Skip to main content

Mullerian adenosarcoma of the uterus with MASO: a case report of cervical adenosarcoma in a young female that never had sexual behavior

Abstract

Background

Cervical mullerian adenosarcoma is a rare uterine sarcoma, especially in young women. Its pathological features are low-grade malignant tumors with bidirectional differentiation, and the degree of malignancy is similar to that of low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma. This paper reports the case of a young asexual patient who has been closely followed up after tumor resection and has not had any recurrences.

Case presentation

A 20-year-old, young asexual woman was diagnosed with cervical mullerian adenosarcoma with sarcomatous overgrowth (MASO). Cervical tumor resection was performed after admission, and the resection margin was negative. After the operation, she refused to undergo secondary surgery due to fertility requirements and did not receive adjuvant treatment. The patient was closely followed up after the operation and has not yet relapsed.

Conclusion

A young woman with cervical MASO did not receive adjuvant treatment after cervical tumor resection. For women with fertility requirements, close follow-ups should be conducted after the operation to guard against tumor recurrence and radical tumor resection should be performed as early as possible after the patient no longer requires their fertility.

Peer Review reports

Background

Mullerian adenosarcoma (MA) is a rare type of uterine sarcoma. It is a mixed tumor composed of benign epithelial and malignant stromal components [1]. It usually occurs in the body of the uterus and rarely in the ovary or cervix [2]. It has several high-risk factors, including mullerian adenosarcoma with sarcomatous overgrowth (MASO), high mitotic rate, myometrial invasion, and extrauterine metastasis [3]. This paper reports a case of a young person with MASO at the cervix. The paper reviews the relevant literature, thereby exploring the clinical characteristics, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of cervical MA and providing a clinical reference for treating this rare case.

Clinical data

The young patient was a 20-year-old asexual female. She was admitted to the hospital for three months after detecting a vulval tumor. The patient had previously been in good health. A vulva mass had been palpated three months before the patient’s admission, and it was approximately the size of the thumb and was continuously enlarging, with mucoid and bloody secretions. The results of the gynecological examination showed it was a solid mass, approximately 3 × 6 cm in size, found at the vaginal orifice. The mass was connected to the body through a pedicle, its root was located in the cervix, and the vagina was consequently closed by the space the mass was occupying. The biochemical blood tests showed that the human chorionic gonadotropin reading was negative. The results showed that the levels of alpha-fetoprotein, cancer antigen 125, carbohydrate antigen 19 − 9, human epididymis protein 4, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were normal. A Doppler ultrasound by color found no obvious abnormalities in the uterus and double appendages. Screening for HPV (human papillomavirus) showed negative. Cervical tumor resection was performed on February 24, 2022. During the operation, pus spots were found on the surface of the tumor, and the odor was bad. The tumor’s pedicle was connected to the left side of the cervix, and the tumor prolapsed from the vaginal orifice (Fig. 1). A subsequent frozen section pathological procedure suggested the lesions were benign.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Picture for tumor gross examination

After being reviewed by three senior pathologists in our hospital, the paraffin pathological examination results (Figs. 2 and 3, and 4) indicated that the tumor was a cervical MA. The sarcomatous component area showed sarcomatous overgrowth with no heterogenic component. No tissue involvement was found at the resection margin, and tumor tissue involvement was found at the base. The immunohistochemical results displayed positive readings for vimentin, creatine kinase (CK) in the epithelium, and cytokeratin 7 in the glandular epithelium. There were negative readings for desmin, myogenin, myoblast determination protein 1 (MyoD1), CEA, cluster of differentiation 10, estrogen receptor (ER), and progesterone receptor (PR). The antigen KI67 (Ki-67) score was 40%. Combined with a pathological diagnosis, it was diagnosed as the International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) stage IA of cervical MASO. Because the patient was young and had fertility requirements, she refused the second operation and postoperative adjuvant treatment. The patient was closely followed up, and no recurrence occurred for more than six months after the operation.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Tumor microscopic examination picture (H&E staining 200×)

Fig. 3
figure 3

Tumor microscopic examination picture (H&E staining 100×)

Fig. 4
figure 4

Tumor microscopic examination picture (H&E staining 200×)

Discussion

Uterine MA is a rare uterine sarcoma that occurs primarily in postmenopausal or premenopausal women. The incidence is low in young women, and ethnic and genetic differences may contribute to differences in the age of onset [4]. When the sarcomatous tissue component accounts for more than 25% of the total tumor volume, it is called a MASO [2]. Most adenosarcomas originate from the endometrium (including the lower uterine segment), and a small number of them originate from the endocervix (5–10%) and extrauterine sites [5]. The most common sites were the uterus (71%) and ovaries (15%), and rarely originated in the cervix (2%). Tumors outside the uterus are more common in adolescents and young women [6]. This is a rare case of a 20-year-old woman, whose tumor originated in the cervix. After a resection, 25–30% of patients relapse within five years. Recurrences are more common in patients with myometrial invasion and overgrowth of sarcomatous elements [7]. This patient was complicated with excessive growth of sarcoma as a high-risk factor and should be followed up closely after surgery.

Pathology

Uterine MA belongs to the mixed epithelial-mesenchymal tumor category and is a low-grade malignant tumor with bidirectional differentiation. The epithelial glandular component is benign, and the mesenchymal component is malignant, and its degree of malignancy is similar to that of low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma [8]. Its typical pathological feature is a sleeve-like shape formed by sarcomatous elements surrounding the glands [9]. A study concluded that adenosarcoma might be associated with endometriosis and adenomyosis [10]. Clement et al. considered those who met one or more of the following criteria to be diagnosed [11]: â‘  ten High Power Fields (HPFs) had two or more mitotic figures (MFs); â‘¡ Significant stromal cell; â‘¢ Significant mesenchymal cell atypia.

Some studies have found that adenomyosis and endometriosis may be associated with the occurrence of Müllerian adenosarcoma, and endometriosis bleeding induces persistent oxidative stress and DNA damage, which may be one of the influencing factors of the disease [12, 13]. For cervix-derived Müllerian adenosarcoma, differs from most intracervical lesions, although the persistence of HPV is thought to be one of the major risk factors for the development of intracervical lesions and recurrence after treatment [14, 15]. However, the disease may be a non-HPV-related disease. Regarding MAs of cervical origin, a study involving 10 patients showed no high-risk human-based tumor viruses were detected by cervical screening [1, 16]. High-risk human papillomaviruses have also not been detected in cases with sarcomatous overgrowth [3]. HPV infection was also not detected in this patient. This would suggest that high-risk human-based tumor viruses are less likely to be involved in the occurrence and development of such tumors. For such non-HPV-related diseases, patients should not rely solely on a negative HPV test to ignore the possibility of cervical lesions, especially young women, who should pay more attention to the importance of gynecological examination.

In applying immune-related molecules, the epithelial components of tumors express epithelial markers such as CK and epithelial membrane antigen. Cluster of differentiation 10, WT1, ER, and PR are highly expressed in the sarcomatous component, among which ER and PR positivity is detected in about 50–80% of adenosarcomas. In the case of sarcomatous overgrowth, it exhibits dedifferentiation of the mesenchymal component, and the expression of these markers is usually reduced [17]. This patient was complicated with sarcoma overgrowth, and immunohistochemical indicators such as CD10, ER, and PR were negative. The Ki-67 score indicates the degree of proliferation as an index. The higher the proliferation activity of the tumor is, the higher the expression level of Ki-67. If the patient is accompanied by heterologous sarcoma components, such as rhabdomyosarcoma components with positive expressions of Desmin, Myogenin, and MyoD1, the risk of recurrence may increase [18]. However, whether the negative results of Desmin, Myogenin, and MyoD1 in this patient suggest that the risk of recurrence is small, further follow-up is needed to determine the prognosis. Changes in the tumor protein 53 (p53) pathway are common in high-grade adenosarcomas, regardless of the presence or absence of sarcoma overgrowth. The over-expression of p53 is associated with tumor recurrence and metastasis [19]. In the case presented in this paper, it was diagnosed as cervical MASO, as it had strong expression of epithelial components but had no expression of heterologous sarcoma components. The recurrence risk and prognosis require further follow-up.

Mullerian adenosarcoma should also be differentiated from other diseases. For example, endometrial stromal sarcoma is composed of a single endometrial stromal cell with an infiltrating growth border and no epithelial component. The diagnosis can only be made after complete resection of the tumor by sampling multiple sites to determine whether there is an epithelial component. Uterine carcinosarcoma: a mixed tumor composed mainly of malignant glands and malignant mesenchymal components. Current studies suggest that the invasion behavior of this tumor is determined by the composition of malignant epithelial components, while the malignancy of MA is mainly composed of mesenchymal components. Endometrial polyp: Pathological lack of interstitial atypia, interstitial cell proliferation, peri glandular cuff changes, and muscular infiltration of morphological features; Condyloma acuminatum: the upper part of the spinous layer can have obvious vacuolar degeneration, HPV testing is generally positive.

Diagnosis and treatment

The most common clinical manifestation of an MA is vaginal bleeding. Few patients receive treatment due to pelvic pain, abdominal mass, or abnormal vaginal secretions [20]. A gynecological examination may reveal a prolapsed mass from the cervix or a palpable pelvic mass. An ultrasound should show an enlarged uterus and solid intrauterine mass that is mostly hypoechoic. Using color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) shows that the blood flow signal of uterine adenosarcoma is mostly solid, cystic, or mixed cystic–solid. An adenosarcoma outside the uterus is often cystic hyperechoic [21]. In a magnetic resonance examination, uterine adenosarcoma is mostly displayed as isointense nodules on T1-weighted imaging and as mixed signals on T2-weighted imaging. Small hyperintense signals of cystic foci with abundant blood supplies are seen in the tumor [22]. Due to the lack of specificity in clinical symptoms, signs, and supplementary examinations, MAs are easily misdiagnosed preoperatively. Because of its bidirectional differentiation, there may be differences between the frozen section pathological procedure and the paraffin pathological results. The exact diagnosis relies on the paraffin pathological diagnosis after tumor resection.

Surgical treatment is preferred for uterine MA, and a total hysterectomy and bilateral adnexectomy are usually carried out [23]. Surgical staging has an important impact on prognosis. Maintaining negative resection margins is the focus of surgery. Mullerian adenosarcoma generally has a good prognosis with less distant metastasis, but local recurrence is possible. The risk factors for uterine adenosarcoma mainly include age, sarcomatous overgrowth, myometrial invasion, lymph node metastasis, and vascular invasion [24]. In the case of sarcomatous overgrowth, the overall probability of survival is significantly reduced [25]. For young women with reproductive requirements, one study proposes that, if the patient is at FIGO stage IA, that is, the tumor is confined to the endometrium or cervical canal [26], and there are no risk factors such as deep myometrial invasion and sarcomatous overgrowth, tumor resection alone may be enough, and the patient should be closely followed-up and rechecked after the operation. When a patient no longer needs to be fertile, a total hysterectomy and bilateral adnexectomy should be carried out [27]. The two-year survival rate for patients with uterine adenosarcoma is 100%; in contrast, the two-year survival rate for patients with sarcomatous overgrowth is only 20% [28,29,30]. In this case, the patient had sarcoma overgrowth but refused radical surgery and postoperative chemoradiotherapy, and should be closely followed up to be vigilant for tumor recurrence. The resection of cervical lesions increases the risk of preterm birth and preterm premature rupture of membranes [31]. However, there have been case reports of good pregnancy outcomes in patients after cervical tumor resection [27, 32]. This patient does not currently have a pregnancy plan, and further follow-up is needed for studies on the effects of fertility in this patient. In addition, we summarize some of the reported Müllerian adenosarcomas.

References

Age (Years)

Follow-up time

High-risk features

Follow-up

Pedram Fadav et al. [33]

63

9 months

Without risk factor

No signs of recurrence

Qiyue et al. [34]

38

15 months

Without risk factor

No signs of recurrence

Garcia-Mendoza et al. [2]

46

3 months

Sarcomatous overgrowth with heterologous elements of grade 2 chondrosarcoma

Palliative treatment

Goh C et al. [4]

21

8 years

Without risk factor

Recurrence

D.D. Dowding [35]

24

19 months

Arcomatous overgrowth

No signs of recurrence

There is still no consensus on postoperative adjuvant therapy for adenosarcomas. A study concluded that adjuvant chemotherapy was feasible for patients with high-risk factors to reduce the risk of recurrences and improve long-term survival [36]. Now the chemotherapy regimen of doxorubicin combined with ifosfamide is more commonly used [37]. Because ER/PR expression is lower in tumors with sarcomatous overgrowth, the application of hormonal therapy should be limited. Although some studies have suggested that hormone therapy should be considered if ER/PR is positive, there is still a lack of clinical and research-based evidence for hormone therapy in treating adenosarcoma [38, 39].

Conclusion

In summary, this study introduced a case of cervical Müllerian adenosarcoma, which is a sarcomatous overgrowth, which was rare in young females without sexual behavior never and was easily misdiagnosed as uterine polyps or ovulatory abnormal uterine bleeding at the initial diagnosis, and the importance of gynecological examination should be emphasized. Close follow-up of fertility-preserving patients to further understand the impact on pregnancy. For patients with fertility requirements, complete resection of the tumor to achieve a negative resection margin is the basic requirement of surgery. The existing clinical guidelines for the treatment of young patients, especially those with fertility requirements, are unclear, and close follow-up of the tumor and fertility outcome is required. In the future, more clinical studies are needed to further provide evidence and improve the treatment strategy for this disease.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

MA:

Mullerian adenosarcoma

MASO:

Mullerian adenosarcoma with sarcomatous overgrowth

ER:

estrogen receptor

PR:

progesterone receptor

HPF:

high power field

CDFI:

color Doppler flow imaging

References

  1. Morales FDA, Medina RML, Trujillo LM, Beltrán MI, Dulcey IC. Müllerian adenosarcoma of the uterine cervix with sarcomatous overgrowth: a case report of aggressive disease in a young patient. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2016;27:155–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. García-Mendoza YI, Murguia-Perez M, Galván-Linares AI, et al. Case Report: Uterine Adenosarcoma with Sarcomatous overgrowth and malignant heterologous elements. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;8:819141. Published 2022 Jan 10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kudela E, Nachajova M, Balharek T, Gabonova E, Danko J. Mullerian adenosarcomas of the uterine cervix with sarcomatous overgrowth. Curr Probl Cancer. 2019;43(4):371–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Goh C, Lin XH, Chin PS, Lim YK. Uterine preservation in a young patient with adenosarcoma of the uterus - case report and review of literature. Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2018;25:27–9. Published 2018 May 9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Liang J, Lin Z. FIGO cancer report 2018——interpretation of the diagnosis and treatment of uterine sarcomas. Chin J Practical Gynecol Obstet. 2018;34(12):1366–71. Chinese. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&dbname=CJFDLAST2019&filename=ZGSF201812018&uniplatform=NZKPT&v=umM-30p-IGb_GM6uW91wvfFF67NXFjTGATPzUzcSgiWYj_aek8rtwZ-g4W8yHJzL.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Taga S, Sawada M, Nagai A, Yamamoto D, Hayase R. A case of adenosarcoma of the uterus. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2014;2014:342187.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoang L, Chiang S, Lee CH. Endometrial stromal sarcomas and related neoplasms: new developments and diagnostic considerations. Pathology. 2018;50(2):162–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang Y, Li Y, Huang H, et al. Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and uterine adenosarcoma: a comparison of clinical manifestations and outcomes. J Cancer. 2019;10(15):3352–60. Published 2019 Jun 5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Li H, Song M, Ma X, et al. Clinical analysis of 56 cases of Mullerian adenosarcoma. Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2018;34(09):1047–1050. Chinese. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&dbname=CJFDLAST2018&filename=ZGSF201809030&uniplatform=NZKPT&v=umM-30p-IGbPN4V5PQADedF3qWHGKa1EPHHttOaZ1JQJ_2E8g6meNVFoPPAd7cbg

  10. Wang B, Yang HD, Shi XH, Li H. Advanced uterine adenosarcoma with sarcomatous overgrowth in a young woman: a case report. Med (Baltim). 2019;98(47):e18119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Clement PB, Scully RE. Mullerian adenosarcoma of the uterus: a clinicopathologic analysis of 100 cases with a review of the literature. Hum Pathol. 1990;21(4):363–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mubeen A, Shahid M, Makary R. Post-radiation mullerian adenosarcoma with sarcomatous overgrowth: rare presentation of an uncommon malignancy. Pathologica. 2020;112(4):219–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Nannini M, Dondi G, Santini D, De Leo A, Dei Tos AP, Zamagni C, Saponara M, Gatto L, Nigro C, Bertaccini P, Zompatori M, De Iaco P, Perrone AM, Perrone MA, Pantaleo MA. A single-centre experience on the management of Adenosarcoma: a successful report of an Integrated Medical and Surgical Approach. Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2018;12:1179554918782477.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Bogani G, Sopracordevole F, Ciavattini A, Vizza E, Vercellini P, Giannini A, Ghezzi F, Scambia G, Raspagliesi F, Di Donato V. Italian society of Colposcopy and Cervico-Vaginal Pathology (SICPCV); the investigators of the Italian HPV study group (iHPV study group). Duration of human papillomavirus persistence and its relationship with recurrent cervical dysplasia. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2023;32(6):525–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bogani G, Sopracordevole F, Ciavattini A, Vizza E, Vercellini P, Ghezzi F, Scambia G, Di Donato V, Giannini A, Raspagliesi F. HPV persistence after cervical surgical excision of high-grade cervical lesions. Cancer Cytopathol. 2023 Sep 25.

  16. Mumba E, Ali H, Turton D, Cooper K, Grayson W. Human papillomaviruses do not play an aetiological role in Müllerian adenosarcomas of the uterine cervix. J Clin Pathol. 2008;61(9):1041–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Omi M, Tonooka A, Chiba T, et al. Immunohistochemical markers and the clinical course of adenosarcoma: a series of seven cases. Diagn Pathol. 2020;15(1):119. Published 2020 Sep 24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang Y, Liu AJ, Chen X, Song X. Prognosis-related clinicopathologic characteristics of FIGO stage I Müllerian adenosarcoma of uterus. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2018;47(5):334–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hodgson A, Amemiya Y, Seth A, Djordjevic B, Parra-Herran C. High-grade Müllerian Adenosarcoma: genomic and clinicopathologic characterization of a distinct neoplasm with prevalent TP53 pathway alterations and aggressive behavior. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017;41(11):1513–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu Y, Fan Y, Li J, et al. Unmarried asexual life female uterus mullerian ductal gland sarcoma: case report. Chin J Family Plann Gynecotokology. 2019;11(06):91–3. Chinese. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&dbname=CJFDLAST2019&filename=JHFC201906026&uniplatform=NZKPT&v=2K8Yz5RCR6gIp7bclE5U8yGFn154wd7bOfcpNXhmrcRsGgyt6NLTUAJUcs330DUf.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Seagle BL, Kanis M, Strohl AE, Shahabi S. Survival of women with mullerian adenosarcoma: a national cancer data base study. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;1433:636–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhao Y. MRI features of uterine adenosarcoma. Journal of Nanchang University (Medical Sciences). 2021;61(01):52–56. Chinese. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&dbname=CJFDLAST2021&filename=JXYB202101012&uniplatform=NZKPT&v=ClbNsfAzITET85UPpXBiOm8kELy2MmN50gQye76E6Z53eZDmSFiWU-BD-7hZNn_N

  23. Nathenson MJ, Ravi V, Fleming N, Wang WL, Conley A. Uterine adenosarcoma: a review. Curr Oncol Rep. 2016;18(11):68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zizolfi B, Foreste V, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Manzi A, Bifulco G, Carugno J. Fertility sparing management of uterine adenosarcoma: case report and literature review. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2021;12(4):315–8. Published 2021 Jan 8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Mandato VD, Torricelli F, Mastrofilippo V, Valli R, Aguzzoli L, La Sala GB. Primary extra-uterine and extra-ovarian mullerian adenosarcoma: case report and literature review. BMC Cancer. 2018;181:134. Published 2018 Feb 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Xie L, Lin R, Lin Z. Interpretation of 2022 NCCN clinical practice guide for uterine tumors (version 1). Chin J Practical Gynecol Obstet. 2021;37(12):1227–33. Chinese. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&dbname=CJFDLAST2021&filename=ZGSF202101020&uniplatform=NZKPT&v=_uWLVYqiTg-a4l16tFTJWLKmR0rnrsmUM2hxKi0k0XXI6C_3c9kj5RbuhiZPWsRQ.

    Google Scholar 

  27. L’Heveder A, Jones BP, Saso S, et al. Conservative management of uterine adenosarcoma: lessons learned from 20 years of follow-up. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;300(5):1383–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Schroeder B, Pollack SM, Jones RL. Systemic therapy in advanced uterine adenosarcoma with sarcomatous overgrowth. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;132(2):513.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pinto A, Howitt B. Uterine Adenosarcoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016;140(3):286–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tanner EJ, Toussaint T, Leitao MM Jr, et al. Management of uterine adenosarcomas with and without sarcomatous overgrowth. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;129(1):140–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Monti M, D’Aniello D, Scopelliti A, Tibaldi V, Santangelo G, Colagiovanni V, Giannini A, DI Donato V, Palaia I, Perniola G, Giancotti A, Muzii L. Benedetti Panici P. Relationship between cervical excisional treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and obstetrical outcome. Minerva Obstet Gynecol. 2021;73(2):233–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Goh C, Lin XH, Chin PS, et al. Uterine preservation in a young patient with adenosarcoma of the uterus—case report and review of literature. Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2018;25:27–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Fadavi P, Garousi M, Soltani S et al. The uterine adenosarcoma with postoperative residual in a woman treated by total abdominal hysterectomy/bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy: a case report and review of literature. Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2023:e1891.

  34. Wang Q, Sun S, Cai J, Yang L, Lv G, Yang Q. Uterine adenosarcoma: a case report and review of the literature. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023;13(2):70–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Dowding DD, Wayne LM, Guirguis AS. High grade uterine adenosarcoma with sarcomatous overgrowth in a young woman amenable to primary surgical reduction: a case study and literature review. Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2022;39:100920.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Nathenson MJ, Conley AP. Prognostic factors for uterine adenosarcoma: a review. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2018;18(11):1093–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Carroll A, Ramirez PT, Westin SN, et al. Uterine adenosarcoma: an analysis on management, outcomes, and risk factors for recurrence. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;135(3):455–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Li JY, Mutlu L, Tymon-Rosario J, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics and oncologic outcomes in adenosarcoma of gynecologic sites. Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2021;39:100913. Published 2021 Dec 20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang J, Liu Q, Deng B, et al. Clinical analysis of 16 cases of uterine adenosarcoma. Chin J Family Plann Gynecotokology. 2019;11(12):78–82. Chinese. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&dbname=CJFDLAST2020&filename=JHFC201912022&uniplatform=NZKPT&v=2K8Yz5RCR6j-KZis42TpI_0wm27dvE5mrn5aBx0niObfl05dJJZ1v2OvJD23A7NT.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are particularly grateful to all the people who have given us help with our article.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82160538).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Jia-Wei Chen and Ya-Jie Huang conceived the idea and conceptualized the study. Jun-Jiang Liu, Ling-Lu Wang, and Ming-Mei Shi collected the data and analyzed the data. Ya-Jie Huang and Na Li drafted the manuscript and reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final draft.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Na Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as was revised in 2013). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent for publication was obtained from the participant for the publication of the case report.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, JW., Huang, YJ., Wang, LL. et al. Mullerian adenosarcoma of the uterus with MASO: a case report of cervical adenosarcoma in a young female that never had sexual behavior. BMC Women's Health 24, 308 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-03140-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-03140-w

Keywords