Skip to main content
Download PDF

Association between serum vitamin E and bacterial vaginitis in women: a cross-sectional study

BMC Women's Health volume 24, Article number: 316 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction

Bacterial vaginitis (BV) is a common vaginal disease. Vitamin E has been shown to reduce BV by enhancing immune function, but no studies have analyzed the relationship between vitamin E and BV at different BMIs and ages.

Method

This study used 2242 participants from four cycles of NHANES 1999–2006 in American. Participants' vitamin E levels were divided into four groups, and analyses such as study population description, stratified analysis, multiple logistic regression analysis, and curve fitting were performed. To perform data processing, the researchers used the statistical package R (The R Foundation; http://www.r-project.org; version 3.6.3) and Empower Stats software (www.empowerstats.net, X&Y solutions, Inc. Boston, Massachusetts).

Result

The concentrations of serum vitamin E were negatively correlated with the risk of BV, especially when vitamin E were at 1198-5459ug/dL with (OR = -0.443, 95%CI = 0.447–0.923, P = 0.032) or without (OR = -0.521, 95%CI = 0.421–0.837, P = 0.006) adjustment for variables. At the same time, at lower levels, there was no significant association. Vitamin E supplementation may significantly reduce the risk of BV (p < 0.001). In addition, the risk of having BV decreased and then increased with increasing vitamin E concentrations at high BMI levels (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Vitamin E at moderate to high concentrations may significantly reduce BV risk, says the study, providing clinical evidence for the prevention and the treatment of BV.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Females in reproductive age can be affected by BV due to an imbalance in vaginal flora [1,2,3,4]. An individual's history of sexual orientation, behavior intravaginal, the use of contraceptives, the use of antibiotics, race, education, age and menstrual cycle are all risk influences for BV [5]. The prevalence of BV varies from 20 to 60% between countries. As of 2004, the prevalence rate in the United States was 29.2%. It is noteworthy that Australia, New Zealand, and Western Europe have the lowest prevalence rates for BV [6]. BV is characterized by opportunistic bacterial overgrowth and decreased levels of lactobacilli. Approximately 90–95% of the bacteria in healthy vaginal flora are Lactobacillus [7]. BV is prone to recurrence in women receiving conventional treatment [8]. Half of women treated for bacterial vaginosis experience a recurrence within 12 months of treatment, studies have shown [9]. Recurrent bacterial vaginosis may need long-term therapy to restore the vaginal flora to a normal Lactobacillus-dominated environment. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that bacterial vaginosis that does not recur frequently can be controlled with the same drugs used when initially infected with bacterial vaginosis [10]. The same drugs have been used for years, and many women who are affected by recurrent bacterial vaginitis cannot be treated long-term [11]. Recurrent bacterial vaginosis has a extremely destructive impact on their health and happiness, so women need effective, long-lasting treatment [12]. This underscores the need for new therapies.

Vitamin E is an essential lipid soluble nutrient that affects crucial cellular and molecular mechanisms and the regulation of gene expression and plays a vital role in various diseases. In the last 20 years, vitamin E has been demonstrated to regulate cellular responses, including survival, inflammation, migration, secretion, and immunity, through regulation of enzymes in signal transduction pathways [13]. Many in vitro/in vivo and clinical researches have been conducted with α-tocopherol, which is the most biologically active vitamin E [14]. The preventive effect of α-tocopherol in cardiovascular diseases have been reported in several cell culture and animal studies. The anti-inflammatory effects of α-tocopherol have been reported in cell culture and animal studies [15]. As mentioned above, several in vitro and in vivo investigations have confirmed the modulatory effects of vitamin E in signal transduction and inflammation [16]. In the last few years, our knowledge of vitamin E has got better significantly, and the significance of understanding the metabolomic authentication of vitamin E ramifications should not be disappreciated. The identification of key players involved in cellular and molecular mechanisms that are modified by vitamin E will undoubtedly lead to new treatment strategies for preventing disease progression [17].

The intake of several nutrients, such as vitamin B, has been reported to affect the human immune system [18, 19]. To our knowledge, no studies have assessed the association between vitamin E intake and the probability of BV prevalence. Various studies are underway to try to identify new ways to treat BV [20] This study’s purpose is to evaluate the association between vitamin E and the presence of BV. This study aimed to investigate the association between vitamin E and BV risk and to explore vitamin E supplementation as an intervention to reduce BV risk.

Materials and methods

Data sources and study design

National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), which inquires all ages of the population’s health and nutritional status. Population statistics, health indicators, and other relevant information collected in in-home interviews provide a distinctive chance to evaluate the prevalence of BV infections in the general population, identify and ascertain risk factors, and monitor trends in BV prevalence as testing and treatment programs are established and expanded (https://www.cdc.gov/). In this study, four cycles of NHANES 1999–2006 were used, and we had 41,474 participants in America. After exclusion participants with missing variables, 2242 participants remained in this a cross-sectional study, and the flow chart of exclusion criteria is displayed in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart for participant inclusion. Flow chart of participant enrollment for the analysis from the National and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2006 dataset

Full size image

Measurement of vitamin E

In this experiment, serum concentrations of vitamin E (α- and γ-tocopherol) were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with a photodiode array. Prior to being delivered to the National Center for Environmental Health for testing, sample vials were kept under appropriate frozen (-20 °C) storage conditions. Multiplying by 0.02, vitamin E (-tocopherol) results (ug/dL) were converted to ug/dL. Small volumes of serum (100 L) were combined with an ethanol solution, which contained two internal standards, retinol butyrate, and nonapreno-β-carotene (C45). From the aqueous phase, the micronutrients were extracted into n-hexane and dried under a vacuum. The extract was filtered after being redissolved in ethanol and acetonitrile. The filtrate was then divided equally, fed into a C18 reversed-phase column, and eluted under equal pressure by a mobile phase made up of equal parts acetonitrile and ethanol. The quantitative analysis was performed by spectrophotometry and monitored at three wavelengths, and the chromatograms were recorded. The calculations were adjusted for the difference between the peak heights of the internal standards in the calibration solution and the unknown, and α- and γ-tocopherol were compared at 300 nm. The NHANES website provides a thorough explanation of quality assurance and quality control techniques.

Quantification of bacterial vaginitis

The NHANES Laboratory/Medical Technician Procedure Manual (LPM) includes detailed specimen collection, handling, quality control, and quality assurance instructions. After the vaginal swabs were processed, the samples were stored and transported to Magee-Women's Hospital in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. After Gram staining in the laboratory, BV scores were calculated using Nugent's method to quantify the mean number of lactobacilli forms in each oil-soaked area. The number of Lactobacilli spp., Gardner Ella & anaerobic GNR and Mobiluncus spp. Present was quantified. Quantitating the number of morphotypes from 0 to 4 + concerning the number of organisms present per oil immersion field and was identified as positive for bacterial vaginitis when the total bacterial count reached 7–10 (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/index.htm).

Covariates

As the results of the study may be influenced by several factors, race, sex, education, age, marital status, income, alcohol intake, and poverty to income ratio (PIR) were included as covariates to make the results more accurate. Participants' race was classified as Mexican American, Other Hispanic, Non-Hispanic white, Non-Hispanic black, and Other Race; Education was categorized as below high school education level, high school education level, and above high school education; Age was equally divided into low group (14–24) and high group (25–49); Marital status has Married/Living with partner, Widowed/Divorced/Separated, Unmarried; Income includes $0–24999, $25,000–74999 and $75,000 and Over; BMI equally divided into low group (15.09–25.88) and high group (25.89–65.41); PIR was divided into three groups of similar size.

Statistical analysis

Statistical methods such as study population description, multiple logistic regression, stratified analysis, and curve fitting were used in this study. Continuous variables were measured as "mean ± standard deviation" or "median (interquartile spacing)", and categorical variables were reported as numbers and percentages (%). To characterize participants more clearly, we analyzed the baseline characteristics of participants in the BV and non-BV populations.

In the participants' characteristics table, continuous variables were represented using weighted means (95% CI) and P values were measured by t-test or ANOVA (analysis of variance); categorical variables were represented using weighted percentages (95% CI) and P values were measured by chi-square test. The relationship between vitamin E and BV was assessed by logistic regression equations and stratified analyses. Smoothed curves were fitted using the generalised additive model (GAM), in addition to stratification for age and BMI, to explore the relationship between vitamin E and BV in different subgroups.

This study produced regression analysis tables and baseline tables of study population characteristics from two years of weighted data. The weighting analysis for the study population description was done by considering the survey design and adding in SDMVPSU in Cluster IDs, SDMVSTRA in Strata, and WTMEC2YR in Weight. The weighting analysis for the regression analysis was done by considering the survey design in Generalised Linear Models, again giving the parameters for the weighting The weighting parameters are also given. All the above data are available in the NHANES library.Stratified analysis of BV allows for knowing whether the outcome is consistently present in a given group. In this study, stratified analyses were performed for race, education level, marital status, income, alcohol intake, BMI, age, and PIR. The p-value results were consistent across the alcohol intake, BMI, age, and PIR strata, indicating a stable presence in that group and demonstrating that There was a significant negative association between the risk of BV and vitamin E.

The connection between vitamin E and BV was illustrated by multivariate logistic regression analysis with different models incorporating different covariates. Crude Model did not contain any covariates, Model I adjusted for race, education, and age, and Model II adjusted for marital status, income, BMI, alcohol intake, and PIR based on Model I. In this model, vitamin E was divided into four groups 41–772.5, 773–942, 942.1–1196.8, and 1198–5459 (ug/dL), with the first group serving as the reference group. We derived the relationship between vitamin E and BV in each group, performed trend analysis for vitamin E and reported the change in probability (OR) of BV for each unit increase in vitamin E. Trend analysis is a commonly used analytical method to determine the trend effect of changes in vitamin E concentration on BV by not adding adjustment variables.

To better represent the relationship between increased vitamin E intake and BV, we plotted smoothed fit curves according to Model II. In addition, we stratified age and BMI to observe the connection between vitamin E and BV in different age and BMI strata of the population.

For all analyses, the statistical significance level in this study was set at 2-sided p < 0.05 and 95% confidence intervals calculated. To perform data processing, the researchers used the statistical package R (The R Foundation; http://www.r-project.org; version 3.6.3) and Empower Stats software (www.empowerstats.net, X&Y solutions, Inc. Boston, Massachusetts).

Ethics statement

Informed consent of the parents and/or legal guardians of the minors involved, all methods were conducted in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations, ethical approval and consent to participate were obtained, and these are available at https://www.cdc.gov/rdc/.

Result

Participants’ characteristics

We included 2242 participants, 1275 (56.87%) were infected with BV, and 967 (43.13%) were not infected with BV. Table 1 shows the characteristics of the participants in this study. All participants, with BV compared to non-BV were more likely to be black, have lower vitamin E intake, have lower education, income from $25,000 to $74,999, higher BMI, lower PIR, higher alcohol intake, and no marital partners (all p < 0.05).

Table 1 Characteristics of 2242 women overall and by BV infection
Full size table

Association between vitamin E and bacterial vaginitis

Table 2 presents the weighted OR (95% CI) for BV according to vitamin E quartiles, race, etc. Logistic regression Model analysis showed that before adjustment (Crude Model), vitamin E was significantly negatively associated with BV risk in the third quartile of vitamin E. After further adjustment for race, education, age, marital status, income, BMI, alcohol intake, and PIR (Model II), Medium to high concentration of vitamin E were still significantly negatively linked to BV. In groups 3 and 4 of vitamin E concentration, there was a significant negative correlation between vitamin E concentration and BV risk (p < 0.05).

Table 2 Associations between the quartiles of vitamin E and BV infection among women
Full size table

Stratified analysis was performed for age, sex, etc., as shown in Table 3. The association of vitamin E high concentration on BV was stable across alcohol intake and BMI and indicated a significant negative association (p < 0.05) across alcohol intake, income, marital status, education level, BMI, age, and PIR.

Table 3 Stratified analysis
Full size table

For vitamin E and BV, the relationship between the curves is shown in Fig. 2, illustrating that the connection between vitamin E and BV is nonlinear in the curve fit, from which it can be seen that as the concentration of vitamin E increases, the risk of acquiring BV decreases gradually and then increases slightly (p < 0.001).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Correlation between Vitamin E and Bacterial vaginitis. The natural spline curve shows a linear relationship between vitamin E and BV (P linearity < 0.001). The area between the blue dashed lines is considered to be the 95% confidential interval. Each red dot reveals the concentration of vitamin E, forming a continuous fitted curve. Ratios are based on model II in a multivariate logistic regression model, adjusted for all confounders (race, sex, education, age, marital status, income, BMI, alcohol, PIR)

Full size image

Figure 3 Stratifies age and shows the curves of vitamin E to BV. The hazard of acquiring BV showed to reduce with increasing vitamin E concentrations when age was in the Low group (p < 0.01).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Correlation between vitamin E and BV infection stratified by age. Fitting curve of the association between vitamin E and BV infection, stratified by age, with age = 24 taken as the dividing criterion. Race, sex, education, marital status, income, BMI, alcohol and PIR were adjusted

Full size image

Figure 4 Stratifies BMI, and when BMI was in the High group, with increasing vitamin E concentrations, the risk of having BV decreased when the concentration was before 1841 ug/dL and increased when the concentration was greater than 1841 ug/dL (p < 0.01). Among them, the change in concentration before 1841 was significant (p < 0.01).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Correlation between vitamin E and BV infection stratified by BMI. Fitting curve of the association between vitamin E and BV infection, stratified by BMI, with BMI = 25.88 taken as the dividing criterion. Race, sex, education, age, marital status, income, alcohol and PIR were adjusted

Full size image

Discussion

Using multiple regression analysis with vitamin E as an exposure factor in quartiles, we found a significant negative association with the risk of BV at vitamin E concentrations in the third and four quartiles. After adjusting for variables multiple times, we found a correlation between a higher probability of BV prevalence and lower vitamin E intake.

The characteristic of BV is the overgrowth of vaginal anaerobic bacteria, which results in vaginal itching and unpleasant fishy-smelling discharge accompanied by an increase in vaginal pH [21, 22]. The prevalence of BV is closely related to the strength of the body's immune function, and it has been shown that vitamin E can reduce the prevalence of BV by improving the body's immune function [23].

Vitamin E, as a potent antioxidant, has a relationship with the immune response. Studies have shown that vitamin E has some anti-inflammatory effects [24]. When attacked by bacteria, leukocytes produce a large number of free radicals to resist foreign bacteria, and the metabolism of free radicals in the body is abnormal. At the same time, the body produces highly reactive free radicals in the cellular respiratory chain during normal metabolism, especially ROS radicals [25]. ROS can damage cellular components, such as DNA and membrane lipids [26]. A certain amount of ROS helps lymphocytes participate in the immune response [27], but high ROS can cause apoptosis or necrosis [28]. In response to oxidative toxicity, cells preclude or neutralize the ROS produced in the metabolism by various antioxidant mechanisms. When the produce of ROS outstrips the cellular antioxidant scavenging capacity, bacterial vaginitis takes place [29]. In contrast, vitamin E, as a fat-soluble antioxidant, can scavenge excess free radicals in the body and maintain stable ROS levels, as well as regulate signal transduction and gene expression in immune system diseases and may play a role in BV prevention. In conclusion, by improving immune function through antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects, vitamin E may be able to reduce the risk of BV.

As we know, this cross-sectional study is the first one to analyze the relationship between BV prevalence probability and vitamin E intake in US women by age and BMI subgroups. There is only one study on the relationship between dietary nutrient intake and BV that mentions a negative correlation between vitamin E and severe BV, but it was not analyzed specifically [23]. Notably, in Fig. 3, it can be concluded that vitamin E supplementation may significantly reduce the risk of BV in young women aged 14–25 years. Furthermore, in our stratified analysis of BMI (Fig. 4), we found that the risk of having BV decreased and then increased with increasing vitamin E concentrations at high BMI levels. Similar to our findings, Agarwal, S et al. used total nutrient intake data from the National Health NHANES 2001–2008 to compare the micronutrient intake status of overweight and obese populations with those of normal weight and found that the prevalence of malnutrition was higher in obese populations and that vitamin E intake did not meet the normal needs of the organism [30].

In summary, we conclude that moderate to high concentrations of vitamin E can significantly reduce the prevalence of BV, and this result is expected to provide clues and etiological hypotheses for the investigation of the developmental mechanisms of BV, as well as provide effective feedback for the prevention and treatment of BV.

Despite the promising results, there are still problems. Firstly, as it is a cross-sectional study, the causality of exposure and outcome is not sure. Even with multiple variable adjustments, there are still some potential unmeasurable confounders present that introduce errors in the findings. Second, due to a lack of data support, current US clinical guidelines do not recommend screening for BV in asymptomatic pregnant women [31, 32], the BV prevalence levels in the NHANES database may below the actual one.

In the present investigation, although we derived evidence for a correlation between vitamin E and BV, its specific physiological mechanisms need to be further investigated. To optimize this study and provide new ideas for future studies, we propose several suggestions: First, to construct a risk assessment tool for BV disease based on Amsel criteria to identify high-risk groups for BV and improve the efficiency of BV prevention. What’s more, further survey is exceedingly needed to clarify the mechanism how vitamin E reduces the prevalence of BV, to find BV-related biomarkers and promote the development of new drug targets.

Conclusion

In conclusion, when serum vitamin E was at moderate to high concentrations, it was significantly associated with a reduced prevalence of bacterial vaginal infections. Moreover, our study found that those infected with BV were more likely to have lower vitamin E intake, higher BMI, higher alcohol intake, and no marital partners. This study provides some data to support the clinical treatment and prevention of BV. However, more evidence is needed from randomized controlled trials.

Availability of data and materials

Detailed data available at https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/index.htm

Abbreviations

BV:

Bacterial vaginitis

NHANES:

National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

IQR:

Interquartile range

SD:

Standard deviation

PIR:

Poverty Income Ratio

BMI:

Body Mass Index

CI:

Confidence Interval

References

  1. Schwebke JR, Desmond R. Natural history of asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis in a high-risk group of women. Sex Transm Dis. 2007;34(11):876–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318073bd82. PMID: 17522586.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bautista CT, Wurapa E, Sateren WB, Morris S, Hollingsworth B, Sanchez JL. Bacterial vaginosis: a synthesis of the literature on etiology, prevalence, risk factors, and relationship with chlamydia and gonorrhea infections. Mil Med Res. 2016;13(3):4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-016-0074-5. PMID:26877884; PMCID:PMC4752809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Morris MC, Rogers PA, Kinghorn GR. Is bacterial vaginosis a sexually transmitted infection? Sex Transm Infect. 2001;77(1):63–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.77.1.63. PMID:11158694; PMCID: PMC1758329.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ranjit E, Raghubanshi BR, Maskey S, Parajuli P. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and its association with risk factors among nonpregnant women: a hospital based study. Int J Microbiol. 2018;5(2018):8349601. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8349601. PMID:29692813; PMCID: PMC5859802.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schwebke JR, Richey CM, Weiss2 HL. Correlation of behaviors with microbiological changes in vaginal flora. J Infect Dis. 1999;180(5):1632–6. https://doi.org/10.1086/315065. PMID: 10515826.

  6. Kenyon C, Colebunders R, Crucitti T. The global epidemiology of bacterial vaginosis: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(6):505–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.05.006. Epub 2013 May 6. PMID: 23659989.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Madden T, Grentzer JM, Secura GM, Allsworth JE, Peipert JF. Risk of bacterial vaginosis in users of the intrauterine device: a longitudinal study. Sex Transm Dis. 2012;39(3):217–22. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31823e68fe. PMID:22337109; PMCID: PMC3285477.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Japanese Society of Chemotherapy Committee on guidelines for treatment of anaerobic infections; Japanese Association for Anaerobic Infection Research. Chapter 2–6–2. Anaerobic infections (individual fields): bacterial vaginosis. J Infect Chemother. 2011;17 Suppl 1:99–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10156-010-0148-3. PMID: 21728101.

  9. Bradshaw CS, Vodstrcil LA, Hocking JS, Law M, Pirotta M, Garland SM, De Guingand D, Morton AN, Fairley CK. Recurrence of bacterial vaginosis is significantly associated with posttreatment sexual activities and hormonal contraceptive use. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56(6):777–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis1030. Epub 2012 Dec 12. PMID: 23243173.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Workowski KA, Bolan GA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2015;64(RR-03):1–137 Erratum in: MMWR Recomm Rep. 2015 Aug 28;64(33):924. PMID: 26042815; PMCID: PMC5885289.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bagnall P, Rizzolo D. Bacterial vaginosis: a practical review. JAAPA. 2017;30(12):15–21. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JAA.0000526770.60197.fa. PMID: 29135564.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sobel R, Sobel JD. Metronidazole for the treatment of vaginal infections. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2015;16(7):1109–15. https://doi.org/10.1517/14656566.2015.1035255. PMID: 25887246.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zingg JM. Vitamin E: a role in signal transduction. Annu Rev Nutr. 2015;35:135–73. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nutr-071714-034347. PMID: 26185977.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bilardi J, Walker S, McNair R, Mooney-Somers J, Temple-Smith M, Bellhouse C, Fairley C, Chen M, Bradshaw C. Women’s management of recurrent bacterial vaginosis and experiences of clinical care: a qualitative study. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(3):e0151794. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151794. PMID:27010725; PMCID: PMC4807032.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Sozen E, Demirel T, Ozer NK. Vitamin E: regulatory role in the cardiovascular system. IUBMB Life. 2019;71(4):507–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/iub.2020. Epub 2019 Feb 18. PMID: 30779288.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rashidi B, Hoseini Z, Sahebkar A, Mirzaei H. Anti-atherosclerotic effects of vitamins D and E in suppression of atherogenesis. J Cell Physiol. 2017;232(11):2968–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.25738. Epub 2017 Apr 10. PMID: 27966778.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Azzi A, Meydani SN, Meydani M, Zingg JM. The rise, the fall and the renaissance of vitamin E. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2016;1(595):100–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2015.11.010. PMID: 27095224.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bhaskaram P. Immunobiology of mild micronutrient deficiencies. Br J Nutr. 2001;85(Suppl 2):S75–80. https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn2000297. PMID: 11509093.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tuddenham S, Ghanem KG, Caulfield LE, et al. Associations between dietary micronutrient intake and molecular-bacterial vaginosis. Reprod Health. 2019;16:151. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-019-0814-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Abbe C, Mitchell CM. Bacterial vaginosis: a review of approaches to treatment and prevention. Front Reprod Health. 2023;31(5):1100029. https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2023.1100029. PMID:37325243; PMCID: PMC10264601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Paavonen J, Brunham RC. Bacterial vaginosis and desquamative inflammatory vaginitis. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(23):2246–54. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1808418. PMID: 30575452.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Onderdonk AB, Delaney ML, Fichorova RN. The human microbiome during bacterial vaginosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2016;29(2):223–38. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00075-15. PMID: 26864580; PMCID: PMC4786887.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Neggers YH, Nansel TR, Andrews WW, Schwebke JR, Yu KF, Goldenberg RL, Klebanoff MA. Dietary intake of selected nutrients affects bacterial vaginosis in women. J Nutr. 2007;137(9):2128–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/137.9.2128. PMID:17709453; PMCID: PMC2663425.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cook-Mills JM, Averill SH, Lajiness JD. Asthma, allergy and vitamin E: current and future perspectives. Free Radic Biol Med. 2022;179:388–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2021.10.037. Epub 2021 Nov 14. PMID: 34785320; PMCID: PMC9109636.

  25. Agita A, Alsagaff MT. Inflammation, Immunity, and Hypertension. Acta Med Indones. 2017;49(2):158–65. PMID: 28790231.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen Z, Zhang Z, Zhang H, Xie B. Analysis of the oxidative stress status in nonspecific vaginitis and its role in vaginal epithelial cells apoptosis. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:795656. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/795656. Epub 2015 Oct 19. PMID: 26558281; PMCID: PMC4628999.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang Y, Bazhin AV, Werner J, Karakhanova S. Reactive oxygen species in the immune system. Int Rev Immunol. 2013;32(3):249–70. https://doi.org/10.3109/08830185.2012.755176. Epub 2013 Apr 25. PMID: 23617726.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Salganik RI. The benefits and hazards of antioxidants: controlling apoptosis and other protective mechanisms in cancer patients and the human population. J Am Coll Nutr. 2001;20(5 Suppl):464S – 472; discussion 473S−475S. https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2001.10719185. PMID: 11603657.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rimessi A, Previati M, Nigro F, Wieckowski MR, Pinton P. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species and inflammation: Molecular mechanisms, diseases and promising therapies. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2016;81(Pt B):281–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2016.06.015. Epub 2016 Jun 29 PMID: 27373679.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Agarwal S, Reider C, Brooks JR, Fulgoni VL 3rd. Comparison of prevalence of inadequate nutrient intake based on body weight status of adults in the United States: an analysis of NHANES 2001–2008. J Am Coll Nutr. 2015;34(2):126–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2014.901196. Epub 2015 Jan 7. PMID: 25564766.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Guise JM, Mahon S, Aickin M, Helfand M. Screening for bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2001. Report No.: 01-S001. PMID: 20722104.

    Google Scholar 

  32. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy to prevent preterm delivery: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(3):214–9. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-148-3-200802050-00007. PMID: 18252683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely thank LWZ for his guidance and suggestions, Prof. GXG for his guidance, and the participants for their time and effort in the NHANES project.

Funding

The study did not receive any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases; Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology; The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, China

    En-Hui Liu, Wan-Zhe Liao, Hao-Kai Chen, Xiao-Ye Huang, Rui-Xuan Li, Hao-Wen Liang & Xu-Guang Guo

  2. Department of Pediatrics, Pediatrics School, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 511436, China

    En-Hui Liu & Xiao-Ye Huang

  3. Department of Clinical Medicine, The Nanshan College of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 511436, China

    Wan-Zhe Liao

  4. Department of Clinical Medicine, The Third Clinical School of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 511436, China

    Hao-Kai Chen, Hao-Wen Liang & Xu-Guang Guo

  5. Department of Public Utilities Management, The Health Management College of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 511436, China

    Rui-Xuan Li

  6. Guangzhou Key Laboratory for Clinical Rapid Diagnosis and Early Warning of Infectious Diseases, King Med School of Laboratory Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510000, China

    Xu-Guang Guo

Authors
  1. En-Hui Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wan-Zhe Liao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hao-Kai Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiao-Ye Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rui-Xuan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hao-Wen Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xu-Guang Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

LEH collected, analyzed the data, and was responsible for writing the manuscript; LWZ and CHK provided guidance; LEH,LRX, HXY, CHK, and LHW participated in writing the manuscript; GXG participated in designing the experiments and managing them. All authors contributed and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xu-Guang Guo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The ethical review committee of the National Centre for Health Statistics approved all NHANES protocols and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. All the additional materials, including protocol numbers, are available to be found here https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/about_nhanes.htm. The authors confirmed that the whole procedure of the study was conducted under Protocol #98–12, which is available at https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/irba98.htm.

All the methods included in this study are in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, EH., Liao, WZ., Chen, HK. et al. Association between serum vitamin E and bacterial vaginitis in women: a cross-sectional study. BMC Women's Health 24, 316 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-03065-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-03065-4

Keywords

BMC Women's Health

ISSN: 1472-6874

Contact us