This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Effects of tamoxifen on vaginal blood flow and epithelial morphology in the rat
© Kim et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 03 April 2006
Accepted: 13 September 2006
Published: 13 September 2006
Tamoxifen, a selective estrogen receptor modulator with both estrogenic and anti-estrogenic activity, is widely used as adjuvant therapy in breast cancer patients. Treatment with tamoxifen is associated with sexual side effects, such as increased vaginal dryness and pain/discomfort during sexual activity. There have been limited investigations of the effect of tamoxifen on estrogen-dependent peripheral genital arousal responses. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of tamoxifen on vaginal physiology in the rat.
Female Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to sham surgery or bilateral ovariectomy. After 2 weeks, sham-operated rats were implanted with subcutaneous osmotic infusion pumps containing vehicle (control) or tamoxifen (150 μg/day). Ovariectomized rats were similarly infused with vehicle. After an additional 2 weeks, vaginal blood flow responses to pelvic nerve stimulation were measured by laser Doppler flowmetry and vaginal tissue was collected for histological and biochemical assay.
Tamoxifen treatment did not change plasma estradiol concentrations relative to control animals, while ovariectomized rats exhibited a 60% decrease in plasma estradiol. Tamoxifen treatment caused a significant decrease in mean uterine weight, but did not alter mean vaginal weight. Vaginal blood flow was significantly decreased in tamoxifen-infused rats compared to controls. Similar to ovariectomized animals, estrogen receptor binding was increased and arginase enzyme activity was decreased in tamoxifen-infused rats. However, different from control and ovariectomized animals, the vaginal epithelium in tamoxifen-infused rats appeared highly mucified. Periodic acid-Schiff staining confirmed a greater production of carbohydrate-rich compounds (e.g. mucin, glycogen) by the vaginal epithelium of tamoxifen-infused rats.
The observations suggest that tamoxifen exerts both anti-estrogenic and pro-estrogenic effects in the vagina. These physiological alterations may eventually lead to vaginal atrophy and compromise sexual function.
Tamoxifen is a non-steroidal, triphenylethylene derivative that is widely used and highly effective as adjuvant therapy for the management of breast cancer patients with estrogen receptor (ER) positive tumors. Originally developed in the 1960s as a contraceptive agent, tamoxifen was later found to stimulate ovulation, as well as inhibit the formation of mammary tumors in rats exposed to carcinogens . While tamoxifen itself is a poor ER ligand, its metabolite 4-hydroxytamoxifen is a potent antagonist with high affinity for the ER [2, 3]. In addition, the effects of tamoxifen can be stereo-selective. Trans-tamoxifen is generally considered an anti-estrogen, whereas cis-tamoxifen is considered to be a weak estrogen. Interconversion between these isomers has been shown to occur in cultured cells , but this process remains poorly characterized in vivo.
Acknowledged as a first generation selective ER modulator (SERM), tamoxifen and/or its metabolites exert anti-estrogenic effects in breast tissue, estrogenic effects on bone (increased density) and plasma cholesterol (decreased levels), and mixed effects in the uterus [1, 5, 6]. In addition to the beneficial effects of tamoxifen, its complex, tissue-specific action can also result in adverse effects in women. Peri-menopausal symptoms of hot flushes and night sweats are frequently reported side effects in both pre- and post-menopausal women on tamoxifen therapy [5–8]. In pre-menopausal women, tamoxifen has also been reported to cause oligomenorrhea or amenorrhea with a return to normal menses after discontinuing tamoxifen . Yet, the greatest concern has been focused on the effects of tamoxifen in the uterus. Tamoxifen treatment increases the relative risk for endometrial cancer [10–12] and may increase the incidence of endometriosis and uterine mesenchymal (i.e. myometrial) tumors .
While the psychological impact of breast cancer diagnosis and subsequent treatment can cause profound changes in sexual function, tamoxifen itself may increase the incidence of sexual dysfunctions. Limited studies indicate that tamoxifen treatment is associated with decreased sexual interest/desire and increased vaginal dryness and tightness [6, 8, 13, 14]. In a study designed to specifically assess the effects of tamoxifen on sexual function in women, 22 of 41 sexually active subjects (54%) experienced pain/discomfort during intercourse that was unrelated to previous chemotherapy . The duration of tamoxifen treatment ranged from 2 to 24 months with a median duration of 12 months.
Thus, breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy may exhibit symptoms of estrogen deprivation, including sexual dysfunction related to alterations in vaginal tissue structure and function. Sexual health remains an important contributor to quality of life in breast cancer survivors . The use of tamoxifen as a prophylactic agent in younger, pre-menopausal women at risk for breast cancer is expected to increase. Since younger women may be exposed to tamoxifen for longer periods of time, determination and consideration of adverse side effects will be important. In laboratory animal studies that simulate sexual arousal through activation of pelvic parasympathetic nerves, we and others have previously demonstrated that the vaginal responses of increased blood flow and fluid transudate production are estrogen-dependent [16–19]. Given the well-acknowledged estrogen dependency of genital tissues, the preliminary clinical association of tamoxifen treatment with sexual dysfunction in women, and the critical role of estradiol in maintaining the vaginal response to sexual arousal, we investigated the effects of tamoxifen on vaginal blood flow and tissue morphology in the rat. We further assessed changes in ER expression and arginase activity as estrogen-dependent markers in the vagina.
Mature female Sprague-Dawley rats (strain Crl:CD; 8–10 weeks old; 200–225 g) were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA) and used for investigation. These studies were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Boston University School of Medicine. Animals were subjected to sham surgery or bilaterally ovariectomized. After 2 weeks, sham-operated rats were implanted with subcutaneous osmotic infusion pumps (model 2002; Alzet, Palo Alto, CA) containing polyethylene glycol 300 (vehicle-infused control group; CONT, n = 11) or tamoxifen released at a rate of 150 μg/day (TMX, n = 11). Ovariectomized rats (OVX, n = 8) were similarly infused with vehicle. Two weeks after pump implantation, in vivo studies were carried out to assess vaginal blood flow, as described below.
Assessment of estrus cycle phase
For all animals, smears of vaginal cells were prepared before vaginal blood flow measurements. A cotton swab moistened in 0.9% saline was inserted into the vagina, manipulated in a circular fashion and then smeared onto a glass slide. Samples were fixed with 70% ethanol and stained with hematoxylin and CytoQuik stain (Fisher Scientific). The phase of the estrous cycle was determined from the morphological characteristics of the vaginal cells. All samples were examined by a licensed cytologist.
In vivo assessment of vaginal blood flow
Changes in vaginal blood flow in response to pelvic nerve stimulation were determined by laser Doppler flowmetry, as previously described . Briefly, rats were anesthetized with intramuscular injections of ketamine (40 mg/kg) and xylazine (4 mg/kg). To continuously monitor systemic blood pressure, a 24-gauge angiocatheter was introduced into the carotid artery and connected to a pressure channel of the laser Doppler flowmeter (Model BLF21D, Transonic Systems, Inc., Ithaca, NY). A surface probe (Type I; Transonic Systems, Inc.) was placed in the vaginal canal, facing the anterolateral vaginal wall and approximately halfway between the introitus and the cervix. Unilateral pelvic nerve stimulation (PNS) was accomplished with a Grass S9 stimulator set at normal polarity and repeat mode to generate a 30 second train of square waves with 6 Volt pulse amplitude and 0.8 millisecond pulse duration at various frequencies (5, 10, 20 Hz). Blood flow data were recorded as tissue perfusion units (TPU). Hemodynamic parameters (vaginal blood flow and systemic blood pressure) were continuously recorded (collection rate = 100 Hz) throughout the experiment using WinDaq software (version 2.15; Dataq Instruments, Akron, OH). Since blood flow through any given tissue is dependent upon the systemic blood pressure, we also calculated the instantaneous vascular resistance (systemic blood pressure/blood flow) at each time point. Using the vascular resistance plots, the area under the curve (AUC) for each response was determined.
Determination of plasma estradiol concentration
Blood was drawn at the end of the vaginal blood flow studies. Plasma samples were sent to the Endocrinology Laboratory, Animal Health Diagnostic Center at the Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine (Ithaca, NY) for determination of estradiol concentration. A solid-phase radioimmunoassay (RIA) with Coat-A-Count reagents (Diagnostic Products Corp., Los Angeles, CA) was used. The lower detectable limit of this assay was 8 pg/ml. Across a wide range of concentrations in the linear range, the inter-assay variation was 4–8% and the intra-assay variation of replicate samples was 4–7%. The most significant potential cross-reactants were estrone (10%), estrone-β-D-glucuronide (1.8%), estrone-3-sulfate (0.58%), estriol (0.32%), and estriol-3-glucuronide (0.012%). All other steroidal compounds, including tamoxifen, had cross-reactivity that was not detectable or extremely low (≤0.006%).
After the completion of the in vivo studies, animals were exsanguinated and vaginal and uterine tissues were removed in their entirety, weighed and placed in chilled physiological salt solution. For histological analyses, vaginas from each treatment group (n = 5 per group) were opened with a longitudinal incision and a small notch was cut at the distal end for proper orientation. Tissues were then immersed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and stored at 4°C for 24–72 hours. For biochemical studies, vaginal tissues from 6 animals per treatment group (CONT and TMX) were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C until assayed. Due to the lower number of ovariectomized animals and the smaller amounts of tissue obtained from this group, a second set of intact controls and ovariectomized rats (n = 6 per group) were generated specifically for the biochemical assays.
Preparation of cytosolic and nuclear extracts from vaginal tissue
Frozen vaginal tissue was pulverized with a Bessman tissue pulverizer (Spectrum Laboratories, Rancho Dominguez, CA) cooled on dry ice. Tissue powder from each treatment group was pooled and combined (1 g/4 ml) with ice cold buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA, 0.25 M sucrose). After the addition of phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride (PMSF; 0.5 mM) and mammalian protease inhibitor cocktail (1 mM AEBSF, 0.08 μM aprotinin, 20 μM leupeptin, 40 μM bestatin, 15 μM pepstatin A and 14 μM E-64; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO), tissue powder was homogenized on ice using a Brinkmann PT3000 polytron with 10 second bursts and 30 second cooling intervals. The homogenate was centrifuged at 3000 × g for 20 min at 4°C and the supernatant (cytosol) was transferred to a fresh tube. An aliquot was used to determine soluble protein concentration and the rest of the cytosolic extract was frozen at -20°C until further assay. The pellet containing the nuclei was resuspended in ice cold buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4 at 22°C, 1.5 mM sodium EDTA, 10% glycerol, 10 mM sodium molybdate and 10 mM monothioglycerol) containing 0.4 M KCl and homogenized on ice with a Dual glass-glass homogenizer using a motor driven pestle. The nuclear homogenate was incubated on ice for 1 hour and centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 30 minutes. The resulting supernatant (nuclear extract) was transferred to a new tube and frozen at -20°C.
Receptor binding assay
Prior to performing the binding assay, free steroid hormone was removed from vaginal tissue extracts by incubating samples with dextran coated charcoal (DCC). An aliquot of DCC suspension (5 g acid washed charcoal and 0.5 g dextran in 1 liter of 10 mM Tris, pH 7.4 at 2°C, 1.5 mM EDTA, 0.02% NaN3) was placed in a tube and centrifuged for 10 min at 1000 × g. The supernatant was aspirated and an equal volume of cytosol/nuclear extract mixture was added to the DCC pellet. Samples were incubated on ice for 20 min with intermittent mixing and DCC was removed by centrifugation. Binding studies were carried out as described previously by Traish et al. . Briefly, aliquots of the DCC-treated vaginal tissue extracts (100–200 μl) were mixed with an equal volume of buffer containing [2,4,6,7,16,17-3H(N)]estradiol (specific activity = 110 Ci/mmol; Perkin-Elmer Life and Analytical Sciences, Boston, MA) without (total binding) or with a 200-fold molar excess of unlabeled diethylstilbestrol (non-specific binding). Samples were maintained for 24 h at 2°C, followed by incubation at 25°C for 2 h and then re-incubated at 2°C for 22 h to measure occupied and unoccupied binding sites (exchange assay) . The protein-bound radioactivity was separated from free radioactivity by hydroxylapatite assay .
Cytosolic vaginal tissue extract was used to determine arginase activity, as previously described . Briefly, 10 μl of tissue extract (triplicate aliquots) were incubated in buffer (75 mM glycine, pH 9.0, 0.25 mM MnCl2) containing 300,000 dpm of [14C-guanidino]-L-arginine (51.5 mCi/mmol; NEN Life Science Products, Boston, MA), 4 mM of unlabelled L-arginine in a final volume of 100 μl. Samples were incubated for 60 min at 37°C and reactions were terminated by the addition of 400 μl of 0.25 M acetic acid (pH 4.5), 7 M urea, 10 mM L-arginine. After the addition of 500 μl of water, samples were passed through a 0.5 ml column of Dowex 50W-X8 resin (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Tubes were rinsed twice with 500 μl of water and both rinses were poured onto the columns. Columns were washed with an additional 1 ml of water and all effluent was collected in 20-ml vials. After the addition of 16 ml of Liquiscint (National Diagnostics, Atlanta, GA), radioactivity was quantified by liquid scintillation spectroscopy. Urea production was normalized to total soluble protein in the tissue.
After fixation, the mid-section of each vagina was embedded in paraffin and subsequently sectioned at 5 microns using a rotary microtome. Tissue sections were deparaffinized with CitriSolv (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA), rehydrated in graded ethanol solutions (100–70%), and subjected to a modified Masson's trichrome and periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining procedure, as previously described .
The results were expressed as mean ± S.E.M. Comparisons between treatment groups were analyzed by unpaired t-tests or analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by post-hoc comparisons to control (Dunnett's test), as appropriate. Means were considered significantly different if the p-value was less than 0.05.
Sex steroid hormones play a critical role in the development and maintenance of female genital tissues. Despite this widely accepted perspective, characterization of vaginal responsiveness to steroid hormones in the adult has been limited mainly to the epithelial layer. However, several studies in animal models have demonstrated that fluctuations in ovarian hormones cause measurable changes in overall vaginal wall thickness, nerve density and structural organization of the muscularis layer [24–30]. Biochemical and functional in vivo studies suggest that estrogens are critical in maintaining vaginal blood flow, and fluid transudate production [16, 17, 19, 31–33].
In the present study, the tamoxifen-induced changes in vaginal blood flow, ER expression and arginase activity were similar to those in ovariectomized animals and markedly differed from the control group. The trophic response of the uterus is a sensitive parameter to assess estrogenic effects. The significant decrease in uterine wet weight of tamoxifen-infused rats suggests that the dose of tamoxifen used (150 μg/day) was physiologically relevant and effective as an anti-estrogen to inhibit uterine growth. Tamoxifen treatment significantly reduced vaginal blood flow responses. This is consistent with our previous studies in which ovariectomized rats also exhibited a decrease in vaginal blood flow responses . Thus, we attribute the decreased vaginal blood flow in tamoxifen-infused rats to ER antagonism by 4-hydroxytamoxifen.
In addition, increased ER expression and decreased arginase activity were observed in both tamoxifen-infused and ovariectomized rats in this study. Increased ER levels may reflect a compensatory up-regulation under conditions of low estrogen or ER antagonism . Arginase has been shown to modulate vascular responses in female genital tissue by decreasing intracellular arginine pools and inhibiting nitric oxide synthesis through substrate competition . The decrease in arginase activity in tamoxifen-infused rats may be reflective of a compensatory down-regulation in the local vasculature to maintain vaginal perfusion. Alternatively, since arginase has been shown in other tissues to be critical for regulating cell growth via the polyamine synthesis pathway [35, 36], the lower arginase activity may be an early physiological change that eventually results in vaginal atrophy with prolonged tamoxifen treatment. Future studies examining the time course of changes with tamoxifen treatment would be helpful in this regard. Longer periods (>2 weeks) of tamoxifen treatment may also result in structural changes in the lamina propria and muscularis layers that were not evident in this study. Nevertheless, the parallel changes observed in tamoxifen-infused and ovariectomized rats suggest that tamoxifen generally exerts an anti-estrogenic effect in the vagina.
Tamoxifen also exerted a pro-estrogenic effect in the vaginal epithelium. The thickened epithelium and the dramatic increase in PAS-positive secretory vesicles within the apical cells suggested a highly mucified epithelium in tamoxifen-infused animals. Since PAS stains all 1,2-glycol carbohydrates (glycogen, mucins and glycolipids) the specific identity of the secretory product(s) remained uncharacterized. It is also possible that tamoxifen may interfere with vaginal epithelial differentiation in the rat. While glycogen and mucin production are part of this process, post-translational modifications of keratins in the apical layer of the vaginal epithelium have also been shown to be regulated by estradiol [37, 38]. At least one of these processes (transamidation) is inhibited by tamoxifen . These post-translational modifications are critical for keratin filament formation and aggregation. Also, since ER regulates synthesis of the progesterone receptor (PR), it is possible that antagonism of ER by tamoxifen results in PR downregulation and that PR may be involved in exocytosis of glycogen from the vaginal epithelium. Thus, tamoxifen may inhibit the terminal differentiation of vaginal epithelial cells without interfering with intermediate differentiation processes.
It is interesting to note that the estrogenic effects of tamoxifen on the vaginal epithelium have been observed by other investigators using animal models [39–41]. Clinical studies have also consistently verified the estrogenic effects of tamoxifen on the vaginal epithelium [42–47]. However, in breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen, although cytological examination of vaginal epithelial cells indicated a high maturation index, this estrogenic effect was unrelated to sexual function, duration of tamoxifen treatment or type of breast cancer surgery . Thus, the relevance of tamoxifen's effect on the vaginal epithelium to sexual function remains unclear.
Some of the cell and tissue-specific effects of tamoxifen and its metabolites may be attributed to their multiple modes of action. In addition to being an ER antagonist, tamoxifen (and/or its metabolites) has been shown to be an inhibitor of protein kinase C and a calmodulin antagonist [48, 49]. In general, these events lead to inhibition of cell growth and are presumably responsible for tamoxifen's ability to inhibit tumorigenesis. More importantly, the interaction of the tamoxifen-bound ER with various co-activators and co-repressors may be critical in determining the pro- or anti-estrogenic effects of tamoxifen [50–52]. Since different cell types may have different levels of protein expression for each co-regulator, the overall balance of co-regulatory proteins with activating and repressing activity may determine whether tamoxifen has an estrogenic or anti-estrogenic effect. In addition, a membrane protein with characteristics identical to ERα may stimulate the phosphoinositide pathway in rat vaginal epithelial cells, [53, 54]. However, whether the epithelium is unique in this regard, relative to other cell types in the vagina, remains to be established.
A limitation of our study is that we did not investigate the effects of tamoxifen on testosterone metabolism or androgen receptors. Given that plasma testosterone and estradiol both decrease in ovariectomized animals, analogous changes between tamoxifen-treated and ovariectomized rats do not necessarily indicate that these changes are due entirely to estrogen-dependent mechanisms. It is possible that the effects of tamoxifen are partially dependent upon androgens. For example, in male rats, tamoxifen has been shown to decrease circulating levels of luteinizing hormone and testosterone and to increase liver enzymes that metabolize androgens [55, 56]. In postmenopausal women with breast cancer, tamoxifen treatment resulted in increased sex hormone binding globulin and decreased levels of circulating androgens . Further, some studies suggest that tamoxifen may directly bind the androgen receptor and can inhibit androgen receptor activity [58, 59]. Thus, the effects of tamoxifen are complex and may be manifested through multiple and inter-related receptor systems.
It should be further emphasized that tamoxifen may exert effects that are species specific. Different responses may occur due to unique expression profiles of co-activator and co-repressor proteins. In addition, rats have been shown to metabolize tamoxifen to hydroxytamoxifen much more efficiently than humans . Secondary metabolites produced by the action of sulfotransferases can also have mutagenic activity through the formation of DNA adducts. Rat hydroxysteroid sulfotransferase has been shown to have at least 20-fold greater ability to produce mutagenic metabolites when compared to the comparable human enzyme . Thus, rats may exhibit a greater sensitivity to both the anti-estrogenic and mutagenic actions of tamoxifen than humans.
Tamoxifen administration in the female rat causes functional changes in vaginal tissue that parallel the estrogen-deprived state. Such alterations may eventually lead to vaginal atrophy, dryness and pain, compromising sexual function. The apparent pro-estrogenic effect of tamoxifen on vaginal epithelium and its relevance to sexual function remains unclear, but is consistent with previous laboratory and clinical observations. Vaginal epithelial cells may manifest a unique expression profile of ER co-regulatory proteins, as well as membrane-associated and soluble ER species that enable tamoxifen to mediate an estrogenic effect on the epithelium while acting as an anti-estrogen on other cell types in the vagina. The molecular alterations responsible for the observed functional changes should be the subject of future studies examining the mixed effects of tamoxifen (and potentially other SERMs) on the vagina. Given the current widespread use of tamoxifen in the management of post-menopausal breast cancer patients, the prospect of increased use of tamoxifen or other SERMs in younger, premenopausal women at risk for breast cancer, and the importance of sexual health to the patient's quality of life, additional research on the effects of tamoxifen on genital organ function are warranted.
This work was supported by funds from the Institute for Sexual Medicine at the Boston University School of Medicine. We thank Yue-hua Huang for expert technical assistance in the execution of the biochemical assays.
- Jordan VC: Tamoxifen: a most unlikely pioneering medicine. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003, 2: 205-213. 10.1038/nrd1031.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jordan VC, Collins MM, Rowsby L, Prestwich G: A monohydroxylated metabolite of tamoxifen with potent antioestrogenic activity. J Endocrinol. 1977, 75: 305-316.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Allen KE, Clark ER, Jordan VC: Evidence for the metabolic activation of non-steroidal antioestrogens: a study of structure-activity relationships. Br J Pharmacol. 1980, 71: 83-91.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Katzenellenbogen BS, Norman MJ, Eckert RL, Peltz SW, Mangel WF: Bioactivities, estrogen receptor interactions, and plasminogen activator-inducing activities of tamoxifen and hydroxy-tamoxifen isomers in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 1984, 44: 112-119.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Benshushan A, Brzezinski A: Tamoxifen effects on menopause-associated risk factors and symptoms. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1999, 54: 272-278. 10.1097/00006254-199904000-00024.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mourits MJ, De Vries EG, Willemse PH, Ten Hoor KA, Hollema H, Van der Zee AG: Tamoxifen treatment and gynecologic side effects: a review. Obstet Gynecol. 2001, 97: 855-866. 10.1016/S0029-7844(00)01196-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mortimer JE, Boucher L, Baty J, Knapp DL, Ryan E, Rowland JH: Effect of tamoxifen on sexual functioning in patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999, 17: 1488-1492.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marttunen MB, Cacciatore B, Hietanen P, Pyrhönen S, Tiitinen A, Wahlström T, Ylikorkala O: Prospective study on gynaecological effects of two antioestrogens tamoxifen and toremifene in postmenopausal women. Br J Cancer. 2001, 84: 897-902. 10.1054/bjoc.2001.1703.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ribeiro G, Swindell R: The Christie hospital adjuvant tamoxifen trial – status at 10 years. Br J Cancer. 1988, 57: 601-603.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Fornander T, Rutqvist LE, Cedermark B, Glas U, Mattsson A, Silfverswärd C, Skoog L, Somell A, Theve T, Wilking N, Askergren J, Hjalmar ML: Adjuvant tamoxifen in early breast cancer: occurrence of new primary cancers. Lancet. 1989, 1: 117-120. 10.1016/S0140-6736(89)91141-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fisher B, Costantino JP, Redmond CK, Fisher ER, Wickerham DL, Cronin WM: Endometrial cancer in tamoxifen-treated breast cancer patients: findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-14. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994, 86: 527-537.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sasco AJ, Chaplain G, Amoros E, Saez S: Endometrial cancer following breast cancer: Effect of tamoxifen and castration by radiotherapy. Epidemiology. 1996, 7: 9-13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morales L, Neven P, Timmerman D, Christiaens MR, Vergote I, Van Limbergen E, Carbonez A, Van Huffel S, Ameye L, Paridaens R: Acute effects of tamoxifen and third-generation aromatase inhibitors on menopausal symptoms of breast cancer patients. Anticancer Drugs. 2004, 15: 753-760. 10.1097/00001813-200409000-00003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mourits MJ, Bockermann I, de Vries EG, van der Zee AG, ten Hoor KA, van der Graaf WT, Sluiter WJ, Willemse PH: Tamoxifen effects on subjective and psychosexual well-being, in a randomised breast cancer study comparing high-dose and standard-dose chemotherapy. Br J Cancer. 2002, 86: 1546-1550. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600294.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ganz PA, Desmond KA, Leedham B, Rowland JH, Meyerowitz BE, Belin TR: Quality of life in long-term, disease-free survivors of breast cancer: a follow-up study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002, 94: 39-49.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Park K, Ahn K, Lee S, Ryu S, Park Y, Azadzoi KM: Decreased circulating levels of estrogen alter vaginal and clitoral blood flow and structure in the rabbit. Int J Impot Res. 2001, 13: 116-24. 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900655.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Min K, Munarriz R, Kim NN, Goldstein I, Traish A: Effects of ovariectomy and estrogen and androgen treatment on sildenafil-mediated changes in female genital blood flow and vaginal lubrication in the animal model. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002, 187: 1370-1376. 10.1067/mob.2002.126641.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Min K, Munarriz R, Kim NN, Choi S, O'Connell L, Goldstein I, Traish AM: Effects of ovariectomy and estrogen replacement on basal and pelvic nerve stimulated vaginal lubrication in an animal model. J Sex Marital Ther. 2003, 29: 77-84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim SW, Kim NN, Jeong SJ, Munarriz R, Goldstein I, Traish AM: Modulation of rat vaginal blood flow and estrogen receptor by estradiol. J Urol. 2004, 172: 1538-1543. 10.1097/01.ju.0000137744.12814.2e.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim SW, Jeong SJ, Munarriz R, Kim NN, Goldstein I, Traish AM: An in vivo rat model to investigate female vaginal arousal response. J Urol. 2004, 171: 1357-1361. 10.1097/01.ju.0000109868.19569.d7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Traish AM, Muller RE, Wotiz HH: A new procedure for the quantitation of nuclear and cytoplasmic androgen receptors. J Biol Chem. 1981, 256: 12028-12033.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Katzenellenbogen JA, Johnson HJ, Carlson KE: Studies on the uterine, cytoplasmic estrogen binding protein. Thermal stability and ligand dissociation rate. An assay of empty and filled sites by exchange. Biochemistry. 1973, 12: 4092-4099. 10.1021/bi00745a011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim NN, Cox JD, Baggio RF, Emig FA, Mistry SK, Harper SL, Speicher DW, Morris SM, Ash DE, Traish A, Christianson DW: Probing erectile function: S-(2-boronoethyl)-L-cysteine binds to arginase as a transition state analogue and enhances smooth muscle relaxation in human penile corpus cavernosum. Biochemistry. 2001, 40: 2678-2688. 10.1021/bi002317h.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pessina MA, Hoyt RF, Goldstein I, Traish AM: Differential effects of estradiol, progesterone, and testosterone on vaginal structural integrity. Endocrinol. 2006, 147: 61-69. 10.1210/en.2005-0870.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sjoberg NO: Increase in transmitter content of adrenergic nerves in the reproductive tract of female rabbits after oestrogen treatment. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1968, 57: 405-413.Google Scholar
- Owman C: Pregnancy induces degenerative and regenerative changes in the autonomic innervation of the female reproductive tract. Ciba Found Symp. 1981, 83: 252-279.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaleczyc J: Effect of estradiol and progesterone on noradrenaline content in nerves of the oviduct, uterus and vagina in ovariectomized pigs. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 1994, 32: 119-126.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Forsberg JG: A morphologist's approach to the vagina – age-related changes and estrogen sensitivity. Maturitas. 1995, S7-S15. 10.1016/0378-5122(95)00957-4. 22 SupplGoogle Scholar
- Ting AY, Blacklock AD, Smith PG: Estrogen regulates vaginal sensory and autonomic nerve density in the rat. Biol Reprod. 2004, 71: 1397-1404. 10.1095/biolreprod.104.030023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim NN, Min K, Pessina MA, Munarriz R, Goldstein I, Traish AM: Effects of ovariectomy and steroid hormones on vaginal smooth muscle contractility. Int J Impot Res. 2004, 16: 43-50. 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901138.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Al-Hijji J, Larsson B, Batra S: Nitric oxide synthase in the rabbit uterus and vagina: hormonal regulation and functional significance. Biol Reprod. 2000, 62: 1387-1392. 10.1095/biolreprod62.5.1387.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Berman JR, McCarthy MM, Kyprianou N: Effect of estrogen withdrawal on nitric oxide synthase expression and apoptosis in the rat vagina. Urology. 1998, 51: 650-656. 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00683-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Traish AM, Kim NN, Huang YH, Min K, Munarriz R, Goldstein I: Sex steroid hormones differentially regulate nitric oxide synthase and arginase activities in the proximal and distal rabbit vagina. Int J Impot Res. 2003, 15: 397-404. 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901097.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim NN, Christianson DW, Traish AM: Role of arginase in the male and female sexual arousal response. J Nutr. 2004, 134 (10 Suppl): 2873S-2879S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li H, Meininger CJ, Kelly KA, Hawker JR, Morris SM, Wu G: Activities of arginase I and II are limiting for endothelial cell proliferation. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2002, 282: R64-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morris SM: Recent advances in arginine metabolism. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2004, 7: 45-51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vijayalakshmi V, Gupta PD: Estradiol-regulated transamidation of keratins by vaginal epithelial cell transglutaminase. Exp Cell Res. 1994, 214: 358-366. 10.1006/excr.1994.1268.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gupta PD, Swarup G, Reddy AG: Modulation of phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of keratin and other polypeptides by estradiol-17β in rat vaginal epithelium. FEBS Lett. 1990, 273: 135-138. 10.1016/0014-5793(90)81068-Y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Iguchi T, Todoroki R, Yamaguchi S, Takasugi N: Changes in the uterus and vagina of mice treated neonatally with antiestrogens. Acta Anat (Basel). 1989, 136: 146-154.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Carthew P, Edwards RE, Noloan BM, Martin EA, Heydon RT, White IN, Tucker MJ: Tamoxifen induces endometrial and vaginal cancer in rats in the absence of endometrial hyperplasia. Carcinogenesis. 2000, 21: 793-797. 10.1093/carcin/21.4.793.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ketani MA, Ketani S, Kaloglu C, Guney B: Effects of tamoxifen administration in rat vaginas: an ultrastructural and light microscopy study. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2002, 23: 557-560.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lahti E, Vuopala S, Kauppila A, Blanco G, Ruokonen A, Laatikainen T: Maturation of vaginal and endometrial epithelium in postmenopausal breast cancer patients receiving long-term tamoxifen. Gynecol Oncol. 1994, 55: 410-414. 10.1006/gyno.1994.1314.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yokosuka K, Teshima H, Katase K, Fujimoto I, Yamauchi K, Hasumi K, Tatsuki Y: Effects of long-term administration of tamoxifen on vaginal epithelium and complications of endometrial lesions in breast cancer patients. Nippon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1995, 47: 125-132.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bertolissi A, Cartei G, Turrin D, Cioschi B, Rizzi V: Behaviour of vaginal epithelial maturation and sex hormone binding globulin in post-menopausal breast cancer patients during the first year of tamoxifen therapy. Cytopathology. 1998, 9: 263-270. 10.1046/j.1365-2303.1998.00077.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Friedrich M, Mink D, Villena-Heinsen C, Woll-Hermann A, Schmidt W: Tamoxifen and proliferation of vaginal and cervical epithelium in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998, 80: 221-225. 10.1016/S0301-2115(98)00117-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Love RR, Kurtycz DF, Dumesic DA, Laube DW, Yang Y: The effects of tamoxifen on the vaginal epithelium in postmenopausal women. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2000, 9: 559-563. 10.1089/15246090050073648.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ellmen J, Hakulinen P, Partanen A, Hayes DF: Estrogenic effects of toremifene and tamoxifen in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2003, 82: 103-111. 10.1023/B:BREA.0000003957.54851.11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- O'Brian CA, Liskamp RM, Solomon DH, Weinstein IB: Inhibition of protein kinase C by tamoxifen. Cancer Res. 1985, 45: 2462-2465.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lam H-YP: Tamoxifen is a calmodulin antagonist in the activation of cAMP phosphodiesterase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1984, 118: 27-32. 10.1016/0006-291X(84)91062-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Riggs BL, Hartmann LC: Selective estrogen-receptor modulators – mechanisms of action and application to clinical practice. New Engl J Med. 2003, 348: 618-629. 10.1056/NEJMra022219.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jordan VC: Selective estrogen receptor modulation: Concept and consequences in cancer. Cancer Cell. 2004, 5: 207-213. 10.1016/S1535-6108(04)00059-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Katzenellenbogen BS, Frasor J: Therapeutic targeting in the estrogen receptor hormonal pathway. Semin Oncol. 2004, 31 (Suppl 3): 28-38. 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2004.01.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Singh S, Gupta PD: Induction of phosphoinositide-mediated signal transduction pathway by 17β-oestradiol in rat vaginal epithelial cells. J Mol Endocrinol. 1997, 19: 249-257. 10.1677/jme.0.0190249.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Singh S, Shaul PW, Gupta PD: Conventional estrogen receptors are found in the plasma membrane of vaginal epithelial cells of the rat. Steroids. 2002, 67: 757-764. 10.1016/S0039-128X(02)00028-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Balasinor N, Parte P, Gill-Sharma MK, Kini J, Juneja HS: Mechanism delineating differential effect of an antiestrogen, tamoxifen, on the serum LH and FSH in adult male rats. J Endocrinol Invest. 2006, 29: 485-496.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ickenstein LM, Holsmer SL, Bandiera SM: Tamoxifen alters hepatic cytochrome P450 enzyme expression and circulating growth hormone levels in intact male rats. Pharm Res. 2004, 21: 1631-1636. 10.1023/B:PHAM.0000041458.81836.c4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lofgren L, Wallberg B, Wilking N, Fornander T, Rutqvist LE, Carlstrom K, von Schoultz B, von Schoultz E: Tamoxifen and megestrol acetate for postmenopausal breast cancer: diverging effects on liver proteins, androgen, and glucocorticoids. Med Oncol. 2004, 21: 309-318. 10.1385/MO:21:4:309.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leo G, Cappiello G, Poltronieri P, Giardina C, Manca C, Storelli C, Marsigliante S: Tamoxifen binding sites heterogeneity in breast cancer: a comparative study with steroid hormone receptors. Eur J Cancer. 1991, 27: 452-456.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kawashima H, Tanaka T, Cheng JS, Sugita S, Ezaki K, Kurisu T, Nakatani T: Effect of anti-estrogens on the androgen receptor activity and cell proliferation in prostate cancer cells. Urol Res. 2004, 32: 406-410. 10.1007/s00240-004-0424-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lim CK, Yuan ZX, Lamb JH, White IN, De Matteis F, Smith LL: A comparative study of tamoxifen metabolism in female rat, mouse and human liver microsomes. Carcinogenesis. 1994, 15: 589-593.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Glatt H, Davis W, Meinl W, Hermersdorfer H, Venitt S, Phillips DH: Rat, but not human, sulfotransferase activates a tamoxifen metabolite to produce DNA adducts and gene mutations in bacteria and mammalian cells in culture. Carcinogenesis. 1998, 19: 1709-1713. 10.1093/carcin/19.10.1709.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/6/14/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.