Skip to main content
Download PDF

Quality of life and its associated factors among women diagnosed with pelvic organ prolapse in Gynecology outpatient department Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples region public referral hospitals, Ethiopia

BMC Women's Health volume 23, Article number: 342 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Pelvic organ prolapse is an important public health issue that influences millions of women’s lives; through limitations on physical, social, and sexual activities as well as psychological distress. However, there were no reports on the quality of life for women with pelvic organ prolapse in Ethiopia. Therefore this study amid to assess the magnitude of quality of life and its associated factors among women who diagnosed with pelvic organ prolapse in Gynecology outpatient departments in Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples region public referral hospitals; Ethiopia.

Method

An institutional-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples region of public referral hospitals from May 1-July 4, 2022 among 419 diagnosed women with pelvic organ prolapse. A validated tool was used to collect the data. The collected data were entered into Epidata version 3.1 and analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression was computed. The p-value of < 0.05 was used to declare the final statistical significance.

Result

A total of 409 women with pelvic organ prolapse were included in the study, giving a response rate of 97.6%. The overall poor quality of life was 57.5%. Regarding the quality of life domains; personal relationships (73.6%), were highly affected, and sleep/energy (24.2%) was the least affected domain. Stage III/IV prolapse (AOR = 2.52, 95% CI: 1.34, 4.74), menopause (AOR = 3.21, 95% CI 1.75, 5.97), unmarried women (widowed, divorced) (AOR = 2.81, 95% CI: 1.48, 5.32), and longer duration of prolapse (AOR = 5.8, 95% CI: 3.13, 10.81), were significantly associated with poor quality of life.

Conclusion

More than half of women with pelvic organ prolapse had a poor quality of life. Stage III/IV prolapse, longer duration of prolapse, menopause women, and unmarried women are statistically significant factors for the quality of life of women with Pelvic organ prolapse.

Peer Review reports

Background

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is the descent of female pelvic organs into or through the vagina, including the bladder, uterus, and rectum [1]. This case results from the defect of the pelvic floor support, caused by many risk factors such as vaginal birth, advancing age, and increasing body mass index; atrophic changes caused by aging or estrogen loss, chronic straining, and abnormalities of connective tissue [2, 3].

The affected women may present with signs and symptoms of urinary or fecal loss or retention, vaginal pressure or heaviness, abdominal, low back, vaginal, or perennial pain or discomfort, a mass sensation, difficulty walking, lifting, sitting, and stress or fear related to anxiety about the problem [1, 3, 4]. It is the leading indication for hysterectomy in postmenopausal women and accounts for 15–18% of procedures in all age groups [5]. In the Southern Nation Nationality and Peoples Region of Ethiopia, there were high burdens of pelvic organ prolapse, and the most common cause was old age, long hours of carrying heavy objects, a high parity, a history of home delivery, a history of chronic constipation, and a history of chronic cough [6, 7].

Pelvic organ prolapse is a significant public health issue that affects the lives of millions of women [8]. On average, POP influenced 19.7% of women in developing countries [9]. Similarly in Ethiopia, it influenced 23.52% of women [10]. It has the potential to severely influence women’s health-related quality of life through restrictions on physical, social, and sexual activities, psychological distress, and increased financial burden related to healthcare [11]. In addition, access to health care to manage these conditions is often limited, and women usually have to live with the consequences for the rest of their lives [8].

The quality of life of women with POP varies from country to country based on economic level, lifestyle, educational level, and culture [12]. However, a study showed that globally, the most common predominant risk factor for worsening QoL in women with POP is symptoms of POP [13, 14]. Overall, pelvic floor disorders harm women’s lives, emotions, and quality of life, and they may be associated with a variety of systemic symptoms such as urinary, bowel, and sexual symptoms, which may significantly confront the quality of life of the women [15, 16].

Pelvic organ prolapse highly affects women’s quality of life in developing countries compared to developed countries [17, 18]. However, in developing countries, the degree and consequences of the burden of the disease due to pelvic floor dysfunction, especially on the quality of life, are more poorly understood [19]. In addition, the QoL of POP on women’s health has not yet been recognized as a public health problem in many developing countries. This is because only a few studies have examined POP about the normal deterioration of general health-related QOL in the general population [9, 20].

In developed countries, the quality of life and its associated factor in women with POP is assessed with P-QoL tool and used as a baseline strategy for the treatment of POP, but in developing countries, especially in Africa, including Ethiopia not applicable, this is due to limited information on the quality of life of pelvic organ prolapse [21]. Despite the quality of life allowing the quantification of morbidity, treatment efficacy and also acting as a measure of how lives are affected, and coping strategies, research has usually concentrated on the prevalence, etiology, diagnosis, and management of pelvic floor dysfunction, with limited work being performed on the effects of chronic conditions or their treatment on QoL [22].

Pelvic organ prolapse is one of the sources of severe morbidity and psychological upheaval for the patient, who is often socially withdrawn and stigmatized and negatively influences the socioeconomic and reproductive activity of affected women [23, 24]. However, in Ethiopia, no reports were showing the quality of life of women with pelvic organ prolapse. Measuring the quality of life of women with POP is an important input for policymakers and program implementers to develop strategies.

Methods

Study area and period

The study was conducted in South Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples Region (SNNPR). The SNNPR is bordered by Kenya to the south, South Sudan to the west, Gambela regional to the northwest, Oromia region to the north and east, South West region to the Southwest, and Sidama region to the east [25]. The region has 3-referral public hospitals(Dilla university referall, Wolaita Sodo university, Wolkite university) 2 specialized and comprehensive hospitals, 3 general hospitals, 44 primary hospitals, 474 health centers, and 2633 health posts [26]. The previous two-month report in the three referral public hospitals showed that there were four hundred seventy POP cases [27]. The data were collected from May 1, 2022-July 4, 2022 in public referral hospitals, SNNPR; Ethiopia 2022.

Study population and eligibility criteria

All women who were diagnosed with pelvic organ prolapse in the Gynecology outpatient department of SNNPR public referral hospitals during the data collection period. All women diagnosed with pelvic organ prolapse and who had not gotten treatment before in the Gynecology outpatient department in all selected public referral hospitals were included.

Sample size and sampling procedure

The sample size was calculated using a single population formula (n = (Z α/2)2* P (1-P) ⁄ d2).

Based on a study conducted in Uganda, the proportion of poor QoL among POP women was 45.5% [28]. Then, using the following assumptions: 95% of a confidence interval, α = 0.05, and margin of error = 5% the sample size required for this study was calculated.

The calculated sample size was 381. By adding 10% of the non-response rate the final sample size was 419.

All three public referral hospitals found in SNNPR were included in this study. The previous two months’ average POP report of each hospital was used to proportional allocate the calculated sample size [27]. Finally, study respondents were selected using a consecutive sampling technique.

Operational definitions

Quality of Life (QoL)

WHO defines the quality of Life as an individual’s perception of their position in life in the context of the culture and value systems in which they live and about their goals, expectations, standards, and concern. It is a multi-dimensional concept that includes domains related to physical, mental, emotional, level of independence, and social functioning [29].

Poor quality of life

Greater or equal to the median score of the overall (nine) QoL domains [30, 31].

Duration of prolapse:

The number of months or years from the time pelvic organ prolapse first occurred until now [32].

Stages of prolapse

Based on Baden–Walker Halfway Scoring System:

  • Stage 0: is no prolapse.

    Stage I: is leading part of the prolapse is more than 1 cm above the hymen.

    Stage II: is the leading edge less than or equal to 1 cm above or below the hymen;

    Stage III: is leading edge is more than 1 cm beyond the hymen, but less than or equal to the total vaginal length;

    Stage IV: is complete eversion [1, 2, 33].

Data collection tool and procedure

The data collection tool was adopted from the University of Gondar validated tool on prolapse quality of life questionnaire (P-QoL) [34]. An interviewer-administered validated Amharic version questionnaire was used to collect the data. The questionnaire includes 20 items in nine different domains (General Health Condition and POP on the overall life has one item, Role limitation, Social Limitation, Sleep/ Energy and physical limitation has two items, personal relationship and emotion has three items, intensity or Severity of Pain have four items).

The Questions are rated on a four-point Likert scale ranging from one to four, indicating better to worse conditions. This scale was converted into zero to hundred scales. Therefore, the total score is a range of 0–100. Each domain score was obtained by adding the scores of the individual items that comprise the domain. A full-scale score was obtained by the addition of nine-domain items. The lowest total score that can be on the scale is zero, and the highest score is 100. The cut-off point was the median of the total score [35].

Three BSc and MSc midwives were recruited as data collectors and supervisors respectively. The training was given to both data collectors and supervisors by the investigator about the objective of the study, data collection tool, procedure, and how to fill out the questionnaires. All women who were diagnosed with POP in the Gynecology outpatient department of SNNPR public referral hospitals were interviewed after assessing eligibility and obtaining informed written consent and their charts were reviewed to assess the stage of the prolapse.

Data quality assurance

The training was given to data collectors and supervisors. A data collector was supervised throughout the data collection period. Then, the overall process was coordinated and controlled by the investigator. Investigators, supervisors, and data collectors took a discussion meeting after data collection to ensure completeness. Furthermore, the collected data was Checked and coded and entered into the Epi-data computer program version 3.1 to minimize data entry errors.

Data processing and analysis

The collected data was entered into the EPI data version 3.1 computer program. Then, it was exported to Statistical Package for social science version 25. Descriptive statistics like frequency and summary statistics were employed to describe the characteristics of the study participants. Multicollinearity of the predictor variable was checked by using the variance inflation factor before binary logistic regression was done, and it was < 2 VIF for all independent variables. All explanatory variables in bivariable logistic regression that fulfill the chi-square static assumption were considered for multivariable logistic regression analysis to control for confounding factors. Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) with their corresponding 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) and p-value less than 0.05 was used to declare the association between dependent and independent variables. Model fitness was checked by the Hosmer–Lemeshow test, it was fitted with a p-value of 0.45; finally presented by figure, table, and graph.

Result

Socio-demographic characteristics

A total of 409 women were enrolled in the study, giving a 97.6% response rate. The age range of the participants is 36 to 72 years with a median of 54 years. Most of the respondents 220(53.8%) were married. Additionally, regarding educational status, 204 (49.87%) were non-educated (Table 1).

Table 1 Socio-demographic characteristics among women diagnosed with POP in Gynecology outpatient department SNNPR public referral hospitals; Ethiopia 2022 (n = 409)
Full size table

Gynecologic and obstetrics characteristics

For most respondents, 251(61.36%) prolapses were greater than two years durations. Regarding stages of prolapse, 153(37.4%) of women had stage III prolapse. Moreover, the parity ranged from 4 to 14 with a mean and standard deviation of (8.23 ± 2.23), and 295(72.1%) of women had ≥ 7 number of childbirth (Table 2).

Table 2 Gynecologic & obstetrics characteristics among women diagnosed with POP in Gynecology outpatient department SNNPR public referral hospitals, Ethiopia 2022 (n = 409)
Full size table

The magnitude of quality of life of women with pelvic organ prolapse

According to this study, the magnitude of poor quality of life among women with POP was 235(57.5%) with (95% CI: 52.5, 62.3) (Fig. 1). Personal relationships 301(73.6%), the impact of pop 248(60.6%), and emotional well-being 239(58.4%) were domains of quality of life that had the highest score, whereas social limitation 142(34.7%) and sleep/energy 99(24.2%) had the lowest score (Table 3).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Magnitude of quality of life among women diagnosed with pelvic organ prolapse in Gynecology outpatient department SNNPR public referral hospitals, Ethiopia 2022 (n = 409)

Full size image
Table 3 Quality of life domain score among women diagnosed with pelvic organ prolapse in Gynecology outpatient department SNNPR public referral hospitals, Ethiopia 2022 (n = 409)
Full size table

Factor associated with QoL of women with pelvic organ prolapse

To assess the relationship between various socio-demographic, obstetric, and POP-related factors and quality of life, binary logistic regression was used. The variables that full fill the chi-square static assumption were maternal educational status, residency, marital status, parity, transportation access, menopausal status, duration POP, and stage of POP. Then, using the backward likelihood ratio approach, these variables were subjected to multivariable logistic regression analysis. In the final model, only five variables were present. Model fitness was tested with the Hosmer and Lemeshow Goodness of fit test and fit with a p-value of 0.45. Additionally, all independent variables had no multicollinearity with a variance inflation factor value (VIF) < 2.

This study shows that women with stage III/IV prolapse were 2.52 times more likely to have a poor quality of life than those with stage I or II prolapse (AOR = 2.52, 95% CI: 1.34, 4.74). In addition, women in the menopause period were 3.21 times more likely to have a poor quality of life than in the pre-menopause period (AOR = 3.21, 95% CI 1.75, 5.97). Furthermore, the odds of having a poor quality of life were 2.81 times greater for women who were not married (widowed or divorced) than for those who were married (AOR = 2.81, 95% CI:1.48, 5.32). Moreover, women with a longer duration of POP were 5.8 times more likely to have a poor quality of life than their counterparts (AOR = 5.8, 95% CI: 3.13, 10.81) (Table 4).

Table 4 Factor associated with QoL among women diagnosed with POP in Gynecology outpatient department SNNPR public referral hospitals, Ethiopia 2022 (n = 409)
Full size table

Discussion

This study showed that the overall poor quality of life among women who had pelvic organ prolapse was 57.5% (95%CI: 52.5, 62.3). This indicated that, although pelvic organ prolapse is a benign case, it highly influences the quality of life of women. This finding is in line with a study conducted in France 54.5% [36]; Pakistan 60.8% [37], and Slovakia 52.8% [12]. This is due to the fact that, although the quality of life of women with POP varies from country to country based on economic level, lifestyle, educational level, and culture, the most common predominant risk factors for worsening QoL in women are pelvic organ prolapse symptoms [13, 14].

On the other side, it is higher than a study conducted in Uganda 45.5% [28], and Ghana 39.4% [38]. This difference is due to QoL domain and item differences and sample size differences.

In addition, this study showed that the poor quality of life of women with POP was significantly associated with advanced stages of prolapse. This finding is supported by studies conducted in South Africa [30], Taiwan [39], Thailand [16], Nepal [40], the USA [41], Italy [42], and London [31].

This is due to the fact that as the prolapse advanced, secondary consequences, including decubitus ulcers, bowel symptoms, urinary symptoms, abdominal symptoms, and vaginal symptoms, increased, which worsened the quality of life [31, 38, 40].

Moreover, this study showed that there was a significant association between the poor quality of life of women with POP and longer durations of prolapse. This finding is supported by studies conducted in Pakistan [37], France [13], and Bangladesh [43]. This is because, as the duration of the disease increased, there was progressive disability. In addition, as the duration of the prolapse increased, there were advanced stages of prolapse that caused a symptomatic prolapse that worsened women’s health conditions [44].

Furthermore, this study showed that women’s being unmarried was strongly associated with poor quality of life. This finding is in line with studies conducted in Bangladesh [43]. In fact being in a relationship, could be considered a buffer mechanism against psychological illnesses, reducing the likelihood of developing depressive symptoms, and isolation [30]. In addition, lonely women with pelvic organ prolapse had double responsibility to lead their lives; this condition could be worse for their lives.

Moreover, this study showed that menopausal women were significantly associated with poor quality of life. This finding is supported by studies conducted in Turkey [20]. This is due to the fact that as the women entered the menopausal stage, there were physiological changes resulting in menopausal symptoms and worsening of the prolapse, which is a double burden that worsens the quality of life [1].

Conclusion

According to this study, more than half of women with pelvic organ prolapse had a poor quality of life. Stage III/IV prolapse, longer duration of prolapse, menopausal period, and unmarried women (widowed, divorced) were significantly associated with poor quality of life.

Recommendation

To the South Nation Nationalities and Peoples of Ethiopia region health bureau:

  • Offering the possibility of early diagnosis and treatment for women with POP that has been hidden in the community

To researcher:

  • Researches need on why women with pelvic organ prolapse are not early attending health care facilities (Time to health-seeking behavior among women with POP and its factors).

  • Further community based study

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AOR:

Adjusted Odds Ratio,

HRQoL:

Health related quality of life

OPD:

Outpatient Department

POP:

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

QoL:

Quality of Life

SNNPR:

Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples Region

References

  1. Charles R. B. Beckmann M, MHPE. Frank W. Ling, MD. Barbara M. Barzansky, PhD, MHPE. William N. P. Herbert, MD. Douglas W. Laube, MD, MEd. Roger P. Smith, MD. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. sixth ed2010.

  2. Jelovsek JE, Maher C, Barber MD. Pelvic organ prolapse. The Lancet. 2007;369(9566):1027–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barber MD. Pelvic organ prolapse. Bmj. 2016;354.

  4. Kumar S, Padubidri V, Daftary SN. Howkins & Bourne, Shaw's Textbook of Gynecology, -EBOOK: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2018.

  5. Kesharvarz H HS, Kieke BA, Marchbanks PA. . Hysterectomysurveillance—United States 1994–1999. MMWR Surveill Summ 2002; ;51 (SS05):: 1–8.

  6. Beketie ED, Tafese WT, Assefa ZM, Berriea FW, Tilahun GA, Shiferaw BZ, et al. Symptomatic pelvic floor disorders and its associated factors in South-Central Ethiopia. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(7): e0254050.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Badacho AS, Lelu MA, Gelan Z. Uterine prolapse and associated factors among reproductive age women in Dawro zone, southwest Ethiopia: a community based cross sectional study. 2020.

  8. Wilkins MF, Wu JM. Epidemiology of pelvic organ prolapse. Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports. 2016;5(2):119–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Walker GJ, Gunasekera P. Pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence in developing countries: review of prevalence and risk factors. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(2):127–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gedefaw G, Demis A. Burden of pelvic organ prolapse in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Womens Health. 2020;20(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Weber AM, Richter HE. Pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(3):61534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Svihrova V, Svihra J, Luptak J, Swift S, Digesu GA. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) in general population with pelvic organ prolapse: a study based on the prolapse quality-of-life questionnaire (P-QOL). European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2014;182:22–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fritel X, Varnoux N, Zins M, Breart G, Ringa V. Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse at midlife, quality of life, and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(3):609.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Davila GW, Ghoniem GM, Wexner SD. Pelvic floor dysfunction: Springer; 2006.

  15. Dietz V, Maher C. Pelvic organ prolapse and sexual function. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(11):1853–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hatthanirun P WR, Suthutvoravut S, Singhakajen V Quality of life in women with pelvic organ prolapse 2015.

  17. Gjerde JL, Rortveit G, Muleta M, Adefris M, Blystad A. Living with pelvic organ prolapse: voices of women from Amhara region. Ethiopia International urogynecology journal. 2017;28(3):361–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Islam RM, Oldroyd J, Rana J, Romero L, Karim MN. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in community-dwelling women in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(12):2001–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gunasekera PSJ. Walker G Pelvic organ prolapse:don’t forget developing countries. Lancet. 2007;369:1789–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vurgec BA, Beji NK. Quality of life and sexual life in women with advanced stage pelvic organ prolapse. Cukurova Medical Journal. 2018;43(Ek 1):230–9.

  21. Barber MD, Amundsen CL, Paraiso MF, Weidner AC, Romero A, Walters MD. Quality of life after surgery for genital prolapse in elderly women: obliterative and reconstructive surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2007;18(7):799–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sushma Srikrishna LC. Quality of Life and Patient Reported Outcomes. The Global Library of Women’s Medicine’s. June 2014.

  23. Rogers G, Villarreal A, Kammerer-Doak D, Qualls C. Sexual function in women with and without urinary incontinence and/or pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2001;12(6):361–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Haylen BT, De Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourology and Urodynamics: Official Journal of the International Continence Society. 2010;29(1):4–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wikipedia tfe. Southern nations, Ntionalities and peoples Region. https://enwikipediaorg/wiki/Southern_Nations_Nationalities_and_Peoples%27_Region2022.

  26. bureau Srh. unpublished report on anual activity. 2022 4/18/2022.

  27. privious two months report in three public referral hospital in SNNPR. unpublished reprort. 2022.

  28. Kayondo M, Kaye DK, Migisha R, Tugume R, Kato PK, Lugobe HM, et al. Impact of surgery on quality of life of Ugandan women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: a prospective cohort study. BMC Womens Health. 2021;21(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. WHO. quality of life assessment. Psychological medicine 1998 May;28(3):551–8.

  30. Brandt C, van Vuuren ECJ. Dysfunction, activity limitations, participation restriction and contextual factors in South African women with pelvic organ prolapse. The South African journal of physiotherapy. 2019;75(1).

  31. Digesu GA, Chaliha C, Salvatore S, Hutchings A, Khullar V. The relationship of vaginal prolapse severity tosymptoms and quality of life. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2005;112(7):971–6.

  32. Belayneh T, Gebeyehu A, Adefris M, Rortveit G, Gjerde JL, Ayele TA. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery and health-related quality of life: a follow-up study. BMC Womens Health. 2021;21(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. J.K. Oates SA. Fundamentals of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 8th edition ed.

  34. Belayneh T, Gebeyehu A, Adefris M, Rortveit G, Genet T. Translation, transcultural adaptation, reliability and validation of the pelvic organ prolapse quality of life (P-QoL) in Amharic. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019;17(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Cetinkaya SE, Dokmeci F, Dai O. Correlation of pelvic organ prolapse staging with lower urinary tract symptoms, sexual dysfunction, and quality of life. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(10):1645–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Christian Chauvin EC, Marcos Ballester and Emile Daraï. Potential relevance of pre-operative quality of lifequestionnaires to identify candidates for surgicaltreatment of genital prolapse. BMC Urology. 2012;12:9.

  37. Jokhio AH, Rizvi RM, MacArthur C. Prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse in women, associated factors and impact on quality of life in rural Pakistan: population-based study. BMC Womens Health. 2020;20(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wusu-Ansah OK, Opare-Addo HS. Pelvic organ prolapse in rural Ghana. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2008;103(2):121–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Manchana T, Bunyavejchevin S. Validation of the Prolapse Quality of Life (P-QOL) questionnaire in Thai version. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(8):985–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Shrestha B, Onta S, Choulagai B, Paudel R, Petzold M, Krettek A. Uterine prolapse and its impact on quality of life in the Jhaukhel-Duwakot Health Demographic Surveillance Site, Bhaktapur. Nepal Global health action. 2015;8(1):28771.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Jelovsek JE, Barber MD. Women seeking treatment for advanced pelvic organ prolapse have decreased body image and quality of life. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(5):1455–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Digesu GA, Santamato S, Khullar V, Santillo V, Digesu A, Cormio G, et al. Validation of an Italian version of the prolapse quality of life questionnaire. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2003;106(2):184–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Imoto A, Sarker M, Akter R, Matsuyama A, Honda S. Health-related quality of life in parous women with pelvic organ prolapse and/or urinary incontinence in Bangladesh. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(4):887–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Fontenele MQS, Moreira MA, de Moura ACR, de Figueiredo VB, Driusso P, Nascimento SL. Pelvic floor dysfunction distress is correlated with quality of life, but not with muscle function. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021;303(1):143–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Debre Markos University College of Medicine and Health Science to support this research project. The authors would also like to extend their gratitude to southern region public referral hospitals, study participants, data collectors, and supervisors for their valuable contribution.

Funding

There were no external organizations that funded this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Midwifery, College of Health Science, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia

    Zewdu Tefera

  2. Department of Midwifery, College of Health Science, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia

    Belsity Temesgen, Mikyas Arega & Tmesgen Getaneh

  3. Department of Midwifery, College of Health Science, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia

    Aynalem Belay

Authors
  1. Zewdu Tefera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Belsity Temesgen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mikyas Arega
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tmesgen Getaneh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Aynalem Belay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ZT developed the project. ZT, BT, MA, TG, and AB participated in the methodology, data analysis, and developing of the initial drafts of the manuscript and revising subsequent drafts. ZT and MA prepared the final draft of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zewdu Tefera.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of College Health Science; Debre Markos university (study protocol number 159/2022). Then, officials at different levels in the hospitals were communicated through letters from College of Medicine and Health Science. Then, informed written consent from all participants was obtained. For those who cannot write and read the consent form was read in front of a witness (their friends, relatives, and independent body of the research team) and the witness signed and provided written informed consent. In addition, affirmation was made that they are free to withdraw consent and discontinue participation without any form of prejudice. All participants have assured confidentiality of information and privacy of their personal information. To preserve confidentiality, the data was not exposed to any third party except the investigators. All necessary methods were carried out in accordance with the guidelines of institutional and declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tefera, Z., Temesgen, B., Arega, M. et al. Quality of life and its associated factors among women diagnosed with pelvic organ prolapse in Gynecology outpatient department Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples region public referral hospitals, Ethiopia. BMC Women's Health 23, 342 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02507-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02507-9

Keywords

BMC Women's Health

ISSN: 1472-6874

Contact us