube tumors, whether benign or malignant, deserve close attention. Regarding young women suffering from pelvic mass requiring resection of the ovaries and/or fallopian tubes due to either neoplasm or heterotopic pregnancy, counselling should foster access to fertility preservation procedures [52, 53]. Moreover, the management of pelvic cyst/neoplasm requires a holistic approach focused on reducing overall inflammation, increasing detoxification with the introduction of antioxidant vitamins, the influence of lifestyle including diets and various nutritional factors, and attenuating troublesome symptoms [54].

There are limitations in this case presentation which included [1] the resected specimen was not preserved for further immunohistochemistry or molecular analysis; [2] not enough serum was preserved for detailed analysis of hormone profiles and no duplication of analysis could be done; [3] the blood taken for the examination was not scheduled and the possible circadian variations and fluctuations of hormone concentrations throughout the menstrual cycle could not be properly adjusted [4] the hormone profiles were assayed on the day blood samples taken, thus analytical variability and confounding factors could not be waived as four different days of analysis. In conclusion, this tubal adenofibromatous lesion presented an unusual big size of heterotopic extraovarian sex cord-stromal proliferation and discrepant serum FSH and AMH levels mimicking ROS. Whether the tubal serous adenofibroma of the patient possesses gonadotropin- or estrogen-secreting properties such as sex cord components, that may have interrupted or modulated the hypothalamus-pituitary-ovary axis remains unknown.

Data Availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.



Follicle stimulating hormone


Gonadotropin-resistant ovary syndrome


Anti-Müllerian hormone


Body mass index


Luteinizing hormone


Polycystic ovarian syndrome


Serous papillary tumor of low malignant potential


Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma


Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate










  1. Kanbour AI, Burgess F, Salazar H. Intramural adenofibroma of the fallopian tube. Cancer. 1973;31(6):1433–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Casasola SV, Mindan JP. Cystadenofibroma of fallopian tube. Appl Pathol. 1989;7(4):256–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alvarado-Cabrero I, Navani SS, Young RH, Scully RE. Tumors of the fimbriated end of the fallopian tube: a clinicopathologic analysis of 20 cases, including nine carcinomas. Int J Gynecol pathology: official J Int Soc Gynecol Pathologists. 1997;16(3):189–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Erra S, Costamagna D. Serous cystadenofibroma of the fallopian tube: case report and literature review. G Chir. 2012;33(1–2):31–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Khatib Y, Patel R, Kashikar A, Chavan K. Serous papillary cystadenofibroma of the fallopian tube: a case report and short review of literature. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2015;58(4):524.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tavares MA, Silva RC, Lourenço M, Ambrósio A. Case report: Giant serous adenofibroma of the fallopian tube. BMJ Case Reports. 2020;13(6).

  7. Gurbuz Y, Ozkara SK. Immunohistochemical profile of serous papillary cystadenofibroma of the fallopian tube: a clue of paramesonephritic origin. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2003;11(2):153–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McCluggage WG, Stewart CJ, Iacobelli J, Soma A, Cho KR, Heatley MK, et al. Microscopic extraovarian sex cord proliferations: an undescribed phenomenon. Histopathology. 2015;66(4):555–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Longworth A, Ganesan R, Yoong AK, Hirschowitz L. Microscopic heterotopic extraovarian sex cord–stromal proliferations: expanding the histologic spectrum. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2018;37(1):35–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Radovick S, Levine JE, Wolfe A. Estrogenic regulation of the GnRH neuron. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2012;3:52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tan SL, Hague WM, Becker F, Jacobs HS. Autoimmune premature ovarian failure with polyendocrinopathy and spontaneous recovery of ovarian follicular activity. Fertil Steril. 1986;45(3):421–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Latronico AC, Arnhold IJ. Gonadotropin resistance. Endocr Dev. 2013;24:25–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Koninckx PR, Brosens IA. The “gonadotropin-resistant ovary” syndrome as a cause of secondary amenorrhea and infertility. Fertil Steril. 1977;28(9):926–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Maxson WS. In: Wentz AC, editor. The gonadotropin resistant ovary syndrome. Seminars in Reproductive Endocrinology; 1983. Copyright© 1983 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.

  15. Jequier AM. Conception in the resistant ovary syndrome occurring during hormone replacement therapy: a report of 2 cases. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;30(2):176–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kalantaridou SN, Davis SR, Nelson LM. Premature ovarian failure. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1998;27(4):989–1006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Arici A, Matalliotakis IM, Koumantakis GE, Goumenou AG, Neonaki MA, Koumantakis EE. Diagnostic role of inhibin B in resistant ovary syndrome associated with secondary amenorrhea. Fertil Steril. 2002;78(6):1324–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuechler A, Hauffa BP, Köninger A, Kleinau G, Albrecht B, Horsthemke B, et al. An unbalanced translocation unmasks a recessive mutation in the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) gene and causes FSH resistance. Eur J Hum Genet. 2010;18(6):656–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Woo I, Zhang Y, Hui H, Mor E. Resistant ovary syndrome masquerading as premature ovarian insufficiency. J Clin Gynecol Obstet. 2019;8(4):111–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Seidman JD, Krishnan J, Yemelyanova A, Vang R. Incidental serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma and non-neoplastic conditions of the fallopian tubes in grossly normal adnexa: a clinicopathologic study of 388 completely embedded cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2016;35(5):423–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lagerstrom I, Uy M, Teschan N. Heterotopic sex cord-stromal proliferation: a Case Report. Am J Clin Pathol. 2021;156(Supplement1):77–S8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. de Silva TS, Patil A, Lawrence RN. Acute presentation of a benign cystadenofibroma of the fallopian tube: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2010;4(1):1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Haroon S, Zia A, Idrees R, Memon A, Fatima S, Kayani N. Clinicopathological spectrum of ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors; 20 years’ retrospective study in a developing country. J ovarian Res. 2013;6(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lim D, Oliva E. Ovarian sex cord-stromal tumours: an update in recent molecular advances. Pathology. 2018;50(2):178–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Al Harbi R, McNeish IA, El-Bahrawy M. Ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors: an update on clinical features, molecular changes, and management. Int J Gynecol cancer: official J Int Gynecol Cancer Soc. 2021;31(2):161–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bossuyt V, Medeiros F, Drapkin R, Folkins AK, Crum CP, Nucci MR. Adenofibroma of the fimbria: a common entity that is indistinguishable from ovarian adenofibroma. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2008;27(3):390–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. McNulty JR. The ovarian serous cystadenofibroma: a report of 25 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1959;77(6):1338–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dillon K, Boyde A, Murphy JK, McCluggage WG. Ovarian serous cystadenofibroma with stromal sex cord elements: report of a unique case. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2006;25(4):336–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chi H, Huang N, Liang H, Li R, Liu C, Qiao J. Abnormal elevation of anti-mullerian hormone and androgen levels presenting as Granulosa Cell Tumor. Front Oncol. 2021;11:799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jones GS, De Moraes-Ruehsen M. A new syndrome of amenorrhea in association with hypergonadotropism and apparently normal ovarian follicular apparatus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1969;104(4):597–600.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Dewhurst CJ, de Koos EB, Ferreira HP. The resistant ovary syndrome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1975;82(4):341–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mueller A, Berkholz A, Dittrich R, Wildt L. Spontaneous normalization of ovarian function and pregnancy in a patient with resistant ovary syndrome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;111(2):210–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mehta AE, Matwijiw I, Lyons EA, Faiman C. Noninvasive diagnosis of resistant ovary syndrome by ultrasonography. Fertil Steril. 1992;57(1):56–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kallio S, Aittomäki K, Piltonen T, Veijola R, Liakka A, Vaskivuo T, et al. Anti-Müllerian hormone as a predictor of follicular reserve in ovarian insufficiency: special emphasis on FSH-resistant ovaries. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(3):854–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. O’Herlihy C, Pepperell R, Evans J. The significance of FSH elevation in young women with disorders of ovulation. Br Med J. 1980;281(6253):1447–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. FILICORI M, SANTORO N, MERRIAM GR, CROWLEY WF JR. Characterization of the physiological pattern of episodic gonadotropin secretion throughout the human menstrual cycle. J Clin Endocrinol Metabolism. 1986;62(6):1136–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Andersen CY. Effect of FSH and its different isoforms on maturation of oocytes from pre-ovulatory follicles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2002;5(3):232–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Melado L, Lawrenz B, Sibal J, Abu E, Coughlan C, Navarro AT, et al. Anti-müllerian hormone during natural cycle presents significant intra and intercycle variations when measured with fully automated assay. Front Endocrinol. 2018;9:686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Folkins AK, Jarboe EA, Roh MH, Crum CP. Precursors to pelvic serous carcinoma and their clinical implications. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;113(3):391–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Dietl J, Wischhusen J. The forgotten fallopian tube. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11(3):227. author reply.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Dietl J, Wischhusen J, Hausler SF. The post-reproductive fallopian tube: better removed? Hum Reprod. 2011;26(11):2918–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Seidman JD, Yemelyanova A, Zaino RJ, Kurman RJ. The fallopian tube-peritoneal junction: a potential site of carcinogenesis. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2011;30(1):4–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Seidman JD, Zhao P, Yemelyanova A. Primary peritoneal” high-grade serous carcinoma is very likely metastatic from serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma: assessing the new paradigm of ovarian and pelvic serous carcinogenesis and its implications for screening for ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;120(3):470–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Vang R, Shih Ie M, Kurman RJ. Fallopian tube precursors of ovarian low- and high-grade serous neoplasms. Histopathology. 2013;62(1):44–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Lee Y, Miron A, Drapkin R, Nucci M, Medeiros F, Saleemuddin A, et al. A candidate precursor to serous carcinoma that originates in the distal fallopian tube. J Pathology: J Pathological Soc Great Br Irel. 2007;211(1):26–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Karpathiou G, Chauleur C, Venet M, Clemenson A, Peoc’h M. Pathology of the fallopian tube: tubal involvement by ovarian tumors and incidental findings in the nontumoral setting. Pathobiology. 2020;87(1):37–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Zheng W, Wolf S, Kramer EE, Cox KA, Hoda SA. Borderline papillary serous tumor of the fallopian tube. Am J Surg Pathol. 1996;20(1):30–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Haratz-Rubinstein N, Fromberg E, Lederman S. Sonographic diagnosis of a serous tumor of low malignant potential of the fallopian tube. J Ultrasound Med. 2004;23(6):869–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Seidman JD. Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinoma localizes to the Tubal-peritoneal Junction: A Pivotal Clue to the site of origin of Extrauterine High-grade Serous Carcinoma (Ovarian Cancer). Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2015;34(2):112–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kurman RJ, Shih Ie M. Molecular pathogenesis and extraovarian origin of epithelial ovarian cancer–shifting the paradigm. Hum Pathol. 2011;42(7):918–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Ramus SJ, Gayther SA. The contribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 to ovarian cancer. Mol Oncol. 2009;3(2):138–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Cucinella G, Gullo G, Etrusco A, Dolce E, Culmone S, Buzzaccarini G. Early diagnosis and surgical management of heterotopic pregnancy allows us to save the intrauterine pregnancy. Menopause Review/PrzeglÄ d Menopauzalny. 2021;20(4):222–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Zaami S, Stark M, Signore F, Gullo G, Marinelli E. Fertility preservation in female cancer sufferers:(only) a moral obligation? Eur J Contracept Reproductive Health Care. 2022;27(4):335–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Habib N, Buzzaccarini G, Centini G, Moawad G, Ceccaldi P-F, Gitas G, et al. Impact of lifestyle and diet on endometriosis: a fresh look to a busy corner. Menopause Review/PrzeglÄ d Menopauzalny. 2022;21(2):124–32.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


No funding to be declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Isabel Hsu recruit and clinical management of this case, helping the draft of the manuscript; Li-Hsuan Lee discussion and clinical management of this case; Leonard Hsu clinical management and pathological study of this case; Shee-Uan Chen discussion and helping the draft of the manuscript; Chao Chin Hsu clinical management of this case and draft the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chao-Chin Hsu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This case presentation was waived from the ethical approval. The case has written consent to participate.

Consent for publication

The case has written consent for publication.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hsu, I., Lee, LH., Hsu, L. et al. Disordered hypothalamus-pituitary-ovary axis in heterotopic extraovarian sex cord-stromal proliferation: a case report of fallopian tube serous adenofibroma. BMC Women's Health 23, 243 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: