Deeks J, Morris J: Evaluating diagnostic tests. Baillieres Clinical Obsetrics and Gynaecology. 1996, 10: 613-630.
Honest H, Khan KS: Reporting of measures of accuracy in systematic reviews of diagnostic literature. BMC Health Services Research. 2002, 2: 4-10.1186/1472-6963-2-4.
Khan KS, Bakour SH, Bossuyt PM: Evidence-based obstetric and gynaecologic diagnosis: the STARD checklist for authors, peer-reviewers and readers of test accuracy studies. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2004, 111 (7): 638-640.
Selman T, Khan K, Mann C: An evidence based approach to test accuracy studies in gynecologic onlcology: the STARD checklist. Gynecologic Oncology. 2005, 96: 575-578. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.09.053.
Chien P, Khan K: Evaluation of clinical test II: assessment of validity. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2001, 108 (6): 568-572. 10.1016/S0306-5456(00)00128-5.
Moher D: CONSORT: an evolving tool to help improve the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials. JAMA. 1998, 279: 1489-91. 10.1001/jama.279.18.1489.
Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, Lijmer JG, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HC: Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. BMJ. 2003, 326 (7379): 41-44. 10.1136/bmj.326.7379.41.
Coppus S, van der Veen F, Bossuyt P, Mol B: Quality of reporting of test accuracy studies in reproductive medicine: impact of the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) initiative. Fertil Steril. 2006, 86 (5): 1321-1329. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.03.050.
Smidt N, Rutjes A, van der Windt D, Ostelo R, Bossuyt P, Reitsma J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC: The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: has it improved?. Neurology. 2006, 67 (5): 792-797. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000238386.41398.30.
Zafar A, Khan G, Siddiqui M: The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in diabetic retinopathy screening: a systematic review. Clin Experiment Opthalmol. 2008, 36 (6): 537-542. 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2008.01826.x.
Rama K, Poovali S, Apsingi S: Quality of reporting of orthopaedic diagnostic accuracy studies is suboptimal. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006, 447: 237-246. 10.1097/01.blo.0000205906.44103.a3.
Gomez Saez N, Hernandez-Aguado I, Lumbreras B: Evaluation of the diagnostic research methodology in Spain after STARD publication. Med Clin (Barc). 2009, 133 (8): 302-310. 10.1016/j.medcli.2008.10.043.
Selman T, Zamora J, Mann C, Appleyard TL, Khan K: Diagnostic accuracy of tests for lymph node status in primary cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2008, 178 (7): 855-862. 10.1503/cmaj.071124.
Selman T, Mann C, Zamora J, Khan K: A systematic review of tests for lymph node status in primary endometrial cancer. BMC Women's Health. 2008, 8 (8).
Selman T, Luesley D, Acheson N, Khan K, Mann C: A systematic review of the accuracy of diagnostic tests for inguinal lymph node status in vulval cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. 2005, 99 (1): 206-214. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.05.029.
Morris RK, Cnossen J, Langejans M, Robson S, Kleijnen J, ter Riet G, Mol BW, van der Post JAM, Khan KS: Serum screening with Down's Syndrome markers to predict pre-eclampsia and small for gestational age: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2008, 8 (1): 33-10.1186/1471-2393-8-33.
Cnossen J, Morris RK, Mol BW, ter RG, van der Post JAM, Coomarasamy A, Zwindermann AH, Bindels P, Robson SC, Kleijnen J, Khan KS: Uterine artery Doppler to predict fetal growth restriction: a systematic review and bivariate meta-analysis. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2008, 178 (6): 701-711. 10.1503/cmaj.070430.
Falagas M, Michalopoulos A, Bliziotis I, Sotereiades E: A bibliometric analysis by geographic area of published research in several biomedical fields, 1995-2003. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2006, 175 (11): 1389-1390. 10.1503/cmaj.060361.
Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes R, Altman DG: Emperical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA. 1995, 273 (408): 412.