Skip to main content
Download PDF

Health status of aged women with or without the experience of practicing yoga

BMC Women's Health volume 23, Article number: 524 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Yoga is a popular training practice that enhances women’s physical activity level and modifies the major risk factors contributing to noncommunicable diseases. This study aimed to compare general health and cardiovascular health, musculoskeletal health, psychological health, and health-related quality of life between aged women with and without long-term yoga practice.

Methods

Thirty-two female yoga practitioners (mean age 56 years) with ≥ 2 years experience in regular yoga practice and 32 age-matched women without yoga experience participated in the study. Between-group comparisons was performed to explore the differences in various health outcomes, including body build indices, exercise endurance, blood pressure, and heart rate variability; hamstring flexibility, upper-limb muscle strength, shoulder range of motion, and upper-limb function; and the symptoms of anxiety and depression, sleep quality, and fatigue.

Results

Our findings revealed that yoga practitioners demonstrated greater hamstring flexibility, shoulder ROM on the non-dominant side, and hand-grip strength; a higher heart rate variability parameter value (RMSSD); and shorter sleep latency than those who did not practice yoga.

Conclusions

In view of the encouraging results of the long-term benefits of yoga practice, it warrants being promoted among aged women to enhance their physical and mental well-being.

Peer Review reports

Background

Yoga is a form of integrative medicine that the mind, body, and spirit are unitive in nature [1]. While various aspects of physical fitness, including limb flexibility, balance, and muscle strength, can be improved by the physical postures and breathing exercises used during the practice of yoga, the meditation component has been shown to improve mood. The lifetime prevalence rate of practicing yoga is as high as 13.2% in the general population in the US (N = 34,525) [2], and this trend has been increasing, particularly among older-aged women with better-rated general health [3]. Further, female yoga practitioners have a more positive body image and higher levels of self-esteem than women who do not practice yoga [4]. The practice of yoga can provide a supportive way to promote physical and psychological health, prevent general diseases, and alleviate chronic medical conditions.

Physical inactivity is one of the major risk factors contributing to noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), including cardiovascular disease, stroke, diabetes, and cancer, which lead to subsequent economic burdens and mortality [5]. Based on the World Health Organization’s (WHO) investigation, inactivity increases with age, and more women (33.9%) than men (27.9%) are reported to be less physically active in different countries [6]. To achieve the WHO’s established goals of reducing physical inactivity by 10% and 15% by 2025 and 2030, respectively [7], it is important to address these age and gender gaps in physical inactivity.

Recent studies have reported the potential benefits of yoga in improving women’s health. For example, Wang et al. [8] systematically meta-analyzed 19 randomized controlled trials involving 1,832 women with sleep problems and revealed that yoga therapy significantly improved sleep compared to control participants (standardized mean difference [SMD] = − 0.327; 95% confidence interval [CI] = − 0.506, − 0.148). In another study, Forseth et al. [9] compared 74 yoga practitioners, of which 80% were female and had a mean age of 41.3 ± 1.5 years, with physically inactive participants (n = 1,285; 43.8% female, mean age = 46.4 ± 0.4 years) and found that yoga practitioners were less likely to have an elevated waist circumference (odds ratio [OR] = 0.30; p < 0.01), body mass index (OR = 0.48; p = 0.047), and triglyceride concentration (OR = 0.34; p = 0.02). Moreover, Satin et al. [10] compared 47 yoga practitioners (57% female) who had a mean age of 39.51 ± 11.02 years, with physically inactive participants (n = 52; 54% female, mean age = 34.58 ± 12.55 years), and found that the yoga practitioners had lower levels of depressed mood (Cohen’s d (d) = − 0.71; p = 0.001) and perceived stress (d = 0.88; p < 0.001).

Although recent literature [8,9,10] compared the potential benefits of practicing yoga, they only focused on the effects of those with young to middle age and short period of practicing yoga. For example, in Forseth et al. [9] and Satin et al. [10] studies, the included participants were women with young to middle age (mean age < 45 years); in Cramer et al. [11] and Elwy et al. [12] studies, the included participants were with only 4 to 16 weeks experience of yoga practice. Moreover, abundant studies focused on disease populations, such as cardiovascular diseases [13], pulmonary diseases [14], cancer [15], musculoskeletal disorders [16], diabetes [17], but the potential effects of yoga on healthy women were understudied. Therefore, to understand the effects of long-term yoga practice on health variables in relation to its physiological resilience and homeostatic capacity, the objectives of this study were to compare the general health, cardiovascular health, musculoskeletal health, psychological health, and health-related quality of life between women with and without the experience of long-term yoga practice.

Materials and methods

Study Design and participants

This cross-sectional study was conducted at a university-affiliated rehabilitation laboratory in Hong Kong from April to September 2022. Participants were recruited through electronic postings on social media platforms and poster advertisements at yoga associations/studios. Yoga practitioners were included if they: (1) were women aged 45 to 75 and (2) self-reported regularly engaging in any form of yoga for more than 2 years, with at least 60 min weekly. Yoga practitioners were excluded if they: (1) were diagnosed with a major medical condition that may have hindered their proper assessment, e.g., cardiovascular, pulmonary, neurological, cognitive, or psychological disorders or (2) had prior experiences of practicing stretching exercise or meditation other than yoga in the past 6 months. For the non-yoga group, the inclusion and exclusion criteria were the same as the yoga group, except that they did not have any experience with yoga practice.

Setting and procedure

The eligible participants were invited to the Wellness & Exercise Laboratory at the administering university for data collection. After obtaining data regarding sociodemographics and the physical activity level, which was assessed using the Chinese version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) [18], all assessments were then administered in a random order by two research assistants who were trained by an experienced research nurse. At least 5 min of rest were allowed between tests to avoid fatigue. The study procedure was explained to each participant, and written informed consent was obtained prior to commencing the study. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of the administering university (reference number: HSEARS20220202003) and was conducted in accordance with the guidelines for human experiments outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Outcome measures

Assessments of general and cardiovascular health

The body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) were measured as a proxy for obesity. The participants’ body weight, height, and waist circumference were measured to calculate body build indices.

The 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) [19], which measures the maximum walking distance achieved in 6 min, reliably determines exercise endurance. Heart rate and oxygen saturation were measured before and immediately after the test.

Blood pressure, heart rate, and heart rate variability (HRV) were recorded to determine cardiovascular function. HRV, which was used as a measure of autonomic nervous system function [20], was recorded over a 5-minute period using a validated wearable monitor (Polar H10 heart rate sensor, POLAR®, Kempele, Finland) [21]. Time-domain measures, including the mean R-R interval (RRi); the standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN); the square root of the mean squared differences of successive normal-to-normal intervals (RMSSD); the proportion of NN50 divided by total number of NN intervals (pNN50); and frequency-domain measures, including total power, low frequency normalized units (LF n.u.), high frequency normalized units (HF n.u.), and the LF/HF ratio, were recorded [22]. The analysis was supported by Kubios software [23].

Assessments of musculoskeletal health

The Sit-and-Reach Test was used to assess the extensibility of the lower back and hamstring [24]. The participants were seated with their knees fully extended and one hand on top of the other. They then attempted to stretch forward as far as possible. The distance from the tip of the middle finger to the toe was measured, and the best score was recorded from three attempts.

Shoulder mobility was determined by measuring the active range of motion (ROM) of the bilateral shoulder joints in five angles (flexion, extension, abduction; internal rotation [IR] and external rotation [ER] with the shoulder at 90° abduction), using a goniometer [25]. In addition, the hand-behind-back (HBB) ROM was measured by measuring the interval starting from cervical seventh (C7) vertebra to the level that participant’s thumb maximally reached along the spinal column [26]. Hand-grip strength was measured using a handheld dynamometer (Baseline® Smedley Spring, USA), and shoulder flexion and abduction muscle strength were determined as the strength of a maximal voluntary isometric contraction measured using a handheld dynamometer (Model 001165; Lafayette Instrument, Lafayette, IN, USA). Satisfactory intra-tester reliability has been demonstrated for testing the shoulder ROM (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]3,1 = 0.84–1.0) and muscle strength (ICC3,1 = 0.72–0.99) [25]. The average of three measurements taken in each position was used for analysis.

The upper limb functionality was assessed using the short form of the Chinese (Hong Kong) version of the Disabilities of Arm–Shoulder–Hand Questionnaire (quickDASH-HKPWH) [27]. The quickDASH contains 11 items (0–100%; 0 = no disability; 100 = most severe disability). It has demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.94) and test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.77) [27].

Assessments of psychological health

The participants’ anxiety and depressive symptoms were assessed using the Chinese version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-Chinese), which has demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.85) [28]. The anxiety (HADS-A) and depression (HADS-D) subscale scores range from 0 to 21, with a higher score indicating more severe anxiety and depression.

Sleep quality was assessed using the Chinese version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI-C), which has demonstrated good reliability [29]. The PSQI-C has 19 items (score: 0–21) consisting of the following seven components: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, sleep efficiency, sleep disturbance, the use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction. A higher score represents poorer sleep.

Fatigue was assessed using the Chinese (Cantonese) version of the Fatigue Assessment Scale (C-FAS), which has demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.71–0.82) and test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.77–0.95) [30]. The C-FAS comprises 10 items (score: 10–50) assessing physical and mental fatigue, with a higher score representing greater fatigue severity.

Health-related quality of life

The Chinese (Hong Kong) version of the Short Form 12-Item Health Survey version 2 has demonstrated good reliability and was used to measure health-related quality of life31. The mental component score (MCS) and physical component score (PCS) range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating a better health-related quality of life .

Statistical analyses

Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (version 26) software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) was used to perform the statistical analyses. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the demographic characteristics and variables of interest. The significance level in all tests was set as p < 0.05. The normality of the data distribution was checked using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. For between-group comparisons of continuous variables, independent Student’s t-tests and Mann–Whitney U tests were used for normally and non-normally distributed data, respectively. For categorical variables, chi-square tests were used. Bivariate analyses of the correlation between yoga practice (e.g. duration of yoga experience) and the outcome variables were performed using Pearson’s product-moment or Spearman’s correlation coefficients for normally and non-normally distributed data, respectively.

Results

Participant characteristics

Thirty-two yoga practitioners with a mean age of 56.00 ± 8.68 years and a mean duration of yoga experience of 101.91 ± 56.41 months (range: 2–17 years) and 32 age-matched non-yoga practitioners participated in the study. There were no significant differences in sociodemographic data between the groups (Table 1). Apart from regular yoga practice, both group participants did not regularly engage in other form of physical exercise. Half of the yoga practitioners had practiced yoga for ≥ 10 years (Table 2). All yoga practitioners had engaged in two forms of yoga, hatha yoga and flow yoga, which include components of breathing exercises, yoga posture, and meditation.

Table 1 Participants’ characteristics
Full size table
Table 2 Frequency of yoga practice among yoga participants
Full size table

Between-group differences in outcome measures

General and cardiovascular health

There were no significant between-group differences in body build indices or 6MWT results (Appendix I Table 1). Yoga practitioners had significantly higher RMSSD value (50.6%) and HF n.u. (71.4%) and significantly lower LF n.u. (24.1%), and LF/HF ratio (65.3%) than the non-yoga practitioners (p < 0.001 to p = 0.015).

Musculoskeletal health

In upper-limb flexibility assessments, the yoga practitioners had significantly longer sit-and-reach distances (89.9%; p = 0.014) and better shoulder ROM in angles of extension (non-dominant side [NDS], 15.2%), internal rotation (NDS, 15.1%), external rotation (NDS, 9.8%; dominant side (NS), 8.9%) and hand-behind-back (NDS, 22.4%) than the non-yoga-practitioners (p < 0.001 to p = 0.008). Regarding muscle strength, the yoga practitioners had significantly greater body-weight-adjusted hand-grip strength in both the dominant side (12.8%) and non-dominant side (11.7%) and shoulder flexion in the non-dominant side (13.2%) than the non-yoga-practitioners (p = 0.007 to p = 0.02). However, there were no significant between-group differences in quickDASH scores.

Psychological health and quality of life

Among the sleep parameters assessed, the yoga practitioners had a significantly shorter PSQI-latency time (46.1%) than the non-yoga-practitioners (p = 0.033). However, there were no significant between-group differences in FAS, HADS-A, HADS-D, or SF12v2 scores.

Correlations

The correlation analysis showed that the duration of the yoga experience was significantly correlated with the waist-to-height ratio (r = −0.385, p = 0.031). There were no significant correlations between yoga practice and other outcome variables.

Discussion

This study is the first to comprehensively report differences in general and cardiovascular health, musculoskeletal health, and psychological health between middle-aged women with and without yoga practice. Our findings revealed that female yoga practitioners demonstrated greater hamstring flexibility, shoulder ROM on the non-dominant side, and hand-grip strength; higher HRV (RMSSD); and shorter sleep latency than non-yoga-practitioners. In addition, a longer yoga experience was associated with a lower waist-to-height ratio.

General health

Despite no significant between-group differences in BMI or WHtR, the yoga practitioners’ body build indices were within the normal range, whereas the non-yoga-practitioners, with a BMI of 23.23 and a WHtR of 0.5, were classified as overweight [32, 33]. Yoga exercise, which is categorized as low-to-moderate intensity training, may not induce sufficient stress to the cardiovascular system. This may explain the lack of a significant difference in body composition between the yoga practitioners and non-yoga-practitioners. In contrast, Lauche et al. [34] meta-analyzed 30 studies involving 2,173 members of the general population and found that, compared with usual care, a yoga intervention significantly reduced the BMI (SMD = -0.99, p = 0.004) of overweight or obese participants, although there were no significant effects on weight-related outcomes in healthy adults. Further, Neumark-Sztainer et al. [35] performed a 5-year longitudinal analysis and showed that weight control could be attained when yoga was performed regularly. Likewise, our analysis showed that a longer yoga experience was associated with reduced WHtR among yoga practitioners (r = −0.385). This may be explained by the proficiency in posture of experienced yoga practitioners, who have a higher level of muscle engagement during their practice and therefore increase their energy expenditure and change their body composition [36].

Cardiovascular health

Our results showed that both groups exhibited similar normative values of systolic blood pressure and distance covered in the 6MWT for healthy women. Inconsistent findings regarding the effect of yoga on exercise endurance have been reported in the literature. For example, Widjaja et al. [37] reported significantly improved 6MWT (6%) by obese older women after a yoga intervention with dynamic and static postures training, whilst McCaffrey et al. [38] found no significant improvement in the 6MWT after seated yoga among elderly individuals with Alzheimer’s disease. As noted, the intensity of physical activity depends on the yoga style. Specifically, Cowen and Adams [39] indicated that a vigorous yoga styles with dynamic movements and strength may enhance physical fitness in comparison to gentle styles focusing on stretching and meditation. The yoga practitioners in our study engaged in relatively gentle styles compared to other forms such as Bikram, ashtanga, and vinyasa. Moreover, effects of exercise on cardiorespiratory fitness could be modified by age, sex, and health status; and men with younger age (< 50 years) and chronic health conditions, such as type 2 diabetes and hypertension, could be better benefited from exercise training [40]. However, our included participants were healthy women with older age (mean age 56.00 ± 8.68). Thus, the effects of yoga on cardiorespiratory fitness were not prominent and not reflected by the 6MWT. Further, our findings were in contrast to those of recent meta-analyses targeting patients with pulmonary disease and hypertension, in which a yoga intervention was found to significantly improve 6MWT (mean difference [MD] = 25.53 m; 95% CI = 12.16, 38.90) [41] and lower systolic blood pressure (MD = -4.17; 95% CI = -6.35, -1.99) [42] when compared with usual care. These previous studies included participants with chronic diseases, whereas our study included healthy participants. Therefore, the findings are not comparable and further investigation is warranted to understand the effects of yoga on cardiopulmonary function.

Musculoskeletal health

Our positive findings regarding flexibility and strength showed that the yoga practitioners had greater shoulder ROM and hamstring flexibility, as well as body-weight-adjusted hand-grip strength, than the non-yoga-practitioners. The between-group differences in non-dominant shoulder mobility may be due to the non-dominant side being relatively less involved in daily activities, whereas yoga improves its flexibility. The repetition of the tension and relaxation of limb muscles during yoga posture improves flexibility, which is further enhanced with synchronized breathing practice. Yoga training on posture, particularly training involves weight supporting with upper limbs, is thought to be conducive to improving muscle strength. Yoga has been shown to improve hand-grip strength among teens and young adults (8.9-27.3%) [43] and older females (16.6%) [44], but it has not been investigated in middle-aged people. In addition to the effects of posture training, another possible cause of the improvement in hand-grip strength may be the voluntarily controlled yogic breathing exercise, although the associated mechanism is not well established. It is hypothesized that yogic breathing increases cardiac autonomic balance and parasympathetic tone, which have been found to be associated with a reduction in oxygen consumption for work by the body, thereby providing more energy to increase grip strength [45].

Psychological health

In our study, the regulation of autonomic balance among yoga practitioners was indicated by the findings of HRV parameters, which reflected the predominance of parasympathetic tone coupled with the withdrawal of sympathetic tone in yoga practitioners. The effect of yoga on HRV is inconclusive, with preliminary findings suggesting that regular yoga practice increases HRV and vagal tone [46]. It may be affected independently by yogic breathing. Together with the calming effect of meditation and the use of pose practice to stimulate peripheral pressure receptors innervated by the parasympathetic afferent route [47], yoga has been suggested to regulate cardiac autonomic nervous modulation.

Although we found no between-group differences in HADS scores, the proportion of borderline to abnormal levels of anxiety was two-fold higher in the non-yoga-practitioners (28.2%) than the yoga practitioners (12.5%). Further, a shorter sleep latency was found in the yoga practitioners relative to the non-yoga-practitioners. Prolonged stress and anxiety lead to dysfunctional arousal, which induces difficulties in falling asleep, therefore, lengthened sleep latency.

Mood states are affected by various factors, such as the environmental context and our cognition. From the physiological aspects, they are associated with the autonomic nervous system activity and HRV is a measure of the parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous systems. In the present study, we found that yoga practitioners had higher HF and RMSSD and lower LF and HF/LF ratio than non-yoga-practitioners. These findings were consistent with previous studies [48, 49] that women with yoga practicing experience could have increased parasympathetic tone and decreased sympathetic tone that may lead to the mobilization of our stress coping capacity. This may explain that our yoga practitioners had lower level of anxiety as measured by the HADS than non-yoga-practitioners.

Further, brain imaging findings indicate that experienced yoga practitioners have morphological changes in functional regions and hippocampal circuits of the brain [50] that are associated with emotional regulation, including anxiety reduction. The breathing control training and meditation components of yoga practice may help maintain homeostasis to regulate the circadian sleep–wake cycle, which can alter sleep onset and thereby improve sleep latency. It is believed that the physical component of yoga improves sleep, but breathing control training and meditation components also make contribution.

Previous studies revealed that yoga has small effects (SMD = 0.27, 95% CI = 0.23, 0.31) [51] on improving the fatigue severity with various physical diseases, such as cancer, but it was not reflected in this cohort of participants with at least 2 years of yoga experience when compared with those without yoga practicing experience. One possible explanation is that, in the present study, our participants were healthy subjects with low level of fatigue (mean FAS score < 22). Thus, the effects of yoga could not further induce mark improvement of fatigue. Another possible explanation is that is our sample size (yoga group, n = 32) was not sufficient to capture the small effects of yoga on improving fatigue.

Quality of life

Surprisingly, our results showed no significant difference in health-related quality of life between yoga group and non-yoga group. This is in contrast to previous studies that proposed that practicing yoga improves quality of life through several possible mechanisms, including improved physical fitness, neurocardiac modulation, cognitive skills, and emotions through yoga poses, breathing control training, and meditation, as well as improved social participation [52, 53]. A possible reason for the discrepancies is that those participants may suffer from symptoms of chronic disease, thus, they may have benefited more from a yoga intervention. Despite our postulation that yoga practitioners have a better quality of life than non-yoga-practitioners, the healthy participants of our study may have had a relatively high health-related quality of life (SF12v2: 50.14–51.57), and thus no significant between-group differences were observed. Moreover, although the non-yoga group did not engage in yoga practice, they may have engaged in other activities that may have also induced a better quality of life.

Limitations

There are several limitations of this study. First, there was a lack of detailed information on the yoga styles adopted. An analysis of yoga type would help to understand how yoga practice brings specific health benefits. Second, our participants were recruited on a convenience basis, therefore, self-selection bias cannot be ruled out. Further, our rather homogenous subject group may limit the generalizability of the findings. Third, the small sample size potentially influenced the statistical power to expose the effects on certain outcomes. Finally, due to the cross-sectional design of the study, a cause-and-effect relationship between yoga and health outcomes could not be established. Future research directions should include an evaluation of the effects of yoga on various health outcomes in large-scale randomized controlled trials.

Conclusions

Our findings revealed that aged women with long-term yoga practice outperformed their non-yoga-practicing counterparts in hand-grip strength, shoulder flexibility, particularly non-dominant hand mobility, cardiac autonomic function, and sleep latency. In view of the benefits of this multimodal activity, it is worth promoting yoga among aged women to enhance their physical and mental well-being.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

IPAQ:

International Physical Activity Questionnaire

BMI:

Body mass index

WHtR:

Weight-to-height ratio

HBB:

hand-behind-back

HR:

heart rate

6MWT:

6-min walk test

HRV:

heart rate variability

RRi:

R-R interval

SDNN:

standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals

RMSSD:

square root of the mean squared differences of successive normal-to-normal intervals

pNN50:

proportion of NN50 divided by total number of NN intervals

LF n.u.:

low frequency normalized unit

HF n.u.:

high frequency normalized unit

quickDASH:

short form of the Disabilities of Arm-Shoulder-Hand Questionnaire

PSQI:

Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index

HADS:

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

FAS:

Fatigue Assessment Scale

SF-12v2:

Short Form 12-item Health Survey version 2

PCS:

physical component score

MCS:

mental component score

References

  1. Büssing A, Michalsen A, Khalsa SB, Telles S, Sherman KJ. Effects of yoga on mental and physical health: a short summary of reviews. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012;2012:165410. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/165410.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Cramer H, Ward L, Steel A, Lauche R, Dobos G, Zhang Y. Prevalence, patterns, and predictors of yoga use: results of a U.S. nationally Representative Survey. Am J Prev Med. 2016;50(2):230–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.07.037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ding D, Stamatakis E. Yoga practice in England 1997–2008: prevalence, temporal trends, and correlates of participation. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:172. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-172. Published 2014 Mar 24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Mahlo L, Tiggemann M. Yoga and positive body image: a test of the Embodiment Model. Body Image. 2016;18:135–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.06.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ding D, Lawson KD, Kolbe-Alexander TL, Finkelstein EA, Katzmarzyk PT, van Mechelen W, et al. The economic burden of physical inactivity: a global analysis of major non-communicable diseases. Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1311–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30383-X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, Guthold R, Haskell W, Ekelund U. Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):247–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60646-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. World Health Organization. Global action plan on physical activity 2018–2030: more active people for a healthier world. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wang WL, Chen KH, Pan YC, Yang SN, Chan YY. The effect of yoga on sleep quality and insomnia in women with sleep problems: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2020;20(1):195. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02566-4. Published 2020 May 1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Forseth B, Boyer W, Miller A, Fitzhugh EC. Demographic, health behavior, and cardiometabolic risk factor profile in yoga and non-yoga participants: NHANES 1999–2006. Complement Ther Med. 2019;44:123–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2019.04.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Satin JR, Linden W, Millman RD. Yoga and psychophysiological determinants of cardiovascular health: comparing yoga practitioners, runners, and sedentary individuals. Ann Behav Med. 2014;47(2):231–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-013-9542-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cramer H, Ward L, Saper R, Fishbein D, Dobes G, Lauche R. The safety of yoga: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of Randomized controlled trials. Am J Epidemiol. 2015;182(4):281–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwv071.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Elwy AR, Groessl EJ, Eisen SV, Riley KE, Maiya M, Lee JP, et al. A systematic scoping review of yoga intervention components and study quality. Am J Prev Med. 2014;47(2):220–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.03.012.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Haider T, Sharma M, Branscum P. Yoga as an alternative and complimentary therapy for Cardiovascular Disease: a systematic review. J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med. 2017;22(2):310–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156587215627390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Li C, Liu Y, Ji Y, Xie L, Hou Z. Efficacy of yoga training in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2018;30:33–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2017.11.006.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Danhauer SC, Addington EL, Cohen L, Sohl SJ, Puymbroeck MV, Albinati NK, et al. Yoga for symptom management in oncology: a review of the evidence base and future directions for research. Cancer. 2019;125(12):1979–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31979.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. McCaffrey R, Park J. The benefits of yoga for Musculoskeletal Disorders: a systematic review of the literature. J Yoga Phys Ther. 2012;02(05). https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7595.1000122.

  17. Thind H, Lantini R, Balletto BL, Donahue M, Salmoirago-Blotcher E, Bock BC, et al. The effects of yoga among adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med. 2017;105:116–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.08.017.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Macfarlane DJ, Lee CC, Ho EY, Chan KL, Chan DT. Reliability and validity of the chinese version of IPAQ (short, last 7 days). J Sci Med Sport. 2007;10(1):45–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2006.05.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Enright PL. The six-minute walk test. Respir Care. 2003;48(8):783–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Thomas BL, Claassen N, Becker P, Viljoen M. Validity of commonly used heart rate variability markers of autonomic nervous system function. Neuropsychobiology. 2019;78(1):14–26. https://doi.org/10.1159/000495519.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Speer KE, Semple S, Naumovski N, McKune AJ. Measuring Heart Rate Variability using commercially available Devices in Healthy Children: a validity and reliability study. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2020;10(1):390–404. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe10010029. Published 2020 Jan 10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Shaffer F, Ginsberg JP. An overview of Heart Rate Variability Metrics and norms. Front Public Health. 2017;5:258. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00258. Published 2017 Sep 28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Tarvainen MP, Niskanen JP, Lipponen JA, Ranta-Aho PO, Karjalainen PA. Kubios HRV–heart rate variability analysis software. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2014;113(1):210–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.07.024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gabbe B, Bennell K, Wajswelner H, Finch C. Reliability of common lower extremity musculoskeletal screening tests. Phys Ther Sport. 2004;5(2):90–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Harrington S, Padua D, Battaglini C, Michener LA, Giuliani C, Myers J, et al. Comparison of shoulder flexibility, strength, and function between breast cancer survivors and healthy participants. J Cancer Surviv. 2011;5(2):167–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-010-0168-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Han SH, Oh KS, Han KJ, Jo J, Lee DH. Accuracy of measuring tape and vertebral-level methods to determine shoulder internal rotation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(2):562–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2112-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee EW, Lau JS, Chung MM, Li AP, Lo SK. Evaluation of the chinese version of the disability of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH-HKPWH): cross-cultural adaptation process, internal consistency and reliability study. J Hand Ther. 2004;17(4):417–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Leung CM, Wing YK, Kwong PK, Lo A, Shum K. Validation of the chinese-cantonese version of the hospital anxiety and depression scale and comparison with the Hamilton Rating Scale of Depression. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1999;100(6):456–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1999.tb10897.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ho RT, Fong TC. Factor structure of the chinese version of the Pittsburgh sleep quality index in breast cancer patients. Sleep Med. 2014;15(5):565–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2013.10.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ho LYW, Lai CKY, Ng SSM. Measuring fatigue following stroke: the chinese version of the fatigue Assessment Scale. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43(22):3234–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1730455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lam CL, Tse EY, Gandek B. Is the standard SF-12 health survey valid and equivalent for a chinese population? Qual Life Res. 2005;14(2):539–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-0704-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. WHO Expert Consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies [published correction appears in Lancet. 2004;363(9412):902]. Lancet. 2004;363(9403):157–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15268-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zeng Q, He Y, Dong S, Zhao X, Chen Z, Song Z, et al. Optimal cut-off values of BMI, waist circumference and waist:height ratio for defining obesity in chinese adults. Br J Nutr. 2014;112(10):1735–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114514002657.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lauche R, Langhorst J, Lee MS, Dobos G, Cramer H. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of yoga on weight-related outcomes. Prev Med. 2016;87:213–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.03.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Neumark-Sztainer D, MacLehose RF, Watts AW, Eisenberg ME, Laska MN, Larson N. How is the practice of yoga related to Weight Status? Population-Based findings from Project EAT-IV. J Phys Act Health. 2017;14(12):905–12. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2016-0608.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Pate JL, Buono MJ. The physiological responses to Bikram yoga in novice and experienced practitioners. Altern Ther Health Med. 2014;20(4):12–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Widjaja W, Wongwattanapong T, Laskin JJ, Ajjimaporn A. Benefits of thai yoga on physical mobility and lower limb muscle strength in overweight/obese older women: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2021;43:101345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2021.101345.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. McCaffrey R, Park J, Newman D, Hagen D. The effect of chair yoga in older adults with moderate and severe Alzheimer’s disease. Res Gerontol Nurs. 2014;7(4):171–7. https://doi.org/10.3928/19404921-20140218-01.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Cowen V, Adams T. Physical and perceptual benefits of yoga asana practice: results of a pilot study. J of Bodyw Mov Ther. 2005;9(3):211–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lin X, Zhang X, Guo J, et al. Effects of Exercise Training on Cardiorespiratory Fitness and biomarkers of Cardiometabolic Health: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of Randomized controlled trials. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4(7):e002014. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.002014. Published 2015 Jun 26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Cramer H, Haller H, Klose P, Ward L, Chung VC, Lauche R. The risks and benefits of yoga for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33(12):1847–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215519860551.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hagins M, States R, Selfe T, Innes K. Effectiveness of yoga for hypertension: systematic review and meta-analysis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:649836. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/649836.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Dash M, Telles S. Improvement in hand grip strength in normal volunteers and rheumatoid arthritis patients following yoga training. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 2001;45(3):355–60.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Yao C, Tseng C. Effectiveness of chair yoga for improving the functional fitness and well-being of Female Community-Dwelling older adults with low physical activities. Top Geriatr Rehabil. 2019;35(4):248–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Thangavel D, Gaur GS, Sharma VK, Bhavanani AB, Rajajeyakumar M, Syam SA. Effect of slow and fast pranayama training on handgrip strength and endurance in healthy volunteers. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(5):BC01–BC3. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/7452.4390.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Tyagi A, Cohen M. Yoga and heart rate variability: a comprehensive review of the literature. Int J Yoga. 2016;9(2):97–113. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-6131.183712.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Vinay AV, Venkatesh D, Ambarish V. Impact of short-term practice of yoga on heart rate variability. Int J Yoga. 2016;9(1):62–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-6131.171714.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Chu IH, Wu WL, Lin IM, Chang YK, Lin YJ, Yang PC. Effects of yoga on Heart Rate Variability and depressive symptoms in women: a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Altern Complement Med. 2017;23(4):310–6. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2016.0135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Bankar MA, Chaudhari SK, Chaudhari KD. Impact of long term yoga practice on sleep quality and quality of life in the elderly. J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2013;4(1):28–32. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-9476.109548.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. van Aalst J, Ceccarini J, Demyttenaere K, Sunaert S, Van Laere K. What Has Neuroimaging Taught Us on the Neurobiology of Yoga? A Review. Front Integr Neurosci. 2020;14:34. Published 2020 Jul 8. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2020.00034.

  51. Boehm K, Ostermann T, Milazzo S, Büssing A. Effects of yoga interventions on fatigue: a Meta-analysis. Evid.-based complement. Altern Med. 2012;1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/124703.

  52. Vardar Yağlı N, Şener G, Arıkan H, Sağlam M, İnal İnce D, Savcı S, et al. Do yoga and aerobic exercise training have impact on functional capacity, fatigue, peripheral muscle strength, and quality of life in breast cancer survivors? Integr Cancer Ther. 2015;14(2):125–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534735414565699.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Lakkireddy D, Atkins D, Pillarisetti J, Ryschon K, Bommana S, Drisko J, et al. Effect of yoga on arrhythmia burden, anxiety, depression, and quality of life in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the YOGA my heart study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(11):1177–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.060.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong (SAR), China

    Sarah Suet Shan Wong & Shamay Sheung Mei Ng

  2. School of Nursing and Health Studies, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Ho Man Tin, Hong Kong (SAR), China

    Sarah Suet Shan Wong & Tai Wa Liu

  3. Research Centre for Chinese Medicine Innovation, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong (SAR), Hung Hom, Hong Kong (SAR), China

    Shamay Sheung Mei Ng

Authors
  1. Sarah Suet Shan Wong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tai Wa Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shamay Sheung Mei Ng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SN, TWL, and SW contributed to the conception and design of the research, and data acquisition, statistical analysis, result interpretation, and manuscript writing. All authors approved the submitted version and agreed to be accountable for ensuring the integrity and accuracy of the work.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sarah Suet Shan Wong or Shamay Sheung Mei Ng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the PolyU Institutional Review Board (reference number: HSEARS20220202003) and was conducted in accordance with the guidelines for human experiments outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. The study procedure was explained to each participant, and written informed consent was obtained prior to commencing the study. Participants were ensured that they understand the voluntary nature to their participation, and they have right to withdraw at any time without any consequences.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wong, S.S.S., Liu, T.W. & Ng, S.S.M. Health status of aged women with or without the experience of practicing yoga. BMC Women's Health 23, 524 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02586-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02586-8

Keywords

BMC Women's Health

ISSN: 1472-6874

Contact us