Skip to main content

Reviewer acknowledgements

A peer-reviewed journal would not survive without the generous time and insightful comments of the reviewers, whose efforts often go unrecognized. Although final decisions are always editorial, they are greatly facilitated by the deeper technical knowledge, scientific insights, understanding of social consequences, and passion that reviewers bring to our deliberations. For these reasons, the Editors and staff of BMC Women's Health would like to publicly acknowledge our peer reviewers.

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012



Annual Journal Metrics

  • Citation Impact
    2.742 - 2-year Impact Factor (2021)
    3.256 - 5-year Impact Factor (2021)
    1.452 - SNIP (Source Normalized Impact per Paper)
    0.742 - SJR (SCImago Journal Rank)

    Speed
    52 days to first decision for all manuscripts (Median)
    81 days to first decision for reviewed manuscripts only (Median)

    Usage 
    3,366,293 Downloads (2022)
    2,349 Altmetric mentions (2021)

Peer-review Terminology

  • The following summary describes the peer review process for this journal:

    Identity transparency: Single anonymized

    Reviewer interacts with: Editor

    Review information published: Review reports. Reviewer Identities reviewer opt in. Author/reviewer communication

    More information is available here

Sign up for article alerts and news from this journal