Skip to main content

Female genital mutilation/cutting among girls aged 0–14: evidence from the 2018 Mali Demographic and Health Survey data

Abstract

Background

Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) is considered a social norm in many African societies, with varying prevalence among countries. Mali is one of the eight countries with very high prevalence of FGM/C in Africa. This study assessed the individual and contextual factors associated with female FGM/C among girls aged 0–14 years in Mali.

Methods

We obtained data from the 2018 Mali Demographic and Health Survey. The prevalence of FGM/C in girls was presented using percentages while a multilevel binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the predictors of FGM/C and the results were presented using adjusted odds ratios with associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

The results indicate that more than half (72.7%, 95% CI = 70.4–74.8) of women in Mali with daughters had at least one daughter who has gone through circumcision. The likelihood of circumcision of girls increased with age, with women aged 45–49 having the highest odds compared to those aged 15–19 (aOR = 17.68, CI = 7.91–31.79). A higher likelihood of FGM/C in daughters was observed among women who never read newspaper/magazine (aOR = 2.22, 95% CI = 1.27–3.89), compared to those who read newspaper/magazine at least once a week. Compared to women who are not circumcised, those who had been circumcised were more likely to have their daughters circumcised (aOR = 53.98, 95% CI = 24.91–117.00).

Conclusion

The study revealed the age of mothers, frequency of reading newspaper/magazine, and circumcision status of mothers, as factors associated with circumcision of girls aged 0–14 in Mali. It is, therefore, imperative for existing interventions and new ones to focus on these factors in order to reduce FGM/C in Mali. This will help Mali to contribute to the global efforts of eliminating all harmful practices, such as child, early and forced marriage and female genital mutilation by 2030.

Peer Review reports

Background

Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) is a public health issue that threatens the health and wellbeing of girls and women all over the world [1]. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines FGM/C as “all procedures that are involved in the partial or total removal of the external female genitalia or other injury to the female genital organs for non-medical reasons” [2]. Although FGM/C is primarily centered in 30 countries across Africa and Middle East [2], it also occurs in the diaspora in Australia, New Zealand, North America, and Europe [3]. With a considerable decline in FGM/C in some parts of the world, it is estimated that about 200 million women and girls living the world over have undergone the practice and about 30 million girls are at risk of being cut before their 15th birthday [2].

FGM/C has been known as a violation of the human rights of women and girls by several international rights organizations [4]. Aside being an infringement on human rights of females, the practice also has negative health implications, as it destroys healthy genital tissues, resulting in severe pain, hemorrhage, infections, urinary and menstrual problems, sexual problems and even deaths [5]. FGM/C is also linked with poor reproductive health outcomes, including increased risk of childbirth complications and newborn deaths [6, 7].

Structural complications of the genitourinary system, post-procedural complications, obstetrical complications, and death are forms of health complications as a result of FGM/C [8]. The adoption of UN resolution A/RES/67/146 (intensifying global efforts for the elimination of FGM/C) on December 2012 by all 194 member states of the General Assembly, which includes the 30 countries that are at the pinnacle of the practice, is an indication of the commitment at the global level to end FGM/C. The WHO also condemns the medicalization or the practice of FGM/C carried out by healthcare providers, specifically nurses and midwives globally [5].

In some African countries, FGM/C is considered as a social norm [9] and the prevalence of the practice varies across countries. Mali is one of the eight countries with very high prevalence of FGM/C in Africa, as 89% of girls and women aged 15 to 49 years had undergone the practice in 2013 [1]. However, 58% of girls and women who have suffered FGM/C are daughters of mothers who oppose it [1].

Previous studies on predictors of FGM/C in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) have focused generally in Burkina Faso [10], Ethiopia, [11], Nigeria [12] and Senegal [13]. In Mali, studies by Cetorelli et al. [14] and Hayford et al. [15] have examined the trends, policies and community influences of FGM. The gap in these studies is that, both studies used data obtained in 2012–2013 despite the existence of current nationally representative data that can provide current literature on the phenomenon. Again, previous studies have not assessed how individual and contextual factors play a role in the circumcision of girls 0–14 years. In the present study, we aim to add to the existing literature by investigating the individual and contextual factors associated with FGM/C of girls aged 0–14 in Mali. This study is needful because, despite the high prevalence of the practice, coupled with the rapid increase of medicalization of the practice in Mali, it is not clear why the practice still exists in the country, especially among girls aged 0–14 who are the next generation of women. Findings from the study will call for collective efforts to address the phenomenon within a wider framework of policies and interventions that will holistically address all harmful practices and all forms of violence against girls and women. This will help Mali to contribute to global efforts of eliminating all harmful practices, such as child, early and forced marriage and female genital mutilation by 2030.

Methods

Study area and data source

The study was conducted in Mali. Mali is a landlocked country in West Africa and it is the eighth-largest country in Africa with a land area of over 1,241,238 square kilometres. The country shares borders in the north with Algeria, in the east with Niger, in the northwest with Mauritania, in the south with Burkina Faso and Cote d’Ivorie and then in the west with Guinea and Senegal. Mali’s population is estimated to be 21.9 million with about 65% of its population estimated to be under the age of 25. The predominant religion in Mali is Islamic religion accounting for above 95% of the population.

Data for the study were obtained from the 2018 Mali Demographic and Health Survey (MDHS). The Individual Recode (IR) file, which contains data on women of reproductive age (15–49) was used for this study. The survey is the sixth version since its commencement in 1987 [16]. The MDHS is part of the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) Program which seeks to gather data on health indicators such as female genital mutilation, family planning methods, fertility preferences, sexual activity, marriage, and other essential population health measures in low- and middle-income countries. It used a two-stage stratified random sampling design. At the primary stage, 379 Primary Survey Units (UPS)/clusters from urban (104) and rural (275) areas were systematically selected. The second stage involved the selection of households from the predefined clusters [16]. Details of the sampling and selection of research participants are available in the final report accessible via https://dhsprogram.com/what-we-do/survey/survey-display-517.cfm. For the purpose of the study, women were included if they had daughters and had complete cases on all the variables considered for the study (n = 5,665).

Study variables

Outcome variable

‘Circumcision of girls aged 0–14’ was the outcome variable in this study. To derive this variable, women of reproductive age who had daughters were asked how many of their daughter(s) had their genital area “nicked with nothing removed,” “something removed,” or “sewn shut.” [17, 18]. The responses ranged from ‘no daughter’ to 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 daughters. To provide a binary outcome, women who said none of their daughters went through FGM/C were coded as ‘No = 0’ and those who had at least one daughter circumcised were coded ‘Yes = 1’.

Independent variables

Twelve independent variables, consisting of nine individual level factors and three contextual level factors, were considered in this study. Age groups (15–19, 20–24, 25–29, 30–34, 35–39, 40–44, 45–49 years), level of education (no education, primary and secondary or higher), partner’s education (no education, primary, secondary or and not known), employment status (employed or unemployed), marital status (never in union, married, cohabiting, and Widowed/divorced/separated), frequency of reading newspaper/magazine (not at all, less than once a week, at least once a week), frequency of listening to radio (not at all, less than once a week, at least once a week), frequency of watching television (not at all, less than once a week, at least once a week), and circumcision status (circumcised or not circumcised) were the individual level factors. The contextual level factors were wealth index (poorest, poorer, middle, richer, richest), sex of household head (male or female), and place of residence (urban or rural). The selection of these variables was based on their associations with FGM/C in previous studies [10, 17,18,19,20].

Statistical analyses

Stata version 14.2 for Windows was used in analysing the data. First, the prevalence of FGM/C in girls was presented together with a distribution of FGM/C in girls across the individual and contextual level factors. Statistical significance of the association between each of the factors and FGM/C in girls was measured using chi-square test of independence at a p-value of 0.05 (see Table 1). Second, multilevel binary logistic regression analysis was carried out to examine the individual and contextual factors associated with FGM/C. Only variables that were significant in the chi-square test were considered for the multilevel binary logistic regression analysis. In terms of the modelling, four models, comprising the empty model (Model 0), Model I, Model II, and Model III were fitted. Model 0 was fitted to show the variance in FGM/C in girls, which could be attributed to the clustering of the primary sampling units (PSUs) without the explanatory variables. Model I modelled the association between the individual level factors and FGM/C in girls. Model II contained the contextual level factors and FGM/C in girls while Model III modelled the individual and contextual level factors and FGM/C in girls. Model comparison was carried out using the log-likelihood and Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) tests. The highest log-likelihood and the lowest AIC were used to determine the best-fit model [21]. Adjusted odds ratio and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were presented for all the models apart from model 0 (see Table 2). To check for high correlation among the explanatory variables, a test for multicollinearity was carried out using the variance inflation factor (VIF), and the results showed no evidence of high collinearity (Mean VIF = 1.20, Maximum VIF = 1.65, and Minimum VIF = 1.01). Sample weight (v005/1,000,000) and svy command were used to correct for over- and under-sampling, and the complex survey design and generalizability of the findings respectively.

Table 1 Socio-demographic characteristics of women and FGM/C in girls in Mali (Weighted, N = 5665)
Table 2 Multivariable multilevel logistic regression models on individual and contextual factors associated with circumcision of girls in Mali

Results

Characteristics of the respondents

Table 1 shows results on the characteristics of the respondents. The majority of the women were aged 25–29 (23.7%), had no formal education (77%), had partners with no formal education (72.2%), and were married (96.8%). Most of the respondents were not working (64.4%), never read newspaper (96.1%), listened to radio at least once a week (46.3%), and never television (41.1%). Most of them were circumcised (89.7%), were poor (41.2%), lived in male-headed households (87.9%) and in rural areas (78.2%).

Prevalence of FGM/C in girls in Mali

Figure 1 shows the prevalence of FGM/C in girls in Mali. The results indicate that more than half (72.7%, 95% CI =  70.4–74.8) of women with daughters had at least one daughter who had gone through circumcision.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Proportion of women who had at least one daughter circumcised

Distribution of FGM/C in girls accross the socio-demographic characteristics of women

As shown in Table 1, most of the women whose daughters were circumcised were aged 40–44 (81.3%), had primary education (73.7%), had partners with primary education (74.1%), were widowed/divorced/separated (74.0%), working (77.8%), never read newspaper/magazine (73.0%), listened to radio at least once week (75.1%), and watched television at least once a week (75.9%). Among women who had undergone circumcision themselves, the majority (79.9%) had at least one circumcised daughter, were in the richer wealth quintile (78.4%), lived in male-headed households (72.7%), and lived in urban areas (74.4%). Apart from level of education all the socio-demographic characteristics had significant relationship with the circumcision of girls at 95% CI.

Predictors of FGM/C in girls in Mali

Table 2 shows results of the multivariable multilevel logistic regression models of the study. As shown in the full model containing all the individual and contextual level factors and circumcision of girls, the likelihood of circumcision of girls increased with age, with women aged 45–49 having the highest odds compared to those aged 15–19 (aOR = 17.68, CI = 7.91–31.79). A high likelihood of FGM/C in daughters was observed among women who never read newspaper/magazine (aOR = 2.22, CI = 1.27–3.89), compared to those who read newspaper at least once a week. Compared to women who had not gone through circumcision, those who had been circumcised were more likely to have their daughters circumcised (aOR = 53.98, CI = 24.91–117.00).

Discussion

FGM/C negatively affects the health of women, and it is also an infringement on women’s rights. Mali is one of the countries with high rate of FGM/C in SSA. In the present study, we assessed the prevalence and predictors of FGM/C among girls in Mali. The prevalence recorded in this study is 52.5%. This is lower than the 73% reported by one of the organisations in Mali [22] and the 83% reported in the 2012–2013 MDHS [23]. The prevalence of FGM/C in the present study is attributable to a number of factors. Legally, there is no law that proscribes FGM/C in Mali, despite the fact that Mali has endorsed some international resolutions such as the International Day of Zero Tolerance for FGM aimed at fighting FGM/C. This contrasts what happens in other African countries, like Mauritania, where the practice is considered a crime punishable by law [24]. Additionally, in Mali, the practice is buried in social norms, and because of this, people who are willing to stop the practice continue to perpetrate it for the fear of being ostracized by other community members. Thus, many people who might even want to abolish the practice are forced by societal norms to continue the practice [22]. The possible reason for the decrease in the proportion of daughters who were circumcised in Mali between 2013 and 2018 could be attributed to the ongoing education across the globe, especially in Africa, on the negative effects of FGM/C. Again, the reduction in the proportion could be due to our focus on our selection of variables for this study, which limited our analysis to only married and cohabiting women, while the proportion reported in the 2013 MDHS focused on the proportion of all women of reproductive age who reported having their daughter circumcised.

The likelihood of FGM/C was associated with the age of mothers. Specifically, mothers aged 35–39 years had higher odds of getting their daughters circumcised, as opposed to those aged 15–19. Previous studies in Benin City, Nigeria [25], Okada, Edo State, Nigeria [26], Bale zone, Ethiopia [27], and East Gojjam zone, Ethiopia [28] reported similar findings. A study in Iran by Pashael et al. [29] also revealed that older women have positive attitude to FGM/C, relative to younger women. Obi and Igbinadolor [25] explained that the lower likelihood of younger mothers getting their female children circumcised could be as a result of the proliferation of human rights sensitization programs focused on younger women. Such programs normally focus on issues related to negative sociocultural practices including FGM/C. Kaplan et al. [30] also argued that older women normally consider female genital mutilation as a religious practice similar to male circumcision. They, therefore, consider it as a religious obligation, and this could be the reason for the higher likelihood of getting FGM/C done on their daughters. With the lower likelihood of FGM/C among daughters of younger mothers, it is expected that FGM/C will reduce further in the future, if the current trend continues.

The study revealed a significant association between media exposure and FGM/C. Specifically, women who read newspapers or magazines at least once a week had lower odds of getting their daughters circumcised, as compared to those who never read newspapers. This finding disagrees with an earlier study in Mali by Dalal et al. [31], who revealed that teenage girls who read newspapers/magazines had positive attitudes towards FGM/C, compared to those who did not read newspapers/magazines. The difference in findings could be attributed to data source: While Dalal et al. [31] used 2006 Mali Demographic and Health Survey data, which was collected many years, the present study used the 2018 session of the survey. The finding in the present study, compared with what was found by Dalal et al. [31], seems to suggest a change in the influence of media on people’s attitude towards FGM/C over the years. The study used the oldest dataset and this inconsistent finding may indicate that media did not play its expected role of protecting girls from FGM at the time of the study.

Our finding in the present study implies that newspapers and magazines in Mali are now producing contents focusing on FGM/C eradication. In line with this, Cetorelli et al. [24] have noted how some civil society organizations in Mali, including Association Malienne pour le Suivi et l‘Orientation des Pratiques Traditionnelles (AMSOPT), Tagne, Sini Sanuman, are using media such as newspapers to campaign against FGM/C. The low likelihood of FGM/C among daughters of mothers who read newspapers/magazines reported in the present study could be suggestive of the effectiveness of such campaigns. Thus, newspapers and magazines could serve as a medium for health promotion programs aimed at ending FGM/C to reach their audience and clear misconceptions about FGM/C [32].

Also, circumcision status of women had a significant association with getting their daughters circumcised. Specifically, women who had experienced FGM/C were more likely to get their daughters circumcised, compared to those who had not been circumcised. This finding confirms the findings of Obi and Igbinadolor [25], Bogale et al. [33], and Ashimi et al. [34]. This finding suggests that going through FGM/C, with its negative health implications, does not necessarily dissuade women from getting their daughters through FGM/C, as the practice seems to be deeply rooted in some sociocultural norms. Women, therefore, engage in the practice for various reasons [35]. Bogale et al. [33], for instance, identified that FGM/C is done as a religious practice, as a way of safeguarding girls’ virginity, and to ensure one’s social acceptability. Ashimi et al. [34] similarly noted that FGM/C was practiced in order to meet demands of tradition, to enable future husbands of the girls to have pleasure during sex, and to prevent promiscuity. In Mali, FGM/C is supported by some sociocultural and religious norms. For instance, in Dogon religion, the practice is considered as spiritual cleansing [36]. Besides, in Mali, the clitoris is generally associated with masculinity, hence the need to cut it in order to initiate girls into adulthood [22]. This finding suggests that interventions aimed at ending the practice need to focus on eradication of such sociocultural norms and misconceptions.

Strengths and limitations

It is important to interpret the findings in the light of certain strengths and limitations of the study. In terms of strengths, the data used for the study is nationally representative, and this allows us to generalize the findings to all girls in Mali. Additionally, we used data from the 2018 MDHS, which is the most recent of the surveys. With this, the findings could be reflective of the current practice of FGM/C in Mali. Moreover, we used higher-order statistical tools, such as logistic regressions, for the analysis. This ensured vigorous analysis of the data. Beside these strengths, the study comes with certain limitations. First, due to the age category of girls considered in this study, it is possible that some of the girls would not have been cut at the time of the survey, leading to under-reporting. Again, the study adopted a cross-sectional research design. With this, it becomes impossible to draw causal relationship between the variables studied. Additionally, the retrospective nature of reporting FGM/C may affect the accuracy of the reports, and this may result in recall biases which often characterize DHS data. Relatedly, the reports may also be subjected to issues of social desirability bias. The authors did not control for region of residence due to multicollinearity.

Conclusion

In the present study, we investigated the determinants of FGM/C in Mali. Firstly, the study revealed an association between the age of mothers and FGM/C of their daughters, with daughters of older women being more inclined to FGM/C. The study also revealed an association between reading of newspapers/magazines and FGM/C. Additionally, the study revealed that mothers who had been circumcised and those who were working were more likely to get their daughters circumcised, compared to those who had not gone through circumcision and those who were not working respectively. It is, therefore, critical for existing interventions and new ones to focus on these factors, so as to reduce FGM/C in Mali. For example, such interventions can successfully use newspapers/and magazines to sensitise women on the need to stop FGM/C in Mali.

Data availability

The dataset is available freely for download at: https://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm.

Abbreviations

cOR:

crude Odds Ratio

aOR:

Adjusted Odds Ratio

CI:

Confidence Interval

DHS:

Demographic and Health Survey

FGM/C:

Female genital mutilation/cutting

WHO:

World Health Organization

Ref:

Reference category

PSU:

Primary Sampling Unit

ICC:

Intra-Class Correlation

LR Test:

Likelihood ratio Test

AIC:

Akaike’s Information Criterion

References

  1. UNICEF. Female genital Mutilation/Cutting. A statistical overview and exploration of the dynamics of change. 2013.

  2. WHO. Female Genital Mutilation. Fact Sheet. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mediacenter/factsheets/fs241/en/. 2017.

  3. Muthumbi J, Svanemyr J, Scolaro E, Temmerman M, Say L. Female genital mutilation: a literature review of the current status of legislation and policies in 27 African countries and Yemen. Afr J Reprod Health. 2015;19(3):32–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. OHCHR U., UNDP U., & UNESCO U. Eliminating Female genital mutilation. An interagency statement. Geneva: WHO. 2008.

  5. WHO. Global strategy to stop healthcare providers from performing FGM.2010.

  6. Akpak YK, Yilmaz I. The impact of female genital mutilation/cutting on obstetric outcomes and its management. J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;4:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bellizzi S, Say L, Rashidian A, Boulvain M, Abdulcadir J. Is female genital mutilation associated with eclampsia? Evidence from a nationally representative survey data. Reproductive Health. 2020;17(1):1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. WHO. Study group on FGM and Obstetric outcome. WHO: Collaborative prospective study in sex African countries. Lancet:2006:367:1835–1841.

  9. Insight I. The dynamics of social change towards the abandonment of female genital mutilation/cutting in five African countries.2010.

  10. Karmaker B, Kandala N, Chung D, Clarke A. ‘Factors associated with FGM in Burkina Faso and its policy implications. Int J Equity Health:2011:10(20).

  11. Abeya SG, Chuluko BG, Gemeda DD. Factors Associated with female genital mutilation among women of Reproductive Age in Gewane Woreda, Afar National Regional State, Ethiopia. Remed Open Access 2017:2:1051.

  12. Gajaa M, Wakgari N, Kebede Y, Derseh L. Prevalence and associated factors of circumcision among daughters of reproductive aged women in the Hababo Guduru District, Western Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Womens Health. 2016;16(1):42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Setegn T, Yihunie Lakew K. D. Geographic variation and factors associated with female genital mutilation among reproductive age women in Ethiopia: a national population based survey. PloSONE:2016:11(1).

  14. Hayford SR, Garver S, Soura AB, Cheong YF, Grose RG, Yount KM. Community influences on female genital Mutilation/Cutting: a comparison of four Francophone West African Countries. Stud Fam Plann. 2020;51(1):3–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cetorelli V, Wilson B, Batyra E, Coast E. Female genital mutilation/cutting in Mali and Mauritania: understanding trends and evaluating policies. Stud Fam Plann. 2020;51(1):51–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Institut National de la Statistique (INSTAT) and ICF. 2018 Mali Demographic and Health Survey Key Findings. Rockville, Maryland, USA. INSTAT and ICF. 2019.

  17. Grose RG, Hayford SR, Cheong YF, Garver S, Kandala NB, Yount KM. Community influences on female genital mutilation/cutting in Kenya: norms, opportunities, and ethnic diversity. J Health Soc Behav. 2019;60(1):84–100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Yoder P, Stanley, Wang S. 2013. Female Genital Cutting: The Interpretation of Recent DHS Data. DHS Comparative Reports No. 33. Calverton, Maryland, USA: ICF International.

  19. Mboge B, Knapp K, Tantsyura V, Jagne SF, Alamgir H. Female genital cutting in the Gambia: can education of women bring change? J Public Health.2019.

  20. Yount KM, Cheong YF, Grose RG, Hayford SR. Community gender systems and a daughter’s risk of female genital mutilation/cutting: multilevel findings from Egypt. PLoS ONE:2020:15(3);0229917.

  21. Solanke BL, Oyinlola FF, Oyeleye OJ, Ilesanmi BB. Maternal and community factors associated with unmet contraceptive need among childbearing women in Northern Nigeria. Contracept Reproductive Med. 2019;4(1):11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Associazione italiana donne per lo sviluppo Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) A Quick Guide For The Media. 2016.

  23. Planning and Statistics Unit (CPS/SSDSPF), National Institute of Statistics (INSTAT/MPATP), INFO-STAT and, International ICF. Demographic and Health Survey in Mali 2012–2013. Maryland, USA: CPS, INSTAT, INFO-STAT and ICF International: Rockville; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Valeria Cetorelli B, Wilson E, Batyra, Coast E. Female genital Mutilation/Cutting in Mali and Mauritania: understanding trends and evaluating policies. Stud Fam Plann. 2020;0(0):1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Obi AI, Igbinadolor OL. Prevalence of female genital mutilation and its determinants among pregnant women in Benin City, Nigeria. J Community Med Prim Health Care:2018:30 (2):12–21.

  26. Obi AI, Adesoye O, Adelosoye A. Awareness and Knowledge of Female Genital Mutilation among women in a Sub-urban Community in Edo State, Nigeria. Annals Biomedical Sci. 2016;15(1):42–50.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bogale D, Markos D, Kaso M. Prevalence of female genital mutilation and its effect on women’s health in Bale Zone, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health:2014:14:1076. Availabe at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/14/1076.

  28. Andualem M. Female genital mutilation and Associated factors in GonchaSiso-Enessie District, East Gojjam Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. J Health Med Informat:2013: 4: 142. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7420.1000142.

  29. Pashaei T, Ponnet K, Moeeni M, Khazaee-pool M, Majlessi F. Daughters at risk of female genital mutilation: examining the determinants of mothers’ intentions to allow their daughters to undergo female genital mutilation. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(3).

  30. Kaplan A, Forbes M, Bonhoure I, Utzet M, Martín M, Manneh M, Ceesay H. Female genital mutilation/cutting in the Gambia: long-term health consequences and complications during delivery and for the newborn. Int J Women’s Health. 2013;5:323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dalal K, Kalmatayeva Z, Mandal S, Ussatayeva G, Lee MS, Biswas A. Adolescent girls’ attitudes toward female genital mutilation: a study in seven African countries. F1000Research. 2018;7.

  32. Alcaraz MR, González JS, Ruiz CS. Attitudes towards female genital mutilation: an integrative review. Int Nurs Rev:2013:1–10.

  33. Bogale D, Markos D, Kaso M. Intention toward the continuation of female genital mutilation in Bale Zone, Ethiopia. Int J Women’s Health. 2015;7:85–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ashimi AO, Amole TG, Iliyasu Z. Prevalence and predictors of female genital mutilation among infants in a semi urban community in northern Nigeria.2015.

  35. Abathum AD, Sundby J, Gele AA. Attitude toward female genital mutilation among Somali and Harari people, Eastern Ethiopia. Int J Women’s Health. 2016;8:557–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shell-Duncan B, Hernlund Y. Female ‘Circumcision’ in Africa: culture, controversy, and change. Lynne Rienner:2001.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Measure DHS for access to Demographic Health Survey’s unrestricted survey data files, which it is authorized to distribute, at no cost, for legitimate academic research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BOA was involved in the conceptualization of the study, EB conducted the statistical analysis. BOA, EB, AS, EA, CA, EKA, AIA and SY drafted the manuscript. All authors revised the manuscript for quality, consistency and accuracy. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdul-Aziz Seidu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

According to the 2018 MDHS report, ethical approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board of ICF International [16].

Informed consent

Was also sought from each woman during the fieldwork. The authors of this manuscript sought permission from the DHS Program for use of the dataset for this study. Details about data and ethical standards for DHS are available at:http://goo.gl/ny8T6X. All experiments were performed in accordance to the Declaration of Helsinki guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Anthony Idowu Ajayi is a member of the Editorial Board of this Journal.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahinkorah, B.O., Budu, E., Seidu, AA. et al. Female genital mutilation/cutting among girls aged 0–14: evidence from the 2018 Mali Demographic and Health Survey data. BMC Women's Health 24, 180 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-02940-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-02940-4

Keywords