Skip to main content
Download PDF

Effectiveness of physical therapy interventions in women with dyspareunia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMC Women's Health volume 23, Article number: 387 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Dyspareunia is defined as the occurrence of pain during or after sexual intercourse, which directly affects physical, sexual, and mental health. This condition can lead to depression, anxiety, and low self-esteem in women who experience it.

Objectives

The aim of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness of physical therapy interventions for the treatment of female dyspareunia.

Design

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted.

Method

Search of publications was conducted in Scopus, Medline, Pubmed, Cinahl and Web of Science. Treatment effects were defined as standardized mean difference and their 95% confidence intervals. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using Crohan's Q test and quantified using the I2 index.

Results

Of the 19 articles selected, six applied multimodal physiotherapy treatments; five, electrotherapy; three, Thiele's massage; two, interdisciplinary interventions or pelvic floor muscle training; and one, extracorporeal shockwave therapy. The meta-analysis showed significant results for the variables pain and quality of life with the interventions based on electrotherapy and electrotherapy combined with pelvic floor muscle training. These interventions did not show significant results for the improvement of sexual function.

Conclusions

Physiotherapy techniques are effective and procedures have been identified with reliable results in improving pain and quality of life in patients with dyspareunia. One of the most important aspects is the strengthening of the perineal musculature and the application of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation. Furthermore, manual trigger point release therapy and Thiele massage, optimize and guarantee the reduction of pain intensity.

Prospero registration

CRD42021236155.

Peer Review reports

Background

Female sexual dysfunction is known as the disorder experienced by a woman when changes occur in her usual sexual behavior [1]. It is estimated that between 16 and 40% of women suffer from some form of sexual dysfunction, and this percentage increases with age [2]. Among the painful disorders, dyspareunia stands out. It involves the onset of pain during or after intercourse, directly affecting physical health, as well as sexual and mental well-being. Consequently, it can lead to depression, anxiety, and low self-esteem in women who experience it [3]. The prevalence of distressing sexual problems in women peaked at 14.8% in middle-aged women compared to younger women (aged 18–44 years: 10.8%) or older women (aged ≥ 65 years: 8.9%) [4]. Dyspareunia can be classified as superficial when it affects the vulva and vaginal entrance, or deep when the painful area is the cervix, bladder, and/or lower pelvis. Another classification divides it into primary, associated with pain at the beginning of sexual life, and secondary, when it appears at a later time [5].

Specifying the etiology of dyspareunia can be challenging as it encompasses structural, inflammatory, infectious, traumatic, hormonal, and psychosocial conditions [5, 6]. These conditions can act as both risk factors and consequences, creating a cycle that is influenced by emotional intimacy, sexual stimuli, arousal, and physical and emotional satisfaction in a non-linear manner. The disruption of this cycle predisposes individuals to experience sexual pain [7].

The treatment of sexual dysfunctions does not guarantee complete resolution, but it does help reduce their impact on patients' quality of life [8]. One of the most recommended approaches is multidisciplinary treatment, which addresses physical, emotional, and behavioral aspects. This approach involves a multidisciplinary team comprising gynecologists, physiotherapists, sex therapists, and psychologists and/or psychiatrists. Among them, physiotherapy for sexual dysfunctions has the ability to enhance sexual health through individualized interventions for each patient. These interventions include education on healthy habits, promotion of active lifestyles, improvement of self-image and body appreciation, and enhancement of the biomechanics and physiology of pelvic-perineal structures [9].

However, to date, there has been no detailed definition of which techniques are most suitable for treating dyspareunia, including their optimal application parameters or dosage. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis were considered necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of physical therapy interventions for the treatment of female dyspareunia.

Methods

Eligibility criteria, information sources and search strategy

This systematic review and meta-analysis were prospectively registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021236155) and followed the reporting guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sport Medicine, and Sports Science, as well as the recommendations from the Cochrane Collaboration [10, 11]. The PICO question was formulated as follows: P – population: women with dyspareunia; I – intervention: physical therapy techniques; C – control: pharmacological treatment, psycho-behavioral interventions, or non-intervention; O – outcome: intensity of perceived pain during sex and strength and elasticity of the perineal muscles; S – study designs: experimental studies (quasi-experimental and clinical trials).

A systematic search of publications was conducted in May 2023 using the following databases: Scopus, Medline, PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science. The search strategy involved various combinations of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms: Dyspareunia, Sexual dysfunctions, Pelvic floor, Physical therapy modalities,

Rehabilitation, exercise and manual therapy

The search strategy, aligned with the focused PICOS question, is presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Search strategy according to the focused question (PICO)
Full size table

Study selection

After removing duplicates, two reviewers (X. X.-X. and X.X.-X.) independently screened the articles for eligibility. In cases of disagreement, a third reviewer (X. X.-X.) made the final decision on whether to include the study or not. The inclusion criteria established that: (a) the intervention should involve at least one physical therapy technique or treatment method; (b) the sample should consist exclusively of women; and (c) the sample should include patients with dyspareunia. On the other hand, studies with non-experimental methodologies (such as reviews, meta-analyses, editorials, etc.) and those without full-text availability were excluded from this review.

After screening the data, extracting, and obtaining the titles and abstracts based on the inclusion criteria, the selected abstracts were obtained in full text. Titles and abstracts lacking sufficient information regarding the inclusion criteria were also obtained as full texts. Full-text articles were selected by the two reviewers if they met the inclusion criteria, using a data extraction form.

Data synthesis

The two reviewers independently extracted data from the included studies using a customized data extraction table in Microsoft Excel. In case of disagreement, both reviewers engaged in discussions and debates until an agreement was reached.

Data extraction

The data extracted from the included articles for further analysis included demographic information (title, authors, journal, and year), characteristics of the sample (age, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and number of participants), study-specific parameters (study type, duration of the intervention, physical therapy techniques applied), and results obtained (variables analyzed, instruments used, and follow-up time). When possible, the results were categorized based on the type of intervention applied. Tables were used to describe both the characteristics of the studies and the extracted data.

Assessment of risk of bias

The ROBINS-I tool was used to assess the risk of bias in non-randomized studies [12], while the RoB tool was used to assess the risk of bias in randomized studies [13]. Additionally, the Grades of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was employed to assess the quality of the evidence when conducting meta-analysis [14].

Statistical analysis

The treatment effects were defined as standardized mean differences (SMD) along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). The mean and standard deviation (SD) were obtained for each study group, and the effect size was calculated based on the outcome of interest. A random-effects model, assuming heterogeneity across studies, was developed using the DerSimonian and Laird method. The magnitude of the effect size of the intervention was assessed using Cohen's method, where an SMD between 0.2 and 0.5 indicates a small effect, between 0.5 and 0.8 indicates a moderate effect, and an SMD greater than 0.8 indicates a large effect. Forest plots were used to visually represent the effect sizes and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

The model described by Higgins and Green was utilized to calculate the mean and SD between pre- and post-treatment data for all studies included in the meta-analysis [15]. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test and quantified using the I2 index [16]. A subgroup analysis was conducted based on the type of treatment analyzed, specifically electrotherapy or a combination of electrotherapy and kinesitherapy. All analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.3 (The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014).

Results

Study selection and characteristics

The systematic search of publications resulted in a total of 1,672 results. After removing duplicate results, the abstract titles of 713 publications were analyzed. From this initial analysis, 81 results were selected for full-text analysis. The agreement between reviewers 1 and 2, as measured by the Kappa score, was 0.9, indicating a very high level of agreement. Finally, based on the defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 19 articles were considered eligible and included in the review (see Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram

Full size image

Of the 19 articles, six applied multimodal physiotherapy treatments [17,18,19,20,21,22]; five studies utilized electrotherapy [23,24,25,26,27] (with two of them combined with drugs [24, 25] and two with pelvic floor muscle training [26, 27]); three studies used Thiele's massage [28,29,30] (with one of them including an educational session [30]); and two studies implemented an interdisciplinary intervention [31, 32] or pelvic floor muscle training [33, 34]. Lastly, one study exclusively applied extracorporeal shockwave therapy [35].

The methodological characteristics of the studies are presented in Table 2, while a summary of the findings from each study can be found in Table 3.

Table 2 Methodological characteristics of the studies analyzed
Full size table
Table 3 Characteristics and results of the studies analyzed
Full size table

Regarding the experimental designs of the analyzed studies, eight of them were randomized controlled trials [17, 23,24,25, 30, 33,34,35], while the remaining studies were quasi-experimental. Among the quasi-experimental studies, eight had a single experimental group [19, 21, 22, 26,27,28, 31, 32], and three had two experimental groups [18, 20, 29] (with only two of them having random assignment of participants [18, 20]).

Interventions applied

In the study by Brotto et al. [32], the multidisciplinary intervention included two educational seminars, psychological treatment, and physiotherapy, which involved biofeedback and guidance on pelvic floor relaxation, the use of dilators, and home exercises. In other studies, the intervention included sessions with the gynecologist, physiotherapist, and psychologist. The physiotherapy sessions focused on relaxation techniques, diaphragmatic breathing, addressing central and local factors affecting sexual function (such as sexual interest, desire, arousal), and providing pain education [31]. Both investigations reported significant reductions in pain intensity [31, 32], severity of dyspareunia [32] and sexual distress [32]. They also found statistically significant improvements in sexual quality of life [31] and sexual functionality, including sexual desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasms, sexual satisfaction, and pain reduction [32]. However, no changes were observed on the Dyadic Adjustment Scale [32]. These improvements were still present up to six months after the intervention in the variables of pain, distress, sexual desire, and satisfaction [32].

The investigations that applied multimodal interventions included various techniques such as Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) (by intravaginal probe at 110 Hz, pulses of 80 ms duration and maximum tolerable intensity) [17], infrared therapy [18], myofascial release of trigger points [17,18,19,20], of the abdominal diaphragm, piriformis and psoas-iliac [18, 20], intravaginal massage [17, 19, 20, 22], perineal stretching [19, 20, 22], abdominal training [18], pelvic floor muscle training (contraction and relaxation exercises) [17, 18] and pelvic floor muscle training by biofeedback [18,19,20,21,22] (with electromyography in three of the cases [18, 21, 22]). In addition, in some cases, the researchers provided educational materials such as information leaflets and videos on pelvic floor muscle training [17, 19,20,21,22]. Four of these interventions [19,20,21,22] also included education for participants on the pathophysiology and management of their dysfunction, as well as the use of lubricants and moisturizers. Additionally, one study recommended self-perineal stretching exercises using a dilator [20]. These multimodal interventions resulted in significant improvements in pain [17,18,19,20, 22], sexual function [17, 18, 20] (especially in desire, satisfaction and pain in those participants who received abdomino-pelvic floor muscle training [18]), sexual distress [22], quality of life [18, 19] (if abdomino-pelvic floor muscle training was included [18]), severity of dyspareunia (if abdomino-pelvic floor muscle training was included [18]), perineal function and contractility [17, 18, 21] (more so if the intervention included pelvic floor muscle training [18]) catastrophism, and anxiety [22]. These improvements were still present three months after the end of the intervention [17]. Additionally, Schvartzman et al. [18] using electromyography of the abdominal and perineal musculature, identified a significant increase in sustained contraction time and a reduction in resting activity. However, the intervention by Cyr et al. [19], although it improved sexual functionality and the frequency of penetrative intercourse, did not show significant changes.

Thiele's massage involves a transvaginal massage using longitudinal slides along each muscle with a pressure that is tolerable for the patient. One of its advantages is its ease of learning, allowing the patient and her partner to perform it at home, and it has no contraindications [36]. Research studies utilizing this method have shown significant improvements in pain [28,29,30] (in one study, only in the intensity of superficial dyspareunia but not deep dyspareunia [30]), sexual desire and lubrication [26] as well as levator ani contractility [28, 30]. These improvements were still present up to six months after the completion of the study [29]. Participants reported being "very satisfied" with the intervention they received [28, 30]. However, no significant changes in anxiety and depression levels were observed [29].

Two of the studies that applied electrotherapy combined the use of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) with other treatments [24, 25]. In Murina et al.'s study [25] TENS was combined with vaginal administration of Diazepam, while Mira et al.'s study [24] combined TENS with hormonal therapy. In Murina et al.'s study [25], TENS was administered in two programs. The first program had a frequency of 100 Hz and a pulse duration of 50 ms, while the second program had a frequency of 5 Hz and pulse duration of 100 ms. In Mira et al.'s study [24], TENS was self-administered at home twice a day for 20 min, with a frequency of 85 Hz and a pulse duration of 75 ms. The intensity of TENS was set at 10, 20, or 30 mA based on the patient's preference, up to the maximum non-painful sensory threshold. Both studies reported significant improvements in pain intensity [24, 25] (with the application of TENS without Diazepam there were improvements, although not significant [25], and the combined application with hormonal therapy was significantly superior to hormonal therapy alone [24]), in the severity of dyspareunia [24, 25] (the combined application with hormonal therapy was significantly superior to hormonal therapy alone [24]), in the number of days with pain [24], in the tone of the levator ani, in the number of days with pain [25] (with the application of TENS alone without combination with Diazepam there were non-significant improvements [25]), satisfaction and lubrication related to sexual functionality (satisfaction improved significantly more with the combined application of TENS and hormone therapy than with the latter alone [24]) and quality of life (the combined application with hormone therapy was significantly superior to hormone therapy alone [24]). Sensory threshold, indicative of perineal peripheral nerve integrity, improved with TENS alone and in combination with Diazepam, with greater improvement observed in the TENS-alone group [25] Muscle strength and relaxation capacity of the perineal muscles also improved after TENS and Diazepam treatment, although not statistically significantly [25]. These changes were sustained even two months after the completion of treatment sessions [25].

In one study, the effectiveness of TENS was evaluated based on whether it was applied in the office or at home [23]. In-office TENS was applied at 8 Hz, 260 ms, and intensity at the maximum non-painful threshold. The participants who applied TENS at home used a frequency of 86 Hz, pulse duration of 75 ms, and intensity of 10, 20, or 30 mA. TENS was applied twice a day for 20 min, with a 12-h interval between the two sessions. The electrodes were placed in the sacral region (S3-S4) using two routes with two electrodes each. The study found that all participants experienced a significant reduction in pain, severity of dyspareunia, dyschezia, and improvement in quality of life. Although dysmenorrhea and dysuria improved, the changes were not statistically significant. There were no significant differences between the in-office and at-home TENS groups, but the group that received a higher frequency achieved better results.

Two other studies combined pelvic floor muscle training with electrotherapy interventions [26, 27] (specifically vaginal electrogalvanic stimulation [26] and radiofrequency [27]). Alshiek et al.’s [27] intervention included pelvic floor muscle training with biofeedback, vaginal electrogalvanic stimulation at a variable frequency and tolerable amplitude, and patient education. Fernández-Cuadros et al.’s [27] intervention included pelvic floor muscle exercises assisted with manometric biofeedback of the tonic type (three seconds of work and six seconds of rest) and phasic type (five rapid contractions followed by ten seconds of rest), bipolar capacitive radiofrequency at the suprapubic and perineovaginal level for five minutes (448 kHz) with two electrodes (one on the lower abdomen and the other on the perineum) and vaginal and lumbo-sacral resistive for ten minutes with two electrodes (one active intracavitary vaginal electrode and one passive electrode on the lumbo-sacral region) using INDIBA® (INDIBA, Barcelona, Spain). Both interventions resulted in significant improvements in pain intensity [26, 27], perineal strength [27], intestinal symptoms [26], and urinary symptoms (number of leaks per day, daily episodes of urgency without leaks and with leaks) [26]. However, the study using vaginal electrogalvanic stimulation did not show improvements in intestinal or sexual function [26], while the study using radiofrequency treatment did not improve perineal contractility assessed by manometry [27].

Two studies specifically focused on evaluating the effects of pelvic floor muscle training in different populations. The first study targeted primiparous women with postpartum vaginal dyspareunia [33] while the second study focused on postmenopausal women [34]. In the study involving primiparous women, the participants were divided into two groups: one group received training sessions led by a physiotherapist and a home exercise guide, while the control group only received the home exercise guide [33]. In the other study, the experimental group underwent pelvic floor muscle training both in clinical sessions with the physiotherapist and at home [34]. The training programs in both studies resulted in improvements in perineal muscle function [34] and perineal strength and endurance (more so in the intervention group, although not significantly) [33]. However, there was no significant difference in resting vaginal pressure [33] or sexual function [34]. Additionally, the authors compared women with and without levator ani dysfunction and found that regardless of the presence of muscle defects, pelvic floor muscle strength and endurance significantly improved [33].

A study evaluated the efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy [35]. In this study, the intervention was compared to a placebo group where a pad was placed to block the transmission of impulses between the device and the skin surface. Hurt et al. applied extracorporeal shockwaves on a weekly basis, delivering 4000 pulses per week for 4 consecutive weeks. The energy flux density, frequency, focus zone, therapeutic efficiency, and stand-off parameters were set according to specific values. The shockwave transducer position was changed after every 500 pulses, and eight areas covering the entire vulva and perineum were treated.

The results of the study showed significant changes in penile-vaginal sexual intercourse (assessed using the Marinoff Dyspareunia Scale) and pain intensity (evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale) following the intervention and up to three months later. However, no significant modifications in these outcomes were observed in the placebo group.

Meta-analysis results

Despite the methodological variability of the studies, a meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate pain, sexual function, and quality of life in studies comparing physical therapy (including electrotherapy and subgroups with training) with a control group. Due to variations in outcome measures across studies, not all of them were included in the meta-analysis.

When analyzing quality of life, the SMD was -0.38 (95% CI: -0.74 to -0.03), indicating that the groups treated with electrotherapy had a better quality of life (p = 0.03). The studies showed a null level of heterogeneity (I2 = 0%) (Fig. 2A). When analyzing pain, a reduction was also observed in the groups treated with electrotherapy or electrotherapy plus pelvic floor muscle training, with an SMD of -4.43 (95% CI: -7.9 to -0.96) (p = 0.01). The studies, in this case, showed a high level of heterogeneity (I2 = 98%) (Fig. 2b). When analyzing sexual function, there was no significant difference between the groups analyzed (p = 0.22), with an SMD of 2.37 (95% CI: -1.43 to 6.17). These studies showed a high level of heterogeneity (I2 = 97%) (Fig. 2c).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Meta-analysis results for physiotherapy interventions vs. Control group

Full size image

Risk of bias for individual studies

The risk of bias within individual studies was determined to be critical in six studies (31.6%) [19, 24, 26,27,28, 32] while six studies had a low risk of bias [20, 25, 30, 31, 34, 35]. The remaining studies were classified as having a moderate risk of bias [17, 18, 23, 29, 33] (Table 4).

Table 4 Risk of bias for included studies
Full size table

Additionally, the certainty of the evidence obtained was assessed as low for the variables of pain and quality of life, and very low for the variable of sexual function (Table 5).

Table 5 Certainty of the evidence (GRADE)
Full size table

Discussion

The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of physical therapy interventions in treating female dyspareunia. The applied techniques were found to be effective, and significant differences were observed among the different modalities of physiotherapy that were studied.

All the reviewed articles consistently reported a significant reduction in pain intensity [17, 19, 20, 23,24,25,26, 28,29,30, 32, 33, 35]. The studies that employed multimodal physical therapy interventions, including techniques such as TENS, manual therapy, pelvic floor muscle training, and education, showed superior improvements in pain intensity compared to other interventions [17]. Although it is not the only study that used this type of intervention [18,19,20,21,22], it is the only one that incorporated high-frequency TENS, the purpose of which is strictly antalgic. This type of electrical stimulation activates afferent fibers and inhibits the response of nociceptive fibers through the activation of interneurons in the gray matter of the spinal cord's posterior horn [37]. The meta-analysis conducted further supports the effectiveness of electrotherapy in reducing pain and, consequently, improving quality of life.

The improvements observed in pain intensity indirectly suggest improvements in sexual function [38]. Several studies specifically measured sexual function and reported positive results [17,18,19,20, 24, 29, 32] (except for when pelvic floor muscle training was applied in isolation [34]). However, these improvements did not reach statistical significance in the meta-analysis.

Of note is the study by Ghaderi et al. [17], which showed the most significant difference in the Female Sexual Function Index score immediately after treatment, and these improvements were sustained three months later. Except for two studies [24, 29], the remaining studies included pelvic floor muscle training as part of the intervention [17,18,19,20, 32, 34]: either as home exercises [32], in-clinic sessions [18] or a combination of clinic-based training with a daily home exercise program [17, 19, 20, 34].

The combination of pelvic floor muscle training with other treatment strategies in a multimodal intervention has been shown to yield the best results for improving sexual function [17, 19, 20]. It is important to note that sexual function is a complex construct influenced by various factors, which explains why pelvic floor muscle training alone did not lead to significant improvements in the study by Franco et al. [34].

Training the perineal musculature has multiple benefits, including improving relaxation capacity, restoring normal resting activity, increasing vaginal elasticity, and enhancing muscle awareness and proprioception. These effects help reverse connective tissue and myofascial damage associated with pelvic-perineal pain and dysfunction [39, 40]. Furthermore, a previous review has suggested that weakness in this musculature contributes to a woman's inability to reach orgasm, which is often observed in cases of dyspareunia [41]. Additionally, having good tone in the muscles attached to the clitoral corpus cavernosum, such as the ischiocavernosus and bulbo-spongiosus muscles, can enhance the involuntary contraction of the perineal musculature, thereby improving arousal and orgasmic response [42, 43].

Indeed, the success of an active kinesitherapy program for pelvic floor muscle training relies on several key factors. First, it is important to have professional supervision to ensure proper technique and progress in the exercises. Additionally, combining the training program with other complementary techniques can enhance its effectiveness. Providing clear instructions for performing exercises at home is crucial for maintaining continuity and achieving optimal results [41]. The principles of specificity, overload, reversibility, and duration should be considered when designing an exercise program for pelvic floor muscles [43]. This means that the training should be tailored to the individual needs of the patient, with progressive increases in load and difficulty as the muscle response improves. The program should be continued for as long as necessary to bring about functional changes. Rather than solely focusing on strength gain, emphasis should be placed on coordination and relaxation capacity. It is also important to address breathing normalization and correct posture as part of the training program [39]. It should be noted that not all of these guidelines were fully implemented in the interventions analyzed, except in the study by Ghaderi et al. [17]. Their program included supervised and progressive exercises, combined with manual therapy techniques, electrotherapy, and patient education. They also provided additional information and a diary for recording compliance with the exercises, following recommendations from relevant publications [39, 43]. This comprehensive approach likely contributed to their successful outcomes. Thiele massage is indeed a technique that has shown positive short-term effects on sexual functionality [28, 29]. Da Silva et al. [29] applied this technique for four weekly sessions, each lasting five minutes, and achieved greater improvements compared to other studies that used more complex and prolonged treatments [18,19,20, 24, 32, 34].

The severity of dyspareunia was also reduced with physiotherapy interventions [20, 24, 31, 32, 35], congruent with the results obtained. However, the best results were achieved with the application of multimodal physiotherapy treatment [20] and the use of extracorporeal shockwave therapy [35]. The particularity of the multimodal treatment lies in the application of trigger point myofascial release techniques. For this treatment, manual therapy techniques aimed at improving blood flow, vulvar and visceral mobility, relieving nerve compression and pain, include myofascial release [39]. Myofascial release is used to bring the muscle to its optimal length, decrease pain, and improve function [44]. Therefore, the treatment of trigger points, which represent one of the etiological factors of dyspareunia, should be considered as one of the techniques in approaching this condition. Simultaneously, the positive results identified with the use of extracorporeal shockwave therapy are consistent with its ability to improve chronic regional inflammation in the vulvar and vaginal area. The physical forces generated by low-intensity shockwaves affect tissue mechanics and can trigger the release of growth factors and anti-inflammatory factors [45, 46].

Regarding muscular properties, all the studies that evaluated them showed improvement with physiotherapy interventions [17, 18, 21, 25, 27, 28, 30, 33].

The studies that included pelvic floor muscle training in combination with biofeedback achieved this improvement with a lower number of sessions [18, 21, 27]. This method facilitates the learning of contraction and relaxation commands and, as a result, reinforces the training performed [47, 48]. An additional benefit is that this technique has no contraindications, making it recommended to help patients optimize the effects of training, improve their self-confidence, and increase their perception and knowledge of their own body [47].

This research has several limitations. Firstly, the sample heterogeneity is a limitation, as some studies included patients with dyspareunia associated with other diseases [19, 21,22,23,24,25, 28, 29, 32], or did not solely focus on dyspareunia patients [27, 33]. Furthermore, only two studies took into account whether the dyspareunia was superficial or deep, and the diagnostic methods for dyspareunia varied widely among the studies. The interventions applied also showed a high degree of heterogeneity, with different techniques, durations, and frequencies of sessions being used. Additionally, most of the publications had low risk of bias [19,20,21,22, 24,25,26,27,28, 30,31,32, 34, 35]. As a result of these characteristics, the certainty of the evidence obtained is low. However, we must recognize the strengths of this work, which include being the most complete and extensive review with meta-analysis to date. It has taken into account all the therapeutic options for dyspareunia available in physiotherapy as well as their different modalities of intervention.

Further research is needed to approach dyspareunia from a physiotherapy perspective and establish a standardized treatment protocol. More randomized controlled trials comparing different treatment strategies, dosages, and durations of sessions are necessary. Additionally, other variables related to dyspareunia, such as the personal relationship with the partner and the female sexual response, should be investigated. It is also important to explore sociocultural and psychological factors associated with dyspareunia.

Conclusion

Physiotherapy techniques have shown to be effective in improving pain and quality of life in women with dyspareunia. One crucial aspect is the strengthening of the perineal muscles, which should be carried out both in clinical settings and at home with proper guidance and informative materials. Combining perineal muscle strengthening with biofeedback training, which enhances somatosensory sensitization, and the application of TENS at a high frequency and intensity below the pain threshold has demonstrated positive effects on these patients. Additionally, manual trigger point release therapy and Thiele massage have been proven to effectively reduce pain intensity.

It is important to note that dyspareunia is not solely a physical disorder, but it also has significant psychological implications. Therefore, the involvement of mental health professionals in the treatment process is crucial to enhance the overall quality of life for participants. By combining these techniques with educational guidelines for women, the likelihood of successful treatment outcomes can be increased.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Clayton AH, Juarez EMV. Female sexual dysfunction. Med Clin North Am. 2019;103:681–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McCool-Myers M, Theurich M, Zuelke A, et al. Predictors of female sexual dysfunction: a systematic review and qualitative analysis through gender inequality paradigms. BMC Womens Health. 2018;18:1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Raina R, Pahlajani G, Khan S, et al. Female sexual dysfunction: classification, pathophysiology, and management. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:1273–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shifren JL, Monz BU, Russo PA, Segreti A, Johannes CB. Sexual problems and distress in United States women: prevalence and correlates. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112:970–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Alimi Y, Iwanaga J, Oskouian RJ, et al. The clinical anatomy of dyspareunia: a review. Clin Anat. 2018;31:1013–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Harris V, Fischer G, Bradford JA. The aetiology of chronic vulval pain and entry dyspareunia: a retrospective review of 525 cases. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;57:446–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Orr N, Wahl K, Joannou A, et al. Deep dyspareunia: review of pathophysiology and proposed future research priorities. Sex Med Rev. 2020;8:3–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Weinberger JM, Houman J, Caron AT, et al. Female sexual dysfunction: a systematic review of outcomes across various treatment modalities. Sex Med Rev. 2019;7:223–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Areskoug-Josefsson K, Gard G. Physiotherapy as a promoter of sexual health. Physiother Theory Pract. 2015;31:390–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al. Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;10:ED000142.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ardern CL, Büttner F, Andrade R, et al. Implementing the 27 PRISMA 2020 statement items for systematic reviews in the sport and exercise medicine, musculoskeletal rehabilitation and sports science fields: The PERSiST (implementing prisma in exercise, rehabilitation, sport medicine and SporTs science) guidance. Br J Sports Med. 2022;56:175–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sterne JA, Hernan MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355: i4919.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Cochrane Methods Bias. RoB 2: A revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials; 2023. Available from: https://methods.cochrane.org/bias/resources/rob-2-revised-cochrane-risk-bias-tool-randomized-trials

  14. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. The Cochrane Collaboration, Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0. University of London (UK): The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al. Cochrane statistical methods group. The cochrane collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:5928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ghaderi F, Bastani P, Hajebrahimi S, et al. Pelvic floor rehabilitation in the treatment of women with dyspareunia: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30:1849–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Schvartzman R, Schvartzman L, Ferreira CF, et al. Physical therapy intervention for women with dyspareunia: a randomized clinical trial. J Sex Marital Ther. 2019;45:378–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cyr M, Dumoulin C, Bessette P, et al. Feasibility, acceptability and effects of multimodal pelvic floor physical therapy for gynecological cancer survivors suffering from painful sexual intercourse: a multicenter prospective interventional study. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;159:778–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Morin M, Dumolin C, Bergeron S, et al. Multimodal physical therapy versus topical lidocaine for provoked vestibulodynia: a multicenter, randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;224(189):e1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cyr MP, Dumolin C, Bessette P, et al. Changes in pelvic floor morphometry and muscle function after multimodal physiotherapy for gynaecological cancer survivors sufferinf from dyspareunia: a prospective interventional study. Physiotherapy. 2022;114:54–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cyr MP, Dumolin C, Bessette P, et al. A prospective single-arm study evaluating the effects of a multimodal physical therapy intervention on psychosexual outcomes in women with dyspareunia after gynecologic cancer. J Sex Med. 2021;18:946–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mira TA, Giraldo PC, Yela DA, et al. Effectiveness of complementary pain treatment for women with deep endometriosis through transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS): randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;194:1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mira TA, Yela DA, Podgaec S, et al. Hormonal treatment isolated versus hormonal treatment associated with electrotherapy for pelvic pain control in deep endometriosis: randomized clinical trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;255:134–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Murina F, Felice R, Di Francesco S, et al. Vaginal diazepam plus transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation to treat vestibulodynia: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;228:148–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Alshiek J, Garcia B, Minassian V, et al. Vaginal energy-based devices. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020;26:287–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fernández-Cuadros ME, Kazlauskas SG, Albaladejo-Florin MJ, et al. Effectiveness of multimodal rehabilitation (biofeedback plus capacitive-resistive radiofrequency) on chronic pelvic pain and dyspareunia: Prospective study and literature review. Rehabilitacion. 2020;54:154–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Del Forno S, Arena A, Alessandrini M, et al. Transperineal ultrasound visual feedback assisted pelvic floor muscle physiotherapy in women with deep infiltrating endometriosis and dyspareunia: a pilot study. J Sex Marital Ther. 2020;46:603–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Da Silva APM, Montenegro ML, Gurian MBF, et al. Perineal massage improves the dyspareunia caused by tenderness of the pelvic floor muscles. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2017;39:26–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Del Forno S, Arena A, Pellizzone V, et al. Assessment of levator hiatal area using 3D/4D transperineal ultrasound in women with deep infiltrating endometriosis and superficial dyspareunia treated with pelvic floor muscle physiotherapy: randomized controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;57:726–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yong PJ, Williams C, Bodmer-Roy S, et al. Prospective cohort of deep dyspareunia in an interdisciplinary setting. J Sex Med. 2018;15:1765–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Brotto LA, Yong P, Smith KB, et al. Impact of a multidisciplinary vulvodynia program on sexual functioning and dyspareunia. J Sex Med. 2015;12:238–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kolberg M, Hilde G, Stær-Jensen J, et al. Effect of postpartum pelvic floor muscle training on vaginal symptoms and sexual dysfunction—secondary analysis of a randomised trial. BJOG. 2016;123:634–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Franco MM, Pena CC, de Freitas LM, et al. Pelvic floor muscle training effect in sexual function in postmenopausal women: A randomized controlled trial. J Sex Med. 2021;18:1236–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hurt K, Zahalka F, Halaska M, Rakovicova I, Rakovic J, Cmelisnky V. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for treating dyspareunia: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2021;64: 101545.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Trahan J, Leger E, Allen M, et al. The efficacy of manual therapy for treatment of dyspareunia in females: a systematic review. J Womens Health Phys Ther. 2019;43:28–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sharma N, Rekha K, Srinivasan JK. Efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain. J Midlife Health. 2017;8:36–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Meana M, Binik YM, Khalifé S, et al. Biopsychosocial profile of women with dyspareunia. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90:583–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Murphy KM, Fosnight A. The role of pelvic floor physical therapy for the female patient. Physician Assist Clin. 2018;3:445–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wallace SL, Miller LD, Mishra K. Pelvic floor physical therapy in the treatment of pelvic floor dysfunction in women. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2019;31:485–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ferreira CHJ, Dwyer PL, Davidson M, et al. Does pelvic floor muscle training improve female sexual function? A systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:1735–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Jannini EA, Buisson O, Rubio-Casillas A. Beyond the G-spot: Clitourethrovaginal complex anatomy in female orgasm. Nat Rev Urol. 2014;11:531–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Johnson VY. How the principles of exercise physiology influence pelvic floor muscle training. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2001;28:150–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ajimsha MS, Al-Mudahka NR, Al-Madzhar JA. Effectiveness of myofascial release: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2015;19:102–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Lowenstein L, Vardi Y, Deutsch M, et al. Vulvar vestibulitis severity - Assessment by sensory and pain testing modalities. Pain. 2004;107:47–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Mariotto S, de Prati AC, Cavalieri E, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy in inflammatory diseases: molecular mechanism that triggers anti-inflammatory action. Curr Med Chem. 2009;16:2366–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hite M, Curran T. Biofeedback for pelvic floor disorders. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2021;34:56–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Aalaie B, Tavana B, Rezasoltani Z, Aalaei S, Ghaderi J, Dadarkhah A. Biofeedback versus electrical stimulation for sexual dysfunction: a randomized clinical trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32:1195–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nursing and Physical Therapy Department, University of Leon, Astorga Ave, 24401, Ponferrada, Spain

    Paula Fernández-Pérez

  2. SALBIS Research Group, Nursing and Physical Therapy Department, University of Leon, Astorga Ave, 24401, Ponferrada, Spain

    Raquel Leirós-Rodríguez, Mª Pilar Marqués-Sánchez & María Cristina Martínez-Fernández

  3. Brazilian Hospital Services Company (Ebserh) R. Cláudio Batista - Palestina, Aracaju, 49060-676, Brazil

    Fernanda Oliveira de Carvalho

  4. Physical Therapy Department of Lagarto, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Gov. Marcelo Déda Ave, São José, Lagarto, 49400-000, Brazil

    Leonardo Y. S. Maciel

  5. Faculty of Sport, Research Centre in Physical Activity, Health and Leisure (CIAFEL), University of Porto, R. Dr. Plácido da Costa 91, 4200-450, Porto, Portugal

    Leonardo Y. S. Maciel

Authors
  1. Paula Fernández-Pérez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Raquel Leirós-Rodríguez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mª Pilar Marqués-Sánchez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. María Cristina Martínez-Fernández
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Fernanda Oliveira de Carvalho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Leonardo Y. S. Maciel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

P.F.-P., R.L.-R., M.P. M.-S., M.C. M.-F., F.O.-C. and L.Y.M. conceptualized and designed the study, drafted the initial manuscript, designed the data collection instruments, collected data, carried out the initial analyses, and critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raquel Leirós-Rodríguez.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fernández-Pérez, P., Leirós-Rodríguez, R., Marqués-Sánchez, M.P. et al. Effectiveness of physical therapy interventions in women with dyspareunia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Women's Health 23, 387 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02532-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02532-8

Keywords

BMC Women's Health

ISSN: 1472-6874

Contact us