Skip to main content
Download PDF

Bone mineral density and muscle mass associated with healthy eating index in postmenopausal women; results from RaNCD cohort study

BMC Women's Health volume 23, Article number: 615 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The Healthy Eating Index 2015 (HEI-2015) is a tool for checking the quality of diet. This index is used to examine how well people’s dietary behavior fits certain criteria for achieving a healthy diet in Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2015-2020. We look at the possible association between the HEI-2015 and bone mineral density (BMD) and muscle strength in postmenopausal women.

Methods

This research included 1012 postmenopausal women from the recruitment phase of the Ravansar Noncommunicable Diseases (RaNCD) cohort study in Kermanshah-Iran. A standardized and repeatable food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ) that contains 118 items was used to quantify dietary consumption. Anthropometric indices measured via Bio-Impedance Analyzer BIA (Inbody 770, Inbody Co, Seoul, Korea).

Result

The mean age of postmenopausal women was (56.41 ± 5.31) years. Participants in the highest quartile had a more daily energy intake compared to the lowest quartile (2329.89 ± 837.59), (P < 0.001). Women in the upper quartiles had greater Skeletal Muscle Mass (SMM) than those in the lower quartiles (21.61 ± 2.80 vs 20.52 ± 3.13; p = 0.0002). The linear model didn’t show a significant relationship between HEI score and greater BMD (β = 0.0014, P = 0.169).

Conclusion

A diet of high quality followed by a high HEL-2015 score was shown to be strongly connected to increased BMD and muscle mass in Kurdish postmenopausal women.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The postmenopausal phase marks a pivotal period in a woman’s life, characterized by a complex interplay of physiological changes. It is during this life stage that a woman experiences the cessation of menstrual cycles, primarily due to the significant decline in estrogen levels [1]. Postmenopausal women are at an increased risk of conditions such as osteoporosis and muscle loss, conditions that can have profound consequences for their physical well-being, mobility, and overall quality of life [2]. Diet is an important modifiable risk factor for chronic diseases [3]. Furthermore, food can impact BMD and skeletal muscle both before and after menopause [4]. Protein consumption is connected to muscle mass [5], and various studies emphasize the need for enough calcium and vitamin D consumption to avoid osteoporosis and fractures during this life stage [6]. The 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) indicate a shift away from specific nutrients and foods and toward overall healthy eating patterns, giving nutritional guidelines for every culture and recommending numerous good eating patterns [7, 8]. The Healthy Eating Index (HEI) is a measure that estimates an individual’s diet quality [9], An unhealthy diet, as indicated by lower HEI scores, has been linked to adverse bone outcomes [10,11,12]. Most evidence related to bone health has been restricted to BMD analysis [1]. studied exclusively in postmenopausal women [12, 13]. also, HEI was revised every 5 years and has been linked to a reduction in the risk of cancer and cardiovascular disease [13, 14]. While the HEI’s most essential characteristics have always been aligned with nutritional advice for bone health [9]. A few research investigations have been conducted yet to investigate the association between adherence to older versions of HEI and various indicators of bone health [15, 16].

Furthermore, adherence to HEI recommendations has been linked to increased lifespan and muscular strength [17]. In addition, various components of the Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI-2010) have been studied in connection to sarcopenia [18]. Accordingly, the purpose of the present research was to assess if a Healthy eating index is related to skeletal muscle and BMD in post-menopausal women living in Kermanshah-Iran.

Method

Study design and participants

Data first phase of the Ravansar Non-Communicable Diseases (RaNCD) Cohort investigation was used in this cross-sectional investigation. Ravansar, with a population of 50,000 people, is a district in Kermanshah-Iran. The RaNCD cohort is part of the Prospective Epidemiological Research Studies in Iran (PERSIAN) [19], which began in 2014 with the participation of 10,047 persons aged 35 to 65. The RaNCD research methodology and design were reported in 2019 [20]. From all data in RaNCD, 1672 postmenopausal women satisfied our research requirements. Cancer patients (n = 83), diabetics (n = 870), and people with high blood pressure (n = 1579) were eliminated. Finally, 1012 people were investigated.

Data collection

Questionnaire information was completed by experts of the cohort center through face-to-face interviews. An online computerized data collection form was used to catch demographic data like age, sex, marital status, socioeconomic status (SES), and smoking. A standard cohort questionnaire was applicable to determine physical activity levels [21]. This questionnaire is self-reported and covers 22 questions on your typical daily sports, work, and leisure activities.

Anthropometry

Body weight was measured using a bioelectrical impedance analyzer (BIA) Inbody 770, Inbody Co, Seoul, Korea with a precision of 0.5 kg [22]. Other variable such as Muscle Mass (SMM) and Bone Mineral Density (BMD) was also done using BIA. The height of the participants was measured by BSM 370 (Biospace Co, Seoul, Korea) with a precision of 0.1 cm. WC was measured with a flexible measuring tape at the midpoint between the lower rib margin and the iliac crest to the nearest 0.5 cm. BMI was calculated by the following formula: weight (kg) divided by the square of height (m).

Dietary assessment and healthy eating index 2015

The standardized 137-item 1-year food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) [23] of the PERSIAN cohort study was used to calculate HEI via the Krebs-Smith et al. method [13]. The thirteen ingredients of the HEI 2015 include fruits, whole protein meals, vegetables, seafood and plant proteins, beans, whole grains, milk, lipids, refined grains, salt, added sugars, and saturated fats. Using sufficiency and moderation food categories, these items were split into two groups. The score is greater if the usage is proper. Fruits, vegetables, whole protein meals, seafood, plant proteins, greens and beans, whole grains, milk, and fatty acids should all be a part of a healthy diet. A lower HEI 2015 level, on the other hand, denotes a moderate intake of the last four food groups that make up a balanced diet: refined grains, salt, added sugars, and saturated fats. The first six meals are assessed on a scale of 0 to 5, and the subsequent meals are graded on a scale of 0 to 10. Altogether HEI concession, which ranges from 0 to 100, is the total of the values for any ingredients. The HEI ratings were lowest and greatest in the first and fourth quartiles, respectively (Table 1).

Table 1 Healthy eating index—20151
Full size table

Dietary pattern

e major dietary patterns were identified by principal component analysis to energy-adjusted food intake using data from the RaNCD FFQ. At the beginning, we categorized all food items considering nutrient similarity into 31 food groups (Table 2). In the method of principal component analysis, the varimax rotation was applied to create a distinct and straightforward matrix and kept uncorrelated factor variables called the major pattern. e scree-plot was also drawn to determine the number of matrix components (the major dietary patterns). The typical interpretation of the eigenvalues greater than 1 and the Scree diagram implied that three factors should remain. e extracted factors, dietary patterns, were identified based on recent studies. The factor score of each dietary pattern was computed by calculating the factor load from every group’s dietary intake. Food groups with a factor loading exceeding 0.2 were used to correlate between food groups and the known dietary pattern. Participants individually received a score per pattern based on factor scores and then categorized into tertiles according to dietary model scores.

Table 2 Food groupings used in the dietary pattern analyses
Full size table

Statistical analysis

The STATA software version 14.2 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA) was used for data analysis. The significance threshold considered is 0.05. Data were reported as mean (standard deviation), and percentages (frequency) for quantitative and qualitative characteristics, respectively, using a standard BMI cut-off for each sex. The features of the study subjects by the HEI quartiles were examined using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Chi-square tests for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Analysis of multiple linear regressions was performed to specify the relationship between BMC and HEI.

Results

In this study, data from 1012 postmenopausal women were evaluated. According to the healthy eating index quartiles, Table 3 shows the fundamental features of the research subjects. Participants in the first quartile (56.78 ± 5.34 years) are older than those in the fourth quartile (55.91 ± 5.35 years). Of the 362 participants in good SES, 101 (50%) fall into the fourth quartile. BMI, WHR, WC, Skeletal Muscle Mass, and Bone Mineral were all greater among participants in the fourth quartile than they were among subjects in the first quartile. Subjects in the highest quartile had the highest BMI (28.77 ± 4.33 kg/m2) than the lowest quartile (26.70 ± 5.11 kg/m2), (P < 0.001). If we distinguish between quartiles according to skeletal muscle mass, we see that the participants in the fourth quartile were 21.61 ± 2.80 while those in the first quartile were 20.52 ± 3.13 (P = 0.0002).

Table 3 Background characteristics of the study participants according to HEI category
Full size table

Table 4 provides information about the dietary intake of postmenopausal women divided by Healthy Eating concessions among the research participants. Regarding daily calorie intake, fourth quartile participants received a higher daily calorie intake (2329.89 ± 837.59) than first quartile participants (2225 ± 709.48) (P < 0.001). If we look at the amount of cholesterol intake, again we see that the participants in the last quartile received a higher daily amount (224.073 ± 116.43) than the participants in the first quartile (202.62 ± 107.41) (P = 0.030). Similar to Cholesterol and daily calories, vegetables, Leafy vegetables, fruit, dairy, Nuts, and fish, Olives received higher amounts in the fourth quarter than in the first quarter.

Table 4 Dietary intake of postmenopausal women stratified by Healthy Eating score
Full size table

After adjusting for potential confounding factors (age, smoking status, BMI, energy intake, physical activity, and use of vitamin and mineral complement use) in the multiple linear regression analysis, higher HEI score was not associated with greater skeletal muscle mass (β = 0.000, P = 0.169), greater BMC (β = 0.001, P = 0.939) and greater muscle strength (β = 0.0063, P = 0.818) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Scatterplot of healthy eating index score on bone mineral content (a) and muscle strength (b) with adjusting for age, smoking status, BMI, energy intake, physical activity and use of vitamin and mineral complement use

Full size image

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this investigation is the first investigation into the relationship between Kurdish women’s HEI-2015 adherence and their bone health and muscle mass. The results demonstrated that as quartiles of HEI climbed, menopausal women’s bone mineral density and muscle mass dramatically increased. Previous research on potential connections between HEI and bone health has shown conflicting findings [13, 24,25,26]. In this regard, some studies identified a significant link between HEI compliance and higher BMD [24, 25], while other studies found no such relationship with indications of bone turnover or a higher risk of hip fractures [13, 26].

In this regard, increased BMD in our study was linked to stronger adherence to HEI 2015, while this association was not significant after adjusting for potential confounding factors (Age, Smoking status, BMI, Energy intake, physical activity, and use of vit and mineral complement use). Currently, the comparison of the findings is not clear, since we are not aware of any prior research that looked into the potential association between HEI-2015 and bone mineral density. But Movassaghi and Vatanparast’s examination of 49 studies on the association between dietary type and different bone outcomes, defined retrospectively or a priori [10], which shows that a healthy diet can elevate BMD and thereby lower osteoporosis prevalence, supports our findings. The findings of this study also support Denova-Gutiérrez et al.’s examination that looked at the association between diet and bone health [27], which suggests an adverse relationship between healthy eating with HEI-2015-like components and the risk of low bone density. Additionally, our findings consist of 20 research on the connection between diet quality and bone health, a systematic review and meta-analysis by Fabian et al. [28], and another relevant research demonstrating that a healthy diet like HEI-2015 can diminish the risk of low BMD and fracture by 18 and 41%, respectively.

In our study, we found that there was a significant difference in daily calorie intake and cholesterol intake among participants in different quartiles. Specifically, the fourth quartile participants had a significantly higher daily calorie intake (2329.89 ± 837.59) compared to those in the first quartile (2225 ± 709.48) with a p-value of less than 0.001. This finding aligns with a study conducted by de Dues et al. (2016), where they observed a similar trend in daily calorie intake, with participants in the higher quartiles consuming more calories than those in the lower quartiles [29]. Additionally, when it comes to cholesterol intake, our study also showed that participants in the last quartile had a higher daily cholesterol intake (224.073 ± 116.43) compared to those in the first quartile (202.62 ± 107.41) with a p-value of 0.030, a result consistent with the findings of Xu Z et al. (2018) [30]. Furthermore, similar trends were observed in the consumption of various food groups like vegetables, leafy vegetables, fruits, dairy, nuts, fish, and olives, with the fourth quartile participants consistently consuming higher amounts compared to the first quartile, which corresponds with the outcomes of previous research conducted by Khorasani S et al. (2020) [31].

These consistent findings across different studies suggest a robust association between quartile-based dietary patterns and specific nutrient intake.

The essential properties of this score help to explain the substantial link between HEI-2015 increased and higher BMD in this study. Protein, vitamins D, K, and C, calcium, magnesium, zinc, manganese, and potassium make up the most important nutrients in the maintenance of bone health, with established effects on bone structure and/or digestion, and their consumption linked to higher BMD and also decrease the risk of fractures [32,33,34]. Furthermore, even with adequate calcium consumption, a higher dietary alkaline load from increased magnesium and potassium intake may diminish osteoclasts. There is also growing evidence that it lowers calcium flow to the bone via inhibiting and activating osteoblasts can increase BMD and lower the risk of fractures [35].

Furthermore, increased dietary intake of powerful antioxidant components like vitamins E and C shown to play an important role in fighting bone loss caused by oxidative stress and lowering the risk of osteoporosis [34,35,36]. Furthermore, increasing the consumption of anti-inflammatory foods like fiber, omega-3, and vitamins D, E, and C reduces inflammation and lowers the risk of low bone mineral density and fractures [37]. Omega-3 PUFA and MUFAs may potentially benefit bone metabolism by decreasing osteoclast action or boosting osteoblastic action, lowering the risk of osteoporosis [38]. Furthermore, folate and vitamin B12 can decrease the incidence of low BMD and fractures, mostly by reducing the damaging influence of hyperhomocysteinemia on bone health [39].

Increased intake of simple sugars may increase the risk of low BMD and fracture by processes such as increased inflammation and hyperinsulinemia, as well as increased renal acid load and urine calcium secretion [35]. On the other hand, excessive salt consumption is linked to an elevated risk of osteoporosis due to urine calcium excretion [30]. Excess SFA intake can also increase the risk of bone remodeling mostly via boosting pro-inflammatory mechanisms and decreasing absorption of calcium in the intestine leading to osteoporosis [30].

Another conclusion from our research is that women in the top tertile of HEI concession had more muscle mass than those in the lowest tertile. Following our findings, Esmaeily et al. [40] showed that holding the HEI-2015 increases muscular strength in elderly adults. Furthermore, Chan et al. demonstrated that higher Diet Quality Index-International (DQI-I), “vegetable-fruit” dietary pattern scores, as well as higher scores for the “foods-beverages-dairy” diet [41] and Mediterranean diet [42], were related to decreasing the risk of sarcopenia. In contrast to previous findings, a cohort study of 757 people in Newcastle discovered a link between a “traditional British” diet strong in butter, red meat, gravy, and potatoes with sarcopenia [43].

However, the precise methods by which a good diet might improve muscle mass are unknown, but several suggestions exist. First, consuming these diets reduces oxidative stress [44]. Oxidative stress stimulates the gene production of inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-1 (IL-1) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF), that can damage muscle tissue [45]. SFA reduction was also linked to a decreased incidence of sarcopenia [46]. Second, in healthy diets, low salt levels are associated with fat growth and muscular weakening [47].

Furthermore, earlier research has found a link between milk consumption and the risk of sarcopenia [48]. Individuals in the top tertile of HEI consume more dairy products than those in the lowest tertile in the present population (P = 0.0012).

Conclusion

As a result, our study showed that higher adherence to a healthy diet as HEI affect positively BMD and skeletal muscle in a sample of Kurdish menopausal women. In this regard, we can suggest changing dietary patterns as non-pharmacology therapy for the prevention of bone and muscle loss in this period.

Various limitations to this study should be considered. A causal link cannot be established due to the cross-sectional form. Due to a lack of data, some HEI-2015 components, such as alcohol intake, are not included in the HEI-2015 score.

Availability of data and materials

The data analyzed in the study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Dalal PK, Agarwal M. Postmenopausal syndrome. Indian J Psychiat. 2015 Jul;57(Suppl 2):S222–32. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5545.161483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Santoro N, Randolph JF Jr. Reproductive hormones and the menopause transition. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 2011;38(3):455–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2011.05.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Iriti M, Varoni EM, Vitalini S. Healthy diets and modifiable risk factors for non-communicable diseases-the European perspective. Foods. 2020;9(7):940. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9070940.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Silva TR, Spritzer PM. Skeletal muscle mass is associated with higher dietary protein intake and lower body fat in postmeno- pausal women: a cross-sectional study. Menopause. 2017;24(502–9):9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Group DVDIPAoRT. Patient level pooled analysis of 68 500 patients from seven major vitamin D fracture trials in US and Europe. BMJ. 2010;340:b5463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. US Department of Health and Human Services; US Department of Agriculture. Dietary Guidelines for Americans: 2015-2020. 8th ed. December 2015. Accessed January 2, 2020

  7. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture. Dietary Guidelines for Americans: 2015–2020 (8th ed.). 2015. Retrieved January 2, 2020

  8. Panizza CE, Shvetsov YB, Harmon BE, Wilkens LR, Le Marchand L, Haiman C, Reedy J, Boushey CJ. Testing the predictive validity of the healthy eating index-2015 in the multiethnic cohort: is the score associated with a reduced risk of all-cause and cause- specific mortality? Nutrients. 2018;10

  9. Reedy J, Lerman JL, Krebs-Smith SM, Kirkpatrick SI, Pannucci TE, Wilson MM, Subar AF, Kahle LL, Tooze JA. Evaluation of the healthy eating index-2015. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018;118:1622–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Movassagh EZ, Vatanparast H. Current evidence on the association of dietary patterns and bone health: a scoping review. Adv Nutr. 2017;8(1):1–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Fan Y, Ni S, Zhang H. Association between healthy eating Index-2015 total and component food scores with osteoporosis in middle-aged and older Americans: a cross-sectional study with US National Health and nutrition examination survey. Osteoporos Int. 2022;33(4):921–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Babazadeh-Anvigh B, Abedi V, Heydari S, Karamati D, Babajafari S, Najafi A, Karamati M. Healthy eating index-2015 and bone mineral density among adult Iranian women. Arch Osteoporos. 2020;15(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hamidi M, Tarasuk V, Corey P, Cheung AM. Association between the healthy eating index and bone turnover markers in US postmenopausal women aged≥ 45 y. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94(1):199–208.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. American Bone Health. Dietary Guidelines for Bone Health. https://americanbonehealth.org/nutrition/dietary-guidelines-for-bone- health. Accessed 17 June 2020.

  15. Zeng F, Xue W, Cao W, Wu B, Xie H, Fan F, Zhu H, Chen Y. Diet-quality scores and risk of hip fractures in elderly urban Chinese in Guangdong, China: a case–control study. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25:2131–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rathod AD, Bharadwaj AS, Badheka AO, Kizilbash M, Afonso L. Healthy eating index and mortality in a nationally representative elderly cohort. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:275–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hai S, Wang H, Cao L, Liu P, Zhou J, Yang Y, et al. Association between sarcopenia with lifestyle and family function among community-dwell- ing Chinese aged 60 years and older. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Poustchi H, Eghtesad S, Kamangar F, Etemadi A, Keshtkar AA, Hekmatdoost A, Mohammadi Z, Mahmoudi Z, Shayanrad A, Roozafzai F, Sheikh M. Prospective epidemiological research studies in Iran (the PERSIAN cohort study): rationale, objectives, and design. Am J Epidemiol. 2018;187(4):647–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pasdar Y, Najafi F, Moradinazar M, Shakiba E, Karim H, Hamzeh B, et al. Cohort profile: Ravansar non-communicable disease cohort study: the first cohort study in a Kurdish population. Int J Epidemiol. 2019;48(3):682–3f. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyy296.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Karyani AK, Matin BK, Soltani S, Rezaei S, Soofi M, Salimi Y, et al. Socioeconomic gradient in physical activity: findings from the PERSIAN cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Karimi S, Pasdar Y, Hamzeh B, Ayenehpour A, Heydarpour F, Goudarzi F. Obesity phenotypes related to musculoskeletal disorders; a cross-sectional study from RaNCD cohort. Archi Public Health. 2022;80(1):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pasdar Y, Naja F, Moradinazar M, Shakiba E, Karim H, Hamzeh B, et al. Cohort pro le: Ravansar non-communicable disease cohort study: the rst cohort study in a Kurdish population. Inter J Epidemiol. 2019;48(3):682–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Krebs-Smith SM, Pannucci TE, Subar AF, Kirkpatrick SI, Lerman JL, Tooze JA, et al. Update of the healthy eating index: HEI-2015. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018;118(9):1591–602.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Babazadeh-Anvigh B, Abedi V, Heydari S, Karamati D, Babajafari S, Najafi A, Rashidkhani B, Shariati-Bafghi SE, Karamati M. Healthy eating index-2015 and bone mineral density among adult Iranian women. Arch Osteoporos. 2020;15(1):151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-020-00826-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Viljakainen H, Valta H, Lipsanen-Nyman M, Saukkonen T, Kajantie E, Andersson S, Mäkitie O. Bone characteristics and their determinants in adolescents and young adults with early-onset severe obesity. Calcif Tissue Int. 2015;97:364–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Haring B, Crandall CJ, Wu C, LeBlanc ES, Shikany JM, Carbone L, Orchard T, Thomas F, Wactawaski-Wende J, Li W. Dietary patterns and fractures in postmenopausal women: results from the women’s health initiative. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176:645–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Denova-Gutierrez E, Mendez-Sanchez L, Munoz-Aguirre P, Tucker KL, Clark P. Dietary patterns, bone mineral density, and risk of fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients. 2018;10

  28. Fabiani R, Naldini G, Chiavarini M. Dietary patterns in re- lation to low bone mineral density and fracture risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Adv Nutr. 2019;10:219–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Mendonça RD, Pimenta AM, Gea A, de la Fuente-Arrillaga C, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Lopes AC, Bes-Rastrollo M. Ultraprocessed food consumption and risk of overweight and obesity: the University of Navarra Follow-up (SUN) cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;104(5):1433–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Xu Z, McClure ST, Appel LJ. Dietary Cholesterol Intake and Sources among U.S Adults: Results from National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES), 2001−2014. Nutrients. 2018;10(6):771. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10060771.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Sarkhosh-Khorasani S, Mozaffari-Khosravi H, Mirzaei M, Nadjarzadeh A, Hosseinzadeh M. Empirically derived dietary patterns and obesity among Iranian adults: Yazd health study-TAMYZ and Shahedieh cohort study. Food Sci Nutr. 2020;8(5):2478–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1538.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Karpouzos A, Diamantis E, Farmaki P, Savvanis S, Troupis T. Nutritional aspects of bone health and fracture healing. J Osteoporos. 2017;2017:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sahni S, Mangano KM, McLean RR, Hannan MT, Kiel DP. Dietary approaches for bone health: lessons from the Framingham osteoporosis study. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2015;13:245–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Tucker KL, Hannan MT, Kiel DP. The acid-base hypothesis: diet and bone in the Framingham osteoporosis study. Eur J Nutr. 2001;40:231–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Fateh HL, Mirzaei N, Gubari MI, Darbandi M, Najafi F, Pasdar Y. Association Between Dietary Total Antioxidant Capacity and Hypertension in Pre-and Postmenopausal Women; Finding From RaNCD Cohort Study.

  36. Shivappa N, Steck SE, Hurley TG, Hussey JR, Hebert JR. Designing and developing a literature-derived, population-based dietary inflammatory index. Public Health Nutr. 2014;17:1689–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bao M, Zhang K, Wei Y, Hua W, Gao Y, Li X, Ye L. Therapeutic potentials and modulatory mechanisms of fatty acids in bone. Cell Prolif. 2020;53:e12735.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Fratoni V, Brandi ML. B vitamins, homocysteine and bone health. Nutrients. 2015;7:2176–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. DiNicolantonio JJ, Mehta V, Zaman SB, O'Keefe JH. Not Salt But Sugar As Aetiological In Osteoporosis: A Review. Mo Med. 2018;115(3):247-52.

  40. Esmaeily Z, Tajary Z, Daei S, Rezaei M, Eyvazkhani A, Motlagh ARD, Palmowski A. Association between healthy eating Index-2015 scores and probable sarcopenia in community-dwelling Iranian older adults: a cross-sectional study. J Nutr Sci. 2021;10:151–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Chan R, Leung J, Woo J. A prospective cohort study to examine the associa- tion between dietary patterns and sarcopenia in Chinese community- dwelling older people in Hong Kong. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016;17:336–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mohseni R, Aliakbar S, Abdollahi A, Yekaninejad MS, Maghbooli Z, Mirzaei K. Relationship between major dietary patterns and sarcopenia among menopausal women. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017;29:1241–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Granic A, Mendonça N, Sayer AA, Hill TR, Davies K, Siervo M, et al. E ects of dietary patterns and low protein intake on sarcopenia risk in the very old: the Newcastle 85+ study. Clin Nutr. 2020;39:166–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Chun OK, Kim DO, Smith N, Schroeder D, Han JT, Lee CY. Daily consump- tion of phenolics and total antioxidant capacity from fruit and vegetables in the American diet. J Sci Food Agric. 2005;85:1715–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Schaap LA, Pluijm SM, Deeg DJ, Visser M. In ammatory markers and loss of muscle mass (sarcopenia) and strength. Am J Med. 2006;119(526):e529–17.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Montiel-Rojas D, Santoro A, Nilsson A, Franceschi C, Capri M, Bazzocchi A, et al. Bene cial role of replacing dietary saturated fatty acids with poly- unsaturated fatty acids in the prevention of sarcopenia: ndings from the NU-AGE cohort. Nutrients. 2020;12:3079.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Yoshida Y, Kosaki K, Sugasawa T, Matsui M, Yoshioka M, Aoki K, et al. High salt diet impacts the risk of sarcopenia associated with reduction of skeletal muscle performance in the Japanese population. Nutrients. 2020;12:3474.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Cuesta-Triana F, Verdejo-Bravo C, Fernández-Pérez C, Martín-Sánchez FJ. E ect of Milk and other dairy products on the risk of frailty, sarcopenia, and cognitive performance decline in the elderly: a systematic review. Adv Nutr. 2019;10:S105–19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the PERSIAN cohort Study collaborators and of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences. The Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education has also contributed to the funding used in the PERSIAN Cohort through Grant No; 700/534.

Funding

This research was supported by Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (grant number: 92472).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Nutritional Sciences and Food Technology, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

    Negin Kamari & Yahya Pasdar

  2. Nursing Department, Kalar Technical College, Garmian Polytechnic University, Kalar, Kurdistan region, Iraq

    Hawal Lateef Fateh

  3. Research Center for Environmental Determinants of Health (RCEDH), Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

    Yahya Pasdar & Farid Najafi

  4. Infectious Diseases Research Center, Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

    Shahab Rezaeian

  5. Behavioral Disease Research Center, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

    Ebrahim Shakiba

Authors
  1. Negin Kamari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hawal Lateef Fateh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yahya Pasdar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shahab Rezaeian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ebrahim Shakiba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Farid Najafi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YP and FN designed the study. SR analyzed the data. NK and HL prepared the draft of the manuscript. YP, FN and ES reviewed and approved the final manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farid Najafi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the ethics committee of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (KUMS.REC.1394.318). All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. All the participants were provided oral and written informed consent. All methods were carried out according to relevant guidelines and regulations. This study was conducted by the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kamari, N., Fateh, H.L., Pasdar, Y. et al. Bone mineral density and muscle mass associated with healthy eating index in postmenopausal women; results from RaNCD cohort study. BMC Women's Health 23, 615 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02774-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02774-6

Keywords

BMC Women's Health

ISSN: 1472-6874

Contact us